湿法脱硫浆液的真空蒸馏特性

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.08.41

化工进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (08): 2561-2568.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.08.41

湿法脱硫浆液的真空蒸馏特性

洪永强, 陈桂芳, 毛岩鹏, 马春元

山东大学燃煤污染物减排国家工程实验室, 山东省能源碳减排技术与资源化利用重点实验室, 山东济南 250061

收稿日期:2015-02-01 修回日期:2015-12-31 出版日期:2016-08-05 发布日期:2016-08-05
通讯作者: 陈桂芳,讲师,主要从事氧化法及蒸发法的废水处理技术研究。E-mail:chgf@sdu.edu.cn。
作者简介:洪永强(1992—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事污水的蒸馏特性分析及产物迁移规律研究。E-mail:hongyongqiang@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21307075）。

Distillation characteristics of wet flue gas desulfurization serosity

HONG Yongqiang, CHEN Guifang, MAO Yanpeng, MA Chunyuan

National Engineering Lab for Coal-Fired Pollutants Emission Reduction, Shandong Provincial Key Lab of Energy Carbon Reduction and Resource Utilization, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China

Received:2015-02-01 Revised:2015-12-31 Online:2016-08-05 Published:2016-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 湿法脱硫系统耗水量大，大量水分随净烟气流失，本文拟利用真空蒸馏的方式降低脱硫浆液温度，回收烟气中水分及潜热，达到节能、节水、提高脱硫效率等多重目的。实验利用旋转蒸发仪，进行了不同蒸发温差、冷却水温、蒸发压力下脱硫浆液的蒸馏特性、冷凝水品质及不凝气体释放特性的研究。研究结果表明：实验条件下，蒸发率在0.07~0.77之间，随着蒸发温差的升高呈线性升高趋势，随蒸发压力和冷却水温的升高呈下降趋势。冷凝水pH为8.14~8.33，随蒸发压力、蒸发温差及冷却水温的升高均未呈现明显规律，总体变化很小；氨氮浓度变化不大，在1.25~5.26mg/L之间，随着蒸发压力、蒸发温差的升高略有升高，随着冷却水温的升高变化不大；S^Ⅳ浓度在6.13×10^-4~7.78×10^-4mol/L之间，随蒸发温差及冷却水温的升高而升高，随蒸发压力的增加略有降低；冷凝水中的总碱度主要以HCO₃^-的形式存在，在10.3~20.7mg/L之间，随着蒸发温差和蒸发压力的升高逐渐升高，随着冷却水温的升高不断降低；产生单位体积冷凝水释放的NH₃量随着蒸发压力和冷却水温的升高不断增加，随蒸发温差的增加明显降低。

关键词: 湿法脱硫, 真空蒸馏, 蒸发温差, 冷却水温, 蒸发压力

Abstract: The wet flue gas desulfurization(WFGD) system occupies a heavy water consumption,and large amounts of water get loss with net gas. This study can decrease the desulfurization serosity temperature and reuse moisture and latent heat of flue gas by the way of vacuum distillation to achieve the multiple purposes including energy and water conservation and improving the desulfurization efficiency. In this experiment,we studied distillation characteristics,the condensate water quality and release characteristics of the non-condensable gas under different evaporation temperature difference,cooling water temperature and evaporation pressure by whirling evaporator. Under the experimental conditions of this paper,results showed that the evaporation rate was between 0.07 and 0.77. It increased with an increase in the evaporation temperature difference and decreased with an increase in the cooling water temperature and evaporation pressure. For the condensing water,pH was between 8.14 and 8.33 and its change was small which did not present obvious rules with evaporation pressure,evaporation temperature difference and cooling water temperature rising. The effect of ammonia co concentration becomed weak which was just between 1.25mg/L and 5.26mg/L. It increased with the increase of evaporation pressure and evaporation temperature difference. It becomed weak with the increase of cooling water temperature. S^IV ncentration was between 6.13×10^-⁴mol/L and 7.78×10^-⁴mol/L. It increased with the increase of the evaporation temperature difference and evaporation pressure. It decreased with an increase in the cooling water temperature. Total alkalinity existed in the form of HCO₃^-,changing from10.3mg/L to 20.7mg/L,which has the same regular pattern with ammonia. NH₃ producing each unit condensate water,increased with evaporation pressure and cooling water temperature rising. It decreased with evaporation temperature difference increase.

Key words: wet flue gas desulfurization, vacuum distillation, evaporation temperature difference, cooling water temperature, evaporation pressure

中图分类号:

洪永强, 陈桂芳, 毛岩鹏, 马春元. 湿法脱硫浆液的真空蒸馏特性[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(08): 2561-2568.

HONG Yongqiang, CHEN Guifang, MAO Yanpeng, MA Chunyuan. Distillation characteristics of wet flue gas desulfurization serosity[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2016, 35(08): 2561-2568.

