页岩气废水处理技术研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0124

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩气作为经济价值巨大、资源前景广阔的替代性能源，在近20年来发展迅速，其生产过程中产生页岩气废水的处理受到了广泛关注。页岩气废水水质复杂，通常具有高浓度总溶解固体和有机化合物复杂且含量高的特点，尤其是高浓度总溶解固体对处理技术提出了挑战。在介绍页岩气废水水质特点和处理方式的基础上，本文对近年来出现的页岩气废水处理技术进行总结，包括预处理技术、有机物处理技术和脱盐技术；指出页岩气废水处理的关键在于脱盐，重点论述了热技术和膜技术在页岩气废水脱盐方面的应用，展望了膜技术潜在的利用价值；提出了页岩气废水处理的技术组合。研究特征有机污染物的降解、驯化耐盐菌或接种嗜盐菌、降低热技术的成本、增强膜的抗污染性、开发强化的膜技术，是页岩气废水处理的研究方向。

关键词: 废水, 预处理, 有机化合物, 脱盐, 热技术, 膜技术

Abstract:

As an alternative energy source with huge economic value and broad resource prospects, shale gas has developed rapidly in the past two decades, and the treatment of shale gas wastewater in its production process has received extensive attention. The composition of shale gas wastewater is complex, which usually has a high concentration of total dissolved solids and complex organic compounds. Especially, the high concentration of total dissolved solids poses a challenge to the treatment technology. In this review, based on the introduction of shale gas wastewater quality characteristics and treatment methods, the treatment technologies of shale gas wastewater in recent years were summarized, including pretreatment technology, organic compounds degradation technology and desalination technology. It is pointed out that the key to shale gas wastewater treatment is desalination. The application of thermal technology and membrane technology in desalination of shale gas wastewater was mainly discussed. The potential of utilization value of membrane technology was prospected. The technical combination of shale gas wastewater treatment was proposed. It is suggested that studying the degradation of specific organic matter, domesticating salt-tolerant bacteria or inoculating halophilic bacteria, reducing the cost of thermal technology, enhancing the anti-pollution of membranes, and developing enhanced membrane technology will be the research direction for shale gas wastewater treatment.

Key words: waste water, pretreatment, organic compounds, desalination, thermal technology, membrane technology

中图分类号:

X741

于志龙, 陈滢, 刘敏. 页岩气废水处理技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(11): 4589-4599.

Zhilong YU, Ying CHEN, Min LIU. Research progress in treatment technology for shale gas wastewater[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(11): 4589-4599.

参考文献

1	SUN Yuqing, WANG Yuqing, TSANG D C W, et al. A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction[J]. Environment International, 2019, 125: 452-469.
2	HOWARTH R W, INGRAFFEA A, ENGELDER T. Natural gas: should fracking stop?[J]. Nature, 2011, 477(7364): 271-275.
3	WANG Qiang, LI Rongrong. Natural gas from shale formation: a research profile[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 57: 1-6.
4	SOEDER D J. The successful development of gas and oil resources from shales in North America[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 163: 399-420.
5	NI Yunyan, ZOU Caineng, CUI Huiying, et al. Origin of flowback and produced waters from Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(24): 14519-14527.
6	MA Xinhua, XIE Jun. The progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and development in southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(1): 172-182.
7	WANG Shiqian. Shale gas exploitation: status, problems and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2018, 5(1): 60-74.
8	BUTKOVSKYI A, FABER A H, WANG Yue, et al. Removal of organic compounds from shale gas flowback water[J]. Water Research, 2018, 138: 47-55.
9	GREGORY K B, VIDIC R D, DZOMBAK D A. Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing[J]. Elements, 2011, 7(3): 181-186.
10	吴青芸, 郑猛, 胡云霞. 页岩气开采的水污染问题及其综合治理技术[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(13): 74-83.
10	WU Qingyun, ZHENG Meng, HU Yunxia. Shale gas produced water contamination and its comprehensive treatment[J]. Science and Technology Guide, 2014, 32 (13): 74-83.
11	KERR R A. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene[J]. Science, 2010, 328(5986): 1624-1626.
12	WANG Huan, LU Lu, CHEN Xi, et al. Geochemical and microbial characterizations of flowback and produced water in three shale oil and gas plays in the central and western United States[J]. Water Research, 2019, 164: 114942.
13	VIDIC R D, BRANTLEY S L, VANDENBOSSCHE J M, et al. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality[J]. Science, 2013, 340(6134): 1235009.
14	ELSNER M, HOELZER K. Quantitative survey and structural classification of hydraulic fracturing chemicals reported in unconventional gas production[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(7): 3290-3314.
15	SHIH J S, SAIERS J E, ANISFELD S C, et al. Characterization and analysis of liquid waste from Marcellus shale gas development[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(16): 9557-9565.
16	ZHANG Yimeng, YU Zhisheng, ZHANG Hongxun, et al. Microbial distribution and variation in produced water from separators to storage tanks of shale gas wells in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2017, 3(2): 340-351.
17	PERNETTI M, PALMA L D. Experimental evaluation of inhibition effects of saline wastewater on activated sludge[J]. Environmental Technology, 2005, 26(6): 695-704.
18	BARBOT E, VIDIC N S, GREGORY K B, et al. Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from Devonian-age shale following hydraulic fracturing[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(6): 2562-2569.
19	CHANG Haiqing, LI Tong, LIU Baicang, et al. Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water from shale gas and oil plays: a review[J]. Desalination, 2019, 455: 34-57.
20	KHAN N A, ENGLE M, DUNGAN B, et al. Volatile-organic molecular characterization of shale-oil produced water from the Permian Basin[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 148: 126-136.
21	ZHANG Zhaoji, ZHUANG Yiling, LI Junjie, et al. Feasibility evaluation of the treatment and recycling of shale gas produced water: a case study of the first shale gas field in the eastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2019, 5(2): 358-369.
22	Yonghyeon LEE, CUI Mingcan, CHOI Jongbok, et al. Demonstration and evaluation of potential configuration options for shale-wastewater treatment plant by combining several unit processes[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 232: 867-876.
23	ABASS O K, ZHUO Maoshui, ZHANG Kaisong. Concomitant degradation of complex organics and metals recovery from fracking wastewater: roles of nano zerovalent iron initiated oxidation and adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 328: 159-171.
24	THIEL G P. Treating produced water from hydraulic fracturing: composition effects on scale formation and desalination system selection[J]. Desalination, 2014, 346: 54-69.
25	KAHRILAS G A, BLOTEVOGEL J, STEWART P S, et al. Biocides in hydraulic fracturing fluids: a critical review of their usage, mobility, degradation, and toxicity[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 49(1): 16-32.
26	BUTKOVSKYI A, BRUNING H, KOOLS S A E, et al. Organic pollutants in shale gas flowback and produced waters: identification, potential ecological impact, and implications for treatment strategies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(9): 4740-4754.
27	OREM W, TATU C, VARONKA M, et al. Organic substances in produced and formation water from unconventional natural gas extraction in coal and shale[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 126: 20-31.
28	LUEK J L, GONSIOR M. Organic compounds in hydraulic fracturing fluids and wastewaters: a review[J]. Water Research, 2017, 123: 536-548.
29	陈俊琛, 沙月华, 王东晖. 美国页岩气返排废水处理技术探讨及启示[J]. 水处理技术, 2018, 44(12): 20-25.
29	CHEN Junchen, SHA Yuehua, WANG Donghui. Discussion and enlightenment of the treatment technologies of shale gas flowback wastewater in United States[J]. Water Treatment Technology, 2018, 44 (12): 20-25.
30	RAHM B G, BATES J T, BERTOIA L R, et al. Wastewater management and Marcellus shale gas development: trends, drivers, and planning implications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 120: 105-113.
