Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 5642-5652.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1566
• Materials science and technology • Previous Articles
ZHANG Yan1,2,3(), QIAO Wenpu1, HUANG Jingjun1, SUN Xindi1, LIU Zhong3, WU Haibiao2
Received:
2023-09-06
Revised:
2023-10-20
Online:
2024-10-29
Published:
2024-10-15
Contact:
ZHANG Yan
张妍1,2,3(), 乔文朴1, 黄靖钧1, 孙鑫娣1, 刘忠3, 吴海标2
通讯作者:
张妍
作者简介:
张妍(1989—),女,博士,讲师,研究方向为材料科学与技术、特种纸基功能材料。E-mail:15122753563@163.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Yan, QIAO Wenpu, HUANG Jingjun, SUN Xindi, LIU Zhong, WU Haibiao. Preparation of titanium dioxide/talc composite filler and its application in decorative base paper[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(10): 5642-5652.
张妍, 乔文朴, 黄靖钧, 孙鑫娣, 刘忠, 吴海标. 复合二氧化钛的制备及在装饰原纸中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(10): 5642-5652.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://hgjz.cip.com.cn/EN/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1566
配方 | Tween80∶正丁醇 | 乳化剂∶油相 | 水相∶油相 |
---|---|---|---|
a | 1∶1 | 2∶8 | 1∶4 |
b | 1∶1 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 |
c | 1∶1 | 5∶5 | 1∶2 |
d | 1∶1 | 7∶3 | 1∶3 |
e | 2∶1 | 4∶6 | 3∶5 |
f | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 2∶3 |
配方 | Tween80∶正丁醇 | 乳化剂∶油相 | 水相∶油相 |
---|---|---|---|
a | 1∶1 | 2∶8 | 1∶4 |
b | 1∶1 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 |
c | 1∶1 | 5∶5 | 1∶2 |
d | 1∶1 | 7∶3 | 1∶3 |
e | 2∶1 | 4∶6 | 3∶5 |
f | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 2∶3 |
水平 | 因素 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A(水相∶油相) | B(乳化剂∶油相) | C(Tween80∶正丁醇) | D(滑石粉∶TBT) | |
-1 | 1∶4 | 3∶7 | 1∶2 | 1∶5 |
0 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 |
1 | 3∶4 | 5∶5 | 2∶1 | 1∶3 |
水平 | 因素 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A(水相∶油相) | B(乳化剂∶油相) | C(Tween80∶正丁醇) | D(滑石粉∶TBT) | |
-1 | 1∶4 | 3∶7 | 1∶2 | 1∶5 |
0 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 |
1 | 3∶4 | 5∶5 | 2∶1 | 1∶3 |
乳化剂∶烷烃 | 体系中水的质量分数% | |
---|---|---|
环己烷 | 正庚烷 | |
1∶9 | 7.6 | 3.6 |
2∶8 | 16.0 | 11.8 |
3∶7 | 19.8 | 17.5 |
4∶6 | 25.9 | 19.0 |
5∶5 | 21.8 | 15.3 |
6∶4 | 18.6 | 13.4 |
7∶3 | 14.2 | 10.5 |
8∶2 | 11.1 | 10.1 |
9∶1 | 9.2 | 7.4 |
乳化剂∶烷烃 | 体系中水的质量分数% | |
---|---|---|
环己烷 | 正庚烷 | |
1∶9 | 7.6 | 3.6 |
2∶8 | 16.0 | 11.8 |
3∶7 | 19.8 | 17.5 |
4∶6 | 25.9 | 19.0 |
5∶5 | 21.8 | 15.3 |
6∶4 | 18.6 | 13.4 |
7∶3 | 14.2 | 10.5 |
8∶2 | 11.1 | 10.1 |
9∶1 | 9.2 | 7.4 |
试验号 | 因素 | 不透明度 /% | 白度(ISO)/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |||
1 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.4 | 82.7 |
2 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.8 | 83.9 |
3 | 3∶4 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.3 | 82.0 |
4 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.0 | 82.0 |
5 | 1∶4 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.2 | 82.6 |
6 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.6 | 82.9 |
7 | 1∶4 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.6 | 82.3 |
8 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.3 | 82.5 |
9 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 96.4 | 82.2 |
10 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.7 | 82.0 |
11 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶3 | 96.2 | 82.6 |
12 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 95.2 | 82.0 |
13 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.6 | 81.7 |
14 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.0 | 83.1 |
