膜吸收CO2工艺中不同吸收液对膜润湿的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-0326

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 4088-4097.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-0326

膜吸收CO₂工艺中不同吸收液对膜润湿的影响

孙莹^1,2, 张琳², 杨林军^1,2

1 江苏省煤基CO₂捕集与地质储存重点实验室(中国矿业大学), 江苏徐州 221008;
2 东南大学能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2018-02-06 修回日期:2018-05-09 出版日期:2018-10-05 发布日期:2018-10-05
通讯作者: 杨林军,教授,博士生导师,研究从事PM_2.5、脱硫、脱硝、CO₂捕集方面研究。
作者简介:孙莹(1993-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为CO₂捕集。
基金资助:
江苏省煤基CO₂捕集与地质储存重点实验室（2016年）开放基金项目（2016A05）。

Effects of different absorb liquids on membrane wetting during membrane absorption process

SUN Ying^1,2, ZHANG Lin², YANG Linjun^1,2

1 Key Laboratory of Coal-based CO₂ Capture and Geological Storage(China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, Jiangsu, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and control of Ministry of Education(Southeast University), Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China

Received:2018-02-06 Revised:2018-05-09 Online:2018-10-05 Published:2018-10-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以单乙醇胺（MEA）、二乙醇胺（DEA）和N-甲基二乙醇胺（MDEA）作为吸收液，利用聚丙烯（PP）中空纤维膜组件进行分离模拟烟气中CO₂的实验研究，考察不同吸收液的脱除效率以及长时间连续运行下的膜润湿现象。建立膜相传质阻力随时间变化模型，与实验数据拟合较好。同时将膜丝在不同吸收剂中浸泡，结合接触角、场发射扫描电镜（FE-SEM）、衰减全反射红外光谱（ATR-IR）以及热重（TG）表征分析膜性能的改变。结果表明，相同浓度下，单一吸收剂的CO₂脱除效率大小为MEA > DEA > MDEA；当吸收液为1mol/L MEA时，16天后CO₂脱除效率从93.3%下降到72.1%；而吸收液为1mol/L DEA时，脱除效率从88.3%到第16天的78%，下降约12%；理论计算得吸收液为1mol/L MEA和1mol/L DEA时，膜相传质阻力分别为10564.06s/m和4881.08s/m；浸渍时间增加，膜接触角减小，疏水性减弱，同时膜孔径变大，出现润湿现象；红外光谱和热重分析表明在MEA溶液作用下膜丝出现溶胀。

关键词: 二氧化碳, 吸收, 膜润湿, 模型, 表面张力, 接触角

Abstract: This research presented separation of CO₂ from flue gas by polypropylene (PP) hollow fiber membrane contactors, using aqueous solution of monoethanolamine (MEA)、diethanolamine (DEA) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) as absorption solvents. The CO₂ removal efficiency and dynamic flux were monitored under different absorption solvents conditions. A theoretical model was put forward between the membrane resistances and operation time, and successfully fitted the change of membrane resistance results in gas absorptions. PP hollow fibers were immersed in different absorbents to observe the change of membrane properties dynamically. The contact angle, Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), Attenuated total reflection-infrared spectroscopy(ATR-IR) and Thermogravimetry (TG) were used to study the changes of membrane properties. The results revealed that the CO₂ removal efficiency was in the following order:MEA > DEA > MDEA. The MEA and DEA solutions of 1 mol/L were used for comparison during 16 days of operation. The CO₂ removal efficiency of MEA and DEA used as absorbents continuously declined roughly 22.7% and 12% of initial removal efficiency. The membrane resistances were 10564.06 s/m and 4881.08s/m for MEA and DEA. The contact angel and hydrophobicity decreased, however, pore size increased during the long-term immersion. The results of ATR-IR and TG indicated that in the MEA solution the surface properties of the membrane were changed.

Key words: carbon dioxide, absorption, membrane wetting, model, surface tension, contact angel

中图分类号:

X511

孙莹, 张琳, 杨林军. 膜吸收CO₂工艺中不同吸收液对膜润湿的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(10): 4088-4097.

SUN Ying, ZHANG Lin, YANG Linjun. Effects of different absorb liquids on membrane wetting during membrane absorption process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(10): 4088-4097.

