耦合SOEC的煤制乙二醇新工艺开发与系统评价

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2341

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对传统煤制乙二醇过程CO₂排放高和资源利用率低等问题，本文提出了一种耦合固体氧化物电解池（SOEC）的煤制乙二醇新工艺（SO-CtEG）。新工艺通过集成固体氧化物电解池制氢技术，避免了水煤气变换单元和空分单元，也有效降低了煤气化和酸性气体脱除单元的处理规模。在全流程建模与模拟的基础之上，进行了详细的技术经济分析与灵敏度分析。结果表明，SO-CtEG新工艺的碳元素利用效率和?效率分别是传统煤制乙二醇项目的2.16倍和1.48倍。与传统煤制乙二醇过程相比，SO-CtEG新工艺总投资费用降低23.64%、生产成本节约17.14 %，内部收益率提高8.85%。因此，新工艺不但可以提高风光消纳能力和减少传统煤制乙二醇的碳排放，还具有更佳的技术经济环境性能，是未来煤制乙二醇行业具有良好发展前景的工艺路线之一。

关键词: 煤制乙二醇, 固体氧化物电解池, 碳减排, 模拟, 技术经济分析

Abstract:

Traditional coal-to-ethylene glycol process is criticized by the problems of high CO₂ emissions and low resource utilization efficiency. To address these issues, this paper proposed a novel coal-to-ethylene glycol process coupled with solid oxide electrolytic cells (SO-CtEG). Since the novel process is integrated with the solid oxide electrolytic cells for hydrogen production technology, the water gas shift and air separation units are avoided. In addition, the processing scale of the coal gasification and acid gas removal units is also effectively reduced. According to the modeling and simulation results of the whole SO-CtEG process, techno-economic analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted in detail. The results show that the carbon utilization efficiency and exergy efficiency of the novel SO-CtEG process are 2.16 times and 1.48 times of the traditional coal-to-ethylene glycol process, respectively. Moreover, compared with the traditional coal-to-ethylene glycol process, the total capital investment and total production cost of the novel SO-CtEG process are reduced by 23.64% and 17.14%, respectively, as well as the internal rate of return is increased by 8.85%. Since the novel process can utilize the energy of wind and light, reduces the carbon emissions of traditional coal-to-ethylene glycol process, and has better technical, economic and environmental performance, it is a promising direction for the coal-to-ethylene glycol industry in the future.

Key words: coal to ethylene glycol, solid oxide electrolytic cells (SOEC), carbon reduction, simulation, techno-economic analysis

中图分类号:

TQ536.1

杨庆春, 杨庆, 张金亮, 高明林, 梅树美, 张大伟. 耦合SOEC的煤制乙二醇新工艺开发与系统评价[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(11): 6061-6070.

YANG Qingchun, YANG Qing, ZHANG Jinliang, GAO Minglin, MEI Shumei, ZHANG Dawei. Development and system assessment of a coal-to-ethylene glycol process coupled with SOEC[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(11): 6061-6070.

