基于超声的高浓度浆液两相流粒径在线测量

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0954

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来颗粒粒径测量问题受到了国内外的广泛研究，其中高浓度两相流的在线测量越来越成为关注的焦点。为测量石灰石浆液在流动过程中的颗粒粒径分布，由超声在线测量装置获得质量分数10%~40%浆液在不同时间的超声衰减谱。根据Harker & Temple和BLBL散射叠加模型预测，结合基于最优正则化的加权非负最小二乘算法（ORT-WTLS）计算浆液粒径分布。结果表明：由不同粒径理论衰减谱和10dB含噪衰减谱计算的颗粒直径与设定值的相对误差均小于5%。衰减系数并非随浆液浓度线性递增，表明Harker & Temple和BLBL非线性模型适用于高浓度浆液体系的理论预测。使用ORT-WTLS算法对浆液实验衰减谱中的测量误差作加权处理并计算颗粒粒径分布，其测量结果与图像法基本吻合，动态测量误差小于7%。因此结合实验超声衰减谱、颗粒测量的非线性声学理论模型及ORT-WTLS反演算法可准确计算高浓度浆液的颗粒粒径分布。

关键词: 浆液, 两相流, 超声, 粒径分布, 测量

Abstract:

In recent years, particle size measurement has been widely studied at home and abroad, and the online measurement of high concentration two-phase flow of slurry has become the focus of attention. In order to measure the particle size distribution of limestone slurry during flow, ultrasonic attenuation spectra of slurry with mass concentrations of 10%—40% at different moments were obtained by an ultrasonic online measuring device. A weighted non-negative least squares algorithm (ORT-WTLS) based on optimal regularization was used to calculate the slurry particle size distribution based on the predicted theoretical spectra of Harker & Temple and BLBL scattering models. The results showed that the relative deviations of the particle diameters calculated from the theoretical attenuation spectra and the 10dB noise-containing attenuation spectra of different particle sizes were less than 5%. The attenuation coefficients did not increase linearly with slurry concentration, indicating that the Harker & Temple and BLBL nonlinear models were suitable for the theoretical prediction of high concentration slurry systems. The ORT-WTLS algorithm was used to weight the measurement errors in the slurry experimental attenuation spectrum and calculate the particle size distribution, and the measurement results were basically consistent with the image method, and the dynamic measurement deviation was less than 7%. Therefore, combining the experimental ultrasonic attenuation spectrum, the nonlinear acoustic theoretical model of particle measurement, and the ORT-WTLS inversion algorithm can accurately calculate the particle size distribution of highly concentrated slurry.

Key words: slurry, two-phase flow, ultrasonic, particle size distribution, measurement

中图分类号:

TK31

张世玮, 李玉宇, 孟磊, 宁翔, 苏明旭. 基于超声的高浓度浆液两相流粒径在线测量[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 593-601.

ZHANG Shiwei, LI Yuyu, MENG Lei, NING Xiang, SU Mingxu. Online measurement of particle size of high concentration slurry two-phase flows based on ultrasound method[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(2): 593-601.

图/表 13

图1 石灰石浆液粒径测量声学模型矩阵

图2 ORT-WTLS算法流程

图3 ORT-WTLS计算结果与设定直径对比

图4 不同粒径含噪衰减谱及反演结果对比

图5 含噪衰减谱两种算法计算结果对比

图6 浆液粒径超声在线测量系统

图7 不同测量时间的超声透射信号

图8 质量分数10%～40%浆液超声透射信号

图9 不同测量时间和浓度的超声衰减谱

图10 不同浓度浆液在不同时刻的粒径分布

图11 石灰石浆液显微镜图像

表1 图像法分析浆液粒径分布特征参数

参数	粒径/μm
D_V03	10.65
D_V10	12.48
D_V25	14.01
D_V50	15.75
D_V75	17.32
D_V90	18.84
D_V97	20.42

表2 粒径分布特征参数误差统计结果

质量分数/%	D_V50 /μm	D_V50误差/%	D_V90 /μm	D_V90误差/%	D_V90-D_V10 /μm	D_V90-D_V10误差/%
10	16.35	3.81	19.91	5.68	7.33	15.25
20	14.77	-6.22	17.93	-4.83	6.34	-0.31
30	16.75	6.35	20.11	6.74	7.13	12.11
40	16.75	6.35	19.91	5.68	6.73	5.82

