两种反应器中生物质炭水蒸气催化气化的动力学

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-2128

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (08): 2984-2990.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-2128

两种反应器中生物质炭水蒸气催化气化的动力学

李光源, 吴轩韬, 王杰

华东理工大学能源化工系, 煤气化与能源化工教育部重点实验室, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2017-10-16 修回日期:2017-11-08 出版日期:2018-08-05 发布日期:2018-08-05
通讯作者: 王杰,博士,教授,从事煤和生物质转化方向研究。
作者简介:李光源(1993-),男,硕士研究生。E-mail:a10112679@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21376080）。

Kinetics of K₂CO₃ -catalysed steam gasification of biomass char in a vertically blown reactor (VBR) and a horizontal boat reactor(HBR)

LI Guangyuan, WU Xuantao, WANG Jie

Department of Chemical Engineering for Energy, Key Laboratory of Coal Gasification and Energy Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2017-10-16 Revised:2017-11-08 Online:2018-08-05 Published:2018-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 热重分析仪和横置式反应器（横管）是研究气化动力学的两种常用反应器，其共同特点是气化剂不能穿过原料床层，以致难以消除外扩散影响，由此测定的动力学未必是本征动力学。为探究此问题，本文采用竖直管反应器（竖管）和横管，在常压和690～750℃的温度范围内，以水蒸气为气化剂，对两种不同K₂CO₃添加量（质量比各为10%和15%）的松木炭进行等温催化气化实验，研究了不同反应装置所得的催化气化动力学特征。竖管区别于横管在于气化剂能以较高的流速穿过样品颗粒层，加速外扩散。结果表明，在可比工况下，竖管中得到的平均气化反应速率是横管的2.0～2.8倍；且随着碳转化率的增加，竖管对应的反应活化能逐渐减小，而横管对应的反应活化能呈相反趋势，反映了外扩散存在与否对反应速率和动力学参数的影响。修正随机孔模型可良好拟合两种反应器中反应速率随碳转化率变化的曲线，但模型参数存在明显差异。

关键词: 生物质炭, 水蒸气气化, 催化剂, 动力学, 反应器, 外扩散

Abstract: Thermogravimetric apparatus (TGA) and HBR are widely employed for determining the gasification kinetics. However,the limiting external mass transfer could not be avoided in these types of apparatus because the reacting gas is usually not allowed to flow through the sample bed. Consequently,the kinetics determined in TGA and HBR may not be intrinsic. To investigate this problem,a VBR and a HBR were used to study the kinetics of K₂CO₃ -catalysed steam gasification of pinewood char. The gasification experiments were conducted isothermally in the temperature range of 690-750℃ and at atmospheric pressure with 10% and 15% K₂CO₃ loadings. A characteristic difference of VBR from HBR was that the steam passed through the sample grain bed with a high flow velocity in the former reactor,resulting in an accelerated external mass transfer. It was found that the mean gasification rate obtained in VBR was 2.0-2.8 times that from HBR at a comparable condition. The activation energies obtained in VBR decreased with increasing carbon conversion,while those obtained in HBR showed an increase trend. These results were attributed to the different effects of external diffusion limitations in two types of reactor. A modified random pore model (MRPM) was found to be fit to the profiles of rate versus carbon conversion obtained from both reactors,but with distinct differences in the kinetic parameters.

Key words: biomass char, steam gasification, catalyst, kinetics, reactors, external mass transfer

中图分类号:

李光源, 吴轩韬, 王杰. 两种反应器中生物质炭水蒸气催化气化的动力学[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(08): 2984-2990.

LI Guangyuan, WU Xuantao, WANG Jie. Kinetics of K₂CO₃ -catalysed steam gasification of biomass char in a vertically blown reactor (VBR) and a horizontal boat reactor(HBR)[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(08): 2984-2990.

