旋转滑动弧降解垃圾气化焦油组分中的萘

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1134

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (03): 1174-1180.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1134

旋转滑动弧降解垃圾气化焦油组分中的萘

颜欣, 李晓东, 朱凤森, 孔相植, 严建华

浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310027

收稿日期:2017-06-13 修回日期:2017-08-02 出版日期:2018-03-05 发布日期:2018-03-05
通讯作者: 李晓东,教授,主要从事废弃物热处理方法的理论及技术研究。
作者简介:颜欣(1993-),男,硕士研究生,从事低温等离子体在能源环境领域的应用研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51576174）。

Decomposition of naphthalene as tar model compound from the gasification of municipal solid waste by rotating gliding arc plasma

YAN Xin, LI Xiaodong, ZHU Fengsen, KONG Xiangzhi, YAN Jianhua

State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China

Received:2017-06-13 Revised:2017-08-02 Online:2018-03-05 Published:2018-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用新型磁场和气流协同驱动旋转滑动弧等离子体，选取萘作为垃圾气化焦油模拟组分，在氮气气氛下开展了焦油裂解初步实验研究。重点考察了进样浓度、进气流量和预热温度对萘裂解效果及气体产物的影响；此外，采用气相色谱质谱联用仪（GC/MS）对液体副产物进行了表征。结果表明，当进气流量恒定时，随着进样浓度的提高，萘的降解率先升后降，在萘浓度为6mg/L时降解率达到最大值88.3%；随着进气流量从2L/min增加到12L/min，萘的降解率持续下降，由92.1%降至82.5%；提高预热温度可促进萘的降解。实验产生的主要气体产物为H₂和C₂H₂，其选择性与萘的降解率变化趋势基本一致，最高分别为44.0%和13.7%；液体副产物主要有苯乙炔、茚、苊烯等，其GC/MS峰面积比萘低2~3个数量级；在此基础上，对滑动弧反应区域中萘的降解路径及机理进行了初步探讨与分析。

关键词: 旋转滑动弧, 等离子体, 生活垃圾气化, 焦油降解, 萘

Abstract: In this study,a novel rotating gliding arc(RGA) plasma co-driven by a magnetic field and a tangential gas flow was used for tar decomposition. Naphthalene in nitrogen flow was proposed as a tar surrogate. The effects of injection concentration,gas flow rate and preheating temperature on naphthalene degradation efficiency and gas production were investigated. In addition,liquid byproducts were characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry(GC/MS). With the rise of the injection concentration,the degradation efficiency of naphthalene increased first,reaching a maximum value of 88.3% at 6mg/L,and then decreased. With the rise of gas flow rate from 2L/min to 12L/min,the degradation efficiency of naphthalene decreased continuously from 92.1% to 82.5%. Increasing the preheating temperature could promote the degradation of naphthalene. The results showed that the main gas products were H₂ and C₂H₂,with maximum selectivity of 44.0% and 13.7% respectively. The variation trend of the selectivity of H₂ and C₂H₂ were consistent with that of naphthalene degradation efficiency. The major liquid byproducts were acetylene,indene and acenaphthylene,whose GC/MS peak areas were 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than that of naphthalene. On this basis,the reaction pathways and mechanisms of naphthalene decomposition in the plasma zone were preliminary proposed and discussed.

Key words: rotating gliding arc, plasma, municipal solid waste gasification, tar decomposition, naphthalene

中图分类号:

X705
TK09

颜欣, 李晓东, 朱凤森, 孔相植, 严建华. 旋转滑动弧降解垃圾气化焦油组分中的萘[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(03): 1174-1180.

YAN Xin, LI Xiaodong, ZHU Fengsen, KONG Xiangzhi, YAN Jianhua. Decomposition of naphthalene as tar model compound from the gasification of municipal solid waste by rotating gliding arc plasma[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(03): 1174-1180.

