微塑料对污泥厌氧消化的影响和机理

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-2246

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

污泥厌氧消化对实现污水处理厂“碳减排”具有重要意义，然其产甲烷效率和工艺稳定性易受多种因素干扰。微塑料作为新兴污染物经污水处理后，约有99%富集在污泥中，对污泥厌氧消化过程产生影响。因此，本文重点总结了污水中微塑料的来源、性质及其在污水处理工艺中的归宿，详细阐述了聚苯乙烯（PS）、聚酰胺6（PA6）、聚氯乙烯（PVC）等常见微塑料对污泥增溶、水解、酸化和产甲烷阶段的影响，并从细胞结构、微生物群落、酶活性等角度进一步归纳了微塑料影响厌氧消化的机理。最后，在概括当前研究成果的基础上，提出应从系统工程研究（预处理技术、运行条件、反应器类型等）、微塑料及其浸出物的抑制机制（微塑料与胞外聚合物、细胞膜的作用、标志性辅酶和辅因子、特征微生物方面）、微塑料与污泥其他组分间的协同/抑制机理等方面开展深入研究，为污泥资源化利用提供理论基础和技术支持。

关键词: 微塑料, 剩余污泥, 厌氧消化, 酶活性, 微生物

Abstract:

The anaerobic digestion of sludge to produce methane is of great significance to the realization of "carbon reduction" in wastewater treatment plants, however, its efficiency of methane production and the stability of process are easily affected by many factors. Microplastics, as an emerging pollutant, are treated by wastewater treatment, and about 99% are enriched in the sludge, which has an impact on the anaerobic digestion process of sludge. Therefore, in this article, the sources and properties of microplastics in wastewater and their destination in wastewater treatment processes were overviewed. Simultaneously, the effects of common microplastics such as polystyrene (PS), polyamide 6 (PA6), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) on the solubilization, hydrolysis, acidification and methanogenesis stages of sludge were elaborated. Furthermore, the mechanism of microplastics affecting anaerobic digestion was summarized from the perspectives of cell structure, microorganisms and enzyme activities. Finally, on the basis of the current research, it was proposed that the systematic engineering researches (pretreatment technologies, operating conditions, reactor type, etc.), the suppression mechanism of microplastics and their extracts (interactions of microplastics with extracellular polymer substance and cell membrane, iconic coenzymes and cofactors, and characteristic microorganisms), and the synergy/inhibition mechanism between microplastics and other components in the sludge should be carried out in-depth, providing theoretical basis and technical support for the utilization of sludge resources.

Key words: microplastics, sludge, anaerobic digestion, enzyme activity, microorganisms

中图分类号:

TQ150.9

刘亚利, 张宏伟, 康晓荣. 微塑料对污泥厌氧消化的影响和机理[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 5037-5046.

LIU Yali, ZHANG Hongwei, KANG Xiaorong. Effect and mechanisms of microplastics on anaerobic digestion of sludge[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(9): 5037-5046.