15 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.7 | 84.0 |
16 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 97.1 | 84.0 |
17 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.4 | 82.7 |
18 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶5 | 95.7 | 82.2 |
19 | 3∶4 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.6 | 82.1 |
20 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.8 | 82.5 |
21 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.3 | 81.7 |
22 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.7 | 81.7 |
23 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 96.4 | 82.9 |
24 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 95.7 | 81.9 |
25 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 95.0 | 81.8 |
26 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.7 | 84.0 |
27 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.7 | 82.0 |
28 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 95.6 | 82.1 |
29 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.9 | 84.0 |
试验号 | 因素 | 不透明度 /% | 白度(ISO)/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |||
1 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.4 | 82.7 |
2 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.8 | 83.9 |
3 | 3∶4 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.3 | 82.0 |
4 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.0 | 82.0 |
5 | 1∶4 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.2 | 82.6 |
6 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.6 | 82.9 |
7 | 1∶4 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.6 | 82.3 |
8 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.3 | 82.5 |
9 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 96.4 | 82.2 |
10 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.7 | 82.0 |
11 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶3 | 96.2 | 82.6 |
12 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 95.2 | 82.0 |
13 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.6 | 81.7 |
14 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.0 | 83.1 |
15 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.7 | 84.0 |
16 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 97.1 | 84.0 |
17 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 96.4 | 82.7 |
18 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶5 | 95.7 | 82.2 |
19 | 3∶4 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.6 | 82.1 |
20 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 1∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.8 | 82.5 |
21 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.3 | 81.7 |
22 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 2∶1 | 1∶3 | 95.7 | 81.7 |
23 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 96.4 | 82.9 |
24 | 1∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 95.7 | 81.9 |
25 | 3∶4 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶5 | 95.0 | 81.8 |
26 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.7 | 84.0 |
27 | 1∶2 | 3∶7 | 2∶1 | 1∶4 | 95.7 | 82.0 |
28 | 1∶2 | 5∶5 | 1∶2 | 1∶4 | 95.6 | 82.1 |
29 | 1∶2 | 4∶6 | 1∶1 | 1∶4 | 96.9 | 84.0 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方差 | F | P | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2=0.9942 | Adjusted R2=0.9883 | |||||
模型 | 7.6300 | 14 | 0.5452 | 170.25 | <0.0001 | 显著 |
A | 0.9185 | 1 | 0.9185 | 286.83 | <0.0001 | |
B | 0.0320 | 1 | 0.0320 | 10 | 0.0069 | |
C | 0.0675 | 1 | 0.0675 | 21.080 | 0.0004 | |
D | 0.0133 | 1 | 0.0133 | 4.1600 | 0.0606 | |
AB | 0.2116 | 1 | 0.2116 | 66.080 | <0.0001 | |