参考文献

[1] Nunnally T, Tsangaris A, Rabinovich A, et al. Gliding arc plasma oxidative steam reforming of a simulated syngas containing naphthalene and toluene[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2014,39(23):11976-11989.
[2] Milne T A,Evans R J,Abatzaglou N. Biomass gasifier"Tars":their nature,formation,and conversion[R]. National Renewable Energy Laboratory,Golden,CO(US),1998.
[3] Brandt P,Henriksen U B. Decomposition of tar in gas from updraft gasifier by thermal cracking[C]//1st World Conference and Exhibition on Biomass for Energy and Industry,2000.
[4] Jess A. Mechanisms and kinetics of thermal reactions of aromatic hydrocarbons from pyrolysis of solid fuels[J]. Fuel,1996,75(12):1441-1448.
[5] Chun Y N,Kim S C,Yoshikawa K. Decomposition of benzene as a surrogate tar in a gliding Arc plasma[J]. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy,2013,32(3):837-845.
[6] Chun Y N,Kim S C,Yoshikawa K. Destruction of anthracene using a gliding arc plasma reformer[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,2011,28(8):1713-1720.
[7] Ren Y,Li X,Yu L,et al. Degradation of PCDD/Fs in fly ash by vortex-shaped gliding arc plasma[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing,2013,33(1):293-305.
[8] Yu L,Tu X,Li X,et al. Destruction of acenaphthene,fluorene,anthracene and pyrene by a dc gliding arc plasma reactor[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,180(1):449-455.
[9] Moussa D,Brisset J L,Hnatiuc E,et al. Plasma-chemical destruction of trilaurylamine issued from nuclear laboratories of reprocessing plants[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2006,45(1):30-33.
[10] Zhang H,Zhu F,Li X,et al. Rotating gliding arc plasma assisted hydrogen production from methane decomposition in argon[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2016,44(2):192-200.
[11] Zhu F,Li X,Zhang H,et al. Destruction of toluene by rotating gliding arc discharge[J]. Fuel,2016,176:78-85.
[12] Yang Y C,Chun Y N. Naphthalene destruction performance from tar model compound using a gliding arc plasma reformer[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,2011,28(2):539-543.
[13] Ni M,Shen X,Gao X,et al. Naphthalene decomposition in a DC corona radical shower discharge[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Science A),2011,12(1):71-77.
[14] Liu S,Mei D,Wang L,et al. Steam reforming of toluene as biomass tar model compound in a gliding arc discharge reactor[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2017,307:793-802.
[15] Abdelaziz A A,Seto T,Abdel-Salam M,et al. Performance of a surface dielectric barrier discharge based reactor for destruction of naphthalene in an air stream[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics,2012,45(11):115201.
[16] Fridman A,Kennedy L A. Plasma physics and engineering[M]. Boca Raton,FL:CRC Press,2004.
[17] Bityurin V A,Filimonova E A,Naidis G V. Simulation of naphthalene conversion in biogas initiated by pulsed corona discharges[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science,2009,37(6):911-919.
[18] Wu Z,Wang J,Han J,et al. Naphthalene decomposition by dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science,2017,45(1):154-161.
[19] Abdelaziz A A,Seto T,Abdel-Salam M,et al. Influence of nitrogen excited species on the destruction of naphthalene in nitrogen and air using surface dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2013,246:26-33.
[20] Wang C,Huang W,Ying Y,et al. Functional characterization of the rice SPX-MFS family reveals a key role of OsSPX-MFS1 in controlling phosphate homeostasis in leaves[J]. New Phytologist,2012,196(1):139-148.
[21] Ye Z,Zhang Y,Li P,et al. Feasibility of destruction of gaseous benzene with dielectric barrier discharge[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,156(1):356-364.

旋转滑动弧降解垃圾气化焦油组分中的萘

Decomposition of naphthalene as tar model compound from the gasification of municipal solid waste by rotating gliding arc plasma

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨静, 李博, 李文军, 刘晓娜, 汤刘元, 刘月, 钱天伟. 焦化污染场地中萘降解菌的分离及降解特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4351-4361.
[2]	王兰江, 梁瑜, 汤琼, 唐明兴, 李学宽, 刘雷, 董晋湘. 快速热解铂前体合成高分散的Pt/HY催化剂及其萘深度加氢性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4159-4166.
[3]	孔倩, 孙巾超, 葛佳琪, 张鹏, 马艳龙, 刘百军. 沉淀剂对NiW/TiO₂-ASA催化剂加氢裂化性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 265-271.
[4]	祁元, 徐欣蓉, 阮玮, 吴昊, 吴科, 周亚明, 杨宏旻. 改性活性碳纤维对苯胺吸附特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 622-630.
[5]	程鹏, 赵山山, 杨文龙, 齐跃, 丁晓墅, 杨秋生, 张东升, 王延吉. 1,5-二氨基萘合成技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 5011-5021.
[6]	洪乾, 白瑞, 彭欣华, 孙鸣, 刘珊珊, 焦林郁, 马晓迅. 负载型铜在萘的α-硝基化反应中的催化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1894-1899.
[7]	周永泉, 张艾, 刘亚男, 王铮. 等离子体射流耦合活性碳纤维去除水中糖皮质激素[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2209-2215.
[8]	王思怡, 李月慧, 葛玉洁, 王焕然, 赵璐璐, 李先春. NTP-DBD气化城市污泥及其模型化合物：气氛对产物分布及特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2150-2160.
[9]	杨广东, 苏林, 邹志雪, 姜涛. 微波诱导活性炭激发等离子体射流脱硝实验[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 1054-1062.
[10]	谭潇, 齐随涛, 周一鸣, 石利斌, 程光旭, 伊春海, 杨伯伦. 非热等离子体协同锰铁双金属催化剂直接催化还原NO[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5850-5857.
[11]	赵文霞, 赵玉, 柴子茹, 张硕, 王世欣, 焦志杰. N₂等离子体改性介孔TiO₂的可见光催化性能及机理[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5820-5829.
[12]	彭冲, 刘鹏, 胡永康, 肖文德, 潘云翔. 低温等离子体构筑高效Ni基催化剂进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(7): 3553-3563.
[13]	陈焕浩, 范晓雷. 非热等离子体催化转化C₁分子及其催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(6): 3034-3045.
[14]	徐瑞, 杨凡, 贾显枝, 刘璐, 赵彬然, 马晓迅. 非平衡负离子与ZnO-ZrO₂固溶体协同催化CO₂与H₂O反应制甲醇[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6714-6720.
[15]	赵亚飞, 叶凯, 庄烨, 郑进保. 锰基催化剂协同等离子降解VOCs研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 175-184.