31	LUTZ B D, LEWIS A N, DOYLE M W. Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus shale gas development[J]. Water Resources Research, 2013, 49(2): 647-656.
32	SHAFFER D L, ARIAS CHAVEZ L H, BEN-SASSON M, et al. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(17): 9569-9583.
33	KIM Junghyun, KWON Heejung, Seockheon LEE, et al. Membrane distillation (MD) integrated with crystallization (MDC) for shale gas produced water (SGPW) treatment[J]. Desalination, 2017, 403: 172-178.
34	KIM Junghyun, KIM Jungwon, HONG Seungkwan. Recovery of water and minerals from shale gas produced water by membrane distillation crystallization[J]. Water Research, 2018, 129: 447-459.
35	SILVA T L S, MORALES-TORRES S, CASTRO-SILVA S, et al. An overview on exploration and environmental impact of unconventional gas sources and treatment options for produced water[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 200: 511-529.
36	陆争光, 高鹏, 马晨波, 等. 页岩气采出水污染及处理技术进展[J]. 天然气与石油, 2015, 33(6): 90-95， 14.
36	LU Zhengguang, GAO Peng, MA Chenbo, et al. Technical progress of shale gas produced water contamination and treatment[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2015, 33(6): 90-95, 14
37	ESTRADA J M, BHAMIDIMARRI R. A review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing[J]. Fuel, 2016, 182: 292-303.
38	O'DONNELL M C, GILFILLAN S M V, EDLMANN K, et al. Wastewater from hydraulic fracturing in the UK: assessing the viability and cost of management[J]. Environmental Science Water Research & Technology, 2018, 4(2): 325-335.
39	CARRERO-PARREN?O A, ONISHI V C, SALCEDO-DíAZ R, et al. Optimal pretreatment system of flowback water from shale gas production[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(15): 4386-4398.
40	CHANG Haiqing, LIU Baicang, YANG Boxuan, et al. An integrated coagulation-ultrafiltration-nanofiltration process for internal reuse of shale gas flowback and produced water[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 211: 310-321.
41	KONG Fanxin, CHEN Jinfu, WANG Heming, et al. Application of coagulation-UF hybrid process for shale gas fracturing flowback water recycling: performance and fouling analysis[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 524: 460-469.
42	WANG Meicheng, WANG Min, CHEN Dong, et al. Evaluation of pretreatment techniques for shale gas produced water to facilitate subsequent treatment stages[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019, 7(1): 102878.
43	SARDARI K, FYFE P, LINCICOME D, et al. Aluminum electrocoagulation followed by forward osmosis for treating hydraulic fracturing produced waters[J]. Desalination, 2018, 428: 172-181.
44	MOHAMMAD-PAJOOH E, WEICHGREBE D, CUFF G, et al. On-site treatment of flowback and produced water from shale gas hydraulic fracturing: a review and economic evaluation[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 212: 898-914.
45	AL-GHOUTI M A, AL-KAABI M A, ASHFAQ M Y, et al. Produced water characteristics, treatment and reuse: a review[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019, 28: 222-239.
46	CHENG Min, ZENG Guangming, HUANG Danlian, et al. Hydroxyl radicals based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for remediation of soils contaminated with organic compounds: a review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 284: 582-598.
47	LIU Pingxin, REN Yueming, MA Wenjie, et al. Degradation of shale gas produced water by magnetic porous MFe₂O₄(M= Cu, Ni, Co and Zn) heterogeneous catalyzed ozone[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 345: 98-106.
48	HONG S, RATPUKDI T, SIVAGURU J, et al. Photolysis of glutaraldehyde in brine: a showcase study for removal of a common biocide in oil and gas produced water[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 353: 254-260.
49	TURAN N B, ERKAN H S, ENGIN G O. The investigation of shale gas wastewater treatment by electro-Fenton process: statistical optimization of operational parameters[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 109: 203-213.
50	JIMéNEZ S, ANDREOZZI M, MICóM M, et al. Produced water treatment by advanced oxidation processes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 666: 12-21.
51	WANG Wei, YAN Xiuyi, ZHOU Jinghui, et al. Treatment of hydraulic fracturing wastewater by wet air oxidation[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(5): 1081-1089.
52	LESTER Y, FERRER I, THURMAN E M, et al. Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: implications for water treatment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 512/513: 637-644.
53	LEFEBVRE O, MOLETTA R. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review[J]. Water Research, 2006, 40(20): 3671-3682.
54	CASTILLO-CARVAJAL L C, SANZ-MARTíN J L, BARRAGáN-HUERTA B E. Biodegradation of organic pollutants in saline wastewater by halophilic microorganisms: a review[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21(16): 9578-9588.
55	FREEDMAN D E, RILEY S M, JONES Z L, et al. Biologically active filtration for fracturing flowback and produced water treatment[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2017, 18: 29-40.
56	RILEY S M, OLIVEIRA J M S, REGNERY J, et al. Hybrid membrane bio-systems for sustainable treatment of oil and gas produced water and fracturing flowback water[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 171: 297-311.
57	FRANK V B, REGNERY J, CHAN K E, et al. Co-treatment of residential and oil and gas production wastewater with a hybrid sequencing batch reactor-membrane bioreactor process[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2017, 17: 82-94.
58	金艳, 张永红, 宋兴福, 等. 耐盐菌MBR系统处理页岩气采出水性能及膜污染特性[J/OL]. 华东理工大学学报(自然科学版): 1-7.