图/表 5

参考文献 81

1	侯俊, 许晓雅, 程芳, 等. 微塑料与有机污染物的相互作用及环境行为研究进展[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(1): 22-28.
	HOU Jun, XU Xiaoya, CHENG Fang, et al. Research progress on interaction and environment behavior between microplastics and organic pollutants[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 48(1): 22-28.
2	BRETAS ALVIM C, MENDOZA-ROCA J A, BES-PIÁ A. Wastewater treatment plant as microplastics release source—Quantification and identification techniques[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 255: 109739.
3	LIU X N, YUAN W K, DI M X, et al. Transfer and fate of microplastics during the conventional activated sludge process in one wastewater treatment plant of China[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 362: 176-182.
4	许霞, 侯青桐, 薛银刚, 等. 污水厂中微塑料的污染及迁移特征研究进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(11): 4393-4400.
	XU Xia, HOU Qingtong, XUE Yingang, et al. Research progress on the transference and pollution characteristics of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018, 38(11): 4393-4400.
5	邢薇, 刘梦瑶, 李頔, 等. 污水处理厂中微塑料的去除效能与全流程分析——以北京某下沉式三级污水处理厂为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(3): 1140-1147.
	XING Wei, LIU Mengyao, LI Di, et al. Removal efficiency and whole process analysis of microplastics in a wastewater treatment plant: taking an underground tertiary wastewater treatment plant in Beijing as an example[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(3): 1140-1147.
6	SUN J, DAI X H, WANG Q L, et al. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: detection, occurrence and removal[J]. Water Research, 2019, 152: 21-37.
7	HE Z W, YANG W J, REN Y X, et al. Occurrence, effect, and fate of residual microplastics in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 331: 125035.
8	DU W J, HUANG X D, ZHANG J M, et al. Enhancing methane production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with addition of sodium lauroyl sarcosinate[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 336: 125321.
9	陈思思, 杨殿海, 庞维海, 等. 我国剩余污泥厌氧转化的主要影响因素及影响机制研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(4): 1511-1520.
	CHEN Sisi, YANG Dianhai, PANG Weihai, et al. Main influencing factors and mechanisms of anaerobic transformation of excess sludge in China[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(4): 1511-1520.
10	ZHANG M, WANG Y C. Impact of biochar supported nano zero-valent iron on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste: methane production, performance stability and microbial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 340: 125715.
11	陈思思, 杨殿海, 庞维海, 等. 污泥中蛋白类物质厌氧转化影响因素及其促进策略研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(5): 1992-1999.
	CHEN Sisi, YANG Dianhai, PANG Weihai, et al. Advances in research on factors affecting anaerobic conversion of proteinaceous materials in sludge and their promotion strategies[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(5): 1992-1999.
12	LI J, ZHANG K N, ZHANG H. Adsorption of antibiotics on microplastics[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 237: 460-467.
13	QI K, LU N, ZHANG S Q, et al. Uptake of Pb(Ⅱ) onto microplastic-associated biofilms in freshwater: adsorption and combined toxicity in comparison to natural solid substrates[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 411: 125115.
14	CHEN Y G, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Z Z. Occurrence, effects, and biodegradation of plastic additives in sludge anaerobic digestion: a review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 287: 117568.
15	ALI I, DING T D, PENG C S, et al. Micro-and nanoplastics in wastewater treatment plants: occurrence, removal, fate, impacts and remediation technologies—A critical review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 423: 130205.
16	HATINOĞLU M D, SANIN F D. Sewage sludge as a source of microplastics in the environment: a review of occurrence and fate during sludge treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 295: 113028.
17	RAJU S, CARBERY M, KUTTYKATTIL A, et al. Transport and fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: implications to environmental health[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2018, 17(4): 637-653.
18	康佩颖, 嵇斌, 卫婷, 等. 污水处理厂中微塑料的来源与分析方法[J]. 中国给水排水, 2020, 36(22): 29-36.
	KANG Peiying, JI Bin, WEI Ting, et al. Overview of sources and analysis methods of microplastics in wastewater[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2020, 36(22): 29-36.
19	YANG L B, LI K X, CUI S, et al. Removal of microplastics in municipal sewage from China’s largest water reclamation plant[J]. Water Research, 2019, 155: 175-181.
20	MURPHY F, EWINS C, CARBONNIER F, et al. Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(11): 5800-5808.
21	郝晓地, 翟学棚, 吴远远, 等. 微塑料在污水处理过程中的演变与归宿[J]. 中国给水排水, 2019, 35(8): 20-26.
	HAO Xiaodi, ZHAI Xuepeng, WU Yuanyuan, et al. Evolution and fate of microplastics in sewage treatment[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2019, 35(8): 20-26.
22	TANG N, LIU X N, XING W. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants of Wuhan, Central China: abundance, removal, and potential source in household wastewater[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 745: 141026.
23	张楠, 来嘉熙, 高山雪, 等. 污水处理过程中微塑料的特性[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(6): 1508-1510, 1514.
	ZHANG Nan, LAI Jiaxi, GAO Shanxue, et al. Characteristics of microplastics in sewage treatment[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(6): 1508-1510, 1514.
24	LUO J Y, ZHANG Q, ZHAO J N, et al. Potential influences of exogenous pollutants occurred in waste activated sludge on anaerobic digestion: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 383: 121176.
25	JIANG J H, WANG X W, REN H Y, et al. Investigation and fate of microplastics in wastewater and sludge filter cake from a wastewater treatment plant in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 746: 141378.
26	IYARE P U, OUKI S K, BOND T. Microplastics removal in wastewater treatment plants: a critical review[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2020, 6(10): 2664-2675.
