蒸发压力对卡琳娜循环不同目标参数的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.11.005

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 3852-3858.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.11.005

蒸发压力对卡琳娜循环不同目标参数的影响

李子申¹, 李惟毅¹, 孟金英¹, 贾向东², 李志会³

1 天津大学中低温热能高效利用教育部重点实验室, 天津 300072;
2 北京源深节能技术有限责任公司, 北京 100142;
3 天津市宝坻区益安机动车检测有限公司, 天津 301800

收稿日期:2015-05-06 修回日期:2015-05-21 出版日期:2015-11-05 发布日期:2015-11-05
通讯作者: 李惟毅,教授,博士生导师,从事可再生能源利用与节能、能源与环境工程、传热与传质等方面的研究。E-mailliwy@tju.edu.cn。
作者简介:李子申(1988—),男,硕士研究生,从事中低温余热发电,分布式能源和可再生能源利用与节能方面的研究。E-mailskyleesen@163.com。
基金资助:
北京市科技计划项目(Z111100058911008)。

Influences of evaporating pressure on different target parameters of Kalina cycle

LI Zishen¹, LI Weiyi¹, MENG Jinying¹, JIA Xiangdong², LI Zhihui³

1 Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2 Beijing Yuanshen Energy Saving Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100142, China;
3 Tianjin Baodi District Yian Motor Vehicle Detection Co., Ltd., Tianjin 301800, China

Received:2015-05-06 Revised:2015-05-21 Online:2015-11-05 Published:2015-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了蒸发压力对卡琳娜循环系统性能的影响。以基液氨浓度分别为65%、75%和85%的氨水工质为研究对象,建立一个数学模型进行模拟分析。在其他变量一定的情况下,通过改变蒸发压力,从热力学第一定律、第二定律和经济性3个角度,分析其对卡琳娜循环系统热力学过程的影响。结果表明:在基液氨浓度和热源一定的条件下,蒸发压力越高,基液氨和富氨蒸气质量流量越小,蒸发器和冷凝器换热量越小,系统热效率和(火用)效率越高;存在一个最佳的蒸发压力使系统净输出功达到最大,且最佳的蒸发压力会随基液氨浓度升高而增大;蒸发器和冷凝器所占系统总(火用)损比例随蒸发压力增大而增大,而汽轮机和回热器则正好相反;从经济性角度分析还得出:当蒸发压力大于2.5MPa时,换热器的投资相对有利,对汽轮机尺寸参数的优化设计则要综合考虑其成本和发电量。

关键词: 蒸发压力, 卡琳娜循环, 模拟, 热力学过程, 经济性, 优化设计

Abstract: This article studied the effects of evaporating pressure on the Kalina cycle system. Ammonia concentrations of the base solution were 65%, 75% and 85% and a mathematical model was established for simulation analysis. Evaporating pressure was the only variable in this experiment in order to analyze its effects on Kalina thermodynamics process from the aspects of thermodynamics first and second law of and economic efficiency. The results showed that when the ammonia concentrations of the base solution and heat source were fixed, mass flow rate of base liquid ammonia and rich ammonia steam decreased with the increase of evaporating pressure, and thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency of system increased with the decrease of heat transfer of evaporator and condenser. At the optimal evaporating pressure for ammonia solution at certain concentration, the net output power was maximized, and the optimal evaporating pressure increased with the increase of base liquid ammonia concentration. The exergy loss of evaporator and condenser increased as the evaporating pressure increased, but the results for steam turbine and regenerator were the opposite. When evaporating pressure was greater than 2.5MPa, the investment of heat exchanger was relatively favorable. Therefore, the cost and power generation should be considered in the optimal design of steam turbine.

Key words: evaporating pressure, Kalina cycle, simulation, thermodynamics process, economic efficiency, optimal design

中图分类号:

TK114

李子申, 李惟毅, 孟金英, 贾向东, 李志会. 蒸发压力对卡琳娜循环不同目标参数的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(11): 3852-3858.

