粉体搅拌扭矩的试验及关联式

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0479

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在直径为480mm的平底搅拌槽内，采用平均直径为4.89μm的氢氧化铝粉体进行搅拌扭矩的试验。通过扭矩传感器测量3种不同型式（开启涡轮XCK、二叶直桨PJ和管形桨GXJ）的6个搅拌器（XCK348、XCK290、PJ348、PJ232、GXJ348和GXJ232）的扭矩。试验结果表明：针对不同的搅拌器型式，搅拌器的扭矩增加幅度从高到低的排序是XCK348＞GXJ348＞PJ348＞XCK290。随着粉体高度的增加，GXJ348搅动效果相对较好。相同工况下搅拌的扭矩随着转速增加而有所下降。搅拌的扭矩大小主要是和搅拌器离粉体表面的高度和搅拌的Froude数有关。对于搅拌器组合，当间距较大时各层搅拌器互相不影响；当层间距与搅拌器直径之比小于0.32时，各层搅拌器存在相互作用。通过扭矩的量纲分析和搅拌粉体的受力分析，分别获得了3种搅拌器型式的扭矩关联式。

关键词: 粉体, 搅拌器, 扭矩, 关联式

Abstract:

Aluminum hydroxide powder with average diameter of 4.89μm was used to carry out the experimental determination of torque in a flat-bottomed stirred tank with diameter of 480mm. Torque sensor was used to measure the torque of three different impellers (pitched-blade turbine XCK, two-blade paddle PJ and tube-shaped impeller GXJ) including six impellers (XCK348, XCK290, PJ348, PJ232, GXJ348 and GXJ232). The experimental results showed that the torque of the impeller increases with the height of the powder. The order of the increasing torque of the impeller from high to low is XCK348>GXJ348>PJ348>XCK290. With the increase of powder height, the GXJ348 impeller has better agitation performance compared to other impellers. As the agitation speed increases, the impeller torque decreases. The impeller torque is mainly related to the height of the impeller from the surface of the powder and the impeller Froude number. For impeller combinations, when the layer distance is large, the impellers do not affect each other. When the ratio of the layer distance to the impeller diameter is less than 0.32, the impellers affect each other. Through the dimensional analysis of torque and the force analysis of stirring powder, two torque correlations for the three types of impellers were obtained.

Key words: powder, impeller, torque, correlation

中图分类号:

TQ027.2

谢明辉, 周国忠, 杨超. 粉体搅拌扭矩的试验及关联式[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(1): 82-88.

Minghui XIE, Guozhong ZHOU, Chao YANG. Determination and correlation of torque for powder stirring[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(1): 82-88.

