热-碱渣预处理强化炼厂剩余活性污泥厌氧消化性能

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0118

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 6609-6619.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0118

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇

热-碱渣预处理强化炼厂剩余活性污泥厌氧消化性能

李晋¹(), 梁家豪², 马文峰³, 郭绍辉¹, 王庆宏¹(), 陈春茂¹

^1.中国石油大学（北京）化学工程与环境学院，石油石化污染物控制与处理国家重点实验室，北京 102249
^2.广东石油化工学院环境科学与工程学院，广东省石油化工污染过程与控制重点实验室，广东高校石油化工污染控制重点实验室，广东茂名 525000
^3.山东石油化工学院化学工程学院，山东东营 257061

收稿日期:2023-01-31 修回日期:2023-02-15 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2024-01-08
通讯作者: 王庆宏
作者简介:李晋（1993—），男，博士研究生，研究方向为固体废弃物资源化利用。E-mail：lijincup@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1801903-01);国家自然科学基金(22278434);中石油集团前瞻基础研究专项(2021DJ6605);茂名市科技专项资金项目(2022S041);广东石油化工学院人才引进项目(RC-XJ2022000702);东营市科学发展基金(DJB202104)

Enhanced anaerobic digestion of refinery waste activated sludge using thermal-refinery spend caustic pretreatment

LI Jin¹(), LIANG Jiahao², MA Wenfeng³, GUO Shaohui¹, WANG Qinghong¹(), CHEN Chunmao¹

^1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
^2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Process and Control, Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Control of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, Guangdong, China
^3.College of Chemical Engineering, Shandong Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Dongying 257061, Shandong, China

Received:2023-01-31 Revised:2023-02-15 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2024-01-08
Contact: WANG Qinghong

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

热-碱预处理是强化剩余活性污泥厌氧消化的有效手段。为降低处理成本，利用炼厂碱渣替代新鲜碱剂，研究了热-碱渣预处理对炼厂剩余活性污泥（refinery waste activated sludge，RWAS）厌氧消化的影响。结果表明，热-碱渣预处理显著促进了胞内有机物的释放，蛋白质、多糖和挥发性脂肪酸浓度随温度和碱渣剂量的提升而增加，在温度90℃和碱渣剂量4%的条件下，蛋白质、多糖和挥发性脂肪酸分别可达1338.7mg/L、510.9mg/L和651.2mg/L。Person相关性结果表明碱渣剂量对腐殖酸类物质荧光强度和类黑素产量呈正相关，与厌氧消化停滞期呈显著正相关，表明高碱渣剂量会抑制RWAS厌氧消化性能。因此，热-碱渣预处理的最佳工艺条件为温度90℃、碱渣剂量1%。该条件下预处理RWAS厌氧消化的溶解性化学需氧量（SCOD）降解率可达66%，最大产酸量为736.2mg/L，甲烷和氢气产量分别是未处理RWAS的5倍和3倍，分别达95.3mL/g-VS（VS为挥发性固体）和11.5mL/g-VS。综上所述，热-碱渣预处理炼厂剩余活性污泥具有较好的应用前景。

关键词: 剩余活性污泥, 炼厂碱渣, 预处理, 厌氧消化, 甲烷

Abstract:

Thermal-alkaline pretreatment is an effective method to improve the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. In order to reduce the cost of treatment process, the refinery spend caustic (RSC) was used instead of fresh alkalis, and the effects of thermal-RSC pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of refinery waste activated sludge (RWAS) were investigated. The results showed that thermal-alkaline pretreatment significantly promoted the solubilization of RWAS, and the concentrations of proteins, polysaccharides and volatile fatty acids (VFA) increased with temperature and RSC dosage increasing, which were 1338.7mg/L, 510.9mg/L and 651.2mg/L at 90℃ with 4% RSC, respectively. Person correlation analysis showed that RSC dosage was positively correlated with fluorescence intensity of humic acids and melanoid production, while had a significantly positive correlation with the stagnation period of anaerobic digestion, which resulted in an inhibition of RWAS anaerobic digestion within high RSC dosages. Eventually, the combination of high temperature and low alkali (90℃, 1%RSC) was preferred. Under this condition, the SCOD degradation rate and maximum VFA production of RWAS by anaerobic digestion were 66% and 736.2mg/L, respectively. The methane (95.3mL/g-VS) and hydrogen (11.5mL/g-VS) production increased 5-fold and 3-fold compared to untreated sludge. Therefore, RWAS anaerobic digestion using thermal-RSC pretreatment has high application potential.