58	JIN Yan, ZHANG Yonghong, SONG Xingfu, et al. Performance and membrane fouling of produced water from shale gas treated by MBR system with salt-tolerant bacteria[J/OL]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition): 1-7. .
59	KEKACS D, DROLLETTE B D, BROOKER M, et al. Aerobic biodegradation of organic compounds in hydraulic fracturing fluids[J]. Biodegradation, 2015, 26(4): 271-287.
60	MONZON O, YANG Yu, KIM Jun, et al. Microbial fuel cell fed by Barnett shale produced water: power production by hypersaline autochthonous bacteria and coupling to a desalination unit[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 117: 87-91.
61	SHRESTHA N, CHILKOOR G, WILDER J, et al. Comparative performances of microbial capacitive deionization cell and microbial fuel cell fed with produced water from the Bakken shale[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2018, 121: 56-64.
62	AKYON B, LIPUS D, BIBBY K. Glutaraldehyde inhibits biological treatment of organic additives in hydraulic fracturing produced water[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 666: 1161-1168.
63	DAVENPORT D M, DESHMUKH A, WERBER J R, et al. High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: current status, design considerations, and research needs[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2018, 5(8): 467-475.
64	ONISHI V C, CARRERO-PARRE?O A, REYES-LABARTA J A, et al. Shale gas flowback water desalination: single vs multiple-effect evaporation with vapor recompression cycle and thermal integration[J]. Desalination, 2017, 404: 230-248.
65	ELIMELECH M, PHILLIP W A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6043): 712-717.
66	RILEY S M, AHOOR D C, OETJEN K, et al. Closed circuit desalination of O&G produced water: an evaluation of NF/RO performance and integrity[J]. Desalination, 2018, 442: 51-61.
67	GUO Can, CHANG Haiqing, LIU Baicang, et al. A combined ultrafiltration–reverse osmosis process for external reuse of Weiyuan shale gas flowback and produced water[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2018, 4(7): 942-955.
68	SHAFFER D L, WERBER J R, JARAMILLO H, et al. Forward osmosis: where are we now?[J]. Desalination, 2015, 356: 271-284.
69	CODAY B D, XU P, BEAUDRY E G, et al. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams[J]. Desalination, 2014, 333(1): 23-35.
70	ISLAM M S, SULTANA S, MCCUTCHEON J R, et al. Treatment of fracking wastewaters via forward osmosis: evaluation of suitable organic draw solutions[J]. Desalination, 2019, 452: 149-158.
71	WANG Peng, CHUNG Taishung. Recent advances in membrane distillation processes: membrane development, configuration design and application exploring[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 474: 39-56.
72	ALKHUDHIRI A, DARWISH N, HILAL N. Membrane distillation: a comprehensive review[J]. Desalination, 2012, 287: 2-18.
73	DESHMUKH A, BOO C, KARANIKOLA V, et al. Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: limits, opportunities, and challenges[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1177-1196.
74	Hyeongrak CHO, CHOI Yongjun, Sangho LEE. Effect of pretreatment and operating conditions on the performance of membrane distillation for the treatment of shale gas wastewater[J]. Desalination, 2018, 437: 195-209.
75	ZHANG Zuoyou, DU Xuewei, CARLSON K H, et al. Effective treatment of shale oil and gas produced water by membrane distillation coupled with precipitative softening and walnut shell filtration[J]. Desalination, 2019, 454: 82-90.
76	颜海洋, 汪耀明, 蒋晨啸, 等. 离子膜电渗析在高盐废水“零排放”中的应用、机遇与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(1): 679-688.
76	YAN Haiyang, WANG Yaoming, JIANG Chenxiao, et al. Ion exchange membrane electrodialysis for high salinity wastewater “zero liquid discharge”: applications, opportunities and challenge[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(1): 679-688.
77	BANASIAK L J, KRUTTSCHNITT T W, SCH?FER A I. Desalination using electrodialysis as a function of voltage and salt concentration[J]. Desalination, 2007, 205(1/2/3): 38-46.
78	PERAKI M, GHAZANFARI E, PINDER G F, et al. Electrodialysis: an application for the environmental protection in shale-gas extraction[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2016, 161: 96-103.
79	ACHARYA H R, HENDERSON C, MATIS H, et al. Cost effective recovery of low-TDS FRAC flowback water for re-use[J]. DOE Report DE-FE0000784, 2011: 100.
80	BARTHOLOMEW T V, MEY L, ARENA J T, et al. Osmotically assisted reverse osmosis for high salinity brine treatment[J]. Desalination, 2017, 421: 3-11.
81	ALTAEE A, HILAL N. Dual-stage forward osmosis/pressure retarded osmosis process for hypersaline solutions and fracking wastewater treatment[J]. Desalination, 2014, 350: 79-85.
82	WANG Zhangxin, DESHMUKH A, DU Yuhao, et al. Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes[J]. Water Research, 2020, 170: 115317.
83	PANAGOPOULOS A, HARALAMBOUS K J, LOIZIDOU M. Desalination brine disposal methods and treatment technologies: a review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 693: 133545.
84	THIEL G P, TOW E W, BANCHIK L D, et al. Energy consumption in desalinating produced water from shale oil and gas extraction[J]. Desalination, 2015, 366: 94-112.
85	CHOI Siwon, KIM Bumjoo, NAYAR K G, et al. Techno-economic analysis of ion concentration polarization desalination for high salinity desalination applications[J]. Water Research, 2019, 155: 162-174.
86	AL-OBAIDANI S, CURCIO E, MACEDONIO F, et al. Potential of membrane distillation in seawater desalination: thermal efficiency, sensitivity study and cost estimation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 323(1): 85-98.
87	MCGOVERN R K, WEINER A M, SUN Lige, et al. On the cost of electrodialysis for the desalination of high salinity feeds[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 136: 649-661.