图/表 11

参考文献 24

1	AZEVEDO J, SERRENHO A, ALLWOOD J. Energy and material efficiency of steel powder metallurgy[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 328: 329-336.
2	POUX M, FAYOLLE P, BERTRAND J, et al. Powder mixing: some practical rules applied to agitated systems[J]. Powder Technology, 1991, 68: 213-234.
3	YAMAGUMA M, CHOI K, MOGAMI T. Suppression of cone discharges in a powder silo using a grounded metal rod[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23: 680-685.
4	ASCANIO G, CASTRO B, GALINDO E. Measurement of power consumption in stirred vessels—A review[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2004, 82(9): 1282-1290.
5	KNIGHT P C, SEVILLE J P K, WELLM A B, et al. Prediction of impeller torque in high shear powder mixers[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(15): 4457-4471.
6	KAUPERT K. An Evaluation of impeller blade torque during an impeller-diffuser interaction[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2004, 126(6): 960-965.
7	SIMONS T A H, BENSMANN S, ZIGAN S, et al. Characterization of granular mixing in a helical ribbon blade blender[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 293: 15-25.
8	BOONKANOKWONG V, FRANK R, VALLIAPPAN P, et al. Flow of granular materials in a bladed mixer: effect of particle properties and process parameters on impeller torque and power consumption[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2018, 29(11): 2733-2752.
9	REMY B, CANTY T, KHINAST J, et al. Experiments and simulations of cohesionless particles with varying roughness in a bladed mixer[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(16): 4557-4571.
10	BAO Yuyun, LU Yu, CAI Ziqi, et al. Effects of rotational speed and fill level on particle mixing in a stirred tank with different impellers[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 26(6): 158-166.
11	ASACHI M, NOURAFKAN E, HASSANPOUR A. A review of current techniques for the evaluation of powder mixing[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2018, 29: 1525-1549.
12	CAVINATO M, ARTONI R, BRESCIANI M, et al. Scale-up effects on flow patterns in the high shear mixing of cohesive powders[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 102: 1-9.
13	REMY B, GLASSER B, KHINAST J. The effect of mixer properties and fill level on granular flow in a bladed mixer[J]. AIChE Journal, 2009, 56(2): 336-353.
14	KANEKO Y, SHIOJIMA T, HORIO M. Numerical analysis of particle mixing characteristics in a single helical ribbon agitator using DEM simulation[J]. Powder Technology, 2000, 108: 55-64.
15	CHANDRATILLEKE R, YU A, BRIDGWATER J, et al. Flow and mixing of cohesive particles in a vertical bladed mixer[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(10): 4119-4130.
16	HALIDAN M, CHANDRATILLEKE G R, CHAN S L I, et al. Prediction of the mixing behaviour of binary mixtures of particles in a bladed mixer[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 120: 37-48.
17	BOONKANOKWONG V, REMY B, KHINAST J, et al. The effect of the number of impeller blades on granular flow in a bladed mixer[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 302: 333-349.
18	EBRAHIMI M, YARAGHI A, EIN-MOZAFFARI F, et al. The effect of impeller configurations on particle mixing in an agitated paddle mixer[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 332(1): 158-170.
19	CHERTKIATTIPOL S, NIYAMAPA T. Variations of torque and specific tilling energy for different rotary blades[J]. International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 2010, 19(3): 1-14.
20	GIJÓN-ARREORTÚA I, TECANTE A. Mixing time and power consumption during blending of cohesive food powders with a horizontal helical double-ribbon impeller[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2015, 149: 144-152.
21	BAO Yuyun, LI Tianchi, WANG Dengfei, et al. Discrete element method study of effects of the impeller configuration and operating conditions on particle mixing in a cylindrical mixer[J]. Particuology, 2020, 49: 146-158.
22	沈雨歌. 粉体搅拌槽内功率特性研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2018.
	SHEN Yuge. Study on powder or particle mixing characteristic in a stirred tank[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2018.
23	WEIZMAN Y, FUSS F K, DOLJIN B. A method for accurate measurement of the non-linear rolling friction coefficient between an instrumented ball and a surface[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 60: 496-500.
24	YUNG K L, XU Yan. Non-linear expressions for rolling friction of a soft ball on a hard plane[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2003, 33(1): 33-41.

桨型	k	c	j	f	R²
PJ	2.791	1.831	0.589	1.040	0.961
GXJ	2.188	1.831	0.589	1.083	0.959
XCK	7.198	1.831	0.589	1.047	0.974

桨型	k	c	j	f	R²
PJ	2.791	1.831	0.589	1.040	0.961
GXJ	2.188	1.831	0.589	1.083	0.959
XCK	7.198	1.831	0.589	1.047	0.974

桨型	K	μ	K_I	R²
PJ	0.676	0.326	-0.204	0.883
GXJ	0.678	0.329	-0.190	0.922
XCK	0.781	0.616	-0.448	0.909

桨型	K	μ	K_I	R²
PJ	0.676	0.326	-0.204	0.883
GXJ	0.678	0.329	-0.190	0.922
XCK	0.781	0.616	-0.448	0.909

桨型	K	K_Ⅰ	K_Ⅱ	β	R²
PJ	0.676	0.0398	0.290	-0.167	0.876
GXJ	0.676	0.0398	0.299	-0.167	0.917
XCK	0.676	0.0398	0.649	-0.114	0.900