参考文献 31

1	GUAN Jian, LIU Qiaoyu, LIU Jie, et al. Elucidation of alginate-drug miscibility on its crystal growth inhibition effect in supersaturated drug delivery system[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 230: 115601.
2	付加, 祁贵生, 刘有智, 等. 超重力湿法脱除气体中细颗粒物研究[J]. 化学工程, 2015, 43(4): 6-10.
	FU Jia, QI Guisheng, LIU Youzhi, et al. Removal of fine particles by high gravity wet cleaning[J]. Chemical Engineering (China), 2015, 43(4): 6-10.
3	刘尚利, 孙海勇, 段清兵, 等. 分级研磨级配制浆技术的研究及应用[J]. 化学工程, 2015, 43(1): 61-64.
	LIU Shangli, SUN Haiyong, DUAN Qingbing, et al. Study and industrial application of coal water mixture by grade grinding technology[J]. Chemical Engineering (China), 2015, 43(1): 61-64.
4	朱玘, 傅开道, 薛瑞敏, 等. 澜沧江流域中下游悬移质泥沙粒度特征及分形研究[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(4): 765-774.
	ZHU Qi, FU Kaidao, XUE Ruimin, et al. Grain size characteristics and fractal dimensions of suspended sediments in the middle and lower reaches of Lancang River[J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 44(4): 765-774.
5	GU Shuaiwei, YANG Zhizhong, CHEN Zhen, et al. Insights into the desulfurization mechanism of low-grade limestone as absorbent induced by particle size[J]. Fuel, 2021, 305: 121444.
6	潘丹萍, 郭彦鹏, 黄荣廷, 等. 石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫过程中细颗粒物形成特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(11): 4618-4625.
	PAN Danping, GUO Yanpeng, HUANG Rongting, et al. Formation of fine particles in flue gas desulphurization process using limestone-gypsum[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(11): 4618-4625.
7	GELHARDT L, KUCH B, DITTMER U, et al. Granulometric distribution of metals in road-deposited sediments by using different sieving methods[J]. Environmental Advances, 2021, 5: 100094.
8	陈宗元, 张磊磊, 赵宁宁, 等. 混合颗粒系重叠图像分割与分类方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(6): 746-753.
	CHEN Zongyuan, ZHANG Leilei, ZHAO Ningning, et al. Research on segmentation and classification methods of mixed overlapped particle images[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 746-753.
9	ZHOU Wu, SU Mingxu, CAI Xiaoshu. Advances in nanoparticle sizing in suspensions: Dynamic light scattering and ultrasonic attenuation spectroscopy[J]. KONA Powder and Particle Journal, 2017, 34: 168-182.
10	张国强, 赵鸣, 张丽娟, 等. 激光粒度测试结果影响因素分析[J]. 中国测试, 2017, 43(3): 24-29.
	ZHANG Guoqiang, ZHAO Ming, ZHANG Lijuan, et al. Analysis of influencing factors on laser particle size measurement[J]. China Measurement & Test, 2017, 43(3): 24-29.
11	胡子健, 苏明旭, 李俊峰. 基于超声衰减和声速动态监测石蜡的相变过程[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(6): 1160-1166.
	HU Zijian, SU Mingxu, LI Junfeng. Dynamic monitoring of paraffin phase change process by ultrasonic attenuation and velocity[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2019, 19(6): 1160-1166.
12	GREENWOOD M S. Attenuation measurements with ultrasonic diffraction grating show dependence upon particle size of slurry and viscosity of base liquid[J]. Ultrasonics, 2018, 84: 134-149.
13	田昌, 苏明旭, 蒋瑜, 等. 超声法在线测量烟气脱硫浆液粒度分布、密度方法和装置[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6516-6522.
	TIAN Chang, SU Mingxu, JIANG Yu, et al. Method and device for on-line measurement of particle size distribution and density of desulfurization slurry by ultrasonic[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(12): 6516-6522.
14	FALOLA A A, HUANG Mingxin, ZOU Xingwu, et al. Characterization of particle size distribution in slurries using ultrasonic attenuation spectroscopy: Addressing challenges of unknown physical properties[J]. Powder Technology, 2021, 392: 394-401.
15	KITAO K, NORISUYE T. Nanoparticle sizing by focused-beam dynamic ultrasound scattering method[J]. Ultrasonics, 2022, 126: 106807.
16	KITAO K, NORISUYE T. Latex agglutination analysis by novel ultrasound scattering techniques[J]. Ultrasonics, 2022, 119: 106581.
17	WROBEL B M, TIME R W. Improved pulsed broadband ultrasonic spectroscopy for analysis of liquid-particle flow[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2011, 72(6): 324-335.
18	ABDA F, AZBAID A, ENSMINGER D, et al. Ultrasonic device for real-time sewage velocity and suspended particles concentration measurements[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2009, 60(1): 117-125.
19	TSUJI K, NAKANISHI H, NORISUYE T. Viscoelastic ECAH: Scattering analysis of spherical particles in suspension with viscoelasticity[J]. Ultrasonics, 2021, 115: 106463.
20	潘晗, 王培红. 基于ECAH模型反演的气固两相流固相浓度测量方法[J]. 热能动力工程, 2018, 33(2): 33-38.
	PAN Han, WANG Peihong. Method for measuring the solid-phase concentration of a gas-solid two-phase flow based on an inversion model[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, 33(2): 33-38.
21	胡边, 苏明旭, 蔡小舒. 高浓度纳米颗粒悬浮液粒径的超声在线测量方法研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2014, 28(4): 901-904.
	HU Bian, SU Mingxu, CAI Xiaoshu. Online measurement of nanoparticle size distribution in high concentration suspensions using ultrasound spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2014, 28(4): 901-904.
22	HAN Qingbang, QI Lihua, SHAN Minglei, et al. Propagation characteristics of interface waves between a porous medium and a sediment-containing two-phase fluid[J]. Ultrasonics, 2017, 81: 73-80.
23	VALIER-BRASIER T, J-M CONOIR, COULOUVRAT F, et al. Sound propagation in dilute suspensions of spheres: Analytical comparison between coupled phase model and multiple scattering theory[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015, 138(4): 2598-2612.
24	SHABANOV N, J-P GASTELLU-ETCHEGORRY. The stochastic Beer-Lambert-Bouguer law for discontinuous vegetation canopies[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2018, 214: 18-32.
25	THORNE P D, LICHTMAN I D, HURTHER D. Acoustic scattering characteristics and inversions for suspended concentration and particle size above mixed sand and mud beds[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2021, 214: 104320.
26	RICHTER A, BABICK F, RIPPERGER S. Polydisperse particle size characterization by ultrasonic attenuation spectroscopy for systems of diverse acoustic contrast in the large particle limit[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2005, 118(3): 1394-1405.
27	ZHANG Liping, LI Zicai, WEI Yimin, et al. New regularization techniques for ill-conditioning problems and their applications: Choices of regularization parameters[J]. Engineering Analysis With Boundary Elements, 2023, 152: 347-361.
28	GÁSPÁR C. Regularization techniques for the method of fundamental solutions[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods, 2013, 10(2): 1341004.
29	GONG X, LI Z. A robust weighted total least-squares solution with Lagrange multipliers[J]. Survey Review, 2017, 49: 176-185.
30	IGUSHI T, YOSHIDA H. Investigation of low-angle laser light scattering patterns using the modified Twomey iterative method for particle sizing[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2011, 82(1): 015111.
31	ZHANG Guangdong, LI Xiongbing, ZHANG Shuzeng, et al. Investigation of frequency-dependent attenuation coefficients for multiple solids using a reliable pulse-echo ultrasonic measurement technique[J]. Measurement, 2021, 177: 109270.