参考文献

[1] International Energy Agency(IEA). Energy technology perspectives 2008:scenarios & strategies to 2050 in support of the G8 plan of action[M]. Paris:Stedi Media, 2008.
[2] KLAASSEN R, FERON P H M, JANSEN A E. Membrane contactor in industrical applications[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83(A3):234-246.
[3] DAVID O C, GORRI D, NIJMEIJER K, et al. Hydrogen separation from multicomponent gas mixtures containing CO, N₂ and CO₂ using matrimid asymmetric hollow fiber membranes[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 44(419/420):1117-1118.
[4] GABELMAN A, HWANG S T. Hollow fiber membrane contactors[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, 159(1/2):61-106.
[5] LI J L CHEN B H. Review of CO₂ absorption using chemical solvents in hollow fiber membrane contactors[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2005, 41(2):109-122.
[6] 陆建刚, 花爱春, 刘士鑫, 等. 膜吸收工艺中溶液对聚丙烯膜结构和形态的影响[J]. 南京理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(5):726-730. LU Jiangan, HUA Aichun, LIU Shixin, et al. Effects of solution on structure and morphology of polypropylene membrane in membrane absorption process[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2011, 35(5):726-730.
[7] WANG R, ZHANG H Y, FERON P H M, et al. Influence of membrane wetting on CO₂ capture in microporous hollow fiber membrane contactors[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2005, 46(1/2):33-40.
[8] MAVROUDI M, KALDIS S P, SAKELLAROPOULOS G P. A study of mass transfer resistance in membrane gas-liquid contacting processes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 272(1):103-115.
[9] DINDORE V Y, BRILMAN D W F, GEUZEBROEK F H, et al. Membrane-solvent selection for CO₂ removal using membrane gas-liquid contactors[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2004, 40(2):133-145.
[10] BARBE A M, HOGAN P A, JOHNSON R A. Surface morphology changes during initial usage of hydrophobic, microporous polypropylene membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 172(1/2):149-156.
[11] LV Y, YU X, TU S T, et al. Wetting of polypropylene hollow fiber membrane contactors[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 362(1/2):444-452.
[12] WANG R, LI D F, ZHOU C, et al. Impact of DEA solutions with and without CO₂ loading on porous polypropylene membranes intended for use as contactors[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 229(1):147-157.
[13] 吕月霞. 聚丙烯中空纤维膜接触器分离CO₂的研究[D]. 上海:华东理工大学, 2011. LÜ Yuexia. CO₂ capture in a polypropylene hollow fiber membrane contactor[D]. Shanghai:East China University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[14] CAPLOW M. Kinetics of carbamate formation and breakdown[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1968, 90(24):6795-6803.
[15] LITTEL R J, SWAAIJ W P M V, VERSTEEG G F. Kinetics of carbon dioxide with tertiary amines in aqueous solution[J]. AIChE Journal, 1990, 36(11):1633-1640.
[16] RONGWONG W, JIRARATANANON R, ATCHARIYAWUT S. Experimental study on membrane wetting in gas-liquid membrane contacting process for CO₂, absorption by single and mixed absorbents[J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2009, 69(1):118-125.
[17] ZHANG H Y, WANG R, LIANG D T, et al. Theoretical and experimental studies of membrane wetting in the membrane gas-liquid contacting process for CO₂ absorption[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 308(1/2):162-170.
[18] 陆建刚, 王连军, 刘晓东, 等. 湿润率对疏水性膜接触器传质性能的影响[J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2005, 26(5):912-917. LU Jiangang, WANG Lliandong, LIU Xiaodong, et al. Effect of wettability on mass transfer performance of hydrophobic membrane contactor[J]. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2005, 26(5):912-917.
[19] MAVROUDI M, KALDIS S P, SAKELLAROPOULOS G P. A study of mass transfer resistance in membrane gas-liquid contacting processes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 272(1):103-115.
[20] KREULEN H, SMOLDERS C A, VERSTEEG G F, et al. Determination of mass transfer rates in wetted and non-wetted microporous membranes[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1993, 48(11):2093-2102.
[21] PORCHERON F, DROZDZ S. Hollow fiber membrane contactor transient experiments for the characterization of gas/liquid thermodynamics and mass transfer properties[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(2):265-275.
[22] RANGWALA H A. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous solutions using hollow fiber membrane contactors[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1996, 112(2):229-240.
[23] KAMO J, HIRAI T, KAMADA K. Solvent-induced morphological change of microporous hollow fiber membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1992, 70(2/3):217-224.
[24] TARLETON E S, ROBINSON J P, SALMAN M. Solvent-induced swelling of membranes-Measurements and influence in nanofiltration[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 280(1/2):442-451.
[25] BARBE A M, HOGAN P A, JOHNSON R A. Surface morphology changes during initial usage of hydrophobic, microporous polypropylene membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 172(1/2):149-156.
[26] YANG D, DEVLIN D J, BARBERO R S. Effect of hollow fiber morphology and compatibility on propane/propylene separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 304(1/2):88-101.
[27] FRANCO J A, DEMONTIGNY D, KENTISH S E, et al. Effect of amine degradation products on the membrane gas absorption process[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(18):4016-4023.

膜吸收CO₂工艺中不同吸收液对膜润湿的影响

Effects of different absorb liquids on membrane wetting during membrane absorption process

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[2]	郑谦, 官修帅, 靳山彪, 张长明, 张小超. 铈锆固溶体Ce_0.25Zr_0.75O₂光热协同催化CO₂与甲醇合成DMC[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 319-327.
[3]	戴欢涛, 曹苓玉, 游新秀, 徐浩亮, 汪涛, 项玮, 张学杨. 木质素浸渍柚子皮生物炭吸附CO₂特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[4]	张凤岐, 崔成东, 鲍学伟, 朱炜玄, 董宏光. 胺液吸收-分步解吸脱硫工艺的设计与评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[5]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[6]	李季桐, 王刚, 熊亚选, 徐钱. 不同工质单效吸收式制冷系统的能量和㶲分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 104-112.
[7]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[8]	徐晨阳, 都健, 张磊. 基于图神经网络的化学反应优劣评价[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 205-212.
[9]	王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[10]	陈林, 徐培渊, 张晓慧, 陈杰, 徐振军, 陈嘉祥, 密晓光, 冯永昌, 梅德清. 液化天然气绕管式换热器壳侧混合工质流动及传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4496-4503.
[11]	张帆, 陶少辉, 陈玉石, 项曙光. 基于改进恒热传输模型的精馏模拟初始化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4550-4558.
[12]	张振, 李丹, 陈辰, 吴菁岚, 应汉杰, 乔浩. 吸附树脂对唾液酸的分离纯化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4153-4158.
[13]	张智琛, 朱云峰, 成卫戍, 马守涛, 姜杰, 孙冰, 周子辰, 徐伟. 高压聚乙烯失控分解研究进展：反应机理、引发体系与模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3979-3989.
[14]	王耀刚, 韩子姗, 高嘉辰, 王新宇, 李思琪, 杨全红, 翁哲. 铜基催化剂电还原二氧化碳选择性的调控策略[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4043-4057.
[15]	刘毅, 房强, 钟达忠, 赵强, 李晋平. Ag/Cu耦合催化剂的Cu晶面调控用于电催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4136-4142.