图/表 11

参考文献 34

1	杨鹏举, 刘道勇, 时鹏. 煤制乙二醇装置运行效果及市场前景分析[J]. 河南化工, 2019, 36(7): 7-9.
	YANG Pengju, LIU Daoyong, SHI Peng. Operation and market analysis of coal-to-ethylene glycol plant[J]. Henan Chemical Industry, 2019, 36(7): 7-9.
2	YANG Q C, ZHU S, YANG Q, et al. Comparative techno-economic analysis of oil-based and coal-based ethylene glycol processes[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 198: 111814.
3	黄格省, 李振宇, 王建明. 我国现代煤化工产业发展现状及对石油化工产业的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(2): 295-302.
	HUANG Gesheng, LI Zhenyu, WANG Jianming. Development status of coal chemical industry in China and its influence on petrochemical industry[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2015, 34(2): 295-302.
4	黄格省, 阎捷, 师晓玉, 等. 新能源制氢技术发展现状及前景分析[J]. 石化技术与应用, 2019, 37(5): 289-296.
	HUANG Gesheng, YAN Jie, SHI Xiaoyu, et al. Development status and prospect analysis of hydrogen production with new energy technology[J]. Petrochemical Technology & Application, 2019, 37(5): 289-296.
5	KIM J, JUN A, GWON O, et al. Hybrid-solid oxide electrolysis cell: a new strategy for efficient hydrogen production[J]. Nano Energy, 2018, 44: 121-126.
6	杨庆, 许思敏, 张大伟, 等. 石油与煤路线制乙二醇过程的技术经济分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2164-2172.
	YANG Qing, XU Simin, ZHANG Dawei, et al. Techno-economic analysis of oil and coal to ethylene glycol processes[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2164-2172.
7	YANG Q C, ZHANG D W, ZHOU H R, et al. Process simulation, analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol process[J]. Energy, 2018, 155: 521-534.
8	朱顺, 郭琦, 张大伟, 等. 集成CO₂高效利用的煤制乙二醇过程设计与系统分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 772-779.
	ZHU Shun, GUO Qi, ZHANG Dawei, et al. Conceptual design and system analysis coal to ethylene glycol process integrated with efficient utilization of CO₂[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(2): 772-779.
9	YANG Q C, LIU X, ZHU S, et al. Efficient utilization of CO₂ in a coal to ethylene glycol process integrated with dry/steam-mixed reforming: conceptual design and technoeconomic analysis[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 3496-3510.
10	YUE H R, ZHAO Y J, MA X B, et al. Ethylene glycol: properties, synthesis, and applications[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2012, 41(11): 4218.
11	QIAN Y, MAN Y, PENG L J, et al. Integrated process of coke-oven gas tri-reforming and coal gasification to methanol with high carbon utilization and energy efficiency[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(9): 2519-2525.
12	SUN S C, SHAO Z G, YU H M, et al. Investigations on degradation of the long-term proton exchange membrane water electrolysis stack[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 267: 515-520.
13	PERNA A, MINUTILLO M, JANNELLI E. Hydrogen from intermittent renewable energy sources as gasification medium in integrated waste gasification combined cycle power plants: a performance comparison[J]. Energy, 2016, 94: 457-465.
14	IM-ORB K, VISITDUMRONGKUL N, SAEBEA D, et al. Flowsheet-based model and exergy analysis of solid oxide electrolysis cells for clean hydrogen production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 1-13.
15	HAJJAJI N, PONS M N, HOUAS A, et al. Exergy analysis: an efficient tool for understanding and improving hydrogen production via the steam methane reforming process[J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 42: 392-399.
16	LEI L B, ZHANG J H, YUAN Z H, et al. Progress report on proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2019, 29(37): 1903805.
17	ZHANG H F, DESIDERI U. Techno-economic optimization of power-to-methanol with co-electrolysis of CO₂ and H₂O in solid-oxide electrolyzers[J]. Energy, 2020, 199: 117498.
18	ZHANG H F, WANG L G, HERLE J VAN, et al. Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 259: 114135.
19	ZHANG H F, WANG L G, HERLE J VAN, et al. Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 270: 115113.
20	CINTI G, BALDINELLI A, DI MICHELE A, et al. Integration of solid oxide electrolyzer and Fischer-Tropsch: a sustainable pathway for synthetic fuel[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 162: 308-320.
21	ALI S, SØRENSEN K, NIELSEN M P. Modeling a novel combined solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC)-biomass gasification renewable methanol production system[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 154: 1025-1034.
22	GIGLIO E, LANZINI A, SANTARELLI M, et al. Synthetic natural gas via integrated high-temperature electrolysis and methanation: Part II—Economic analysis[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2015, 2: 64-79.
23	YANG Q, YANG Q C, XU S M, et al. Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of ethylene glycol production from coal and natural gas compared with oil-based production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 273: 123120.
24	CARNEIRO J, GU X K, TEZEL E, et al. Electrochemical reduction of CO₂ on metal-based cathode electrocatalysts of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(36): 15884-15893.
25	ZHANG H C, SU S H, CHEN X H, et al. Configuration design and performance optimum analysis of a solar-driven high temperature steam electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(11): 4298-4307.
26	LONIS F, TOLA V, CAU G. Renewable methanol production and use through reversible solid oxide cells and recycled CO₂ hydrogenation[J]. Fuel, 2019, 246: 500-515.
27	ZHANG W, CROISET E, DOUGLAS P L, et al. Simulation of a tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack using AspenPlusTM unit operation models[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2005, 46(2): 181-196.
28	CLAUSEN L R, BUTERA G, JENSEN S H. High efficiency SNG production from biomass and electricity by integrating gasification with pressurized solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Energy, 2019, 172: 1117-1131.
29	YI Q, FENG J, LI W Y. Optimization and efficiency analysis of polygeneration system with coke-oven gas and coal gasified gas by Aspen Plus[J]. Fuel, 2012, 96: 131-140.
30	XIANG D, XIANG J J, SUN Z, et al. The integrated coke-oven gas and pulverized coke gasification for methanol production with highly efficient hydrogen utilization[J]. Energy, 2017, 140: 78-91.
31	ALBRECHT F G, KÖNIG D H, BAUCKS N, et al. A standardized methodology for the techno-economic evaluation of alternative fuels—A case study[J]. Fuel, 2017, 194: 511-526.
32	ANGHILANTE R, COLOMAR D, BRISSE A, et al. Bottom-up cost evaluation of SOEC systems in the range of 10-100MW[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(45): 20309-20322.
33	LIN M, HAUSSENER S. Techno-economic modeling and optimization of solar-driven high-temperature electrolysis systems[J]. Solar Energy, 2017, 155: 1389-1402.
34	国家能源局. 2020年光伏电价新政落地分布式补贴下调超五成[EB/OL]. , 2020-04-08.
	National Energy Administration. The new policy of photovoltaic power price will be implemented and the distributed subsidy will be reduced by more than 50% in 2020[EB/OL]. , 2020-04-08.

