重油加氢裂化过程动力学模型的研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0708

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S1): 149-154.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0708

重油加氢裂化过程动力学模型的研究进展

黄汤舜, 王子军, 张书红, 刘必心, 郭鑫

中国石化石油化工科学研究院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2017-04-20 修回日期:2017-05-05 出版日期:2017-12-31 发布日期:2017-12-13
通讯作者: 黄汤舜(1992-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为重质油加工的基础研究。
作者简介:黄汤舜(1992-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为重质油加工的基础研究。E-mail:huangtangshun.ripp@sinopec.com。

Research progress of kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil

HUANG Tangshun, WANG Zijun, ZHANG Shuhong, LIU Bixin, GUO Xin

Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2017-04-20 Revised:2017-05-05 Online:2017-12-31 Published:2017-12-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对近年来重油加氢裂化过程的动力学模型进行了归纳和总结，包括传统集总动力学模型（宽馏分集总模型以及离散型集总模型），基于连续混合物的集总动力学模型以及基于分子水平的动力学模型（结构导向和单事件模型）；对各模型中所用的反应网络、计算方法等方面做了详细的阐述和说明，并分析了各个模型的优缺点，就重质油加氢裂化过程的动力学研究来说，传统集总方法因其对原料产物的简化在今后的很长一段时间内将会一直是研究的重点，然而展望该方面的动力学模型研究，精确化与细致化必将是今后的发展趋势，基于连续混合物的集总模型以及基于分子水平的动力学研究会是今后研究的重点。

关键词: 重油, 加氢裂化, 动力学模型

Abstract: An exhaustive review of the scientific literature on kinetic modeling of heavy oil hydrocracking is reported in this paper, including traditional lumping (models based on wide distillation range fractions and models based on pseudocomponents), models based on continuous mixtures and models based on molecular level (structure oriented lumping and single event models).Reaction networks, main characteristics of kinetic approaches and kinetic parameter values are also reported.In the base of comparing the advantages of these models, the paper predicts the probably trend of this kind of hydrocracking models in the future:because of the complexity of heavy oil, traditional lumping methods will be important for the long time, however, for higher requirements of adaptation of the model, in the future, kinetic models of heavy oil hydrocracking are trending for more and more accurate,as a result, models based on continuous mixtures and models based on molecular level are attaching more and more people's attention.

Key words: heavy oil, hydrocracking, kinetic model

中图分类号:

TE621

黄汤舜, 王子军, 张书红, 刘必心, 郭鑫. 重油加氢裂化过程动力学模型的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1): 149-154.

HUANG Tangshun, WANG Zijun, ZHANG Shuhong, LIU Bixin, GUO Xin. Research progress of kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(S1): 149-154.

参考文献

[1] FURIMSKY E.Selection of catalysts and reactors for hydro-processing[J].Applied Catalysis A,General,1998,171(2):177-206.
[2] BYKOVA M V,ERMAKOV D Y,KHROMOVA S A,et al. Stabilized Ni-based catalysts for bio-oil hydrotreatment:reactivity studies using guaiacol[J].Catalysis Today,2014,s 220-222(5):21-31.
[3] ANCHEYTA J,SANCHEZA S,RODRIGUEZ M A. Kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil fractions:a review[J]. Catalysis Today,2005,109(1):76-92.
[4] 范建光,赵愉生,胡长禄.渣油加氢反应动力学研究进展[J]. 化工进展,2012,31(s1):410-415.
[5] RAHIMI P M,GENTZIS T.The chemistry of bitumen and heavy oil processing[M]//Practical Advances in Petroleum Processing.New York:Springer.2007:597-634.
[6] MOSBY J F,BUTTKE R D,COX J A,et al.Process characterization of expanded-bed reactors in series[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,1986,41(4):989-995.
[7] AYASSE A R.Lumped kinetics of hydrocracking of bitumen[J].Fuel,1997,76:1025-1033.
[8] ALMEIDA R M D,GUIRARDELLO R.Hydroconversion kinetics of Marlim vacuum residue[J].Catalysis Today,2005,109(1/4):104-111.
[9] SANCHEZ A S,RODRIGUEZ M A,ANCHEYTA J. Kinetic model for moderate hydrocracking of heavy oils[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2005,44(25):págs.9409-9413.
[10] HASSANZADEH H,ABEDI J.Modelling and parameter estimation of ultra-dispersed in situ catalytic upgrading experiments in a batch reactor[J].Fuel,2010,89(10):2822-2828.
[11] LORIA H,TRUJILLOFERRER G,SOSASTULL C,et al. Kinetic modeling of bitumen hydroprocessing at in-reservoir conditions employing ultradispersed catalysts[J]. Energy & Fuels,2011,25(4):1364-1372.
[12] MARTINEZ J,ANCHEYTA J.Kinetic model for hydrocracking of heavy oil in a CSTR involving short term catalyst deactivation[J]. Fuel,2012,100(4):193-199.
[13] ASAEE S D S,VAFAJOO L,KHORASHEH F.A new approach to estimate parameters of a lumped kinetic model for hydroconversion of heavy residue[J].Fuel,2014,134(9):343-353.
[14] KRISHNA R,SAXENA A K.Use of axial dispersion model for kinetic description of hydrocracking[J].Chemical Engineering Science,1989,44(3):703-712.
[15] STANGELAND B E.A Kinetic model for the prediction of hydrocracker yields[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design & Development,1974,13(1).
[16] MOHANTY S,SARAF D N,KUNZRU D.Modeling of a hydrocracking reactor[J].Fuel Processing Technology,1991,29(1/2):1-17.
[17] MANUEL A.Pacheco,CARLOS G. Dassori. Hydrocracking:an improved kinetic model and reactor modeling[J].Chemical Engineering Communications,2002,189(12):1684-1704.
[18] LAXMINARASIMHAN C S,VERMA R P,RAMACHA-NDRAN P A.Continuous lumping model for simulation of hydrocracking[J]. AIChE Journal,1996,42(9):2645-2653.
[19] NARASIMHAN C S L,SAU M,VERMA R P.An integrated approach for hydrocracker modeling[J].Studies in Surface Science & Catalysis,1999,127(99):297-306.
[20] BASAK K,SAU M,MANNA U,et al.Industrial hydrocracker model based on novel continuum lumping approach for optimization in petroleum refinery[J]. Catalysis Today,2004,98(1/2):253-264.
[21] ELIZALDE I,ANCHEYTA J.On the detailed solution and application of the continuous kinetic lumping modeling to hydrocracking of heavy oils[J].Fuel,2011,90(12):3542-3550.
[22] ELIZALDE I,ANCHEYTA J.Modeling catalyst deactivation during hydrocracking of atmospheric residue by using the continuous kinetic lumping model[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2014,123(7):114-121.
[23] MARTENS G G,MARIN G B.Kinetics for hydrocracking based on structural classes:model development and application[J]. AIChE Journal,2001,47(7):1607-1622.
[24] BECKER P J,SERRAND N,CELSE B,et al.Comparing hydrocracking models:continuous lumping vs single events[J].Fuel,2016,165:306-315.

