基于分子模拟的低温煤焦油中酚类化合物的溶解特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-0549

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

低温煤焦油中酚类化合物溶解行为及机理研究是其高效分离的基础。本文以焦油中的典型组分为研究对象，借助混合能参数，模拟计算各组分与酚类化合物的相溶性；在焦油模型中，借助相互作用能、径向分布函数计算及电子密度分析，探究酚类化合物的溶解机理。结果表明：①焦油中各组分物质苯环上取代基基团、苯环数量等结构特征是影响酚类化合物在焦油中溶解行为的关键；②酚类化合物在各组分中的溶解行为受到缔合作用的影响，缔合作用越大、空间位阻效应越小，酚类化合物与其他组分相溶性越强；③模型焦油中，苯酚与苯、苯并噻吩之间缔合作用力均为π-π堆积作用力，苯酚与正己烷、吲哚之间缔合作用力分别为CH-π堆积作用力和N—H···O氢键。

关键词: 酚类化合物, 热力学性质, 溶解性, 分子模拟, 缔合作用

Abstract:

The dissolution behavior and mechanism of phenolic compounds in low temperature coal tar (LTCT) is the basis for their efficient separation. In this paper, simulation study on the miscibility of phenolic compounds with typical components in LTCT was conducted based on mixing energy. Then, the dissolution mechanism of phenolic compounds was investigated with respect to the interaction energy, radial distribution function and electron density. The results show that: ① the structural characteristics of the substances in coal tar such as the substitution groups on benzene ring, the number of benzene ring are the key factors affecting the dissolution behavior of the phenolic compounds. ② the dissolution behavior of the phenolic compounds in each component of coal tar is also affected by the association. The greater the association and the smaller the steric hindrance effect, the stronger the miscibility of phenolic compounds with other components. ③the associative forces between phenol and benzene, and benzothiophene, are π-π stacking force. CH-π stacking force and NH···O hydrogen bond are the associative forces between of hexane-phenol and indole-phenol, respectively.

Key words: phenolic compounds, thermodynamic properties, solubility, molecular simulation, association

中图分类号:

O642.5

李光升,解强,张香兰,张海永. 基于分子模拟的低温煤焦油中酚类化合物的溶解特性[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(1): 137-144.

Guangsheng LI,Qiang XIE,Xianglan ZHANG,Haiyong ZHANG. Solubility of phenolic compounds in low temperature coal tar based on molecular simulation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(1): 137-144.

图/表 14

参考文献 29

1	何璐, 解强, 梁鼎成, 等. 煤热解反应热测定方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(2): 494-501.
	HE L, XIE Q, LIANG D C,et al. Measurement of reaction heat of coal pyrolysis: state-of-the-art[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(2): 494-501.
2	张俊杰, 徐绍平, 王光永, 等. 停留时间对低阶煤快速热解产物分布、组成及结构的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(3): 1346-1352.
	ZHANG J J, XU S P, WANG G Y, et al. Effect of residence time on distribution, composition and structure of products derived from fast coal pyrolysis[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(3): 1346-1352.
3	SUN M, CHEN J, DAI X M, et al. Controlled separation of low temperature coal tar based on solvent extraction-column chromatography[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 136: 41-49.
4	张生娟, 高亚男, 陈刚, 等. 煤焦油中酚类化合物的分离及其组成结构鉴定研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(7): 2588-2596.
	ZHANG S J, GAO Y N, CHEN G, et al. Progress of separation, composition and structure identification of phenolic compounds in coal tar[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(7): 2588-2596.
5	MENG H, GE C T, REN N N, et al. Complex extraction of phenol and cresol from model coal tar with polyols, ethanol amines, and ionic liquids thereof[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 53(1): 355-362.
6	SUN M, MA X X, YAO Q X, et al. GC-MS and TG-FTIR study of petroleum ether extract and residue from low temperature coal tar[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(3): 1140-1145.
7	SHI Q, PAN N, LONG H Y. Characterization of middle-temperature gasification coal tar. Part 3: Molecular composition of acidic compounds[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(1): 108-117.
8	李文英, 慕海, 王伟, 等. 煤基粗油轻质组分定性定量分析现状与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(1): 217-228.
	LI W Y, MU H, WANG W, et al. Status quo and outlook of qualitative and quantitative analysis of light weight fractions of coal-based crude oil[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(1): 217-228.
9	DAI F F, XIN K, SONG Y H, et al. Liquid-liquid equilibria for the extraction of phenols from alkane using ethylene glycol[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2016, 419: 50-56.
10	JIAO T T, ZHUANG X L, HE H Y, et al. Separation of phenolic compounds from coal tar via liquid-liquid extraction using amide compounds[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(9): 2573-2579.
11	易兰, 李文英, 冯杰, 等. 煤基液体油分离技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3678-3692.
	YI L, LI W Y, FENG J, et al. Recent progress on coal-based liquid oil separation technology[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3678-3692.
12	刘兴坤, 张香兰, 刘潜, 等. 正十二烷-甲苯-苯酚三元体系液液相平衡数据的测定与关联[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2018, 32(2): 275-279.
	LIU X K, ZHANG X L, LIU Q, et al. Determination and correlation of liquid equilibrium of the n-dodecane-toluene-phenol ternary system[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2018, 32(2): 275-279.
13	张海永, 刘潜, 刘兴坤, 等. 低温煤焦油中正十二烷-甲苯-苯酚的相平衡及分离[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(8): 3479-3487.
	ZHANG H Y, LIU Q, LIU X K, et al. Phase equilibrium and separation of n-dodecane-toluene-phenol in low temperature coal tar[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(8): 3479-3487.
14	李洪, 张季, 李鑫钢, 等. 分子模拟方法计算相平衡热力学性质的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(8): 2731-2741.
	LI H, ZHANG J, LI X G, et al. Progress in study on thermodynamic properties of phase equilibria using molecular simulation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(8): 2731-2741.
15	ZHAO Y, ZHANG X H, ZHANG W, et al. Simulation and experimental on the solvation interaction between the GAP matrix and insensitive energetic plasticizers in solid propellants[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2015, 120(5): 765-770.
16	FU X L, FAN X Z, JU X H, et al. Molecular dynamic simulations on the interaction between an HTPE polymer and energetic plasticizers in a solid propellant[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 65(5): 52844-52851.
17	ZENG F L, SUN Y, ZHOU Y, et al. Molecular simulations of the miscibility in binary mixtures of PVDF and POSS compounds[J]. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2009, 17(7): 75002.
18	于共奇. 重质油组分及其溶解机理的分子动力学研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2013.
	YU G Q. Molecular dynamics study of the composition and the dissolution theory of heavy oil[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2013.
19	FAN C F, OLAFSON B D, BLANCO M, et al. Application of molecular simulation to derive phase diagrams of binary mixtures[J]. Macromolecules, 1992, 25(14): 3667-3676.
20	BLANCO M. Molecular silverware. Ⅰ. General solutions to excluded volume constrained problems[J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 1991, 12(2): 237-247.
21	FLORY. Principles of polymer chemistry[M]. New York: Cornell University Press, 1953: 672.
22	周公度. 结构化学基础[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 363.
	ZHOU G D. Structural chemistry foundation[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2008: 363.
23	邓蕾, 张炜, 鲍桐, 等. PBT与含能增塑剂相互作用的分子动力学模拟[J]. 含能材料, 2017, 25(1): 32-38.
	DENG L, ZHANG W, BAO T, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of interaction between PBT and energetic plasticizer[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 25(1): 32-38.
24	STEINER T, DESIRAJU G R. Distinction between the weak hydrogen bond and the van der Waals interaction[J]. Chemical Communications, 1998(8): 891-892.
25	PAN N, CUI D C, LI R L, et al. Characterization of middle-temperature gasification coal tar. Part 1: bulk properties and molecular compositions of distillates and basic fractions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(9): 5719-5728.
26	LONG H Y, SHI Q, PAN N, et al. Characterization of middle-temperature gasification coal tar. Part 2: Neutral fraction by extrography followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electrospray ionization coupled with fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(6): 3424-3431.
27	SUN H. COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications-overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1988, 102(38): 7338-7364.
28	肖瑞华. 煤焦油化工学[M]. 2版. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2009: 375-442.
	XIAO R H. Coal tar chemical engineering[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2009: 375-442.
29	ZHANG L Z, ZHANG M, GAO J, et al. Efficient extraction of neutral heterocyclic nitrogen compounds from coal tar via ionic liquids and its mechanism analysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(9): 9358-9370.

