热集成变压精馏乙二醇脱水系统的控制方案优化

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0551

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对热集成变压精馏乙二醇脱水再生系统存在的操作不稳定等问题，基于Aspen Plus和Aspen Dynamics软件，在全流程稳态模拟的基础上，对其进行了动态模拟及控制方案优化。设计了改进型控制方案CS2，与常规控制方案CS1相比，两个塔的操作压力的控制回路是相互独立的，高压塔的塔釜液位由再沸器的导热油流量控制，低压塔的塔釜温度由塔釜的采出流量控制，再分别对进料流量和进料组成中乙二醇含量的阶跃变动的动态响应特性进行分析。结果表明，控制方案CS1基本能够抵抗进料流量和进料组成扰动对系统的影响，但相关控制响应会出现一定的滞后性，难以保证产品满足要求。改进的控制方案CS2对相同的进料流量和进料组成扰动有更好的抵抗能力，控制性能显著提高，保证乙二醇的质量分数不低88%，趋于稳定时产品质量变化幅度小于2%，且该方案在实际应用中涉及到的操作相对简单。本文为相关双塔耦合过程的稳定控制提供了一种新思路，对于双塔耦合在其他体系的工程应用也有借鉴作用。

关键词: 热集成变压精馏, 乙二醇脱水, 稳态模拟, 动态模拟, 过程控制

Abstract:

For the problem of unstable operation in the regeneration of glycol-water separation by heat-integrated pressure swing distillation, based on Aspen Plus and Aspen Dynamics software, dynamic simulation and control scheme were studied and optimized after steady-state simulation and optimization. The control scheme CS2 were designed. Compared with the conventional control scheme CS1, the control loop of operation pressure of two columns is independent, and the liquid level of higher pressure column and the temperature of lower pressure column is controlled by the flow of heat-transfer oil and the bottom production flow of column respectively. The dynamic response characteristics were analyzed by respectively the disturbance to the feed rate and the disturbance to the ethylene glycol content in the feed. The results show that the control scheme CS1 can basically resist the influence of the disturbance of feed rate and feed composition in the system, but the corresponding control response will appear certain hysteresis and it is difficult to guarantee product quality. In comparison, the control scheme CS2 has better resistance against the same feed rate and feed composition disturbance, and improves the control performance significantly. The mass fraction of ethylene glycol is not less than 88% in fluctuation. The variation of product quality is less than 2% compared with that before disturbance, and the scheme is relatively simple in practical application. This study provides a new idea for the stable control of the heat-integrated pressure swing distillation, and has great reference significance in the heat-integrated pressure swing distillation applied in other system.

Key words: heat-integrated pressure swing distillation, glycol-water separation, steady-state simulation, dynamic simulation, process control scheme

中图分类号:

TQ028.3

于斌, 刘春晖, 郑广强, 曲广, 魏永泰, 王红星. 热集成变压精馏乙二醇脱水系统的控制方案优化[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 56-63.

YU Bin, LIU Chunhui, ZHENG Guangqiang, QU Guang, WEI Yongtai, WANG Hongxing. Optimization of control of glycol-water separation by heat-integrated pressure swing distillation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(S2): 56-63.

图/表 9

图1 MEG热集成变压精馏脱水过程模拟及主要参数

表1 稳态模拟详细参数

设备	C01	C02
理论板数	7	9
进料位置	塔釜进料	塔釜进料
回流/进料	0.0386	0.06554
回流量/kg · h^-1	504	606
塔顶压力（A）/kPa	125	11
塔顶温度/℃	106	47.6
塔釜温度/℃	110.5	81.5
再沸器负荷/Gcal · h^-1	2.91	1.944
内径/mm	1000	1500
回流罐体积/m³	5^①
再沸器换热面积/m²/型式	300/降膜	500/降膜

图2 C01塔和C02塔全塔温度分布曲线

图3 控制方案CS1C01—一级脱水塔，E01—一级脱水塔再沸器，E02—一级进料预热器，E03—二级进料预热器，C02—二级脱水塔，E04—二级脱水塔再沸器，E05—二级脱水塔冷凝器，E06—二级脱水塔塔釜冷却器，V01—缓冲罐，V02—一级闪蒸罐，V03—二级闪蒸罐

