耦合过热蒸汽干燥的MVR蒸发结晶系统热力性能分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-0914

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

机械蒸汽再压缩（MVR）作为目前最先进的蒸发结晶技术得到广泛关注和应用，本文结合过热蒸汽干燥技术的优势，提出一种耦合过热蒸汽干燥的MVR蒸发结晶干燥系统。基于EES软件建立数值模型，通过系统仿真的方法分析闪蒸压力p_flash、进料浓度c₀、循环倍率CR、换热温差ΔT_mhex等对压缩机能耗W_comp和系统能效系数COP、下降管结晶盐含水率的上限值ω和换热器UA值的影响情况。结果表明：耦合过热蒸汽干燥的MVR系统相比常规系统具有更高的COP、更低的W_comp，并且能够获得干燥的结晶盐；循环倍率CR增大，压缩机压比π降低，有利于提高COP和降低W_comp，但同时换热器UA_mhex值会增大，设备成本增加；系统COP随p_flash的变化关系与循环倍率CR有关，CR较低时，随P_flash的增大，系统COP增大，CR超过某一定值，随着p_flash的增大，系统COP呈先升后降趋势，其最大值在p_flash为40~50kPa；进入干燥器的下降管结晶盐含水率的上限值ω与进料浓度c₀有关，随进料浓度c₀的升高而增大；?T_mhex对MVR系统性能有显著的影响，?T_mhex每增大1K，COP平均降低5.6%、W_comp平均升高5.8%、UA_mhex平均减少14.4%，ω平均升高1.7%。

关键词: 机械蒸汽再压缩, 过热蒸汽干燥, 废水处理, 蒸发结晶

Abstract:

As the most advanced evaporative crystallization technology, mechanical vapor recompression(MVR) has been widely concerned and applied. In this paper, an advanced MVR evaporative crystallization drying system combined with the superheated steam drying technology was proposed. A mathematical model has been developed using EES software. The effects of the feed concentration(c₀), flash pressure(p_flash), circulation ratio(CR), heat exchanger temperature difference(?T_mhex) on the compressor work(W_comp), coefficient of performance(COP), the maximum value moisture content of salt crystals in downcomer(ω) and heat exchanger parameter(UA) were studied in detail by using system simulation. The results showed that, compared with the conventional system, the MVR system coupled with superheated steam drying technology obtained higher COP, lower W_comp, and could get dry crystal salts. With the increase of circulation ratio CR, the compressor pressure ratio π decreased, which is beneficial to improve COP and reduce W_comp, but at the same time, the heat exchanger parameter UA_mhex and the equipment cost will increase. The variation of COP with p_flash was influenced by the CR. As the CR was under a lower value, the COP increased with the increase of p_flash, and once CR exceeded a certain value, the COP increased first and then decreased with the rising of p_flash. There existed a maximum value when the p_flash was among 40—50kPa. The ω increased significantly with the increase of the c₀. The ?T_mhex has obvious effect on the performance of MVR system, and the COP decreases by 5.6%, W_comp increases by 5.8%, UA_mhex decreases by 14.4%, and ω increases by 1.7%, respectively, per unit increase in?T_mhex.

Key words: mechanical vapor recompression (MVR), superheat stream drying, wastewater treatment, evaporative crystallization

中图分类号:

TQ028

李帅旗,王汉治,冯自平,何世辉,宋文吉. 耦合过热蒸汽干燥的MVR蒸发结晶系统热力性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(2): 439-445.

Shuaiqi LI,Hanzhi WANG,Ziping FENG,Shihui HE,Wenji SONG. Performance analysis of a MVR evaporative crystallization system coupled with super-heated steam drying technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(2): 439-445.