AC | 0.0100 | 1 | 0.0100 | 3.1200 | 0.099 | |
AD | 0.4900 | 1 | 0.4900 | 153.01 | <0.0001 | |
BC | 0.7225 | 1 | 0.7225 | 225.61 | <0.0001 | |
BD | 0.2500 | 1 | 0.2500 | 78.070 | <0.0001 | |
CD | 0.3600 | 1 | 0.3600 | 112.42 | <0.0001 | |
A² | 3.9500 | 1 | 3.9500 | 1234.96 | <0.0001 | |
B² | 0.4670 | 1 | 0.4670 | 145.84 | <0.0001 | |
C² | 1.0800 | 1 | 1.0800 | 337.73 | <0.0001 | |
D² | 0.6677 | 1 | 0.6677 | 208.49 | <0.0001 | |
残差 | 0.0448 | 14 | 0.0032 | |||
失拟值 | 0.0328 | 10 | 0.0033 | 1.0900 | 0.5074 | 不显著 |
纯误差 | 0.0200 | 4 | 0.0030 | |||
总变异 | 7.6800 | 28 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方差 | F | P | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2=0.9942 | Adjusted R2=0.9883 | |||||
模型 | 7.6300 | 14 | 0.5452 | 170.25 | <0.0001 | 显著 |
A | 0.9185 | 1 | 0.9185 | 286.83 | <0.0001 | |
B | 0.0320 | 1 | 0.0320 | 10 | 0.0069 | |
C | 0.0675 | 1 | 0.0675 | 21.080 | 0.0004 | |
D | 0.0133 | 1 | 0.0133 | 4.1600 | 0.0606 | |
AB | 0.2116 | 1 | 0.2116 | 66.080 | <0.0001 | |
AC | 0.0100 | 1 | 0.0100 | 3.1200 | 0.099 | |
AD | 0.4900 | 1 | 0.4900 | 153.01 | <0.0001 | |
BC | 0.7225 | 1 | 0.7225 | 225.61 | <0.0001 | |
BD | 0.2500 | 1 | 0.2500 | 78.070 | <0.0001 | |
CD | 0.3600 | 1 | 0.3600 | 112.42 | <0.0001 | |
A² | 3.9500 | 1 | 3.9500 | 1234.96 | <0.0001 | |
B² | 0.4670 | 1 | 0.4670 | 145.84 | <0.0001 | |
C² | 1.0800 | 1 | 1.0800 | 337.73 | <0.0001 | |
D² | 0.6677 | 1 | 0.6677 | 208.49 | <0.0001 | |
残差 | 0.0448 | 14 | 0.0032 | |||
失拟值 | 0.0328 | 10 | 0.0033 | 1.0900 | 0.5074 | 不显著 |
纯误差 | 0.0200 | 4 | 0.0030 | |||
总变异 | 7.6800 | 28 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方差 | F | P | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2=0.9942 | Adjusted R2=0.9858 | |||||
模型 | 16.100 | 14 | 1.1500 | 139.36 | < 0.0001 | 显著 |
A | 0.1633 | 1 | 0.1633 | 19.800 | 0.0005 | |
B | 0.0133 | 1 | 0.0133 | 1.6200 | 0.2243 | |
C | 0.0408 | 1 | 0.0408 | 4.9500 | 0.0431 | |
D | 0.4408 | 1 | 0.4408 | 53.430 | < 0.0001 | |
AB | 0.0400 | 1 | 0.0400 | 4.8500 | 0.0449 | |
AC | 0.0400 | 1 | 0.0400 | 4.8500 | 0.0449 | |
AD | 0.2500 | 1 | 0.2500 | 30.300 | < 0.0001 | |
BC | 0.7225 | 1 | 0.7225 | 87.580 | < 0.0001 | |
BD | 0.1225 | 1 | 0.1225 | 14.850 | 0.0018 | |
CD | 0.4900 | 1 | 0.4900 | 59.390 | < 0.0001 | |
A² | 8.9300 | 1 | 8.9300 | 1082.43 | < 0.0001 | |
B² | 2.1300 | 1 | 2.1300 | 258.450 | < 0.0001 | |
C² | 5.3800 | 1 | 5.3800 | 652.280 | < 0.0001 | |
D² | 4.0100 | 1 | 4.0100 | 485.530 | < 0.0001 | |
残差 | 0.1155 | 14 | 0.0083 | |||
失拟值 | 0.1075 | 10 | 0.0108 | 5.3800 | 0.0597 | 不显著 |
纯误差 | 0.0080 | 4 | 0.0020 | |||
总变异 | 16.210 | 28 |
变异来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方差 | F | P | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2=0.9942 | Adjusted R2=0.9858 | |||||
模型 | 16.100 | 14 | 1.1500 | 139.36 | < 0.0001 | 显著 |
A | 0.1633 | 1 | 0.1633 | 19.800 | 0.0005 | |
B | 0.0133 | 1 | 0.0133 | 1.6200 | 0.2243 | |
C | 0.0408 | 1 | 0.0408 | 4.9500 | 0.0431 | |
D | 0.4408 | 1 | 0.4408 | 53.430 | < 0.0001 | |
AB | 0.0400 | 1 | 0.0400 | 4.8500 | 0.0449 | |
AC | 0.0400 | 1 | 0.0400 | 4.8500 | 0.0449 | |
AD | 0.2500 | 1 | 0.2500 | 30.300 | < 0.0001 | |
BC | 0.7225 | 1 | 0.7225 | 87.580 | < 0.0001 | |
BD | 0.1225 | 1 | 0.1225 | 14.850 | 0.0018 | |
CD | 0.4900 | 1 | 0.4900 | 59.390 | < 0.0001 | |
A² | 8.9300 | 1 | 8.9300 | 1082.43 | < 0.0001 | |
B² | 2.1300 | 1 | 2.1300 | 258.450 | < 0.0001 | |
C² | 5.3800 | 1 | 5.3800 | 652.280 | < 0.0001 | |
D² | 4.0100 | 1 | 4.0100 | 485.530 | < 0.0001 | |
残差 | 0.1155 | 14 | 0.0083 | |||