图4 进料量改变后的动态响应曲线

图5 进料组成改变后的动态响应曲线

图6 控制方案CS2

图7 进料量改变后的动态响应曲线

图8 进料组成改变后的动态响应曲线

参考文献 18

1	傅小荣, 赵婵, 田园, 等. 海洋工程产业发展现状及展望[J]. 国际石油经济, 2019, 27(9): 61-66.
	FU Xiaorong, ZHAO Chan, TIAN Yuan, et al. The status quo and prospect of the offshore engineering industry[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2019, 27(9): 61-66.
2	张鹏程. 油气行业八项关键技术进展[J]. 世界石油工业, 2019, 26(3):59-64.
	ZHANG Pengcheng. Eight key technologies improvement of oil and gas industry[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2019, 26(3):59-64.
3	张长智, 万祥, 胡茂宏. 深水天然气田乙二醇系统结垢和腐蚀问题研究[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2011, 25(3): 24-27.
	ZHANG Changzhi, WAN Xiang, HU Maohong. Research on MEG system scaling and corrosion problems for deep water gas field[J]. Total Corrosion Control, 2011, 25(3): 24-27.
4	曹莉, 齐志彬, 汪杨, 等. 海上气田乙二醇回收系统的优化研究[J]. 广州化工, 2014, 42(22): 159-161.
	CAO Li, QI Zhibin, WANG Yang, et al. Research of offshore gas field of ethylene glycol recovery system optimization[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2014, 42(22): 159-161.
5	赵方生, 张苏飞. 某海上气田乙二醇再生方案的优化选择[J]. 石油和化工设备, 2018, 21(5): 72-74, 77.
	ZHAO Fangsheng, ZHANG Sufei. Optimization of glycol regeneration scheme for a certain offshore gas field[J]. Petro & Chemical Equipment, 2018, 21(5): 72-74, 77.
6	郝蕴, 周晓红. 南海深水气田群番禺34-1CEP平台乙二醇再生脱盐系统工艺设计[J]. 中国海上油气, 2014, 26(4): 91-95.
	HAO Yun, ZHOU Xiaohong. Process design of glycol regeneration reclamation unit for PY 34-1 CEP platform in deep water gas fields group of the South China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2014, 26(4): 91-95.
7	任顺顺, 张少春, 孙建宇, 等. 深水气田新型乙二醇再生工艺方法[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(2): 208-210.
	REN Shunshun, ZHANG Shaochun, SUN Jianyu, et al. A new process of MEG regeneration in deep-water gasfield[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(2): 208-210.
8	杨勇, 吴海涛, 宗俊斌, 等. 乙二醇再生系统工艺创新性改造[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2020, 14(2): 46-51, 92.
	YANG Yong, WU Haitao, ZONG Junbin, et al. Technologically innovative transformation of MEG recovery system[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2020, 14(2): 46-51, 92.
9	高晓新, 王天宇, 陈梦圆, 等. 常规变压精馏和变压热集成精馏分离乙腈和水的模拟[J]. 现代化工, 2020, 40(5): 219-222, 226.
	GAO Xiaoxin, WANG Tianyu, CHEN Mengyuan, et al. Simulation for separation of acetonitrile-water by conventional pressure-swing distillation and pressure-swing heat integrating distillation[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2020, 40(5): 219-222, 226.
10	顾晓, 程建民. 双效变压精馏节能技术的应用[J]. 上海化工, 2001(7): 17-19.
	GU Xiao, CHENG Jianmin. Application of dual-effect variable pressure rectification energy-saving technology[J]. Shanghai Chemical Industry, 2001(7): 17-19.
11	唐文献, 赵磊, 李华, 等. 乙二醇再生与回收系统的预处理及脱水再生工艺参数优选[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(2): 142-149.
	TANG Wenxian, ZHAO Lei, LI HUA, et al. Pretreatment of glycol regeneration and recovery system as well as the parameters optimization of dehydration regeneration process [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(2): 142-149.
12	杨勇, 宗俊斌, 赵迎涛, 等. 乙二醇回收装置中脱水单元的操作优化[J]. 辽宁化工, 2017, 46(5): 513-515.
	YANG Yong, ZONG Junbin, ZHAO Yingtao, et al. Operation optimization of dehydration process in mono-ethylene glycol recovery unit[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2017, 46(5): 513-515.
13	张陆军, 李原, 王文涛, 等. 乙二醇再生与回收的再生工艺参数优化[J]. 云南化工, 2020, 47(7): 114-116.
	ZHANG Lujun, LI Yuan, WANG Wentao, et al. Optimization of regeneration process parameters for ethylene glycol regeneration and recovery[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2020, 47(7): 114-116.
14	郝冬青, 沙作良, 王彦飞, 等. 低温多效蒸发海水淡化系统的工艺模拟与分析[J]. 盐业与化工, 2011, 40(3): 37-39.
	HAO Dongqing, SHA Zuoliang, WANG Yanfei, et al. Establish LT- MED simulation system with Aspen Plus[J]. Journal of Salt and Chemical Industry. 2011, 40(3): 37-39.
15	胡建清, 伍联营. 多效蒸发海水淡化系统的动态模拟[J]. 计算机与应用化学, 2014, 31(12): 1423-1427.
	HU Jianqing, WU Lianying. Dynamic simulation of MED seawater desalination system[J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2014, 31(12): 1423-1427.
16	LUYBEN W L. Distillation design and control using Aspen‍™ simulation[M]. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,2006: 161-197.
17	LUYBEN W L. Use of mass or molar reflux-to-feed ratios in distillation single-end control structures[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52: 15883-15895．
18	张治山, 王超, 张青军, 等. 基于Aspen Dynamics超精馏塔的动态模拟与控制[J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(4): 190-193.
	ZHANG Zhishan, WANG Chao, ZHANG Qingjun, et al. Dynamic simulation and control of superfractionator based on Aspen Dynamics[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(4): 190-193.

