高温固体氧化物电解制氢模拟研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1523

化工进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 126-141.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1523

高温固体氧化物电解制氢模拟研究进展

张玉魁¹^,²(), 张晨佳¹^,²^,³, 孙振新¹^,², 杜庶铭¹^,², 徐冬¹^,², 曲宗凯¹^,², 陈保卫⁴

^1.国电新能源技术研究院有限公司，北京 102209
^2.发电系统功能材料北京市重点实验室，北京 102209
^3.华北电力大学核科学与工程学院，北京 102206
^4.国家能源投资集团有限责任公司，北京 100011

收稿日期:2020-08-03 修回日期:2020-12-19 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-11-09
通讯作者: 张玉魁
作者简介:张玉魁（1989—），男，博士，研究方向为氢能与储能技术。E-mail：zhyk2036@sina.cn。
基金资助:
北京市科技计划(Z191100004619009)

Review on modeling and simulation of high temperature solid oxide electrolysis for hydrogen production

ZHANG Yukui¹^,²(), ZHANG Chenjia¹^,²^,³, SUN Zhenxin¹^,², DU Shuming¹^,², XU Dong¹^,², QU Zongkai¹^,², CHEN Baowei⁴

^1.Guodian New Energy Technology Research Institute Co. , Ltd. , Beijing 102209, China
^2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Power Generation System Functional Material, Beijing 102209, China
^3.School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
^4.China Energy Corporation Group Co. , Ltd. , Beijing 100011, China

Received:2020-08-03 Revised:2020-12-19 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-11-09
Contact: ZHANG Yukui

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

固体氧化物电解池（solid oxide electrolysis cell, SOEC）是一种先进的电化学能量转化装置，具有高效、简单、灵活、环境友好等特点，是目前国际能源领域的研究热点。但SOEC在高温、密闭的复杂环境下运行，实验研究代价高昂，有些甚至无法完成。相对来说，数值模拟具有成本低、易操作的显著优势。近年来，有关SOEC电解制氢的模拟研究取得了较大进展。本文在简要介绍SOEC工作原理的基础上，从电化学、热力学和流体动力学等方面阐述了模拟基础理论，重点从稳态与瞬态及系统、宏观与微观的角度总结了高温电解制氢模拟技术的研究进展，进而指出当前研究存在的局限性。SOEC电解制氢模拟还需从数学模型验证、适用性分析、系统非设计工况和动态运行特性等方面加强研究工作。随着技术的不断发展与完善，数值模拟必将为SOEC技术商业化提供关键支撑。

关键词: 再生能源, 固体氧化物电解池, 电解, 制氢, 模拟

Abstract:

The solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) is an advanced electrochemical energy conversion device characterized by high efficiency, simplicity, high flexibility, and environmental friendliness. Thus, it has been a research hotspot in the energy field internationally. However, the SOEC operates in a complex environment (high temperature, closed, etc.), and experimental research is expensive, some cannot even be completed. Comparatively, numerical simulation has the advantages of low cost and easy operation. In recent years, the modelling and simulation of SOEC for hydrogen production has made great progress. The working principle of SOEC were briefly introduced first. The fundamental theories i.e., electrochemistry, thermodynamics, and fluid dynamics, were then elaborated. The progress in simulation technology were summarized from the perspectives of steady and transient state, system, macro-and micro-level. The limitations of current research were also pointed out to provide useful reference for further development of the technology. More research work should be emphasized on model verification, applicability analysis, non-design working and dynamic operating characteristics. With the continuous improvement of simulation technique, it will provide significant support for the commercialization of SOEC technology.

Key words: renewable energy, SOEC, electrolysis, hydrogen production, simulation

中图分类号:

TK91

张玉魁, 张晨佳, 孙振新, 杜庶铭, 徐冬, 曲宗凯, 陈保卫. 高温固体氧化物电解制氢模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 126-141.

ZHANG Yukui, ZHANG Chenjia, SUN Zhenxin, DU Shuming, XU Dong, QU Zongkai, CHEN Baowei. Review on modeling and simulation of high temperature solid oxide electrolysis for hydrogen production[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(S1): 126-141.