[1]	杨杰源, 朱易春, 赖雅芬, 张超, 田帅, 谢颖. 低强度超声波对高负荷厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 1098-1108.
[2]	侯立凯, 范旭, 包福兵. 微小液体流量校准技术[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 579-585.
[3]	周骛, 龚文超, 徐日辛. 离焦图像法颗粒多参数在线测量技术[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2): 586-592.
[4]	谢广烁, 张斯亮, 何松, 肖娟, 王斯民. 基于最佳预后元模型的颗粒污垢特性全局敏感性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(1): 328-337.
[5]	卜祥宁, 任玺冰, 童正, 倪梦茜, 倪超, 谢广元. 功率超声对废旧锂离子电池资源化回收利用过程的影响研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(1): 514-528.
[6]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[7]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[8]	徐若思, 谭蔚. C形管池沸腾两相流流场模拟与流固耦合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 47-55.
[9]	向硕, 卢鹏, 石伟年, 杨鑫, 何燕, 朱立业, 孔祥微. 二维WS₂纳米片的规模化可控制备及其摩擦学性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4783-4790.
[10]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[11]	董佳宇, 王斯民. 超声强化对二甲苯结晶特性及调控机理实验[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4504-4513.
[12]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[13]	赵健, 卓泽文, 董航, 高文健. 含蜡原油及其乳状液体系微观结构观测的新方法[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4372-4384.
[14]	吴展华, 盛敏. 绝热加速量热仪在反应安全风险评估应用中的常见问题[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3374-3382.
[15]	王硕, 张亚新, 朱博韬. 基于灰色预测模型的水煤浆输送管道冲蚀磨损寿命预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3431-3442.