[1]	张祚群, 高扬, 白超杰, 薛立新. 二次界面聚合同步反扩散原位生长ZIF-8纳米粒子制备聚酰胺混合基质反渗透（RO）膜[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 364-373.
[2]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[3]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[4]	张婷婷, 左旭乾, 田玲娣, 王世猛. 化工园区挥发性有机物排放清单及因子库构建方法[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 549-557.
[5]	王鹏, 史会兵, 赵德明, 冯保林, 陈倩, 杨妲. 过渡金属催化氯代物的羰基化反应研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4649-4666.
[6]	葛亚粉, 孙宇, 肖鹏, 刘琦, 刘波, 孙成蓥, 巩雁军. 分子筛去除VOCs的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[7]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.
[8]	李由, 吴越, 钟禹, 林琦璇, 任俊莉. 酸性熔盐水合物预处理麦秆高效制备木糖及其对酶解效率的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4974-4983.
[9]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[10]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[11]	郑梦启, 王成业, 汪炎, 王伟, 袁守军, 胡真虎, 何春华, 王杰, 梅红. 菌藻共生技术在工业废水零排放中的应用与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4424-4431.
[12]	陈娜, 张肖静, 张楠, 马冰冰, 张涵, 杨浩洁, 张宏忠. 淬灭酶对亚硝化-混合自养脱氮系统的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3816-3823.
[13]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[14]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[15]	杨红梅, 高涛, 鱼涛, 屈撑囤, 高家朋. 高铁酸盐处理难降解有机物磺化酚醛树脂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3302-3308.