Key words: waste activated sludge, refinery spend caustic, pretreatment, anaerobic digestion, methane

中图分类号:

X703.1

李晋, 梁家豪, 马文峰, 郭绍辉, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 热-碱渣预处理强化炼厂剩余活性污泥厌氧消化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(12): 6609-6619.

LI Jin, LIANG Jiahao, MA Wenfeng, GUO Shaohui, WANG Qinghong, CHEN Chunmao. Enhanced anaerobic digestion of refinery waste activated sludge using thermal-refinery spend caustic pretreatment[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(12): 6609-6619.

图/表 9

参考文献 35

1	刘发强, 曲天煜, 张媛. 炼油厂含油污泥处理技术进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2017, 37(12): 1-5.
	LIU Faqiang, QU Tianyu, ZHANG Yuan. Technical progress in the treatment of oil-bearing sludge in refineries[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2017, 37(12): 1-5.
2	LIZAMA Alfredo Córdova, FIGUEIRAS Cristian Carrera, HERRERA Rafael Rojas, et al. Effects of ultrasonic pretreatment on the solubilization and kinetic study of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2017, 123: 1-9.
3	MAHMOODI Peyman, KARIMI Keikhosro, TAHERZADEH Mohammad J. Hydrothermal processing as pretreatment for efficient production of ethanol and biogas from municipal solid waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 261: 166-175.
4	XIAO Benyi, LIU Cao, LIU Junxin, et al. Evaluation of the microbial cell structure damages in alkaline pretreatment of waste activated sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 196: 109-115.
5	LIN Feng, ZHU Xiaolin, LUO Yong, et al. Improvement of activated sludge dewatering properties using green conditioners: Chitosan hydrochloride and lysozyme[J]. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(12): 6936-6945.
6	阮敏, 孙宇桐, 黄忠良, 等. 污泥预处理-厌氧消化体系的能源经济性评价[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1503-1516.
	RUAN Min, SUN Yutong, HUANG Zhongliang, et al. Energy economy evaluation of sludge pretreatment-anaerobic digestion system[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1503-1516.
7	徐慧, 王素芳, 丁秋炜, 等. 高硫炼油碱渣废水处理技术研究[J]. 清洗世界, 2019, 35(4): 68-70.
	XU Hui, WANG Sufang, DING Qiuwei, et al. Study on treatment technology of high sulfur refinery alkali residue wastewater[J]. Cleaning World, 2019, 35(4): 68-70.
8	LI Jin, WANG Qinghong, LIANG Jiahao, et al. An enhanced disintegration using refinery spent caustic for anaerobic digestion of refinery waste activated sludge[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 284: 112022.
9	侯银萍, 蔡斌斌, 张安龙, 等. 不同预处理方法促进剩余污泥破胞及厌氧消化产气效率的研究[J]. 陕西科技大学学报, 2022, 40(2): 13-19, 27.
	HOU Yinping, CAI Binbin, ZHANG Anlong, et al. Research on promoting sludge cracking and the biogas production efficiency of anaerobic digestion by different pretreatment methods[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, 2022, 40(2): 13-19, 27.
10	ZOU Xuemei, YANG Ruijie, ZHOU Xu, et al. Effects of mixed alkali-thermal pretreatment on anaerobic digestion performance of waste activated sludge[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 259: 120940.
11	唐心漪, 陈翔宇, 肖本益, 等. 剩余污泥热碱处理及其对污泥厌氧消化的强化研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(5): 218-226.
	TANG Xinyi, CHEN Xiangyu, XIAO Benyi, et al. Thermal-alkaline treatment of sewage sludge and its enhancement on anaerobic sludge digestion[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2022, 40(5): 218-226.
12	国家环境保护总局，水和废水监测分析方法编委会编. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
	State Environmental Protection Administration. Water and wastewater monitoring and analysis method [M]. 4th edition. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
13	SIEDLECKA Ewa, KUMIRSKA Jolanta, OSSOWSKI Tadeusz, et al. Determination of volatile fatty acids in environmental aqueous samples[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2008, 17(3): 351-356.
14	李晋, 谢萍, 陈平, 等. 废白土热解残渣强化炼化剩余污泥水热液厌氧产能[J]. 工业水处理, 2022, 42(12): 65-71, 77.
	LI Jin, XIE Ping, CHEN Ping, et al. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of refinery excess sludge hydrothermal liquid by pyrolytic residue of spent bleaching earth[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2022, 42(12): 65-71, 77.
15	王慧迪, 张伟军. 活性污泥水热过程中产生的类黑素对酶活性的影响机制[C]//中国环境科学学会. 全国污泥处理、处置与资源化利用交流研讨会. 张家港, 2019: 103-112.
	WANG Huidi, ZHANG Weijun. Mechanism of melanoidins products during hydrothermal process of activated sludge on enzyme activity[C]//Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences. National Symposium on Sludge Treatment, Disposal and Resource Utilization. Zhangjiagang, 2019: 103-112.
16	张广彩, 于会彬, 徐泽华, 等. 基于三维荧光光谱结合平行因子法的蘑菇湖上覆水溶解性有机质特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(7): 933-939.
	ZHANG Guangcai, YU Huibin, XU Zehua, et al. The characteristics of dissolved organic matter in the overlying water of moguhu lake based on three dimensional fluorescence spectrum and parallel factor method[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(7): 933-939.