27	李小伟, 纪艳艳, 梅庆庆, 等. 污水处理厂污水和污泥中微塑料的研究展望[J]. 净水技术, 2019, 38(7): 13-22, 84.
	LI Xiaowei, JI Yanyan, MEI Qingqing, et al. Review of microplastics in wastewater and sludge of wastewater treatment plant[J]. Water Purification Technology, 2019, 38(7): 13-22, 84.
28	GIES E A, LENOBLE J L, NOËL M, et al. Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 133: 553-561.
29	HAMIDIAN A H, OZUMCHELOUEI E J, FEIZI F, et al. A review on the characteristics of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: a source for toxic chemicals[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 295: 126480.
30	XU Q J, GAO Y Y, XU L, et al. Investigation of the microplastics profile in sludge from China’s largest water reclamation plant using a feasible isolation device[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 388: 122067.
31	YUAN F, ZHAO H, SUN H B, et al. Investigation of microplastics in sludge from five wastewater treatment plants in Nanjing, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 301: 113793.
32	TALVITIE J, MIKOLA A, SETÄLÄ O, et al. How well is microlitter purified from wastewater?—A detailed study on the stepwise removal of microlitter in a tertiary level wastewater treatment plant[J]. Water Research, 2017, 109: 164-172.
33	MAHON A M, O’CONNELL B, HEALY M G, et al. Microplastics in sewage sludge: effects of treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(2): 810-818.
34	MAGNI S, BINELLI A, PITTURA L, et al. The fate of microplastics in an Italian Wastewater Treatment Plant[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 652: 602-610.
35	徐玉璐, 乔子茹, 储思琴, 等. 污泥资源化过程中新兴污染物的赋存与控制研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(9): 146-153.
	XU Yulu, QIAO Ziru, CHU Siqin, et al. Research progress on the occurrence and control of emerging pollutants in the process of sludge recycling[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2021, 39(9): 146-153.
36	MINTENIG S M, INT-VEEN I, LÖDER M G J, et al. Identification of microplastic in effluents of waste water treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging[J]. Water Research, 2017, 108: 365-372.
37	LUSHER A, HURLEY R, VOGELSANG C, et al. Mapping microplastics in sludge[R]. Norwegian Institute for Water Research, 2018.
38	ROLSKY C, KELKAR V, DRIVER E, et al. Municipal sewage sludge as a source of microplastics in the environment[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 2020, 14: 16-22.
39	HU Y L, GONG M Y, WANG J Y, et al. Current research trends on microplastic pollution from wastewater systems: a critical review[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2019, 18(2): 207-230.
40	COLE M, LINDEQUE P K, FILEMAN E, et al. Microplastics alter the properties and sinking rates of zooplankton faecal pellets[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(6): 3239-3246.
41	WEI W, HUANG Q S, SUN J, et al. Polyvinyl chloride microplastics affect methane production from the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge through leaching toxic bisphenol-A[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(5): 2509-2517.
42	WEI W, HUANG Q S, SUN J, et al. Revealing the mechanisms of polyethylene microplastics affecting anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(16): 9604-9613.
43	GONG R, TANG X, FAN C Z, et al. Effect of DEHP on SCFA production by anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge[J]. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2020(1): 1-12.
44	CHEN H B, TANG M G, YANG X, et al. Polyamide 6 microplastics facilitate methane production during anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 408: 127251.
45	CHEN H B, ZENG X N, ZHOU Y Y, et al. Influence of roxithromycin as antibiotic residue on volatile fatty acids recovery in anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 394: 122570.
46	张静静, 赵明星, 李超, 等. 聚苯乙烯微塑料对厌氧消化产甲烷的影响研究[C]//2020 年全国有机固废处理与资源化利用高峰论坛. 2020: 32-38.
	ZHANG Jingjing, ZHAO Mingxing, LI Chao, et al. Evaluation the impact of polystyrene microplastics on the methane generation by anaerobic digestion[C]//2020 National Organic Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Utilization Summit Forum. 2020: 32-38.
47	HOU G Y, ZHANG R, HAO X Y, et al. An exploration of the effect and interaction mechanism of bisphenol A on waste sludge hydrolysis with multi-spectra, isothermal titration microcalorimetry and molecule docking[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 333: 32-41.
48	YANG H, ZHANG L, HOU G Y, et al. Insights into the effect and interaction mechanism of bisphenol S on lipids hydrolysis in sludge through multi-spectra, thermodynamics, and molecule docking analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(8): 7834-7843.
49	JIANG X P, YAN Y Y, FENG L Y, et al. Bisphenol A alters volatile fatty acids accumulation during sludge anaerobic fermentation by affecting amino acid metabolism, material transport and carbohydrate-active enzymes[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 323: 124588.
50	WEI W, ZHANG Y T, HUANG Q S, et al. Polyethylene terephthalate microplastics affect hydrogen production from alkaline anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge through altering viability and activity of anaerobic microorganisms[J]. Water Research, 2019, 163: 114881.
51	LIU Q, LI L, ZHAO X L, et al. An evaluation of the effects of nanoplastics on the removal of activated-sludge nutrients and production of short chain fatty acid[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 148: 1070-1076.
52	DUAN X, WANG X, DAI L R, et al. Simultaneous enhancement of nonylphenol biodegradation and short-chain fatty acids production in waste activated sludge under acidogenic conditions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651: 24-31.
53	ZHANG J J, ZHAO M X, LI C, et al. Evaluation the impact of polystyrene micro and nanoplastics on the methane generation by anaerobic digestion[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 205: 111095.
54	FENG Y, FENG L J, LIU S C, et al. Emerging investigator series: inhibition and recovery of anaerobic granular sludge performance in response to short-term polystyrene nanoparticle exposure[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2018, 4(12): 1902-1911.
55	江晓影, 刘泳汐, 秦艳, 等. 聚丙烯微塑料对污泥厌氧消化效能作用影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(5): 2252-2257.
	JIANG Xiaoying, LIU Yongxi, QIN Yan, et al. Effect of polypropylene microplastics on the performance of sludge anaerobic digestion[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(5): 2252-2257.
56	PITTURA L, FOGLIA A, AKYOL Ç, et al. Microplastics in real wastewater treatment schemes: comparative assessment and relevant inhibition effects on anaerobic processes[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 262: 128415.
57	WEI W, CHEN X, NI B J. Different pathways of microplastics entering the sludge treatment system distinctively affect anaerobic sludge fermentation processes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(16): 11274-11283.
58	FENG Y, DUAN J L, SUN X D, et al. Insights on the inhibition of anaerobic digestion performances under short-term exposure of metal-doped nanoplastics via Methanosarcina acetivorans[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 275: 115755.
59	WANG J, LIU X H, DAI Y X, et al. Effects of co-loading of polyethylene microplastics and ciprofloxacin on the antibiotic degradation efficiency and microbial community structure in soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 741: 140463.
60	TANG X, ZHANG B W, FAN C Z, et al. The presence of cationic polyacrylamide attenuated the toxicity of polyvinyl chloride microplastics to anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 427: 131442.
61	FU S F, DING J N, ZHANG Y, et al. Exposure to polystyrene nanoplastic leads to inhibition of anaerobic digestion system[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 625: 64-70.
62	WEI W, HAO Q, CHEN Z J, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics reshape the anaerobic granular sludge for recovering methane from wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2020, 182: 116041.
63	LI L, GENG S X, LI Z Y, et al. Effect of microplastic on anaerobic digestion of wasted activated sludge[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 247: 125874.
64	CHOI O, DENG K K, KIM N J, et al. The inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and silver chloride colloids on microbial growth[J]. Water Research, 2008, 42(12): 3066-3074.
65	LIANG Z H, DAS A, HU Z Q. Bacterial response to a shock load of nanosilver in an activated sludge treatment system[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(18): 5432-5438.
66	ZHANG Y T, WEI W, HUANG Q S, et al. Insights into the microbial response of anaerobic granular sludge during long-term exposure to polyethylene terephthalate microplastics[J]. Water Research, 2020, 179: 115898.
67	ZHANG Z Q, CHEN Y G. Effects of microplastics on wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and their removal: a review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122955.
68	MOHAMMAD MIRSOLEIMANI AZIZI S, HAI F I, LU W J, et al. A review of mechanisms underlying the impacts of (nano)microplastics on anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 329: 124894.
69	林旭萌, 宿程远, 吴淑敏, 等. 微塑料PES与2, 4-DCP复合污染对厌氧污泥胞外聚合物与微生物群落的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(4): 1946-1955.
	LIN Xumeng, SU Chengyuan, WU Shumin, et al. Effects of PES and 2, 4-DCP on the extracellular polymeric substances and microbial community of anaerobic granular sludge[J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42(4): 1946-1955.
70	HERMABESSIERE L, DEHAUT A, PAUL-PONT I, et al. Occurrence and effects of plastic additives on marine environments and organisms: a review[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 182: 781-793.
71	HAHLADAKIS J N, VELIS C A, WEBER R, et al. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 344: 179-199.
72	SAMARAS V G, STASINAKIS A S, THOMAIDIS N S, et al. Fate of selected emerging micropollutants during mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature co-phased anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 162: 365-372.
73	WANG D, ZHAO J, ZENG G, et al. How does poly(hydroxyalkanoate) affect methane production from the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge? [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(20): 12253-12262.
74	YANG X J, NIE J M, WANG D, et al. Enhanced hydrolysis of waste activated sludge for methane production via anaerobic digestion under N₂-nanobubble water addition[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 693: 133524.
75	汪刚慧, 刘宏波, 郑志永, 等. 利用米曲霉发酵餐厨垃圾产水解酶促进污泥厌氧消化[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(5): 1175-1185.
	WANG Ganghui, LIU Hongbo, ZHENG Zhiyong, et al. Promoted sludge anaerobic digestion by the hydrolase produced from food waste fermentation with Aspergillus oryzae[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2019, 13(5): 1175-1185.
76	WANG X L, ZHAO J W, YANG Q, et al. Evaluating the potential impact of hydrochar on the production of short-chain fatty acid from sludge anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 246: 234-241.
77	LI L, LIU D, LI Z, et al. Evaluation of microplastic polyvinylchloride and antibiotics tetracycline co-effect on the partial nitrification process[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2020, 160: 111671.
78	TANG L Q, SU C Y, CHEN Y, et al. Influence of biodegradable polybutylene succinate and non-biodegradable polyvinyl chloride microplastics on anammox sludge: performance evaluation, suppression effect and metagenomic analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401: 123337.
79	HE Z W, YANG C X, TANG C C, et al. Response of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge to residual ferric ions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 322: 124536.
80	HEYER R, KOHRS F, REICHL U, et al. Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants[J]. Microbial Biotechnology, 2015, 8(5): 749-763.
81	PASSARIS I, GAELEN P, CORNELISSEN R, et al. Cofactor F430 as a biomarker for methanogenic activity: application to an anaerobic bioreactor system[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102(3): 1191-1201.