图/表 5

参考文献 88

1	BP P. L.C. BP statistical review of world energy 2019[R]. BP P.L.C., 2019.
2	国家统计局能源司. 中国能源统计年鉴2018[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019: 34-54.
	Energy Department of China Statistics Bureau. China energy statistical yearbook 2018[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House, 2019:34-54.
3	白建华, 辛颂旭, 刘俊, 等. 中国实现高比例可再生能源发展路径研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2015, 35(14): 3699-3705.
	BAI Jianhua, XIN Songxu, LIU Jun, et al. Roadmap of realizing the high penetration renewable energy in China[J]. Proceeding of the CSEE, 2015, 35(14):3699-3705.
4	SAMAVATI M, SANTARELLI M, MARTIN A, et al. Thermodynamic and economy analysis of solid oxide electrolyser system for syngas production[J]. Energy, 2017, 122: 37-49.
5	牟树君, 林今, 邢学韬, 等. 高温固体氧化物电解水制氢储能技术及应用展望[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(10): 3385-3391.
	MU Shujun, LIN Jin, XING Xuetao, et al. Technology and application prospect of high-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(10):3385-3391.
6	STAFFELL I, SCAMMAN D, VELAZQUEZ Abad A, et al. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12: 463-491.
7	刘明义, 于波, 徐景明. 固体氧化物电解水制氢系统效率[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 49(6): 852-855.
	LIU Mingyi, YU Bo, XU Jingming. Efficiency of solid oxide water electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 49(6):852-855.
8	邢学韬, 林今, 宋永华, 等. 基于高温电解的大规模电力储能技术[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2018, 1(3): 303-312.
24	MA Zheng, LIU Chao, PU Jiangge, et al. Development of cathode materials in solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Journal of Ceramics, 2019, 40(5): 565-573.
25	陈婷, 王绍荣. 固体氧化物电解池电解水研究综述[J]. 陶瓷学报, 2014, 35(1): 1-6.
8	XING Xuetao, LIN Jin, SONG Yonghua, et al. Large scale energy storage technology based on high-temperature electrolysis[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 2018, 1(3): 303-312.
9	JENSEN S H, SUN X, EBBESEN S D, et al. Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production using pressurized solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(18): 9544-9549.
10	STOOTS C M, O’BRIEN J E, CONDIE K G, et al. High-temperature electrolysis for large-scale hydrogen production from nuclear energy--experimental investigations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(10): 4861-4870.
11	LI Q, ZHENG Y, GUAN W, et al. Achieving high-efficiency hydrogen production using planar solid-oxide electrolysis stacks[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(21): 10833-10842.
12	SCHEFOLD J, BRISSE A, POEPKE H. Long-term steam electrolysis with electrolyte-supported solid oxide cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 179: 161-168.
13	ZHANG X, O’BRIEN J E, TAO G, et al. Experimental design, operation, and results of a 4kW high temperature steam electrolysis experiment[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 297: 90-97.
14	RIEDEL M, HEDDRICH M P, FRIEDRICH K A. Analysis of pressurized operation of 10 layer solid oxide electrolysis stacks[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(10): 4570-4581.
15	刘同乐, 王诚, 付志强, 等. LSCF-GDC氧电极固体氧化物电堆高温蒸汽电解制氢性能研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2016, 30(3):575-581.
	LIU Tongle, WANG Cheng, FU Zhiqiang, et al. Performance of solid oxide electrolysis stack with LSCF-GDC oxygen electrodes in hydrogen production from high temperature steam[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2016, 30(3): 575-581.
16	霍海波, 朱新坚, 曹广益. SOFC建模与控制策略的研究现状与发展[J]. 电源技术, 2007, 31(10): 833-836.
	HUO Haibo, ZHU Xinjian, CAO Guangyi. Research status and development of modeling and controlling for SOFC[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 31(10): 833-836.
17	STEMPIEN J P, SUN Q, CHAN S H. Solid oxide electrolyzer cell modeling: a review[J]. Journal of Power Technologies, 2013, 93(4):216-246.
18	HAJIMOLANA S A, HUSSAIN M A, DAUD W M A W, et al. Mathematical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(4): 1893-1917.
19	YU B, ZHANG W, CHEN J, et al. Advance in highly efficient hydrogen production by high temperature steam electrolysis[J]. Science in China Series B: Chemistry, 2008, 51(4): 289-304.
20	HERRING J S, O’BRIEN J E, STOOTS C M, et al. Progress in high-temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production using planar SOFC technology[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(4):440-450.
21	NI M, LEUNG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. Technological development of hydrogen production by solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC)[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(9): 2337-2354.
22	LAGUNA-BERCERO M A. Recent advances in high temperature electrolysis using solid oxide fuel cells: a review[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 203: 4-16.
23	SHI Y, LUO Y, LI W, et al. Handbook of clean energy systems[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2015: 1-19
25	CHEN Ting, WANG Shaorong. Water electrolysis using SOECs: a review[J]. Journal of Ceramics, 2014, 35(1): 1-6.
26	赵晨欢, 张文强, 于波, 等. 固体氧化物电解池[J]. 化学进展, 2016, 28(8): 1265-1288.
	ZHAO Chenhuan, ZHANG Wenqiang, YU Bo, et al. Solid oxide electrolyzer cells[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2016, 28(8): 1265-1288.
27	张文强, 于波, 陈靖, 等. 高温固体氧化物电解水制氢技术[J]. 化学进展, 2008, 20(5): 778-787.
	ZHANG Wenqiang, YU Bo, CHEN Jing, et al. Hydrogen production through solid oxide electrolysis at elevated temperatures[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2008, 20(5): 778-787.
28	ELLIS M W, GUNES M B, THOMOPKINS D, et al. Status of fuel cell systems for combined heat and power applications in buildings[J]. Ashrae Transactions, 2002, 108(1): 1032-1044.
29	MENON V, JANARDHANAN V M, DEUTSCHMANN O. A mathematical model to analyze solid oxide electrolyzer cells (SOECs) for hydrogen production[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 110:83-93.
30	GOPALAN S, MOSLEH M, HARTVIGSEN J J, et al. Analysis of self-sustaining recuperative solid oxide electrolysis systems[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 185(2): 1328-1333.
31	NI M, LENUG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by solid oxide steam electrolyzer plant[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(18): 4648-4660.
32	ALZAHRANI A A, DINCER I. Thermodynamic and electrochemical analyses of a solid oxide electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 44(33): 21404-21413.
33	ALZAHRANI A A, DINCER I. Modeling and performance optimization of a solid oxide electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 225: 471-485.
34	MOTTAGHIZADEH P, SANTHANAM S, HEDDRICH M P, et al. Process modeling of a reversible solid oxide cell (r-SOC) energy storage system utilizing commercially available SOC reactor[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 142: 477-493.
35	BUTTLER A, KOLTUN R, WOLF R, et al. A detailed techno-economic analysis of heat integration in high temperature electrolysis for efficient hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(1): 38-50.
36	ZHANG H, SU S, CHEN X, et al. Configuration design and performance optimum analysis of a solar-driven high temperature steam electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(11): 4298-4307.
37	KOUMI NGOH S, AYINA OHANDJA L M, KEMAJOU A, et al. Design and simulation of hybrid solar high-temperature hydrogen production system using both solar photovoltaic and thermal energy[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2014, 7: 279-293.
38	ALZAHRANI A A, DINCER I. Design and analysis of a solar tower based integrated system using high temperature electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 8042-8056.
24	马征, 刘超, 蒲江戈, 等. 固体氧化物电解池阴极材料的发展现状[J]. 陶瓷学报, 2019, 40(5): 565-573.
39	SANZ-BERMEJO J, MUNOZ-ANTON J, GONZALEZ-AGUILAR J, et al. Optimal integration of a solid-oxide electrolyser cell into a direct steam generation solar tower plant for zero-emission hydrogen production[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 131: 238-247.
40	LIU M, YU B, XU J, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of the efficiency of high-temperature steam electrolysis system for hydrogen production[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 177(2): 493-499.
41	SHIN Y, PARK W, CHANG J, et al. Evaluation of the high temperature electrolysis of steam to produce hydrogen[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(10/11): 1486-1491.
42	O’BRIEN J E. Thermodynamic considerations from thermal water splitting process and high temperature electrolysis[C]//2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Boston, 2008.
43	O’BRIEN J E, MCKELLAR M G, HARVEGO E A, et al. High-temperature electrolysis for large-scale hydrogen and syngas production from nuclear energy--summary of system simulation and economic analyses[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(10):4808-4819.
44	HARVEGO E A, MCKELLAR M G, SOHAL M S, et al. Economic analysis of a nuclear reactor powered high-temperature electrolysis hydrogen production plant[C]//Energy Sustainability 2008. United States, 2008.
45	MANAGE M N, SORENSEN E, SIMONS S, et al. A modelling approach to assessing the feasibility of the integration of power stations with steam electrolysers[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2014, 92(10): 1988-2005.
46	SIGUVINSSON J, MANSILLA C, LOVERA P, et al. Can high temperature steam electrolysis function with geothermal heat?‍[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1174-1182.
47	PERDIKARIS N, PANOPOULOS K D, HOFMANN P, et al. Design and exergetic analysis of a novel carbon free tri-generation system for hydrogen, power and heat production from natural gas, based on combined solid oxide fuel and electrolyser cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(6): 2446-2456.
48	SPACIL H S, TEDMON C S. Electrochemical dissociation of water vapor in solid oxide electrolyte cells[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1969, 116(12): 1618-1627.
49	NI M, LENUG M, LEUNG D. An electrochemical model of a solid oxide steam electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2006, 29(5): 636-642.
50	NI M, LEUNG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. Parametric study of solid oxide steam electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13): 2305-2313.
51	IM-ORB K, VISITDUMRONGKUL N, SAEBEA D, et al. Flowsheet-based model and exergy analysis of solid oxide electrolysis cells for clean hydrogen production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 1-13.
52	DUTTA S, MOREHOUSE J H, KHAN J A. Numerical analysis of laminar flow and heat transfer in a high temperature electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1996, 22(9): 883-895.
53	LAURENCIN J, KANE D, DELETTE G, et al. Modelling of solid oxide steam electrolyser: impact of the operating conditions on hydrogen production[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(4): 2080-2093.
54	HAWKES G L, O’BRIEN J E, STOOTS C M, et al. CFD model of a planar solid oxide electrolysis cell: base case and variations[C]//2007 ASME-JSME Thermal Engineering Summer Heat Transfer Conference. Vancouver, 2007.
55	HAWKES G L, O’BRIEN J E, STOOTS C M, et al. CFD model of a planar solid oxide electrolysis cell for hydrogen production from nuclear energy[J]. Nuclear Technology, 2007, 158(2): 132-144.
56	HAWKES G, O’BRIEN J, STOOTS C, et al. 3D CFD model of a multi-cell high-temperature electrolysis stack[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(9): 4189-4197.
57	NI M. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of a solid oxide electrolyzer cell for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(18): 7795-7806.
58	XU Z, REN N, TANG M, et al. Numerical investigations for a solid oxide electrolyte cell stack[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(38): 20997-21009.
59	GRONDIN D, DESEURE J, BRISSE A, et al. Simulation of a high temperature electrolyzer[J]. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2010, 40(5): 933-941.
60	BERNADET L, GOUSSEAU G, CHATROUX A, et al. Influence of pressure on solid oxide electrolysis cells investigated by experimental and modeling approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(38): 12918-12928.
61	HENKE M, WILLICH C, KALLO J, et al. Theoretical study on pressurized operation of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(24): 12434-12439.
62	侯权, 关成志, 肖国萍, 等. 氧分压对固体氧化物电解池性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 284-291.
	HOU Quan, GUAN Chengzhi, XIAO Guoping, et al. Effect of oxygen partial pressure on solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(3): 284-291.
63	TODD D, SCHWAGER M, MERIDA W. Thermodynamics of high-temperature, high-pressure water electrolysis[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 269: 424-429.
64	侯权, 关成志, 肖国萍, 等. 固体氧化物电解池尺寸对其性能的影响[J]. 核技术, 2019, 42(3): 43-51.
	HOU Quan, GUAN Chengzhi, XIAO Guoping, et al. Effect of size on the electrolytic performance of solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2019, 42(3): 43-51.
65	NAVASA M, YUAN J, SUNDEN B. Computational fluid dynamics approach for performance evaluation of a solid oxide electrolysis cell for hydrogen production[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 137: 867-876.
66	XU Z, ZHANG X, LI G, et al. Comparative performance investigation of different gas flow configurations for a planar solid oxide electrolyzer cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(16): 10785-10801.
67	YILDIZ B, SMITH J, SOFU T. Thermal-fluid and electrochemical modeling and performance study of a planar solid oxide electrolysis cell: analysis on SOEC resistances, size, and inlet flow conditions[R]. Chicago, Illinois, 2008: 1-23.
68	JIN X, XUE X. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of solid oxide electrolysis cells with delaminations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(14): 7321-7328.
69	NI M, LEUNG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. A modeling study on concentration overpotentials of a reversible solid oxide fuel cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 163(1): 460-466.
70	FERRERO D, LANZINI A, LEONE P, et al. Reversible operation of solid oxide cells under electrolysis and fuel cell modes: experimental study and model validation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 274: 143-155.
71	HAUCK M, HERMANN S, SPLIETHOFF H. Simulation of a reversible SOFC with Aspen Plus[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 10329-10340.
72	ZHANG J H, LEI L, LIU D, et al. Numerical investigation of solid oxide electrolysis cells for hydrogen production applied with different continuity expressions[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2017, 149: 646-659.
73	DEMIN A, GPRBOVA E, TSIAKARAS P. High temperature electrolyzer based on solid oxide co-ionic electrolyte: a theoretical model[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 171(1): 205-211.
74	NI M, LEUNG M K H, LEUNG D Y C. Mathematical modeling of the coupled transport and electrochemical reactions in solid oxide steam electrolyzer for hydrogen production[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 52(24): 6707-6718.
75	LAY-GRINDLER E, LAURENCIN J, DELETTE G, et al. Micro modelling of solid oxide electrolysis cell: from performance to durability[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(17): 6917-6929.
76	GRONDIN D, DESEURE J, OZIL P, et al. Computing approach of cathodic process within solid oxide electrolysis cell: experiments and continuum model validation[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(22): 9561-9567.
77	CACCIUTTOLO Q, VULLIET J, LAIR V, et al. Effect of pressure on high temperature steam electrolysis: model and experimental tests[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(35): 11378-11384.
78	O’BRIEN J E, STOOTS C M, HERRING J S, et al. Comparison of a one-dimensional model of a high-temperature solid-oxide electrolysis stack with CFD and experimental results[C]//ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Orlando, 2005.
79	LI W, SHI Y, YU L, et al. Theoretical modeling of air electrode operating in SOFC mode and SOEC mode: the effects of microstructure and thickness[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(25): 13738-13750.
80	GRONDIN D, DESEURE J, OZIL P, et al. Solid oxide electrolysis cell 3D simulation using artificial neural network for cathodic process description[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2013, 91(1): 134-140.
81	PTEIPAS F, BRISSE A, BOUALLOU C. Model-based behavior of a high temperature electrolyser system operated at various loads[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 239: 584-595.
82	UDAGAWA J, AGUIAR P, BRANDON N P. Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: model-based steady state performance of a cathode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 166(1): 127-136.
83	CAI Q, LUNA-ORTIZ E, ADJIMAN C S, et al. The effects of operating conditions on the performance of a solid oxide steam electrolyser: a model-based study[J]. Fuel Cells, 2010, 10(6): 1114-1128.
84	UDAGAWA J, AGUIAR P, BRANDON N P. Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: control strategies for a cathode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 180(1): 354-364.
85	UDAGAWA J, AGUIAR P, BRANDON N P. Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: model-based dynamic behavior of a cathode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 180(1): 46-55.
86	CAI Q, HAW A W V, ADJIMAN C S, et al. Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: a model-based study[C]//22nd European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering. London, 2012.
87	JIN X, XUE X. Mathematical modeling analysis of regenerative solid oxide fuel cells in switching mode conditions[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(19): 6652-6658.
88	KAZEMPOOR P, BRAUN R J. Model validation and performance analysis of regenerative solid oxide cells: electrolytic operation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(6): 2669-2684.

[1]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[2]	张杰, 白忠波, 冯宝鑫, 彭肖林, 任伟伟, 张菁丽, 刘二勇. PEG及其复合添加剂对电解铜箔后处理的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 374-381.
[3]	崔守成, 徐洪波, 彭楠. 两种MOFs材料用于O₂/He吸附分离的模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[4]	徐若思, 谭蔚. C形管池沸腾两相流流场模拟与流固耦合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 47-55.
[5]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[6]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[7]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[8]	李梦圆, 郭凡, 李群生. 聚乙烯醇生产中回收工段第三、第四精馏塔的模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[9]	张瑞杰, 刘志林, 王俊文, 张玮, 韩德求, 李婷, 邹雄. 水冷式复叠制冷系统的在线动态模拟与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[10]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[11]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[12]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[13]	许友好, 王维, 鲁波娜, 徐惠, 何鸣元. 中国炼油创新技术MIP的开发策略及启示[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4465-4470.
[14]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[15]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.

高温固体氧化物电解制氢模拟研究进展

Review on modeling and simulation of high temperature solid oxide electrolysis for hydrogen production

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 88

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价