LI Zishen, LI Weiyi, MENG Jinying, JIA Xiangdong, LI Zhihui. Influences of evaporating pressure on different target parameters of Kalina cycle[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(11): 3852-3858.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Xinxin,He Maogang,Zhang Ying. A review of research on the Kalina cycle[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2012,16(7):5309-5318.

[2] Micak H A. An introduction to the Kalina cycle[R]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers,New York,NY (United States),1996.

[3] Kalina A I. Generation of energy by means of a working fluid,and regeneration of a working fluid:US,4346561[P]. 1982-8-31.

[4] Kalina A I. Combined cycle and waste heat recovery power systems based on a novel thermodynamic energy cycle utilizing low-temperature heat for power generation[J]. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.,1983,83:830905.

[5] 周然,韩吉田,于泽庭. 基于太阳能卡琳娜循环的冷热电联供系统热力学分析[J]. 制冷技术,2013,33(3):13-15.

[6] 岳秀艳,韩吉田,于泽庭,等. 新Kalina 循环系统 (KCS) 34的热力学分析[J]. 发电与空调,2014,157(35):10-12.

[7] 罗尘丁,张娜,刘猛. 氨气功冷正逆耦合循环的经济性分析[J]. 工程热物理学报,2009,30(9):1283-1287.

[8] 薄涵亮,马昌文,吴少融. 氨水工质郞肯循环[J]. 清华大学学报:自然科学版,1997,39(2):108-109.

[9] 卢志勇,朱家玲,张伟,等. Kalina 地热发电热力循环效率影响因素分析[J].太阳能学报,2014,35(2):326-330.

[10] 任慧琴,李惟毅,张军朋. 低基液氨质量分数对卡琳娜循环系统 (kcs-34) 理论循环效率的影响[J]. 机械工程学报,2013,48(24):152-157.

[11] 陈世玉,华君叶,陈亚平,等. 用于余热回收的三压力氨水动力循环的热力性能[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,42(4):659-663.

[12] 吕灿仁,严晋跃,马一太. Kalina 循环的研究和开发及其提高效率的分析[J]. 热能动力工程,1991,31(1):1-7.

[13] 张颖,何茂刚,贾真,等. Kalina 循环的热力学第一定律分析[J]. 动力工程,2007,27(2):218-222.

[14] 何嘉诚. 带两相膨胀机的 KCS34 的热力学分析[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2013.

[15] Hettiarachchi H D M,Golubovic M,Worek W M,et al. The performance of the Kalina cycle system 11 (KCS-11) with low-temperature heat sources[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology,2007,129(3):243-247.

[16] 安青松,史琳. 中低温热能发电技术的热力学对比分析[J]. 华北电力大学学报,2012,39(2):79-83.

[17] Valdimarsson P,Eliasson L. Factors influencing the economics of the Kalina power cycle and situations of superior performance[C]// International Geothermal Conference,Reykjavik,2003:32-40.

[18] Ogriseck S. Integration of Kalina cycle in a combined heat and power plant,a case study[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2009,29(14):2843-2848.

[19] 方鹏. 卡琳娜循环在燃煤电厂烟气余热回收利用中的应用分析[J]. 中国科技投资,2013(s2):102-103.

[20] Wang Jiangfeng,Yan Zhequan,Wang Man,et al. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an ammonia-water power system with LNG (liquefied natural gas) as its heat sink[J]. Energy,2013,50:513-522.

[21] 王志奇,周乃君,夏小霞,等. 有机朗肯循环发电系统的多目标参数优化[J]. 化工学报,2013,64(5):1710-1716.

蒸发压力对卡琳娜循环不同目标参数的影响

Influences of evaporating pressure on different target parameters of Kalina cycle

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[2]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[3]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[4]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[5]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[6]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[7]	徐若思, 谭蔚. C形管池沸腾两相流流场模拟与流固耦合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 47-55.
[8]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[9]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[10]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[11]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[12]	许友好, 王维, 鲁波娜, 徐惠, 何鸣元. 中国炼油创新技术MIP的开发策略及启示[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4465-4470.
[13]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[14]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[15]	张帆, 陶少辉, 陈玉石, 项曙光. 基于改进恒热传输模型的精馏模拟初始化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4550-4558.