国家/城市	污水处理程度	污泥类型	微塑料浓度 /颗粒·g^-1干污泥	参考文献
中国北京	三级处理	脱水污泥	2.933~5.333	［30］
中国南京	二级处理	初沉污泥脱水污泥	6.31~16.62 13.06~29.66	［31］
中国山东	二级处理	脱水污泥	30.7	［18］
中国云南	二级处理	剩余污泥	7.70	［18］
芬兰	三级处理	脱水污泥	1.867	［32］
爱尔兰	二级处理	厌氧消化污泥	4.0	［33］
爱尔兰	二级处理	脱水污泥	4.196~15.385	［33］
意大利	二级处理	回流污泥	22.7	［34］
瑞典	—	脱水污泥	16.7±1.96	［35］
德国	—	脱水污泥	1~24	［36］
挪威	—	脱水污泥	1.701~19.837	［37］
加拿大温哥华	—	初沉污泥二沉污泥	14.9 4.4	［28］

国家/城市	污水处理程度	污泥类型	微塑料浓度 /颗粒·g^-1干污泥	参考文献
中国北京	三级处理	脱水污泥	2.933~5.333	［30］
中国南京	二级处理	初沉污泥脱水污泥	6.31~16.62 13.06~29.66	［31］
中国山东	二级处理	脱水污泥	30.7	［18］
中国云南	二级处理	剩余污泥	7.70	［18］
芬兰	三级处理	脱水污泥	1.867	［32］
爱尔兰	二级处理	厌氧消化污泥	4.0	［33］
爱尔兰	二级处理	脱水污泥	4.196~15.385	［33］
意大利	二级处理	回流污泥	22.7	［34］
瑞典	—	脱水污泥	16.7±1.96	［35］
德国	—	脱水污泥	1~24	［36］
挪威	—	脱水污泥	1.701~19.837	［37］
加拿大温哥华	—	初沉污泥二沉污泥	14.9 4.4	［28］

