Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 6574-6580.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2024-1763

• Materials science and technology • Previous Articles    

Stability and influencing factors of Cu-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids

FANG Yubao(), ZHANG Xilong()   

  1. College of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, Shandong, China
  • Received:2024-10-31 Revised:2025-01-10 Online:2025-12-08 Published:2025-11-25
  • Contact: ZHANG Xilong

Cu-H2O和Al2O3-H2O纳米流体稳定性及影响因素

房玉宝(), 张西龙()   

  1. 青岛理工大学机械与汽车工程学院,山东 青岛 266520
  • 通讯作者: 张西龙
  • 作者简介:房玉宝(1999—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为纳米流体强化传热传质。E-mail:3221014820@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市自然科学基金(24-4-4-zrjj-170-jch);山东省高校青年创新科技项目(2023KJ321)

Abstract:

Two-step methods were used to prepare Cu-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids with a mass fraction of 0.5%. The influence of various factors on the stability of nanofluids, including ultrasonic treatment time, dispersant type, dispersant addition concentration and pH value, was analyzed sequentially. The results indicated that for different types of nanofluids, there were their optimal ultrasonic treatment time, pH value and suitable dispersant. The optimal dispersants for Cu-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids were sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), respectively, and the optimal ultrasonic treatment times were about 60min for both. The optimal pH for Cu-H2O and Al2O3-H2O nanofluids were 8 and 4, respectively. When the dispersant addition concentration was 0.5%, the dispersed stability of nanofluids was the best. In addition, a quantitative expression for characterizing the stability of nanofluids based on precipitation observation method was proposed in this paper. Through this method, the optimal preparation scheme and proportion of nanofluids could be determined more accurately, thus providing important reference for future related research and applications.

Key words: nanofluids, stability, precipitation observation method, Cu-H2O nanofluids, Al2O3-H2O nanofluids

摘要:

采用两步法制备了质量分数为0.5%的Cu-H2O和Al2O3-H2O两种纳米流体,依次分析了多个因素对纳米流体稳定性的影响,包括超声处理时间、分散剂种类、分散剂添加浓度以及pH等。实验发现,针对不同类型的纳米流体,均存在各自的最佳超声处理时间、pH及合适的分散剂类型,Cu-H2O和Al2O3-H2O这两种纳米流体的最佳分散剂分别为十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDBS)和聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP),最佳超声处理时间均为60min左右,最佳pH分别为8和4。当添加分散剂的质量分数为0.5%时,纳米流体的分散稳定性表现得最好。此外,本文还提出了一种基于沉淀观察法的量化表征纳米流体稳定性的表达式,通过这一方法,可以更为准确地确定制备纳米流体的最佳方案和配比,从而为未来相关研究和应用提供重要的参考依据。

关键词: 纳米流体, 稳定性, 沉淀观察法, Cu-H2O纳米流体, Al2O3-H2O纳米流体

CLC Number: 

京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号
Copyright © Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, All Rights Reserved.
E-mail: hgjz@cip.com.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd