柱淋滤模式下生活垃圾焚烧炉渣中Cu2+和Zn2+浸出规律

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0412

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

垃圾焚烧炉渣是一种活性材料，在其储存、预处理及应用等过程与雨水频繁接触时，炉渣中重金属随着水域环境发生迁移和浸出现象。本研究采用连续柱淋滤试验装置模拟自然降雨，开展了0～5mm和5～10mm焚烧炉渣的动态淋滤毒性浸出分析，重点研究了pH和降雨强度对Cu²⁺和Zn²⁺的浸出影响。结果表明，动态淋滤过程中，淋滤液pH变化对Cu²⁺和Zn²⁺的浸出水平影响显著，且在酸性较强淋滤液作用下Cu²⁺浸出水平比Zn²⁺更强，与Ⅴ类地表水环境浓度限值对比，在整个淋滤时间内Cu²⁺浸出浓度严重超标，在炉渣工程应用时需预防相关的环境风险；原生炉渣粒径大小与重金属浸出水平无直接相关性，但是0～5mm细炉渣中可浸出Zn²⁺含量更高，这与细颗粒物中Zn赋存形态和可溶出态含量较高有关；淋滤强度对重金属浸出水平影响主要反应了动态淋滤过程液固比和水分运移速率情况，当较低淋滤强度时具有低液固比，溶出液中重金属含量较高。

关键词: 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣, 柱淋滤, 重金属, 浸出浓度

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of heavy metals leaching in the application of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash resources, a continuous column leaching test device was constructed to simulate natural rainfall. The dynamic leaching analysis of 0—5mm and 5—10mm MSW incineration bottom ash was carried out. Attention was paid to the leaching of heavy metals Cu²⁺ and Zn²⁺ under different acid rain conditions and rainfall intensity. The results show that the pH value of the leachate has a great effect on the leaching levels of Cu²⁺ and Zn²⁺ during dynamic leaching. The level of Cu²⁺ leaching is stronger than that of Zn²⁺ in a strongly acidic leachate environment. Compared with the concentration limit of surface water environment in the Class Ⅴ, the concentration of Cu²⁺ leaching seriously exceeds the standard during the entire leaching time, relevant environmental risks need to be prevented in the application of slag engineering. The size of bottom ash has no direct correlation with the leaching level of heavy metals, but the content of leaching Zn²⁺ in the primary bottom ash with a small diameter of 0—5mm is higher, which is related to the occurrence form and the higher soluble Zn in the fine particles. The effect of leaching strength on the leaching level of heavy metals mainly reflects the liquid-solid ratio and water migration rate during the dynamic leaching process. When the leaching strength is lower, the liquid-solid ratio is lower and the heavy metal content in the eluate is higher.

Key words: MSW incineration bottom ash, column leaching, heavy metals, leaching concentration

中图分类号:

徐斌, 何昌轩, 胡艳军, 王琳洁, 朱永豪, 乔欣. 柱淋滤模式下生活垃圾焚烧炉渣中Cu²⁺和Zn²⁺浸出规律[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(S2): 406-412.

Bin XU, Changxuan HE, Yanjun HU, Linjie WANG, Yonghao ZHU, Xin QIAO. [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(S2): 406-412.