失拟值 | 0.1075 | 10 | 0.0108 | 5.3800 | 0.0597 | 不显著 |
纯误差 | 0.0080 | 4 | 0.0020 | |||
总变异 | 16.210 | 28 |
指标 | TiO2 | 复合填料 | 滑石粉 |
---|---|---|---|
灰分/% | 19.6 | 20.9 | 20.2 |
不透明度/% | 98.3 | 97.0 | 94.3 |
白度(ISO)/% | 87.2 | 84.5 | 80.6 |
匀度 | 92 | 90 | 87 |
抗张指数/N·m·g-1 | 33.2 | 36.2 | 32.8 |
耐破指数/kPa·m2·g-1 | 2.42 | 2.96 | 2.36 |
透气度/μm·(Pa·s)-1 | 5.73 | 6.95 | 4.59 |
毛细吸液高度/mm·(10min)-1 | 24 | 27 | 22 |
指标 | TiO2 | 复合填料 | 滑石粉 |
---|---|---|---|
灰分/% | 19.6 | 20.9 | 20.2 |
不透明度/% | 98.3 | 97.0 | 94.3 |
白度(ISO)/% | 87.2 | 84.5 | 80.6 |
匀度 | 92 | 90 | 87 |
抗张指数/N·m·g-1 | 33.2 | 36.2 | 32.8 |
耐破指数/kPa·m2·g-1 | 2.42 | 2.96 | 2.36 |
透气度/μm·(Pa·s)-1 | 5.73 | 6.95 | 4.59 |
毛细吸液高度/mm·(10min)-1 | 24 | 27 | 22 |
1 | 彭庆华. 合成超细硅酸铝在装饰原纸生产中的应用[J]. 中华纸业, 2022, 43(16): 13-18. |
PENG Qinghua. Application of synthetic ultrafine aluminum silicate in decorative base paper production[J]. China Pulp & Paper Industry, 2022, 43(16): 13-18. | |
2 | 苏艳群, 张瑞娟, 刘金刚, 等. 煅烧土/纳米纤维素协同二氧化钛加填对装饰原纸性能的影响[J]. 中国造纸, 2022, 41(12): 36-42. |
SU Yanqun, ZHANG Ruijuan, LIU Jingang, et al. Effects of calcined clay/nanocelluose synergistic titanium dioxide filling on the properties of decorative base paper[J]. China Pulp & Paper, 2022, 41(12): 36-42. | |
3 | 陈雪峰, 许跃, 刘文, 等. 复合钛白粉性能及在装饰原纸中应用的研究[J]. 中国造纸, 2015, 34(12): 1-6. |
CHEN Xuefeng, XU Yue, LIU Wen, et al. Study on the properties of composite titanium dioxide and its application in decorative base paper[J]. China Pulp & Paper, 2015, 34(12): 1-6. | |
4 | 李晓琪. 水溶性高分子乳液改性二氧化钛/无机复合物及其在造纸工业中的应用[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020. |
LI Xiaoqi. Water-soluble polymer emulsion modified TiO2/inorganic composite and its application in paper industry[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020. | |
5 | 桂正涛, 王文利, 李建康, 等. 二氧化钛的制备、改性及其应用研究[J]. 现代盐化工, 2021, 48(5): 12-14, 19. |
GUI Zhengtao, WANG Wenli, LI Jiankang, et al. Study on preparation, modification and application of titanium dioxide[J]. Modern Salt and Chemical Industry, 2021, 48(5): 12-14, 19. | |
6 | HOU Xifeng, ZHANG Yihe, DING Hao, et al. Environmentally friendly wollastonite@TiO2 composite particles prepared by a mechano-chemical method[J]. Particuology, 2018, 40: 105-112. |
7 | LIN Hai, DONG Yingbo, JIANG Leyong. Preparation of calcium carbonate particles coated with titanium dioxide[J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2009, 16(5): 592-597. |
8 | LAYSANDRA Livy, SARI Meri Winda Masnona Kartika, SOETAREDJO Felycia Edi, et al. Adsorption and photocatalytic performance of bentonite-titanium dioxide composites for methylene blue and rhodamine B decoloration[J]. Heliyon, 2018, 3(12): e00488. |
9 | TAHER T, WULANDARI A, MOHADI R, et al. TiO2/kaolin composite as low-cost adsorbent for procion red removal from aqueous solution: Kinetics, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies[J]. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia, 2019, 33(3): 437. |
10 | ZHANG Guangxin, SUN Zhiming, DUAN Yongwei, et al. Synthesis of nano-TiO2/diatomite composite and its photocatalytic degradation of gaseous formaldehyde[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 412: 105-112. |
11 | 张妍, 王慧乐, 赵会芳, 等. 二氧化钛复合填料的制备及在装饰原纸中的应用研究[J]. 中国造纸, 2022, 41(12): 43-50. |
ZHANG Yan, WANG Huile, ZHAO Huifang, et al. Preparation of titanium dioxide/talc composite filler and its application in decorative base paper[J]. China Pulp & Paper, 2022, 41(12): 43-50. | |
12 | 黄骏. 复合钛白粉在涂料中的应用研究[J]. 上海染料, 2019, 47(3): 1-5. |
HUANG Jun. Research on application of complex titanium dioxide on coatings[J]. Shanghai Dyestuffs, 2019, 47(3): 1-5. | |