参考文献

[1] DAHLQUIST Erik. Technologies for converting biomass to useful energy:combustion, gasification, pyrolysis, torrefaction and fermentation[M]. Leiden:CRC Press, 2013:175-178.
[2] 孙宁, 应浩, 徐卫, 等. 松木屑催化气化制取富氢燃气[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(6):2158-2163. SU Ning, YING Hao, XU Wei, et al. Cat]alytic gasification of pine sawdust for producing hydrogen-rich gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(6):2158-2163.
[3] KIRTANIA Kawnish, AXELSSON Joel, MATSAKAS Leonidas, et al. Kinetic study of catalytic gasification of wood char impregnated with different alkali salts[J]. Energy, 2017, 118:1055-1065.
[4] SUTTON D, KELLEHER B, ROSS J R H. Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, 73(3):155-173.
[5] ZHANG Y, ASHIZAWA M, KAJITANI S, et al. Proposal of a semi-empirical kinetic model to reconcile with gasification reactivity profiles of biomass chars[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(4):475-481.
[6] 肖瑞瑞, 杨伟, 于广锁. 生物质半焦的催化气化动力学特性[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(2):460-465. XIAO Ruirui, YANG Wei, YU Guangsuo. Catalytic gasification kinetics of biomass semi-char[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2013, 32(2):460-465.
[7] WU Xuantao, TANG Jia, WANG Jie. A new active site/intermediate kinetic model for K₂CO₃ -catalyzed steam gasification of ash-free coal char[J]. Fuel, 2016, 165(1):59-67.
[8] TANG Jia, WU Xuantao, WANG Jie. Kinetic study of steam gasification of two mineralogically different lignite chars:an active site/intermediate model[J]. Fuel, 2015, 141(1):46-55.
[9] 江龙, 胡松, 孙路石, 等. 农林废弃物水蒸气催化气化动力学研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2015, 36(1):243-250. JANG Long, HU Song, SUN Lushi, et al. Kinetic study on steam catalytic gasification of forestry and agricultural residues[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2015, 36(1):243-250.
[10] WANG Jie, JIANG Mingquan, YAO Yihong, et al. Steam gasification of coal char catalyzed by K₂CO₃ for enhanced production of hydrogen without formation of methane[J]. Fuel, 2009, 88(9):1572-1579.
[11] KOPYSCINSKI J, HABIBI R, MIMS C A, et al. K₂CO₃ -catalyzed CO₂ gasification of ash-free coal:kinetic study[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(8):4875-4883.
[12] GARN P D. An examination of the kinetic compensation effect[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 1975, 7(2):475-478.
[13] BHATIA S K, PERLMUTTER D D. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions:Ⅱ. Diffusion and transport effects[J]. AIChE Journal, 1981, 27(2):247-254.
[14] KRAMB Jason, DEMARTINI Nikolai, PERANDER Magnus, et al. Modeling of the catalytic effects of potassium and calcium on spruce wood gasification in CO₂[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 148:50-59.
[15] WU Xuantao, WANG Jie. K₂CO₃ -catalyzed steam gasification of ash-free coal char in a pressurized and vertically blown reactor. Influence of pressure on gasification rate and gas composition[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 159:9-18.

两种反应器中生物质炭水蒸气催化气化的动力学

Kinetics of K₂CO₃ -catalysed steam gasification of biomass char in a vertically blown reactor (VBR) and a horizontal boat reactor(HBR)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[2]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[3]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[4]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[5]	许家珩, 李永胜, 罗春欢, 苏庆泉. 甲醇水蒸气重整工艺的优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 41-46.
[6]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[7]	顾永正, 张永生. HBr改性飞灰对Hg⁰的动态吸附及动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[8]	汪鹏, 张洋, 范兵强, 何登波, 申长帅, 张贺东, 郑诗礼, 邹兴. 高碳铬铁盐酸浸出过程工艺及动力学[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 510-517.
[9]	邓丽萍, 时好雨, 刘霄龙, 陈瑶姬, 严晶颖. 非贵金属改性钒钛基催化剂NH₃-SCR脱硝协同控制VOCs[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 542-548.
[10]	刘阳, 王云刚, 修浩然, 邹立, 白彦渊. 基于动力学分析的核桃壳最佳炭化工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 94-103.
[11]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[12]	黄益平, 李婷, 郑龙云, 戚傲, 陈政霖, 史天昊, 张新宇, 郭凯, 胡猛, 倪泽雨, 刘辉, 夏苗, 主凯, 刘春江. 三级环流反应器中气液流动与传质规律[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 175-188.
[13]	董佳宇, 王斯民. 超声强化对二甲苯结晶特性及调控机理实验[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4504-4513.
[14]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[15]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.

两种反应器中生物质炭水蒸气催化气化的动力学

Kinetics of K2CO3 -catalysed steam gasification of biomass char in a vertically blown reactor (VBR) and a horizontal boat reactor(HBR)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Kinetics of K₂CO₃ -catalysed steam gasification of biomass char in a vertically blown reactor (VBR) and a horizontal boat reactor(HBR)