图/表 8

图1 基于MVR的含盐废水深度综合处理系统示意图

表1 模型典型工况输入参数

典型工况参数	输入参数值
物料入口流量m₀/kg·h^-1	1000
物料入口温度t₀/℃	25
物料入口质量分数c₀/%	2
物料循环倍率CR	250
闪蒸压力p_flash/kPa	47.4
主换热器有效换热温差?T_mhex/K	4
循环泵效率η_p	0.75
压缩机多变效率η_c	0.8

图2 耦合过热干燥器前后系统单位耗功随闪蒸压力和增压比的变化

图3 不同换热温差下，COP与Wcomp随物料循环倍率的变化

图4 不同换热温差下，主换热器UA值和下降管的结晶盐含水率ω13随物料循环倍率的变化

图5 不同循环倍率下，系统COP和Wcomp随闪蒸压力的变化

图6 不同进料浓度下，系统COP和Wcomp随闪蒸压力的变化

图7 不同进料浓度下，主换热器UAmhex值和下降管结晶盐含水率的上限值ω13随闪蒸压力的变化

参考文献 19

1	全球环保研究网. 全球及中国工业废水处理行业发展报告[EB/OL]. [2018-12-19]. .
	Reserch GEP. Global and Chinese industrial wastewater treatment industry development report[EB/OL]. [2018-12-19]. .
2	梁林. 处理高浓度含盐废水的机械蒸汽再压缩系统设计及性能研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2013.
	LIANG L. Design and performance research of mechanical vaporrecompression system for treating high concentration saline wastewater[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013.
3	杨金明, 邹龙生. MVR技术处理高含盐废水的发展现状[J]. 广东石油化工学院学报, 2018, 28(6): 19-21.
	YANG J M, ZOU L S. Current status and development of MVR technology for treatment of high salt wastewater[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, 2018, 28(6): 19-21.
4	何睦盈, 蔡宇凌, 胥娟. 机械蒸汽再压缩(MVR)技术的发展及应用[J]. 广东化工, 2013, 40(17): 115-116.
	HE M Y, CAI Y L, XU J. Development and application of mechanical vapour recompression[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2013, 40(17): 115-116.
5	LI Y L, WU H, LIANG X G, et al. Experimental study of waste concentration by mechanical vapor compression technology[J]. Desalination, 2015, 361: 46-52.
6	HAN D, HE W F, YUE C, et al. Study on desalination of zero-emission system based on mechanical vapor compression[C]// 7th International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE). Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2017, 185: 1490-1496.
7	高磊, 张凯, 董冰, 等. 螺杆水蒸气压缩机的MVR系统在碱回收中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(11): 3112-3117.
	GAO L, ZHANG K, DONG B, et al. Research of MVR system with twin-screw vapor compressor in lye recovery[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33(11): 3112-3117.
8	韩东, 彭涛, 梁林, 等. 基于蒸汽机械再压缩的硫酸铵蒸发结晶实验[J]. 化工进展, 2009, 28(7): 187-189.
	HAN D, PENG T, LIANG L, et al. Evaporation crystallization experiment of ammonium sulfate based on steam mechanical recompression[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2009, 28(7): 187-189.
9	Ettouney HISHAM. Design of single-effect mechanical vapor compression[J]. Desalination, 2006, 190: 1-15.
10	陈彪. 基于MVR技术的板蓝根浸提液浓缩的工艺设计[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2017.
	CHEN B. Prosess design of radix isatidis extract concentration based on MVR technology[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2017.
11	王力威, 庄景发, 杨鲁伟, 等. 单螺杆水蒸汽压缩机驱动的MVR系统性能实验研究[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2015, 32(1): 38-45.
	WANG L W, ZHUANG J F, YANG L W, et al. Experimental study on performance of MVR system driven by single screwwater vapor compressor[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015, 32(1): 38-45.
12	林文举, 林文野, 杨鲁伟, 等. 板式蒸发器式蒸汽再压缩系统研究及设计[J]. 化工机械, 2013, 40(2): 176-181.
	LIN W J, LIN W Y, YANG L W, et al. Research and design of plate evaporator’s mechanical vapor recompression system[J]. Chemical Engineering & Machinery, 2013, 40(2): 176-181.
13	LIANG L, HAN D, MA R, et al. Treatment of high-concentration wastewater using double-effect mechanical vapor recompression[J]. Desalination, 2013, 314(4):139-146.
14	SHEN J B, XING Z W, ZHANG K, et al. Development of a water-injected twin-screw compressor for mechanical vapor compression desalination systems[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016,95:125-135.
15	王汉治, 李帅旗, 黄冲, 等. 喷气增焓型单级 MVR蒸发结晶系统性能分析[J].化工进展, 2018, 37(9): 3312- 3319.
	WANG H Z, LI S Q, HUANG C, et al. Performance analysis of single-effect MVR evaporative crystallization system using vapor injected compressor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(9): 3312- 3319.
16	GAO X L, Gu Q, Ma J Q, et al. MVR heat pump distillation coupled with ORC process for separating abenzene-toluene mixture[J]. Energy, 2018, 143: 658-665.
17	HAN D, HE W F, YUE C, et al. Analysis of energy saving for ammonium sulfate solution processing with self-heat recuperation principle[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 73: 641-649.
18	刘光启, 马连湘, 刘杰. 化学化工物性数据手册(无机卷)[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002.
	LIU Guangqi, MA Lianxiang, LIU Jie. Chenmical property date handbook (Inorganic volume) [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002.
19	大连理工大学. 化工原理[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009: 395-396.
	Dalian University of Technology. Principles of chemical engineering[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009: 395-396.

