磁载体MoS2催化剂制备及其重油减黏

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-2117

化工进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 170-174.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-2117

磁载体MoS₂催化剂制备及其重油减黏

朱向阳¹^,²(), 乔栋³, 毕秦岭⁴, 邢慧芳¹^,², 倪善¹^,², 杨良嵘¹^,²(), 刘会洲¹^,²()

^1.中国科学院绿色过程与工程重点实验室(中国科学院过程工程研究所)，北京 100190
^2.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
^3.中国石油大学，北京 102249
^4.中国石油天然气股份有限公司石油化工研究院, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2019-12-28 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-06-29
通讯作者: 杨良嵘,刘会洲
作者简介:朱向阳（1994—），男，博士研究生，研究方向为磁性纳米催化剂。E-mail：xiangyzhu@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21922814);中科院青年创新促进会(Grant 2016043);北京市自然科学基金(2194086);中石油合作项目(PRIKY17094)

Preparation of a magnetically supported MoS₂ catalyst and its heavy oil viscosity-reducing performance

Xiangyang ZHU¹^,²(), Dong QIAO³, Qinling BI⁴, Huifang XING¹^,², Shan NI¹^,², Liangrong YANG¹^,²(), Huizhou LIU¹^,²()

^1.CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
^2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
^3.China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
^4.PetroChina Company Limited Petrochemical Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2019-12-28 Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-06-29
Contact: Liangrong YANG,Huizhou LIU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以SiO₂/Fe₃O₄为载体，MoS₂为活性组分，通过水热法制备出超顺磁性MoS₂/SiO₂/Fe₃O₄催化剂，并对催化剂进行XRD、VSM、BET、FTIR等表征。结果表明：催化剂有效担载活性组分并且具有优异的磁学性能，SiO₂包覆不仅能保护磁核，而且显著增大催化剂的比表面积。以常压渣油为原料，系统考察了催化剂的减黏性能。发现所制备的磁载体催化剂减黏效果高于商业二硫化钼及羰基钼，提升反应温度能达到更好的减黏效果。此外，在外加磁铁的作用下，催化剂可以方便回收以达到再利用的效果。将具有优异磁学性能的纳米粒子与具有催化性能的活性组分相结合制备的磁性纳米催化剂，为开发重油改质催化剂提供了新的思路。

关键词: 磁性, 催化剂, 二硫化钼（MoS₂）, 石油, 黏度, 纳米粒子

Abstract:

Here the superparamagnetic MoS₂/SiO₂/Fe₃O₄ catalyst were prepared by hydrothermal method with SiO₂/Fe₃O₄ as carrier and MoS₂ as active constitutes. The as-synthesized samples were characterized by XRD, VSM, BET and FTIR. The results show that the catalyst has effectively loading the active component and has excellent magnetic properties, the coating layer of SiO₂ can not only protect the magnetic core, but also significantly increase BET specific surface area. The viscosity-reducing performance of the catalyst was systematically investigated with atmospheric residue. It was found that the prepared catalyst can effectively reduce the viscosity of residual, which is better than commercial MoS₂ and Mo(CO)₆. Increasing reaction temperature can also achieve better visbreaking effect. Besides, the catalyst can be separated under the external magnetic field after the reaction. These results provide new insights into the development of recyclable catalyst that integrate the magnetic and active component in the treatment of heavy oil.

Key words: magnetic, catalyst, molybdenum disulfide, petroleum, viscosity, nanoparticles

中图分类号:

S216.4

朱向阳, 乔栋, 毕秦岭, 邢慧芳, 倪善, 杨良嵘, 刘会洲. 磁载体MoS₂催化剂制备及其重油减黏[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S1): 170-174.

Xiangyang ZHU, Dong QIAO, Qinling BI, Huifang XING, Shan NI, Liangrong YANG, Huizhou LIU. Preparation of a magnetically supported MoS₂ catalyst and its heavy oil viscosity-reducing performance[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(S1): 170-174.

图/表 4

参考文献 13

1	郭磊, 王齐, 李凤绪, 等. 重油供氢减黏改质技术概述[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(S1): 128-132.
	GUO Lei, WANG Qi, LI Fengxu, et al. Heavy oil hydrogen-donated visbreaking upgrading process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33(S1): 128-132.
2	ZHANG Y S, LU X K, OWEN R E, et al. Fine structural changes of fluid catalytic catalysts and characterization of coke formed resulting from heavy oil devolatilization[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 263. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118329.
3	CASTAÑEDA L C, MUÑOZ J A D, ANCHEYTA J. Current situation of emerging technologies for upgrading of heavy oils[J]. Catalysis Today, 2014, 220/221/222: 248-273.
4	KADIEVA M K, ZEKEL L A, BATOV A E, et al. Effect of various catalyst precursors on hydroconversion of heavy cracked cycle oil[J]. Petroleum Chemistry, 2019, 59(12): 1278-1284.
5	CHENG T, ZHANG D, LI H, et al. Magnetically recoverable nanoparticles as efficient catalysts for organic transformations in aqueous medium[J]. Green Chemistry, 2014, 16(7): 3401-3427.
6	WANG F, GUO C, YANG L, et al. Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles: fabrication and their laccase immobilization performance[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(23): 8931-8935.
7	LIU Z G, WANG Y, DENG R, et al. Fe₃O₄@graphene oxide@Ag particles for surface magnet solid-phase extraction surface-enhanced raman scattering (SMSPE-SERS): from sample pretreatment to detection all-in-one.[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(22): 14160-14168.
8	朱向阳, 倪善, 毕秦岭, 等. 铁氧体磁性纳米催化剂的制备及其在资源能源领域的应用[J]. 化学进展, 2019, 31(S1): 381-393.
	ZHU Xiangyang, NI Shan, BI Qinling, et al. Progress in preparation of ferrite magnetic nano-catalysts and their applications in the field of resources and energy[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2019, 31(S1): 381-393.
9	XU Y, GENG J, PENG Y, et al. Lubricating mechanism of Fe₃O₄@MoS₂ core-shell nanocomposites as oil additives for steel/steel contact[J]. Tribology International, 2018, 121: 241-251.
10	SU S, SUN H, XU F, et al. Highly sensitive and selective determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using gold nanoparticles-decorated MoS₂ nanosheets modified electrode[J]. Electroanalysis, 2013, 25(11): 2523-2529.
11	SUN H, ZENG X, LIU M, et al. Synthesis of size-controlled Fe₃O₄@SiO₂ magnetic nanoparticles for nucleic acid analysis[J]. J.Nanosci: Nanotechnol., 2012, 12: 267-273.
12	HAN C L, ZHU D J, WU H Z, et al. TEA controllable preparation of magnetite nanoparticles (Fe₃O₄ NPs) with excellent magnetic properties[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2016, 408: 213-216.
13	YI Y J, JIN X, WANG L, et al. Preparation of unsupported Ni-Mo-S catalysts for hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene by thermal decomposition of tetramethylammonium thiomolybdates[J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 175(1):460-466.

对比	黏度/mPa·s
对比	25℃	50℃	100℃
对比实验
重油(350℃)	112×10⁴	5120	550
热裂化(410℃)	1080	310	63
供氢裂化(410℃)	1150	260	55
临氢裂化^①(410℃)	915	218	53
临氢裂化^②(410℃)	1080	243	55
Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@MoS₂
临氢裂化(400℃)	1580	340	60
临氢裂化(410℃)	465	190	40
临氢裂化(420℃)	325	120	30

对比	黏度/mPa·s
对比	25℃	50℃	100℃
对比实验
重油(350℃)	112×10⁴	5120	550
热裂化(410℃)	1080	310	63
供氢裂化(410℃)	1150	260	55
临氢裂化^①(410℃)	915	218	53
临氢裂化^②(410℃)	1080	243	55
Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@MoS₂
临氢裂化(400℃)	1580	340	60
临氢裂化(410℃)	465	190	40
临氢裂化(420℃)	325	120	30

[1]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[6]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[7]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[8]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[9]	王鹏, 史会兵, 赵德明, 冯保林, 陈倩, 杨妲. 过渡金属催化氯代物的羰基化反应研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[10]	张启, 赵红, 荣峻峰. 质子交换膜燃料电池中氧还原反应抗毒性电催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4677-4691.
[11]	王伟涛, 鲍婷玉, 姜旭禄, 何珍红, 王宽, 杨阳, 刘昭铁. 醛酮树脂基非金属催化剂催化氧气氧化苯制备苯酚[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4706-4715.
[12]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[13]	向阳, 黄寻, 魏子栋. 电催化有机合成反应的活性和选择性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4005-4014.
[14]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[15]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.

磁载体MoS₂催化剂制备及其重油减黏

Preparation of a magnetically supported MoS₂ catalyst and its heavy oil viscosity-reducing performance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 13

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价