重油加氢裂化过程动力学模型的研究进展

Research progress of kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵毅, 杨臻, 张新为, 王刚, 杨旋. 不同裂缝损伤和愈合温度条件下沥青自愈合行为的分子模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3147-3156.
[2]	刘玉龙, 胡南, 陈祥标, 陈森才, 曾冰勇, 丁德馨. 强碱性阴离子树脂对铀的循环吸附-淋洗性能及动力学分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5574-5583.
[3]	孔倩, 孙巾超, 葛佳琪, 张鹏, 马艳龙, 刘百军. 沉淀剂对NiW/TiO₂-ASA催化剂加氢裂化性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 265-271.
[4]	祁元, 徐欣蓉, 阮玮, 吴昊, 吴科, 周亚明, 杨宏旻. 改性活性碳纤维对苯胺吸附特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 622-630.
[5]	黄金杰, 毛林强, 张文艺. 原生质体融合制备三效工程菌HL及其溶藻机理[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4464-4472.
[6]	王乔逸, 陆少锋, 师文钊, 洪勋, 姚东霞, 张领. 界面聚合聚脲/聚氨酯复合壳体香精微胶囊的制备及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4432-4440.
[7]	陈茂, 张鑫, 谢伟, 陈广辉, 李志礼. 生物炭/凹凸棒土的制备及对磺胺嘧啶的吸附[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2623-2635.
[8]	宋飞, 王君妍, 何林, 隋红, 李鑫钢. 表面活性剂强化重质油矿溶剂萃取残渣中残留溶剂鼓泡分离[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2007-2014.
[9]	韩京京, 谭涓, 刘靖, 刘宇. 小晶粒ZSM-22的可控合成及其催化长链正构生物烷烃制航空煤油性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1916-1924.
[10]	王凯, 黄慧, 南翠红, 王跃社, 卢金玲. 油水分层流条件下腐蚀动力学特性模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 40-47.
[11]	李彦霖, 程星星, 赵明亮, 王鲁元, 王志强. CO在成型催化剂上脱除NO_x的反应动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 245-252.
[12]	郑志行, 张家元, 李谦, 周浩宇. 气流床煤气化的Aspen Plus建模：平衡模型和动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4165-4172.
[13]	方向晨, 郭蓉, 仝玉军, 吴子明, 杨涛. 典型炼化一体化企业生产低硫船用燃料油的重油加工方案比较[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(7): 3703-3710.
[14]	刘东阳, 白宇恩, 张霖宙, 张宇豪, 赵亮, 高金森, 徐春明. 分子尺度反应动力学模型构建在催化裂化/裂解过程中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 2082-2091.
[15]	杜艳泽, 秦波, 王会刚, 郝文月, 高杭, 方向晨. 多级孔分子筛在重油加氢裂化催化剂的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(4): 1859-1867.