参数	取值^［12］	参数	取值^［12］
操作温度/K	1073	电池作用面积A/m²	0.04
操作压力/MPa	0.1	电池总数N_cell	500
阴极入口气体组分（摩尔分数）	H₂O 90%，H₂ 10%	孔隙平均半径D_por/m	0.5×10^-6
蒸汽利用因子	85%	孔隙率/%	0.3
阳极内部气体O₂/N₂摩尔比	0.21/0.79	弯曲度	6
阳极活化能E_act，a/J·mol^-1	1.2×10⁵	阳极电极厚度δ_a/m	17.5×10^-6
阴极活化能E_act，c/J·mol^-1	1.0×10⁵	阴极电极厚度δ_c/m	12.5×10^-6
阳极指前因子γ_a	2.051×10⁸	电解质层厚度δ_e/m	12.5×10^-6
阴极指前因子γ_c	1.344×10¹⁰

参数	取值^［12］	参数	取值^［12］
操作温度/K	1073	电池作用面积A/m²	0.04
操作压力/MPa	0.1	电池总数N_cell	500
阴极入口气体组分（摩尔分数）	H₂O 90%，H₂ 10%	孔隙平均半径D_por/m	0.5×10^-6
蒸汽利用因子	85%	孔隙率/%	0.3
阳极内部气体O₂/N₂摩尔比	0.21/0.79	弯曲度	6
阳极活化能E_act，a/J·mol^-1	1.2×10⁵	阳极电极厚度δ_a/m	17.5×10^-6
阴极活化能E_act，c/J·mol^-1	1.0×10⁵	阴极电极厚度δ_c/m	12.5×10^-6
阳极指前因子γ_a	2.051×10⁸	电解质层厚度δ_e/m	12.5×10^-6
阴极指前因子γ_c	1.344×10¹⁰

项目	来源	CtEG	SO-CtEG
输入?/MW	原煤	1111.8	514.1
	公用工程	211.2	377.7
	总输入	1323.0	891.8
输出?/MW	乙二醇	405.9	405.9
?效率/%		30.68	45.50

项目	来源	CtEG	SO-CtEG
输入?/MW	原煤	1111.8	514.1
	公用工程	211.2	377.7
	总输入	1323.0	891.8
输出?/MW	乙二醇	405.9	405.9
?效率/%		30.68	45.50

[1]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[2]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[3]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[4]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[5]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[6]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[7]	徐若思, 谭蔚. C形管池沸腾两相流流场模拟与流固耦合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 47-55.
[8]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[9]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[10]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[11]	许友好, 王维, 鲁波娜, 徐惠, 何鸣元. 中国炼油创新技术MIP的开发策略及启示[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4465-4470.
[12]	舒斌, 陈建宏, 熊健, 吴其荣, 喻江涛, 杨平. 碳中和目标下推动绿色甲醇发展的必要性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4471-4478.
[13]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[14]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[15]	张帆, 陶少辉, 陈玉石, 项曙光. 基于改进恒热传输模型的精馏模拟初始化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4550-4558.