组分	结构差异	典型化合物
酚类化合物	烷基取代基碳数	苯酚、邻甲基苯酚、邻乙基苯酚、邻丙基苯酚、邻叔丁基苯酚
	烷基取代基数量	苯酚、邻甲基苯酚、2,3-二甲基苯酚
	烷基取代基位置	邻甲酚、间甲酚、对甲酚
	羟基数量	苯酚、邻苯二酚
	羟基位置	邻苯二酚、间苯二酚、对苯二酚
芳香烃	烷基取代基碳数	苯、甲苯、乙苯、异丙苯
	烷基取代基数量	苯、甲苯、邻二甲苯
	烷基取代基位置	邻二甲苯、间二甲苯、对二甲苯
	苯环数量	苯、萘、蒽
脂肪烃	直链烃碳链长短	正己烷、正十二烷、正二十二烷
	环状烃与直链烃	正己烷、环戊烷、环己烷
杂环氮化物	苯环数量等	吡啶、喹啉、吲哚、咔唑
含硫化合物	苯环数量等	噻吩、苯并噻吩、二苯并噻吩

组分	结构差异	典型化合物
酚类化合物	烷基取代基碳数	苯酚、邻甲基苯酚、邻乙基苯酚、邻丙基苯酚、邻叔丁基苯酚
	烷基取代基数量	苯酚、邻甲基苯酚、2,3-二甲基苯酚
	烷基取代基位置	邻甲酚、间甲酚、对甲酚
	羟基数量	苯酚、邻苯二酚
	羟基位置	邻苯二酚、间苯二酚、对苯二酚
芳香烃	烷基取代基碳数	苯、甲苯、乙苯、异丙苯
	烷基取代基数量	苯、甲苯、邻二甲苯
	烷基取代基位置	邻二甲苯、间二甲苯、对二甲苯
	苯环数量	苯、萘、蒽
脂肪烃	直链烃碳链长短	正己烷、正十二烷、正二十二烷
	环状烃与直链烃	正己烷、环戊烷、环己烷
杂环氮化物	苯环数量等	吡啶、喹啉、吲哚、咔唑
含硫化合物	苯环数量等	噻吩、苯并噻吩、二苯并噻吩

物质	分子数量	密度^①/g·cm^-3	密度^②/g·cm^-3
苯酚	200	1.083	1.0576
苯	200	0.863	0.8737
正己烷	200	0.661	0.6603
吲哚	200	1.098	1.22
苯并噻吩	200	1.130	1.165

物质	分子数量	密度^①/g·cm^-3	密度^②/g·cm^-3
苯酚	200	1.083	1.0576
苯	200	0.863	0.8737
正己烷	200	0.661	0.6603
吲哚	200	1.098	1.22
苯并噻吩	200	1.130	1.165

物质	混合能/kJ·mol^-1
苯酚-吲哚	-0.396
苯酚-喹啉	-1.357
苯酚-吡啶	-5.745
苯酚-咔唑	12.641