参考文献

[1] ALI B,张达芳,郑文祥. 用于海水淡化堆的闪蒸器蒸汽发生系统[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版),2002,42(8):1035-1037.
[2] 倪锦,顾锦鸿,沈建,等. 船用闪蒸-蒸发海水淡化系统的建模与热力分析[J]. 水处理技术,2012,38(1):47-50,68.
[3] 侴乔力,金从卓,束鹏程. 压汽闪蒸海水淡化方法的研究与进展[J]. 热能动力工程,2009,24(5): 554-559.
[4] MATHIOULALIS E,BELESSIOTIS V,DELYANNIS E. Desalination by using alternative nenrgy:review and state-of-the-art[J]. Desalination,2007,203(1):346-365.
[5] RALUY G,SERRA L,UCHE J. Life cycle assessment of MSF,MED and RO desalination technologies[J]. Energy,2006,31(13):2361-2372.
[6] 田禾,张于峰,江菊元. 太阳能闪蒸-多效蒸发海水淡化系统研究[J]. 工业水处理,2010,30(7):36-39.
[7] 严俊杰,王金华,邵树峰,等. 多级闪蒸海水淡化系统的改进研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报,2005,39(11):1165-1168,1181.
[8] 刘晓华,沈胜强,KLAUS G,等. 多效蒸发海水淡化系统模拟计算和优化[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报,2005,18(4):16-19.
[9] 周士鹤,郭亚丽,沈胜强,等. 低温多效蒸发海水淡化装置中流动阻力对传热温差的影响[J]. 西安交通大学学报,2015,49(5):30-35,67.
[10] 杨洛鹏,沈胜强,克劳·根特斯. 吸收式热泵多效蒸发海水淡化热力性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报,2007,28(6):612-616.
[11] 胡建清,伍联营. 多效蒸发海水淡化系统的动态模拟[J]. 计算机与应用化学,2014,31(12):1423-1427.
[12] SAURY D,HARMAND S,SIROUX M. Flash evaporation from a water pool influence of the liquid height and of the depressurization rate[J]. International Journal of Thermal Science,2005,44(10):953-965.
[13] 刘景云. 闪蒸海水淡化装置盐水加热器盐垢的化学清洗[J]. 清洗世界,2005,21(10):26-28.
[14] 楚万秀,朱忠信,益斌,等. 盐水再循环多级闪蒸装置放热段的讨论[J]. 净水技术,2014,33(1):39-41,45.
[15] 陈传敏,赵长遂,韩松,等. 闪蒸处理对石灰石脱硫性能的影响[J]. 热能动力工程,2004,19(3):238-241.
[16] STUFFER M R,YOON H. The effect of pore structure on the SO₂-lime reaction[J]. AIChE J.,1989,35(8):1253-1261.
[17] 赵少强,邹强,梁红哲,等. 逆流加料多效蒸发在含盐废水处理中的应用[J]. 河北冶金,2014(5):72-73.
[18] 杨洛鹏,赵存宏,邹振宇,等. 水平-竖直管降膜多效蒸发高盐废水处理系统[J]. 中国环保产业,2014(4):33-35.
[19] 李柄缘,刘光全,王莹,等. 高盐废水的形成及其处理技术进展[J]. 化工进展,2014,33(2):493-497,515.
[20] KIM B S,SHIN H T,LEE Y P,et al. Study on ice slurry productionby water spray [J]. Int. J. Refrigeration,2001,24:176-184.
[21] HINDMARSH J P,RUSSELL A B,CHEN X D. Experimental and numericalanalysis of the temperature transition of a suspended freezing waterdroplet [J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,2003,46:1199-1213.
[22] ZHAO K X,ZHAO J F,CHEN S L,et al.Thermodynamics of flashing /frezzing process of a droplet in Vacuum[J]. Chin. J. Space Sci.,2011,31(1):57-62.
[23] 徐敏,马勇. MVR和ME技术在中盐金坛生产运行中的能耗比较[J]. 中国井矿盐,2011,42(6):12-14.
[24] 高丽丽,张琳,杜明照. MVR蒸发与多效蒸发技术的能效对比分析研究[J]. 现代化工,2012,32(10):84-86.
[25] 尉凤珍,方向红. 真空蒸发浓缩装置在核放射废水处理中的应用试验[J]. 工业水处理,2009,29(9):62-65.
[26] 洪海,唐勇,马利群,等. 缩合-多效蒸发处理丙烯酸废水的能耗[J]. 化工进展,2009,28(s1):176-178.

湿法脱硫浆液的真空蒸馏特性

Distillation characteristics of wet flue gas desulfurization serosity

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王小虎, 吴葵霞, 吴德华, 张其龙, 董勇. 电石渣在燃煤电厂脱硫工艺中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 140-148.
[2]	王军锋, 李金, 徐惠斌, 刘璐, 郑高杰. 湿法脱硫协同去除细颗粒物的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(07): 3402-3411.
[3]	洪永强, 陈桂芳, 马春元, 毛岩鹏, 杨德萍, 刘晓, 沈荣胜. 湿法脱硫废水液柱蒸发特性[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(07): 2698-2706.
[4]	李子申, 李惟毅, 孟金英, 贾向东, 李志会. 蒸发压力对卡琳娜循环不同目标参数的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(11): 3852-3858.
[5]	杨少龙, 韩志涛, 潘新祥, 严志军. 船舶硫氧化物排放控制技术研究现状及展望[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(10): 3779-3784,3818.
[6]	翁卫国, 张军, 李存杰. 湿法脱硫系统“石膏雨”问题的成因及解决对策[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(1): 239-244.
[7]	李洋1，2，陈敏东1，薛志钢2，支国瑞2，马京华2，刘妍2，高炜2. 燃煤电厂协同脱汞研究进展及强化措施[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(08): 2187-2191.