煤焦油渣炭化过程中孔结构及表面分形特征

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0044

化工进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 4305-4313.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0044

• 资源与环境化工 • 上一篇

煤焦油渣炭化过程中孔结构及表面分形特征

常秋连¹^,²^,³(), 李文博¹^,²^,³, 赵鹏¹^,²^,³

^1.煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司煤化工分院，北京 100013
^2.国家能源煤炭高效利用与节能减排技术装备重点实验室，北京 100013
^3.煤基节能环保炭材料北京市重点实验室，北京 100013

出版日期:2020-10-05 发布日期:2020-10-09
通讯作者: 常秋连
作者简介:常秋连（1981—），女，博士，副研究员，研究方向为煤化工技术。E-mail：cqlky2004@sina.com。
基金资助:
天地科技股份有限公司科技创新创业专项项目(2019-TD-MS011);国家重点研发计划(2017YFB0602803)

Structure and surface fractal characteristics of coal tar residue during carbonization

Qiulian CHANG¹^,²^,³(), Wenbo LI¹^,²^,³, Peng ZHAO¹^,²^,³

^1.Beijing Coal chemistry Research Institute of China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China
^2.Key Laboratory of National Energy Coal Utilization and Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction Technology, Beijing 100013, China
^3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Coal Mining and Clean Utilization, Beijing 100013, China

Online:2020-10-05 Published:2020-10-09
Contact: Qiulian CHANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用煤气化焦油渣为原料进行活性炭制备实验研究，对炭化过程焦油渣孔结构和表面特征进行研究，采用N₂吸附/脱附等温实验和表面分形理论研究炭化对焦油渣孔结构和表面特征的影响。结果表明：炭化物的吸附等温线倾向于表征微孔吸附特征的Ⅰ类吸附等温线；炭化物中具有发达的微孔结构、过渡孔结构和极不发达的大孔结构；随着温度和升温速率的提高，微孔结构先增加后又逐渐发展为过渡孔和大孔；对炭化物表面的分形特征进行研究发现，表面分形维数与BET比表面积、总孔容、平均孔径不存在直接关系，但是与微孔面积占比和微孔容积占比存在较好的一致性；焦油渣在炭化处理过程中随着温度的升高和升温速率加快，经历了“立体发展-逐渐衰落”的过程。当炭化终温850℃、升温速率20℃/min时，可以得到最优的活化前体。

关键词: 煤焦油渣, 炭化, 升温速率, 多孔介质, 表面分形特征

Abstract:

During the preparation of activated carbon from tar residue, the influence of carbonization process on the pore structure and the surface characteristics of tar residue was studied by isothermal N₂ adsorption/desorption experiment and surface fractal theory. Results indicated that the adsorption isotherms were close to the type I which represented the microporous adsorption characteristics and indicated that the carbonized products had sub-microporous structure, transition pore structure and extremely undeveloped macroporous structure at the same time. With the increase of temperature and heating rate, the microporous structure increased at first and then gradually developed into transition pore and macropore. It was found that fractal dimension had no direct relationship to the BET specific surface area, total pore volume and average pore diameter. However, there was a good consistence between the proportion of the microporous area and that of the microporous volume. During the pre-carbonization treatment process, the tar residue experienced a process of “three dimensional development-gradual decline”. The optimal activated raw material can be obtained, when the final temperature of the pre-carbonization was 850℃ and the heating rate was 20℃/min.

Key words: coal tar residue, carbonization, heating rate, porous media, surface fractal dimension

中图分类号:

TQ536.4

常秋连, 李文博, 赵鹏. 煤焦油渣炭化过程中孔结构及表面分形特征[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(10): 4305-4313.

Qiulian CHANG, Wenbo LI, Peng ZHAO. Structure and surface fractal characteristics of coal tar residue during carbonization[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(10): 4305-4313.

参考文献

1	IE T T, CHENG J, ZHOU F, et al. Control of pollutants in the combustion of biomass pellets prepared with coal tar residue as a binder[J]. Fuel, 2017, 208(15): 229-237.
2	王雄雷, 牛艳霞, 刘刚, 等. 煤焦油渣处理技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(7): 2016-2022.
2	WANG Xionglei，NIU Yanxia，LIU Gang，et al. Research progress of coal tar residue treatment technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2015, 34(7): 2016-2022.
3	MA Y H, SU W, WANG Q H. Discharge and disposal of coking residue and distribution characteristics of lPAHs in it[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 878(2): 448-453.
4	房永征, 张启锋, 曹银平, 等. 焦油渣对焦炭微观结构及反应动力学的影响[J]. 煤炭转化, 2013, 36(4): 32-35.
4	FANG Yongzheng, ZHANG Qifeng, CAO Yinping, et al. Effect of tar residue on micro-structure and carbon solution kinetics of coke[J]. Coal Conversion, 2013， 36(4): 32-35.
5	LUO A Q, ZHANG D, ZHU P, et al. Effect of pyridine extraction on the tar characteristics during pyrolysis of bituminous coal[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017, 45(11): 1281-1288.
6	LI W Y, WU S Y, WU Y Q, et al. Pore structure characterization of coconut shell char with narrow icroporosity[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2019, 47(3): 51-59.
7	刘冬冬. 不定型煤基活性炭结构演变机制及调控方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学, 2017.
7	LIU D D. Study on the structure evolution mechanism and regulation method of unshaped coal-based activated carbon[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Technology, 2017.
8	JAYARAMAN V K, HLAVACEK V, PUSZYNSKI J. An expanding core model for a heterogeneous, noncatalytic, gas-solid reaction[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26(5): 1048-1050.
9	TANG H, XU J, DAI Z J, et al. Functional mechanism of inorganic sodium on the structure and reactivity of zhundong chars during pyrolysis[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(10): 1-6.
10	DUBININ M M, POLYAKOV N S, KADLEZ O, et al. Heterogeneous microporous structures and adsorption properties of carbon adsorbents[J]. Russian Chemical Bulletin, 1993, 42(8): 1304-1308.
11	USMAN A R A, ABDULJABBAR A, VITHANAGE M, et al. Biochar production from date palm waste: charring temperature induced changes in composition and surface chemistry[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2015, 115: 392-400.
12	MANDELBROT B B. Stochastic models for the Earth^’s relief, the shape and the fractal dimension of the coastlines, and the number area rule for islands[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1975, 72(10): 3825-3828.
13	NOWAK I, JARONIEC M. Assessment of pore structure parameters for polymer-templated mesoporous molecular sieves by means of nitrogen and argon adsorption[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 253(13): 5676-5681.
14	YU J, LUCAS J A, WALL T F. Formation of the structure of chars during devolatilization of pulverized coal and its thermoproperties: a review[J]．Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2007, 33(2): 135-170．
15	何颖, 解炜. 以褐煤为原料制备活性炭前驱体的强度研究[J]. 煤质技术, 2016(2): 13-16，45.
15	HE Ying, XIE Wei. Study on strength of lignite based agglometated activated carbon precursor[J]. Coal Quality Technology, 2016(2): 13-16，45.
16	WU H W. Ash formation during pulverized coal combustion and gasification at pressure[D]. Newcastle: University of Newcastle, 2000.
17	TOVBIN Y K. Local equations of state in non-equilibrium heterogeneous physicochemical systems[J]. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2017, 91(3): 403-424.
18	FU P, YI W M, LI Z H, et al. Evolution of char structral fearures during fast pyrolysis of corn straw with solid heat carriers in a novel V-shaped down tube reactor[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2017, 149: 570-578.
19	GUIZANI C, ESCUDERO S F J, SALVADOR S. Effects of CO₂ on biomass fast pyrolysis: reaction rate, gas yields and char reactive properties[J]. Fuel, 2014, 116(15): 10-320.
20	LIU G S, NIKSA S. Coal conversion submodels for design applications at elevated pressures. Part Ⅱ. Char gasification[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2004, 30(6): 679-717.
21	SHIM H S, HURT R H. Thermal annealing of chars from diverse organic precursors under combustion-like conditions[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14(2): 340-348.
22	LIN S Y, HIRATO M, HORIO M. The characteristics of coal char gasification at around ash melting temperature[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1994, 8(3): 598-606.
23	TANNER J, KABIR K B, MULLER M, et al. Low temperature entrained flow pyrolysis and gasification of a Victorian brown coal[J]. Fuel, 2015, 154(15): 107-113.

[1]	刘阳, 王云刚, 修浩然, 邹立, 白彦渊. 基于动力学分析的核桃壳最佳炭化工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 94-103.
[2]	李宁, 李金科, 董金善. 乙烯裂解炉多孔介质燃烧器的研究与开发[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 73-83.
[3]	徐茂淯, 陶帅, 齐聪, 梁林. 圆盘式环路热管的启动特性及温度波动[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4531-4537.
[4]	汪健生, 张辉鹏, 刘雪玲, 傅煜郭, 朱剑啸. 多孔介质结构对储层内流动和换热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4212-4220.
[5]	马哲杰, 张文励, 赵炫凯, 李平. PEMFC阴极催化层氧传质阻力影响的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2860-2873.
[6]	王雪, 徐期勇, 张超. 木质纤维素类生物质水热炭化机理及水热炭应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2536-2545.
[7]	王光宇, 孟境辉, 张锴. 煤泥间歇微波干燥模拟及介电性质[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1779-1786.
[8]	郭志鹏, 卜宪标, 李华山, 龚宇烈, 王令宝. 基于热-流-化耦合作用的单井增强地热系统性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 711-721.
[9]	周志毅, 王进卿, 王广鑫, 池作和, 翁煜侃. 多孔介质内气泡熟化特性孔隙尺度研究[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1265-1271.
[10]	张学民, 张山岭, 李鹏宇, 黄婷婷, 尹绍奇, 李金平, 王英梅. 多孔介质中CO₂-CH₄水合物置换的影响因素及强化机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5259-5271.
[11]	郑发, 李浩文, 林法伟, 张岩, 吴越强, 陈钊, 马文臣, 陈冠益. 大庆罐底油泥热解特性及污染物释放特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 476-484.
[12]	邹星宇, 赵文霞, 刘勇, 许瑞梅. 炭化叶脉网络生长MOFs材料制备透明超级电容器[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 350-358.
[13]	温丰硕, 刘少帅, 伍文婷, 宋键镗, 朱海峰, 蒋珍华, 吴亦农. 10~30K温区纯不锈钢丝网与混填磁性填料制冷性能对比[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 113-119.
[14]	舒钊, 钟珂, 肖鑫, 贾洪伟, 吕凤勇, 常沙. 多孔纳米基复合相变材料在建筑节能中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 265-278.
[15]	张学民, 张梦军, 杨惠结, 李银辉, 李金平, 王英梅. 冰点以下多孔介质中气体水合物的生成动力学研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 101-108.

煤焦油渣炭化过程中孔结构及表面分形特征

Structure and surface fractal characteristics of coal tar residue during carbonization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价