17	肖本益, 阎鸿, 魏源送. 污泥热处理及其强化污泥厌氧消化的研究进展[J]. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(4): 673-682.
	XIAO Benyi, YAN Hong, WEI Yuansong. State of the art of thermal sludge pretreatment and its enhancement for anaerobic sludge digestion[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2009, 29(4): 673-682.
18	代勤, 张文哲, 于潘芬, 等. 热、热碱处理对污泥溶胞和溶解性有机物的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(5): 2283-2288.
	DAI Qin, ZHANG Wenzhe, YU Panfen, et al. Effects of heat and heat-alkaline treatments on disintegration and dissolved organic matter in sludge[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(5): 2283-2288.
19	LIU Xuran, XU Qiuxiang, WANG Dongbo, et al. Thermal-alkaline pretreatment of polyacrylamide flocculated waste activated sludge: Process optimization and effects on anaerobic digestion and polyacrylamide degradation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 281: 158-167.
20	郝晓地, 唐兴, 李季, 等. 腐殖酸影响剩余污泥厌氧消化过程实验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(8): 3061-3068.
	HAO Xiaodi, TANG Xing, LI Ji, et al. Experimental study on the effect of humic acid on the process of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018, 38(8): 3061-3068.
21	LI Ji, HAO Xiaodi, VAN LOOSDRECHT Mark C M, et al. Effect of humic acids on batch anaerobic digestion of excess sludge[J]. Water Research, 2019, 155: 431-443.
22	YUAN Donghai, AN Yechen, HE Xiaosong, et al. Fluorescent characteristic and compositional change of dissolved organic matter and its effect on heavy metal distribution in composting leachates[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(19): 18866-18878.
23	SHAO Liming, WANG Xiaoyi, XU Huacheng, et al. Enhanced anaerobic digestion and sludge dewaterability by alkaline pretreatment and its mechanism[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 24(10): 1731-1738.
24	WANG Shuai, HU Zhiyi, GENG Ziqian, et al. Elucidating the production and inhibition of melanoidins products on anaerobic digestion after thermal-alkaline pretreatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 424: 127377.
25	CHEN Hong, YI Hao, LI Hechao, et al. Effects of thermal and thermal-alkaline pretreatments on continuous anaerobic sludge digestion: Performance, energy balance and, enhancement mechanism[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147: 2409-2416.
26	LI Chunxing, ZHANG Guangyi, ZHANG Zhikai, et al. Alkaline thermal pretreatment at mild temperatures for biogas production from anaerobic digestion of antibiotic mycelial residue[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 208: 49-57.
27	温佳欣. 腐殖酸对污泥厌氧消化及水解酶活性的影响研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2022.
	WEN Jiaxin. Effects of humic acids on sludge anaerobic digestion and hydrolase activity[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2022.
28	赵琛, 张列宇, 马涛, 等. UASB反应器对晚期渗滤液的碳氮协同削减效应[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(11): 1913-1920.
	ZHAO Chen, ZHANG Lieyu, MA Tao, et al. The synergistic effect for C/N removal by UASB reactor on mature landfill leachate[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(11): 1913-1920.
29	KIMURA Hiroyuki, NASHIMOTO Hiroaki, SHIMIZU Mikio, et al. Microbial methane production in deep aquifer associated with the accretionary prism in Southwest Japan[J]. The ISME Journal, 2010, 4(4): 531-541.
30	SHAH H N, COLLINS M D. Genus bacteroides A chemotaxonomical perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1983, 55(3): 403-416.
31	CHEN Shuangya, SONG Lei, DONG Xiuzhu. Sporacetigenium mesophilum Gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from an anaerobic digester treating municipal solid waste and sewage[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2006, 56(4): 721-725.
32	FAISAL Shah, SALAMA El-Sayed, MALIK Kamran, et al. Anaerobic digestion of cabbage and cauliflower biowaste: Impact of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) on biomethane and microbial communities alteration[J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2020, 12: 100567.
33	许晓晴, 陈烨, 甄毓, 等. 渤海沉积物中产甲烷途径及产甲烷菌群落特征[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2022, 42(3): 50-61.
	XU Xiaoqing, CHEN Ye, ZHEN Yu, et al. Methanogenic pathways and methanogen communities in the sediments from Bohai Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2022, 42(3): 50-61.
34	陈烨, 孙治雷, 吴能友, 等. 海洋沉积物中甲烷代谢微生物的研究进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2022, 42(6): 82-92.
	CHEN Ye, SUN Zhilei, WU Nengyou, et al. Advances in the study of methane-metabolizing microbial communities in marine sediments[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2022, 42(6): 82-92.
35	XIAO Benyi, TANG Xinyi, YI Hao, et al. Comparison of two advanced anaerobic digestions of sewage sludge with high-temperature thermal pretreatment and low-temperature thermal-alkaline pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 304: 122979.

检测指标	剩余活性污泥	厌氧种泥
pH	7.23±0.05	6.68±0.15
总化学需氧量（TCOD）/mg·L^-1	19674±818	14190±367
溶解性化学需氧量（SCOD）/mg·L^-1	120±35	102±37
总固体（TS）浓度/mg·L^-1	16614±276	12625±446
挥发性固体（VS）浓度/mg·L^-1	11197±167	8715±177
溶解性蛋白质（PN）浓度/mg·L^-1	4.77±0.22	2.43±0.08
溶解性多糖（PS）浓度/mg·L^-1	23.91±1.85	48.24±3.14
含油量/%	7.50±1.08	0.17±0.08

检测指标	剩余活性污泥	厌氧种泥
pH	7.23±0.05	6.68±0.15
总化学需氧量（TCOD）/mg·L^-1	19674±818	14190±367
溶解性化学需氧量（SCOD）/mg·L^-1	120±35	102±37
总固体（TS）浓度/mg·L^-1	16614±276	12625±446
挥发性固体（VS）浓度/mg·L^-1	11197±167	8715±177
溶解性蛋白质（PN）浓度/mg·L^-1	4.77±0.22	2.43±0.08
溶解性多糖（PS）浓度/mg·L^-1	23.91±1.85	48.24±3.14
含油量/%	7.50±1.08	0.17±0.08

温度/℃	碱渣投加量/%	拟合曲线R²	Y_max/mL·g^-1 VS	R_m/mL·g^-1-VS·d^-1	λ/d
20	0	0.970	19.74	0.979	0.969
	1	0.944	42.55	2.331	0.695
	2	0.991	58.73	4.032	1.494
	3	0.989	66.06	2.890	4.804
	4	0.950	52.24	2.734	9.931
50	0	0.971	35.54	2.023	0
	1	0.972	56.04	4.312	1.529
	2	0.990	74.43	4.575	2.378
	3	0.981	76.25	2.845	3.774
	4	0.954	50.70	2.414	3.720
70	0	0.972	50.04	3.004	0
	1	0.973	80.30	3.515	2.033
	2	0.995	77.80	4.269	7.320
	3	0.966	39.10	1.755	6.047
	4	0.976	34.35	1.474	6.164
90	0	0.988	71.90	5.948	0.423
	1	0.998	100.27	6.039	3.539
	2	0.990	63.00	2.952	8.601
	3	0.951	30.07	1.300	14.308
	4	0.960	18.62	0.901	12.344