微塑料			温度 /℃	厌氧消化过程				试验方法	文献
种类	粒径	浓度	温度 /℃	溶胞	水解	酸化	产甲烷	试验方法	文献
PVC	1mm	10颗粒/gTS	37	↑	—	↑	↑（5.9%±0.1%）	批次	［41］
PVC	1mm	20~60颗粒/gTS	37	↑	↓	↓	↓（90.6%~75.8%）	批次	［41］
PVC		30mg/gTS、cPAM	35±1	—	↑	↑	↑（抑制从15.6%恢复至5.8%）	BMP、半连续	［60］
PE	40µm	10~60颗粒/gTS	37	—	—	—	—	批次	［42］
PE	40µm	100~200颗粒/gTS	37	—	↓ （15%）	↓	↓ （12.4%~27.5%）	批次	［42］
PE	40µm	200颗粒/gTS	37				↓（28.8%）	连续试验
PS	80nm	0.05~0.2g/L	35			—	—	批次	［53］
PS	80nm	0.25g/L	35			↓	↓（17.9%）	批次
PS	5µm	0.05~0.2g/L	35					批次
PS	5µm	0.25g/L	35			↓	↓（19.3%）	批次
PS	54.8nm	0.05~0.2g/L	37				↓（4.7%~14.4%）	批次	［61］
PS	（50±6）nm	0~1000g/L				↓			［51］
PP		5~50颗粒/gTS					↓（58%）	UASB连续试验	［62］
PP	50μm	0.002~0.2g/gVS； 0.2g时	37±1			乙酸提高15.2%	累积甲烷产量提高148.2%	批次	［55］
PA6	0.5~1.0mm	5~10颗粒/gTS	37	—	—	↑（23.5%）	↑（4.84%~39.5%）	生化甲烷产量（BMP）测试	［44］
PES	200µm	1~200颗粒/gTS （10颗粒/gTS最低）		—	↓	—	↓（11.5%~4.9%）	批次	［63］
污水厂（PE、PET、PS 和PP）		24颗粒/gTS、25颗粒/gTS、7颗粒/gTS和5颗粒/gTS	21±1		↓（蛋白11.2%，糖8%）	↓（21.5%）	碱调控抑制产甲烷	批次	［57］
直接添加PE、PET、PS 和PP		24颗粒/gTS、25颗粒/gTS、7颗粒/gTS和5颗粒/gTS	21±1		↓（蛋白18.9%，糖15.1%）			批次	［57］