13 | 钱红梅, 李燕, 郝成伟. 高岭土负载氧化锌/氧化钛制备光催化功能材料的研究[J]. 中国非金属矿工业导刊, 2010(2): 18-21. |
QIAN Hongmei, LI Yan, HAO Chengwei. Research on preparation of kaolin ZnO/TiO2 load photocatalytic functional materials[J]. China Non-Metallic Minerals Industry, 2010(2): 18-21. | |
14 | ZHANG Yalei, GAN Huihui, ZHANG Gaoke. A novel mixed-phase TiO2/kaolinite composites and their photocatalytic activity for degradation of organic contaminants[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 172(2/3): 936-943. |
15 | GAO Qiang, WU Xiaomei, XIA Zhiwei, et al. Coating mechanism and near-infrared reflectance property of hollow fly ash bead/TiO2 composite pigment[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 305: 433-439. |
16 | 侯喜锋, 丁浩, 杜高翔, 等. 机械力化学法制备绢云母/TiO2复合颗粒材料的机理研究及表征[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013, 39(9): 1413-1419. |
HOU Xifeng, DING Hao, DU Gaoxiang, et al. Preparation of sericite/TiO2 composite particle material via mechno-chemistry and its characterization[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2013, 39(9): 1413-1419. | |
17 | 肖艳红. Pickering乳液聚合法制备聚丙烯酸酯/纳米二氧化硅复合乳液及其涂料应用[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018. |
XIAO Yanhong. Preparation of polyacrylate/nano silica composite emulsion by Pickering emulsion polymerization and its application in coatings[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2018. | |
18 | 薛伟. 微乳液法制备超微细包覆型催化剂及其催化苯酚氧化羰基化反应研究[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2005. |
XUE Wei. Preparation of ultrafine coated catalyst by microemulsion method and its catalytic effect on oxidative carbonylation of phenol[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2005. | |
19 | 马超平. 十二烷基三甲基溴化铵/醇/油/水体系微乳化作用研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2012. |
MA Chaoping. Microemulsification in dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide/alcohols/oils/water systems[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2012. | |
20 | LUO Chenglin, YU Bang, QI Qi, et al. Construction of magnetic-fluorescent bifunctional nanoparticles via miniemulsion polymerization for cell imaging[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2021, 613: 126062. |
21 | BERA Achinta, MANDAL Ajay, KUMAR T. Physicochemical characterization of anionic and cationic microemulsions: Water solubilization, particle size distribution, surface tension, and structural parameters[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2014, 59(8): 2490-2498. |
22 | KUANG Jian, GAO Jian, XIE Shaoxia, et al. Phase behaviors and curcumin encapsulation performance of Gemini surfactant microemulsion[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020, 315: 113786. |
23 | PAKKANG Nutthira, URAKI Yasumitsu, KODA Keiichi, et al. Preparation of water-in-oil microemulsion from the mixtures of castor oil and sunflower oil as makeup remover[J]. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 2018, 21(6): 809-816. |
24 | 周琴, 唐茂, 刘佳伟, 等. 铜掺杂锐钛矿型二氧化钛光催化性能研究[J]. 山东化工, 2021, 50(17): 22-23, 25. |
ZHOU Qin, TANG Mao, LIU Jiawei, et al. The research on the photocatalytic performance of copper-doped anatase type titanium dioxide[J]. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2021, 50(17): 22-23, 25. | |
25 | 周伟, 郭宪英, 刘妍妍. 锐钛型纳米TiO2表面疏水化改性研究[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2010, 18(11): 25-30. |
ZHOU Wei, GUO Xianying, LIU Yanyan. Study on surface drain modification of the nanosized TiO2 [J]. Fine and Specialty Chemicals, 2010, 18(11): 25-30. |