图/表 6

图1 模拟雨水淋滤试验装置

图2 不同pH下粒径0～5mm原生炉渣中Cu2+ 、Zn2+ 浸出浓度

图3 不同pH下粒径5～10mm原生炉渣中Cu2+ (a)、Zn2+ (b)浸出浓度

图4 两种粒径炉渣中Cu2+浸出水平对比

图5 两种粒径炉渣中Zn2+浸出水平对比

图6 不同淋滤速率下5～10mm原生炉渣中Cu2+、Zn2+浸出浓度

参考文献 21

1	MUHAMMAD, SHOAIB, et al. Production of eco-cement exclusively from municipal solid waste incineration residues[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 149: 332-342.
2	YOON J Y, LEE J Y, KIM J H. Use of raw-state bottom ash for aggregates in construction materials[J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Managemen, 2019, 21(4): 838-849.
3	VALLE-ZERMENO D R, FROMOSA J, CHIMENOS J M, et al. Aggregate material formulated with MSWI bottom ash and APC fly ash for use as secondary building material[J]. Waste Management, 2013, 33(3): 621-627.
4	KUO W T, LIU C C, SU D S. Use of washed municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash in pervious concrete[J]. Cement＆Concrete Composites, 2013, 37: 328-335.
5	ASHRAF M S, GHOULEH Z, SHAO Yixin. Production of eco-cement exclusively from municipal solid waste incineration residues[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2019, 149: 332-342.
6	CIARAN J, LYNN R, DHIR G, et al. Use of incinerated as aggregate in concrete: a compressive strength model[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2019, 71(23): 1253-1264.
7	TORALDO E, SAPONARO S, CAREGHINI A, et al. Use of stabilized bottom ash for bound layers of road pavements[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 121: 117-123.
8	LYNN C, GHATAORA G, DHIR R. Municipal incinerated bottom ash (MIBA) characteristics and potential for use in road pavements[J]. Science Direct, 2017, 10: 185-201.
9	TORALDOE, SAPONARO S. A road pavement full-scale test track containing stabilized bottom ashes[J]. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(9): 1114-1122.
10	刘栋, 李立寒, 杨昆. 生活垃圾焚烧炉渣沥青混合料的耐久性能[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(1): 1-7.
	LIU Dong, LI Lihan, YANG Kun． Durability of asphalt mixture containing municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash aggregate[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2016, 44(1): 01-07.
11	PHILIP V, NIELS R, ARNO B, et al. Sustainable high quality recycling of aggregates from waste-to-energy, treated in a wet bottom ash processing installation, for use in concrete products[J]. Materials, 2016, 9.
12	杜锋, 程温, 程艳茹, 等. 对生活垃圾焚烧产物中重金属的探讨[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2011, 36(9): 72-74.
	DU Feng, CHENG Wen, CHENG Yanru, et al. Study on heave metals in incineration products of domestic wastes[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2011, 36(9): 72-74.
13	余磊, 谢宜东, 李海冰, 等. 不同pH浸提条件对生活垃圾焚烧炉渣重金属浸出影响研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2016, 41(1): 111-114.
	YU Lei，XIE Yidong，LI Haibing，et al． Leaching tests of domestic garbage slag heavy metals under different pH[J]. Environmental Science and Management，2016，41(1)：111-114.
14	ANNIKA A， JURATE K, HOLGER E. Evaluation and prediction of emissions from a road built with bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2005, 355(1-3): 1-12.
15	YANG Z Z, TIAN S C, LIU L L, et al. Recycling ground MSWI bottom ash in cement composites: long-term environmental impacts[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 78: 841-848.
16	ABDELKADER T, HUSSAIN A, ASHRAF A, et al. A lysimeter experimental study and numerical characterisation of the leaching of incinerator bottom ash waste[J]. Waste Management, 2010, 30(8/9): 1536-1543.
17	PRAAGH M, JOHANSSON M, FAGERQVIST J, et al. Recycling of MSWI-bottom ash in paved constructions in Sweden—A risk assessment[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 79: 428-434.
18	SABRINA S, MARIA C, ALESSANDRO A. Leaching behaviour of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash: From granular material to monolithic concrete[J]. Waste Management & Research, 2017, 35(9): 978-990.
19	陆胜勇, 池涌, 严建华, 等. 初始pH值、液固比对某焚烧炉灰重金属渗滤的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2003, 48: 1-5.
	LU Shengyong, CHI Yong, YAN Jianhua, et al. Effects of initial pH value and solid/liquid ratio on heavy metals of ash from an incinerator[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2003, 48: 01-05.
20	刘兆鹏. 降雨作用下固化稳定化重金属污染土浸出特性的模型试验与数值模拟研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学，2015.
	LIU Zhaopeng. Model test and numerical simulation study on leaching characteristics of solidified and stabilized heavy metal contaminated soil under rainfall[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University,2015.
21	ZHAO Y, ZHU Y T. Metals leaching in permeable asphalt pavement with municipal solid waste ash aggregate[J]. Water, 2019, 11(10): 2186.

[1]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[2]	李世霖, 胡景泽, 王毅霖, 王庆吉, 邵磊. 电渗析分离提取高值组分的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 420-429.
[3]	李志远, 黄亚继, 赵佳琪, 于梦竹, 朱志成, 程好强, 时浩, 王圣. 污泥与聚氯乙烯共热解重金属特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4947-4956.
[4]	李卫华, 于倩雯, 尹俊权, 吴寅凯, 孙英杰, 王琰, 王华伟, 杨玉飞, 龙於洋, 黄启飞, 葛燕辰, 何依洋, 赵灵燕. 酸雨环境下填埋飞灰吨袋破损后重金属的溶出行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4917-4928.
[5]	张杉, 仲兆平, 杨宇轩, 杜浩然, 李骞. 磷酸盐改性高岭土对生活垃圾热解过程中重金属的富集[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3893-3903.
[6]	李若琳, 何少林, 苑宏英, 刘伯约, 纪冬丽, 宋阳, 刘博, 余绩庆, 徐英俊. 原位热解对油页岩物性及地下水水质影响探索[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3309-3318.
[7]	庄捷, 薛锦辉, 赵斌成, 张文艺. 猪粪厌氧消化进程中重金属与腐殖质的有机结合机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3281-3291.
[8]	郑昕, 贾里, 王彦霖, 张靖超, 陈世虎, 乔晓磊, 樊保国. 污泥与煤泥混烧对重金属固留特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3233-3241.
[9]	常占坤, 张弛, 苏冰琴, 张聪政, 王健, 权晓慧. H₂S气态基质对污泥生物沥滤处理效能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2733-2743.
[10]	李卫华, 吴寅凯, 孙英杰, 尹俊权, 辛明学, 赵友杰. 垃圾焚烧飞灰重金属毒性浸出评价方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2666-2677.
[11]	王玉, 余广炜, 林佳佳, 黎长江, 江汝清, 邢贞娇, 余铖. 沼渣、飞灰和污泥生物炭制备建筑陶粒[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 1039-1050.
[12]	郭宇晨, 刘庆林, 蒋金洋, 宗永忠, 王金伟, 李臻, 吕树祥. 含铬污泥资源化方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 575-584.
[13]	李晶晶, 赵曜, 徐沣驰, 李康建. 不同径流冲刷作用下多孔炉渣沥青混合料重金属的浸出特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5520-5530.
[14]	唐朝春, 王顺藤, 黄从新, 冯文涛, 阮以宣, 史纯菁. 介孔金属有机框架材料吸附水中重金属离子研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3263-3278.
[15]	付杰, 邱春生, 王晨晨, 郑金鑫, 刘楠楠, 王栋, 王少坡, 孙力平. 污泥热水解处理过程重金属的迁移转化与风险评价[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2216-2225.

柱淋滤模式下生活垃圾焚烧炉渣中Cu²⁺和Zn²⁺浸出规律

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价