[1]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[2]	李国友, 张新魁, 才士文, 贾曜宇, 宁泽. 基于改进KFDA与DE优化SOM的故障诊断模型及其化工过程诊断[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1793-1801.
[3]	邵冠瑛, 贺高红, 姜晓滨. 膜辅助添加晶种的过硫酸铵冷却结晶在线监测与过程调控[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6226-6234.
[4]	邹志云, 朱文超, 刘英莉, 孟磊, 郭宁, 于蒙. 小型特种精细化工过程自动化和信息化研究发展趋势探讨[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 269-275.
[5]	章骅,杨瑞,邵立明,何品晶. 二恶英生成抑制剂及其阻滞机理研究现状与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(4): 1485-1492.
[6]	陆佳伟, 孔倩, 汤吉海, 张竹修, 崔咪芬, 陈献, 乔旭. “背包式”反应精馏集成过程研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 4940-4953.
[7]	储震宇, 金万勤. 新型纳米传感薄膜材料在发酵组分检测中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(01): 382-393.
[8]	胡铭菲, 许鋆, 罗雄麟. 带经济成本函数的区间预测控制[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(06): 2060-2066.
[9]	李云, 高东泽, 焦玉骁, 张博惠, 许贺菊, 赵蔚, 于威, 路万兵, 李晓苇. 纳米晶硅多层薄膜的低温调控及其发光特性[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(04): 1516-1521.
[10]	周广文, 杨霞, 郑世清. 智能化风险及可操作性（HAZOP）分析系统研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(03): 815-821.
[11]	罗雄麟, 周衍彤. 预测控制的哲学思想分析及其新架构的提出[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(03): 783-790.
[12]	罗阿群, 刘少光, 林文松, 谷东亮, 陈成武. 二英生成机理及减排方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(03): 910-916.
[13]	周超, 王凡, 贺文智, 李光明. 均相碱催化法生物柴油副产甘油精制的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(02): 463-471.
[14]	罗雄麟, 叶松涛, 许锋, 许鋆. 串级控制对过程预测控制的影响分析与对策[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(02): 417-424.
[15]	李洪, 孟莹, 李鑫钢, 高鑫. 乙酸戊酯酯化反应精馏过程系统控制模拟及分析[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(12): 4165-4171.