[1]	李华华, 李逸航, 金北辰, 李隆昕, 成少安. 厌氧氨氧化-生物电化学耦合废水处理系统的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2678-2690.
[2]	应璐瑶, 王荣昌. 菌藻共生系统削减抗生素类污染物的去除途径及胁迫响应[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 469-479.
[3]	姜华, 张子惠, 宫武旗, 常越勇. MVR分质提盐蒸发结晶系统设计及性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3947-3956.
[4]	张丽珠, 王欢, 李琼, 杨东杰. 木质素衍生吸附材料及其在废水处理中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3731-3744.
[5]	李海涛, 汪东. 精对苯二甲酸生产废水处理与CO₂协同利用技术的实践与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1132-1135.
[6]	陈诗雨, 许志成, 杨婧, 徐浩, 延卫. 微生物燃料电池在废水处理中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 951-963.
[7]	杜明辉, 王勇, 高群丽, 张耀宗, 孙晓明. 臭氧微气泡处理有机废水的效果与机制[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6907-6915.
[8]	李东梅, 吴丹萍, 吴敏, 潘波. 污水处理厂运行工况对温室气体排放的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6897-6906.
[9]	赵红涛, 王树民. 燃煤烟气胺法脱碳MVR再生系统关键参数及能耗分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S1): 256-262.
[10]	刘威. 煤制烯烃含盐废水近零排放技术的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(11): 4643-4650.
[11]	苗淑兰, 陈侠, 周登凤, 兰天骄, 李萍, 王亚楠. 聚苯硫醚生产废水的资源化利用[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(10): 4283-4289.
[12]	仇宏暄,余义昌,黎城君,郜洪文. SiO₂/BiOBr光催化材料制备及其对含油废水的处理[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 4085-4094.
[13]	姜华,张子尧,宫武旗. MVR并联双效蒸发结晶系统设计及研究[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(10): 4461-4469.
[14]	马双忱, 范紫瑄, 温佳琪, 马岚, 赵保华, 张金柱, 孙尧. 基于模糊层次分析的燃煤电厂脱硫废水处理可利用技术评价[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(11): 4451-4459.
[15]	韦朝海, 汝旋, 杨兴舟, 冯春华, 魏永芬, 李富生. 污水生物处理基于氧调控的节能策略[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(11): 4121-4134.