微塑料			温度 /℃	厌氧消化过程				试验方法	文献
种类	粒径	浓度	温度 /℃	溶胞	水解	酸化	产甲烷	试验方法	文献
PVC	1mm	10颗粒/gTS	37	↑	—	↑	↑（5.9%±0.1%）	批次	［41］
PVC	1mm	20~60颗粒/gTS	37	↑	↓	↓	↓（90.6%~75.8%）	批次	［41］
PVC		30mg/gTS、cPAM	35±1	—	↑	↑	↑（抑制从15.6%恢复至5.8%）	BMP、半连续	［60］
PE	40µm	10~60颗粒/gTS	37	—	—	—	—	批次	［42］
PE	40µm	100~200颗粒/gTS	37	—	↓ （15%）	↓	↓ （12.4%~27.5%）	批次	［42］
PE	40µm	200颗粒/gTS	37				↓（28.8%）	连续试验
PS	80nm	0.05~0.2g/L	35			—	—	批次	［53］
PS	80nm	0.25g/L	35			↓	↓（17.9%）	批次
PS	5µm	0.05~0.2g/L	35					批次
PS	5µm	0.25g/L	35			↓	↓（19.3%）	批次
PS	54.8nm	0.05~0.2g/L	37				↓（4.7%~14.4%）	批次	［61］
PS	（50±6）nm	0~1000g/L				↓			［51］
PP		5~50颗粒/gTS					↓（58%）	UASB连续试验	［62］
PP	50μm	0.002~0.2g/gVS； 0.2g时	37±1			乙酸提高15.2%	累积甲烷产量提高148.2%	批次	［55］
PA6	0.5~1.0mm	5~10颗粒/gTS	37	—	—	↑（23.5%）	↑（4.84%~39.5%）	生化甲烷产量（BMP）测试	［44］
PES	200µm	1~200颗粒/gTS （10颗粒/gTS最低）		—	↓	—	↓（11.5%~4.9%）	批次	［63］
污水厂（PE、PET、PS 和PP）		24颗粒/gTS、25颗粒/gTS、7颗粒/gTS和5颗粒/gTS	21±1		↓（蛋白11.2%，糖8%）	↓（21.5%）	碱调控抑制产甲烷	批次	［57］
直接添加PE、PET、PS 和PP		24颗粒/gTS、25颗粒/gTS、7颗粒/gTS和5颗粒/gTS	21±1		↓（蛋白18.9%，糖15.1%）			批次	［57］

[1]	陈翔宇, 卞春林, 肖本益. 温度分级厌氧消化工艺的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4872-4881.
[2]	高聪, 陈城虎, 陈修来, 刘立明. 代谢工程改造微生物合成生物基单体的进展与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4123-4135.
[3]	杨静, 李博, 李文军, 刘晓娜, 汤刘元, 刘月, 钱天伟. 焦化污染场地中萘降解菌的分离及降解特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4351-4361.
[4]	奚永兰, 王成成, 叶小梅, 刘洋, 贾昭炎, 曹春晖, 韩挺, 张应鹏, 田雨. 微纳米气泡在厌氧消化中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4414-4423.
[5]	蒋博龙, 崔艳艳, 史顺杰, 常嘉城, 姜楠, 谭伟强. 过渡金属Co₃O₄/ZnO-ZIF氧还原催化剂Co/Zn-ZIF模板法制备及其产电性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3066-3076.
[6]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[7]	庄捷, 薛锦辉, 赵斌成, 张文艺. 猪粪厌氧消化进程中重金属与腐殖质的有机结合机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3281-3291.
[8]	范思涵, 于国熙, 来超超, 何欢, 黄斌, 潘学军. 非生物改性对厌氧微生物产物光化学活性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2180-2189.
[9]	孟晓山, 汤子健, 陈琳, 呼和涛力, 周政忠. 厌氧消化系统酸化预警及调控技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1595-1605.
[10]	程荣, 邓子祺, 夏锦程, 李江, 石磊, 郑祥. 光催化系统灭活微生物气溶胶的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 957-968.
[11]	胡璇, 陈滢. 聚酯纤维微塑料胁迫下活性污泥系统性能及微生物群落的变化情况[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1051-1060.
[12]	祝佳欣, 朱雯喆, 徐俊, 谢靖, 王文标, 谢丽. 基于导电材料强化抗生素胁迫厌氧消化的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1008-1019.
[13]	孙千千, 刘阵, 李瑞, 张溪, 杨明德, 吴玉龙. 低温水热耦合亚铁离子活化过硫酸盐提高剩余污泥的脱水性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 595-602.
[14]	苏景振, 詹健. 生物炭对水环境中微塑料的去除研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5445-5458.
[15]	陶雨萱, 郭亮, 高聪, 宋伟, 陈修来. 代谢工程改造微生物固定二氧化碳研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 40-52.