臭氧催化氧化降解煤化工生化进水有机物的实验及机理

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0872

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究了臭氧催化氧化降解煤化工生化进水有机物的工艺条件及机理。本文以新疆某煤化工生化进水为研究对象，确定废水中难降解有机物的种类及含量，开展臭氧催化氧化试验，探讨工艺条件对化学需氧量（COD）的去除率，最后以溶解性有机物（DOM）为对象，解析废水难降解有机物的降解规律。结果表明：废水中主要为苯酚及腐殖酸；最佳工艺参数为催化剂投加量1.2L/L、臭氧浓度500mg/L、臭氧通气量2.5m³/h；反应后各组分的UV₂₅₄均下降，去除率从高到低为疏水性中性物质（HoN）>亲水性碱性物质（HiB）>疏水性碱性物质（HoB）>亲水性酸性物质（HiA）>疏水性酸性物质（HoA）>亲水性中性物质（HiN），富里酸类、腐殖酸类、蛋白质类及溶解性生物代谢产物等荧光强度均降低。

关键词: 臭氧催化氧化, 煤化工, 难降解有机物, 降解规律, 溶解性有机物

Abstract:

The process conditions and mechanism of ozone catalytic oxidation degradation of organic compounds in the biochemical influent of coal chemical industry were studied. Taking a coal chemical biochemical influent in Xinjiang as model, the types and amounts of refractory organics in wastewater were determined. Then, ozone catalytic oxidation tests of the refractory organics were carried out and the removal rates of chemical oxygen demand (COD) under different technological conditions were investigated to determine the best reaction conditions. Finally, dissolved organic matter (DOM) was taken as the research object to analyze the degradation law of refractory organics in wastewater. The results showed that the organic compounds were mainly phenol and humic acid. The optimal process parameters were as follows: catalyst dosage was 1.2L/L, ozone concentration was 500mg/L, and ozone aeration rate was 2.5m³/h. The UV₂₅₄ of each component decreased after the reaction, and the removal rates were in the order of hydrophobic neutral substance(HoN)>hydrophilic basic substance(HiB)>hydrophobic basic substance(HoB)>hydrophilic acid substance(HiA)>hydrophobic acid substance(HoA)>hydrophilic neutral substance(HiN). After the catalytic oxidation by ozone, the fluorescence intensities of fulvic acids, humic acids, protein and soluble biological metabolites all decreased.

Key words: ozone catalytic oxidation, coal chemical, refractory organic matter, degradation law, dissolved organic matter

中图分类号:

X703

王吉坤, 李阳, 陈贵锋, 刘敏, 李文博, 何毅聪. 臭氧催化氧化降解煤化工生化进水有机物的实验及机理[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(10): 5837-5844.

WANG Jikun, LI Yang, CHEN Guifeng, LIU Min, LI Wenbo, HE Yicong. Experimental and mechanism studies on degradation of the organics in biochemical influent of coal chemical industry by ozone catalytic oxidation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(10): 5837-5844.

图/表 14

参考文献 24

1	GHOSH S, DE S. Energy analysis of a cogeneration plant using coal gasification and solid oxide fuel cell[J]. Energy, 2006, 31(2/3): 345-363.
2	唐楠, 王鹏, 杨宗仁, 等. 一种新疆煤固定床加压气化的实验研究[J]. 煤质技术, 2012(1): 37-39, 52.
	TANG Nan, WANG Peng, YANG Zongren, et al. The experimental study of pressurized fixed bed gasification with a Xinjiang coal[J]. Coal Quality Technology, 2012(1): 37-39, 52.
3	GAI H J, JIANG Y B, QIAN Y, et al. Conceptual design and retrofitting of the coal-gasification wastewater treatment process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 138(1/2/3): 84-94.
4	何斌, 王亚娥. 蒸氨-脱酚-SBR处理兰炭废水的研究[J]. 广东化工, 2009, 36(12): 140-141.
	HE Bin, WANG Ya’e. Research on coking waste water treatment by distillation ammonia nitrogen-elimination phenol-SBR[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2009, 36(12): 140-141.
5	王伟, 韩洪军, 张静, 等. 煤制气废水处理技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(3): 681-686.
	WANG Wei, HAN Hongjun, ZHANG Jing, et al. Progress in treatment technologies of coal gasification wastewater[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2013, 32(3): 681-686.
6	王文豪, 高健磊, 高镜清. 预处理+A/O+臭氧氧化+BAF深度处理煤化工废水[J]. 工业水处理, 2019, 39(6): 103-106.
	WANG Wenhao, GAO Jianlei, GAO Jingqing. Pretreatment+A/O+ozonation+BAF process for advanced treatment of coal chemical wastewater[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2019, 39(6): 103-106.
7	赵健良, 童昶, 沈耀良. 厌氧(水解酸化)-好氧生物处理工艺及其在我国难降解有机废水处理中的应用[J]. 苏州大学学报(工科版), 2002, 22(2): 84-88.
	ZHAO Jianliang, TONG Chang, SHEN Yaoliang. Anaerobic(hydrolysis-acidogenesis)-aerobic process and its study and applications in refractory organic wastewater treatment in China[J]. Journal of Suzhou University, 2002, 22(2): 84-88.
8	邱立伟, 向光伟, 邓贤文. 水解酸化-厌氧-缺氧-好氧法处理高浓度化工废水[J]. 水处理技术, 2011, 37(12): 131-133.
	QIU Liwei, XIANG Guangwei, DENG Xianwen. Hydrolysis-anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic treatment of high concentration of chemical water[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2011, 37(12): 131-133.
9	邵永康, 黄军. 水解酸化-厌氧-好氧法处理苯甲酸类化工废水研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2013, 38(8): 115-117, 121.
	SHAO Yongkang, HUANG Jun. Research on treatment of benzoic acid wastewater by hydrolysis-anaerobic-aerobic method[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2013, 38(8): 115-117, 121.
10	张文博, 刘发强, 牛进龙. 铁炭内电解法处理化工废水的研究[J]. 石化技术与应用, 2007, 25(1): 44-47.
	ZHANG Wenbo, LIU Faqiang, NIU Jinlong. Chemical wastewater treatment by ferrum-carbon internal electrolysis[J]. Petrochemical Technology & Application, 2007, 25(1): 44-47.
11	ADAK A, BANDYOPADHYAY M, PAL A. Removal of crystal violet dye from wastewater by surfactant-modified alumina[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2005, 44(2): 139-144.
12	曾小勇, 王红武, 马鲁铭, 等. 微曝气催化铁内电解法预处理化工废水[J]. 中国给水排水, 2005, 21(12): 1-4.
	ZENG Xiaoyong, WANG Hongwu, MA Luming, et al. Pretreatment of chemical wastewater by micro-aeration catalyzed iron internal electrolysis process[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2005, 21(12): 1-4.
13	张俊琪, 樊金红, 马鲁铭, 等. 催化铁内电解法处理酸性化工废水后混合印染废水进行混凝处理的研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2012, 38(9): 88-92.
	ZHANG Junqi, FAN Jinhong, MA Luming, et al. Coagulation treatment of printing and dyeing wastewater mixed with acid chemical wastewater after catalyzed iron internal electrolysis treatment[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2012, 38(9): 88-92.
14	SLOKAR Y M, MAJCEN LE MARECHAL A. Methods of decoloration of textile wastewaters[J]. Dyes and Pigments, 1998, 37(4): 335-356.
15	EL-NAGGAR M A, EL-AASAR S A, BARAKAT K I. Bioremediation of crystal violet using air bubble bioreactor packed with Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Water Research, 2004, 38(20): 4313-4322.
16	杨静, 王建兵, 王亚华, 等. 高级氧化工艺处理煤化工浓盐水[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(8): 3680-3686.
	YANG Jing, WANG Jianbing, WANG Yahua, et al. Treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from coal chemical industry with advanced oxidation processes[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(8): 3680-3686.
17	任明, 孙淑英, 金艳, 等. 催化臭氧氧化法处理煤化工高盐废水[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(8): 54-59.
	REN Ming, SUN Shuying, JIN Yan, et al. Treatment of high-salt wastewater from coal chemical industry by catalytic ozone oxidation[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2018, 36(8): 54-59.
18	高珊, 周集体, 孙丽颖, 等. 臭氧氧化法处理煤化工难降解废水实验研究[J]. 辽宁化工, 2013, 42(10): 1179-1180, 1184.
	GAO Shan, ZHOU Jiti, SUN Liying, et al. Experimental study on treatment of refractory wastewater from coal chemical process by ozone oxidation[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2013, 42(10): 1179-1180, 1184.
19	胡洁, 王乔, 周珉, 等. 芬顿和臭氧氧化法深度处理化工废水的对比研究[J]. 四川环境, 2015, 34(4): 23-26.
	HU Jie, WANG Qiao, ZHOU Min, et al. Comparison study on the application of Fenton and ozone oxidation in chemical wastewater treatment[J]. Sichuan Environment, 2015, 34(4): 23-26.
20	陈媛媛, 陆祺, 潘爱萍. 臭氧氧化深度处理煤化工废水的应用[J]. 化工管理, 2015(7): 121.
	CHEN Yuanyuan, LU Qi, PAN Aiping. Application of advanced treatment of coal chemical wastewater by ozonation[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2015(7): 121.
21	PI Y Z, ERNST M, SCHROTTER J C. Effect of phosphate buffer upon CuO/Al₂O₃and Cu(Ⅱ) catalyzed ozonation of oxalic acid solution[J]. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 2003, 25(5): 393-397.
22	陈炜彧, 李旭芳, 马鲁铭. 铁基催化剂催化臭氧深度处理煤化工废水[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(1): 86-92.
	CHEN Weiyu, LI Xufang, MA Luming. Advanced treatment of coal chemical wastewater by catalytic ozonation with iron-based catalyst[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 86-92.
23	ROSAL R, GONZALO M S, RODRÍGUEZ A, et al. Catalytic ozonation of atrazine and linuron on MnO_x/Al₂O₃ and MnO_x/SBA-15 in a fixed bed reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 165(3): 806-812.
24	陈志伟, 汪晓军, 许金花. 臭氧催化氧化-曝气生物滤池工艺深度处理食品添加剂废水[J]. 净水技术, 2008, 27(5): 40-43.
	CHEN Zhiwei, WANG Xiaojun, XU Jinhua. Advanced treatment of food additives wastewater by catalytic ozonization-biological aerated filter processes[J]. Water Purification Technology, 2008, 27(5): 40-43.

序号	保留时间 /min	质量分数 /%	组成
1	8.721	45.247	苯酚
2	10.172	7.153	2-甲基苯酚
3	10.550	30.556	3-甲基苯酚
4	11.389	1.010	2，5-二甲基苯酚
5	11.590	0.716	4-乙基苯酚
6	11.606	3.954	2，3-二甲基苯酚
7	11.817	1.294	3，4-二甲基苯酚
8	12.050	7.257	1-（2-羟基-6-甲氧基苯基）乙基-1-酮
9	12.310	0.215	2-乙基-4-甲基苯酚
10	12.434	0.300	2-羟基-5-甲基间苯二甲醇
11	12.629	0.851	6-羟基-4-甲氧基-2，3-二甲基苯
12	12.694	0.597	5-茚醇
13	12.840	0.442	4-烯丙基苯酚
14	13.809	0.406	2-萘酚

序号	保留时间 /min	质量分数 /%	组成
1	8.721	45.247	苯酚
2	10.172	7.153	2-甲基苯酚
3	10.550	30.556	3-甲基苯酚
4	11.389	1.010	2，5-二甲基苯酚
5	11.590	0.716	4-乙基苯酚
6	11.606	3.954	2，3-二甲基苯酚
7	11.817	1.294	3，4-二甲基苯酚
8	12.050	7.257	1-（2-羟基-6-甲氧基苯基）乙基-1-酮
9	12.310	0.215	2-乙基-4-甲基苯酚
10	12.434	0.300	2-羟基-5-甲基间苯二甲醇
11	12.629	0.851	6-羟基-4-甲氧基-2，3-二甲基苯
12	12.694	0.597	5-茚醇
13	12.840	0.442	4-烯丙基苯酚
14	13.809	0.406	2-萘酚

序号	分子量/Da	总有机碳值/mg·L^-1
1	1000	3690
2	5000	4521
3	10000	4630
4	30000	4630
5	100000	4665

序号	分子量/Da	总有机碳值/mg·L^-1
1	1000	3690
2	5000	4521
3	10000	4630
4	30000	4630
5	100000	4665

[1]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[2]	杨壮壮, 刘永军, 刘兴社, 刘喆, 杨璐, 张爱宁. 煤化工废水中油泥的聚结分离与水中有机物的去除效果[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 538-545.
[3]	杨学萍. 碳中和背景下现代煤化工技术路径探索[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3402-3412.
[4]	相宏伟, 杨勇, 李永旺. 碳中和目标下的煤化工变革与发展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1399-1408.
[5]	闫国春, 温亮, 张华. 现代煤化工产业发展路径分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6201-6212.
[6]	王吉坤, 李阳, 陈贵锋, 刘敏, 寇丽红, 王琦, 何毅聪. 臭氧催化氧化降解煤化工高盐废水有机物的机理[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 493-502.
[7]	刘兴社, 刘永军, 刘喆, 李鹏飞, 张婷婷, 孙小琴. 煤化工废水中油、酚、氨回收研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 1048-1057.
[8]	项军, 张平, 李治水, 聂增来, 唐娜. 丁辛醇缩合废水的处理工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(2): 1097-1105.
[9]	刘兴社, 刘永军, 刘喆, 李鹏飞, 刘磐. 煤化工废水中酚类物质、氨氮的处理方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(1): 505-514.
[10]	李俊杰,程婉静,梁媚,严晓辉,杨靖东,张岳玲,冯连勇,田亚峻,谢克昌. 基于熵权-层次分析法的中国现代煤化工行业可持续发展综合评价[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(4): 1329-1338.
[11]	刘芬, 丰平仲, 朱顺妮, 王博, 王忠铭. 煤化工烟道气毒性成分对Chlorella pyrenoidosa生长和细胞成分的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(11): 4668-4676.
[12]	邹思宇,凌二锁,乐淑荣,孙胜鹏,吴张雄,陈晓东,吴铎,肖杰. 臭氧催化氧化反应器模拟与分析[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 3969-3978.
[13]	杨文玲, 郜子兴, 吴赳, 王妨茶. CuO-Fe₂O₃/γ-Al₂O₃/H₂O₂/O₃催化氧化深度处理制药二级生化出水[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(06): 2399-2405.
[14]	申改燕, 楚可嘉. 传统煤化工无组织排放挥发性有机物的控制排放[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1): 518-520.
[15]	王明华, 蒋文化, 韩一杰. 现代煤化工发展现状及问题分析[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(08): 2882-2887.