温度/℃	碱渣投加量/%	拟合曲线R²	Y_max/mL·g^-1 VS	R_m/mL·g^-1-VS·d^-1	λ/d
20	0	0.970	19.74	0.979	0.969
	1	0.944	42.55	2.331	0.695
	2	0.991	58.73	4.032	1.494
	3	0.989	66.06	2.890	4.804
	4	0.950	52.24	2.734	9.931
50	0	0.971	35.54	2.023	0
	1	0.972	56.04	4.312	1.529
	2	0.990	74.43	4.575	2.378
	3	0.981	76.25	2.845	3.774
	4	0.954	50.70	2.414	3.720
70	0	0.972	50.04	3.004	0
	1	0.973	80.30	3.515	2.033
	2	0.995	77.80	4.269	7.320
	3	0.966	39.10	1.755	6.047
	4	0.976	34.35	1.474	6.164
90	0	0.988	71.90	5.948	0.423
	1	0.998	100.27	6.039	3.539
	2	0.990	63.00	2.952	8.601
	3	0.951	30.07	1.300	14.308
	4	0.960	18.62	0.901	12.344

[1]	赖诗妮, 江丽霞, 李军, 黄宏宇, 小林敬幸. 含碳掺氨燃料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4603-4615.
[2]	李由, 吴越, 钟禹, 林琦璇, 任俊莉. 酸性熔盐水合物预处理麦秆高效制备木糖及其对酶解效率的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4974-4983.
[3]	黄玉飞, 李子怡, 黄杨强, 金波, 罗潇, 梁志武. 光催化CO₂和CH₄重整催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4247-4263.
[4]	奚永兰, 王成成, 叶小梅, 刘洋, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 韩挺, 张应鹏, 田雨. 微纳米气泡在厌氧消化中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4414-4423.
[5]	刘洋, 叶小梅, 苗晓, 王成成, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 奚永兰. 农村有机生活垃圾干发酵氨胁迫下中试工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3847-3854.
[6]	张凯, 吕秋楠, 李刚, 李小森, 莫家媚. 南海海泥中甲烷水合物的形貌及赋存特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3865-3874.
[7]	庄捷, 薛锦辉, 赵斌成, 张文艺. 猪粪厌氧消化进程中重金属与腐殖质的有机结合机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3281-3291.
[8]	张乐乐, 钱运东, 朱华曈, 冯思龙, 杨秀娜, 于颖, 杨强, 卢浩. 加氢原料煤焦油脱水除盐预处理工艺优化限值[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2298-2305.
[9]	马源, 肖晴月, 岳君容, 崔彦斌, 刘姣, 许光文. CeO₂-Al₂O₃复合载体负载Ni基催化剂催化CO _x 共甲烷化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2421-2428.
[10]	阮鹏, 杨润农, 林梓荣, 孙永明. 甲烷催化部分氧化制合成气催化剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1832-1846.
[11]	孟晓山, 汤子健, 陈琳, 呼和涛力, 周政忠. 厌氧消化系统酸化预警及调控技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1595-1605.
[12]	张巍, 王锐, 缪平, 田戈. 全球可再生能源电转甲烷的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1257-1269.
[13]	何阳东, 常宏岗, 王丹, 陈昌介, 李雅欣. 熔融金属法甲烷裂解制氢和碳材料研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1270-1280.
[14]	祝佳欣, 朱雯喆, 徐俊, 谢靖, 王文标, 谢丽. 基于导电材料强化抗生素胁迫厌氧消化的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1008-1019.
[15]	胡玉瑛, 王鑫, 张世豪, 胡锋平, 汪楚乔, 吴静, 许莉, 许高平. 厌氧消化流场可视化技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(12): 6535-6543.

热-碱渣预处理强化炼厂剩余活性污泥厌氧消化性能

Enhanced anaerobic digestion of refinery waste activated sludge using thermal-refinery spend caustic pretreatment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价