[1] | LI Binde, WANG Bixia, YUAN Wenlong, DANG Xiao’e, MA Hongzhou. Preparation of battery-grade iron phosphate using the by-product ferrous sulfate of titanium dioxide [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(8): 4523-4533. |
[2] | HU Feiyan, PENG Jiahuan, LI Heng, XU Zhaohua, SUN Ning. Preparation and sodium storage application of one-dimensional porous TiO2@carbon nanofibers composite [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(4): 1934-1943. |
[3] | HUANG Zhiguo, SUN Zhigao. Preparation and properties of nano phase change microcapsules for heat storage [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(11): 5842-5851. |
[4] | KONG Qian, SUN Jinchao, GE Jiaqi, ZHANG Peng, MA Yanlong, LIU Baijun. Effect of precipitant on the hydrocracking performance of NiW/TiO2-ASA catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(1): 265-271. |
[5] | CUI Weiyi, DING Guomin, TAN Naidi. Research progress on titanium dioxide based catalysts for catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(12): 6310-6318. |
[6] | HU Nan, CHEN Lin, LI Huizhen, ZHANG Siyao, ZHANG Zhijun. Enrichment and recovery of engineered nanoparticle using flotation with intensified foam drainage [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(1): 485-492. |
[7] | SUN Tong, XU Dongdong, SONG Minhang, JIN Xing, HUANG Yun. Research progress of the burners in synthesis of TiO2 by combustion method [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(1): 17-29. |
[8] | ZHANG Xuan, ZHENG Lijun. Process of single phase photocatalysts for hydrogen production [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(S1): 215-222. |
[9] | Caiyun JIANG, Ting WU, Haifei ZHOU, Yuping WANG. Preparation and property of a molecular imprinted material with photocatalytic activity controlled by temperature and pH [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(1): 305-312. |
[10] | Lu DONG, Yaji HUANG, Shouyi DING, Haoqiang CHENG, Sheng WANG, Yufeng DUAN. Experimental on simultaneous NO and mercury removal over manganese modified Ti-Al composite catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(1): 234-241. |
[11] | Lianzhen LI,Linlin LI,Yong GUAN,Haitao LIU. Properies of polyurethane damping material with different inorganic filler [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(08): 3795-3800. |
[12] | Qiaoling ZHANG, Zhao QIN, Youzhi LIU, Yanting SHI, Jingwen ZHANG, Guangping ZENG. Adsorption kinetics and photocatalytic activity of grapheneoxide-TiO2 composites for three dyes [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(06): 2870-2879. |
[13] | Haixia HE, Yameng WAN, Huanzhe CHEN, Kunpeng YANG, Tao LI, Baozeng REN. Process optimization of preparation of manganese carbonate from manganese-containing titanium dioxide wastewater by response surface methodology [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(06): 2649-2657. |
[14] | ZHANG Chongmiao, WEN Yinmei, GAO Min, GAO Qian. Comparative study on the antibacterial properties of TiO2, ZnO and TiO2/ZnO oxide powders [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(11): 4343-4348. |
[15] | MENG Rongqian, LI Qiaoling, JIN Riya. Progress of titanium dioxide nanostructures as carriers in sustained and controlled drug-release delivery system [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(10): 3980-3987. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号 Copyright © Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, All Rights Reserved. E-mail: hgjz@cip.com.cn Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd |