水滴与聚氧化乙烯液滴撞击荷叶表面的实验对比分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1954

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究荷叶表面的液滴撞击行为规律，本文利用高速摄像机以14000帧/秒的帧率分别记录水滴和4种不同相对分子质量的聚氧化乙烯（polyethylene oxide，PEO）水溶液液滴竖直撞击荷叶表面的动力过程，其撞击速度为0.3~3m/s。实验结果表明，水滴与低相对分子质量（5×10⁴）的PEO液滴撞击荷叶表面的行为现象相似，两者随撞击速度增加依次有规则反弹、向上发射卫星液滴、不规则反弹（或部分反弹）、液滴破碎和液指断裂分离小液滴等现象发生，但水滴的接触时间更短，最大铺展系数也更小。中等相对分子质量（3×10⁵）PEO液滴在低速和高速撞击时分别为振荡弹起模态和振荡模态，临界速度为1.13m/s。高相对分子质量（1×10⁶、4×10⁶）的PEO液滴，其高分子长链与表面交互作用显著增强，表现出很强的黏性，撞击后反弹完全被抑制，均黏附沉积于荷叶表面；液滴发生沉积的临界Oh数为0.0544，且Oh数越大，液滴越难发生反弹。速度一定时，相对分子质量3×10⁵以上的3种PEO液滴的最大铺展系数均小于水滴；三者的上升系数随速度增加先减小后保持基本稳定或略微增加。

关键词: 聚氧化乙烯, 荷叶, 超疏水, 动力行为, 可视化实验

Abstract:

In order to investigate the law of behavior that liquid droplets impact on the surface of the lotus leaf, a high-speed camera was used to record water droplets and four kinds of polyethylene oxide (PEO) aqueous solution with different molecular weights vertically hitting the surface of the lotus leaf at a frame rate of 14000fps. During the dynamic process, the impact velocity ranged from 0.3m/s to 3m/s. The experimental results showed that the behavior of water droplets and PEO droplets with low molecular weight (50000) impacting the surface of the lotus leaf was similar. The two kinds of droplets both successively rebounded regularly, launched satellite droplets upward, rebounded irregularly (or partial rebounded), droplet breakage and liquid finger breakage to separate small droplets as the impact speed increased, but the contact time of water droplets was shorter and the maximum spreading coefficient was also smaller. The PEO droplets with medium relative molecular weights (300000) had an oscillating bounce mode and an oscillating mode when respectively impacted at low and high speeds, and its critical velocity was at 1.13m/s. The interaction between long polymer chains in PEO droplets with high molecular weight (1million, 4million) having strong viscosity and the surface was significantly enhanced. The rebound after impact was completely inhibited and all adhered and deposited on the surface of the lotus leaf. The critical Oh number for droplet deposition was 0.0544, and the larger the Oh number, the harder the droplet rebounded. When the speed was constant, the maximum spreading coefficients of the three kinds of PEO droplets with a relative molecular weight of more than 300000 were smaller than that of water droplets. The rising coefficients of the three kinds of PEO droplets first decreased with the increase of speed and then remained basically stable or slightly increase.

Key words: polyethylene oxide, lotus leaf, super-hydrophobic, dynamic behavior, visualization experiment

中图分类号:

O359.1

曾佑林, 姜水生, 文华, 张新宇. 水滴与聚氧化乙烯液滴撞击荷叶表面的实验对比分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4445-4455.

ZENG Youlin, JIANG Shuisheng, WEN Hua, ZHANG Xinyu. Comparative experiments and analysis of water droplet and PEO droplet impacting on the surface of lotus leaf[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(8): 4445-4455.

图/表 13

表1 实验工质参数

液滴类型

温度t₀

/℃

密度ρ

/kg·m^-3

表面张力σ

/×10^-3N·m^-1

黏度μ

/×10^-3Pa·s

液滴直径D

/mm

去离子水

PEO-5

PEO-30

PEO-100

PEO-400

998

71.97

63.35

62.01

61.86

61.39

1.005

2.492

14.321

30.652

196.321

2.20

2.13

2.04

1.98

1.95

图1 动态接触角θ、动态铺展直径Dt和上升高度H0

图2 实验装置与台架

图3 水滴撞击荷叶超疏水表面

图4 PEO-5液滴撞击荷叶超疏水表面

图5 PEO-30振荡弹起模态（v=1.13m·s-1）

图6 不同相对分子质量PEO的液滴撞击现象（v=1.71m/s）

图7 上升系数随速度的变化规律

图8 铺展系数随时间变化曲线

图9 5种液滴在v=1.71m/s下的铺展系数变化规律

图10 5种液滴最大铺展系数随速度变化规律

图11 接触时间随速度变化规律

图12 不同Re数和We数下5种液滴的动力学行为

参考文献 25

1	郭亚丽, 陈桂影, 沈胜强, 等. 盐水液滴撞击固体壁面接触特性实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2015, 36(7): 1547-1552.
	GUO Yali, CHEN Guiying, SHEN Shengqiang, et al. Experimental research on contact characteristics after droplet impacting onto solid surface[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2015, 36(7): 1547-1552.
2	ARTHUR M W. A second paper on the forms assumed by drops of liquids falling vertically on a horizontal plate[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1876, 25: 498-503.
3	YARIN A L. Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 38(1): 159-192.
4	JOSSERAND C, THORODDSEN S T. Drop impact on a solid surface[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 48(1): 365-391.
5	BHUSHAN B, JUNG Y C, KOCH K. Micro-, nano- and hierarchical structures for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2009, 367(1894): 1631-1672.
6	LI X Y, MA X H, LAN Z. Behavioral patterns of drop impingement onto rigid substrates with a wide range of wettability and different surface temperatures[J]. AIChE Journal, 2009, 55(8): 1983-1992.
7	AUSSILLOUS P, QUÉRÉ D. Liquid marbles[J]. Nature, 2001, 411(6840): 924-927.
8	NEINHUIS C, BARTHLOTT W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces[J]. Annals of Botany, 1997, 79(6): 667-677.
9	CHEN L Q, XIAO Z Y, CHAN P C H, et al. A comparative study of droplet impact dynamics on a dual-scaled superhydrophobic surface and lotus leaf[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(21): 8857-8863.
10	SMITH M I, BERTOLA V. Effect of polymer additives on the wetting of impacting droplets[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2010, 104(15): 154502.
11	ZANG D Y, WANG X L, GENG X G, et al. Impact dynamics of droplets with silicananoparticles and polymer additives[J]. Soft Matter, 2013, 9(2): 394-400.
12	韩丁丁. 粘弹性液滴撞击疏水壁面的数值模拟和动力学研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2019.
	HAN Dingding. Numerical simulation and dynamics of viscoelastic drops impacting on hydrophobic solid substrates[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2019.
13	CHEN L Q, WANG Y G, PENG X Y, et al. Impact dynamics of aqueous polymer droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces[J]. Macromolecules, 2018, 51(19): 7817-7827.
14	杨宝海, 王宏, 朱恂, 等. 速度对液滴撞击超疏水壁面行为特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(10): 3027-3033.
	YANG Baohai, WANG Hong, ZHU Xun, et al. Effect of velocity on behavior of droplet impacting superhydrophobic surface[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(10): 3027-3033.
15	张莹, 许术方, 李文彬, 等. 液滴撞击亲疏水间隔条纹表面[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(2): 461-467.
	ZHANG Ying, XU Shufang, LI Wenbin, et al. Drops impinging on alternating hydrophobic and hydrophilic stripes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(2): 461-467.
16	施其明, 贾志海, 林琪焱. 液滴撞击微结构疏水表面的动态特性[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(12): 3818-3824.
	SHI Qiming, JIA Zhihai, LIN Qiyan. Dynamic behavior of droplets impacting on microstructured hydrophobic surfaces[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(12): 3818-3824.
17	CLANET C, BÉGUIN C, RICHARD D, et al. Maximal deformation of an impacting drop[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 517: 199-208.
18	朱玲. 绕流叶片微纳仿生超疏水的制备与减阻机理研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019.
	ZHU Ling. Preparation and drag reduction mechanism of micro-nano bionic superhydrophobics in flowing blades[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2019.
19	秦现代. 疏水性植物叶片仿生微结构的制备和浸润性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2019.
	QIN Xiandai. Preparation of bionic microstructure and wettability research of hydrophobic plant leaves[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2019.
20	PAPIEROWSKA E, MAZUR R, STAŃCZYK T, et al. Influence of leaf surface wettability on the drop splash phenomenon[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 279: 107762.
21	杨海洋, 王妙锋, 朱平平, 等. 聚氧化乙烯水溶液粘度的测定[J]. 化学通报, 2003, 66(6): 418-422.
	YANG Haiyang, WANG Miaofeng, ZHU Pingping, et al. Viscosity determination of poly(ethylene oxide) in aqueous solutions[J]. Chemistry Bulletin, 2003, 66(6): 418-422.
22	李琳, 谭桂莲, 苏春梅. 聚氧化乙烯水溶液粘度行为的研究[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 6(3): 210-213.
	LI Lin, TAN Guilian, SU Chunmei. Research of the abnormal viscosity behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) in aqueous solutions at extremely dilute concentration[J]. Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science), 2005, 6(3): 210-213.
23	RICHARD D, CLANET C, QUÉRÉ D, et al. Contact time of a bouncing drop[J]. Nature, 2002, 417(6891): 811.
24	王雪. 微注压成型超疏水表面的微纳结构设计及其液滴撞击性能研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019.
	WANG Xue. Design and water droplet impacting performance of superhydrophobic micro-/nano-structured surfaces prepared by microinjection compression molding[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2019.
25	SON Y, KIM C. Spreading of inkjet droplet of non-Newtonian fluid on solid surface with controlled contact angle at low Weber and Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 162(1/2/3): 78-87.

[1]	王鑫, 王兵兵, 杨威, 徐志明. 金属表面PDA/PTFE超疏水涂层抑垢与耐腐蚀性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4315-4321.
[2]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[3]	刘战剑, 付雨欣, 任丽娜, 张曦光, 袁中涛, 杨楠, 汪怀远. 超疏水涂层在防腐阻垢领域研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2999-3011.
[4]	杨园园, 雷婷, 秦青青, 武晓, 李剑, 秦舒浩, 李嘉乐, 张兵兵, 任露露. PEO改性PVDF/SMA膜结构和性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1515-1526.
[5]	路涛, 胡嘉怡, 徐成, 胡鑫琳, 郭庆阳, 李朦. 超疏水海绵的简易制备及其高效油/水分离性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5353-5362.
[6]	詹洵, 陈健, 杨兆哲, 吴国民, 孔振武, 沈葵忠. 纳米纤维素构建超疏水材料研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4303-4313.
[7]	朱雪丹, 姚亚丽, 马利利, 王嘉鑫, 杨杰, 彭磊, 何金梅, 屈孟男. 聚氯乙烯基超疏水材料的制备及应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3676-3688.
[8]	李正, 牛静东, 何广泽, 张兰河, 张海丰. PVDF-PFTS/SiO₂膜制备及抗混合污染性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2713-2721.
[9]	梁格, 黄翔峰, 刘婉琪, 熊永娇, 彭开铭. 超疏水三维多孔材料在乳化液油水分离中的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6557-6572.
[10]	宋洁尘, 夏青, 徐宇兴, 谭强强. 全固态锂离子电池的研究进展与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(9): 5045-5060.
[11]	袁雨婷, 冯勇超, 易红宏, 唐晓龙, 于庆君, 张媛媛, 隗晶慧, 孟宪政. 体相超疏水材料及其在大气污染控制领域的应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4327-4345.
[12]	雷瑜, 田蒙蒙, 张心亚, 蒋翔. 超疏水表面自修复及应用的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2624-2633.
[13]	郑龙珠, 苏晓竞, 李红强, 官航, 古孜努尔·阿巴白克力null, 冯海洋, 韦业, 赖学军, 曾幸荣. 功能性超疏水表面的构建及其应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2634-2645.
[14]	燕国飞, 杨振生, 李春辉, 王志英, 李浩. 溶胀辊轧法PVDF膜表面的疏水强化：溶胀剂的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(11): 6270-6277.
[15]	王志英, 张海静, 张佩影, 杨振生, 李春利. 表面沉积化镁合金基底上超疏水聚偏氟乙烯微孔膜的制备与性能[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(8): 3177-3182.