化工进展

• 资源与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

接种辫硫杆菌与活性污泥生物滴滤塔去除硫化氢效果对比

张兰河1,2,宋 达1 ,杨日光1,张德义1   

  1. 1东北电力大学化学工程学院,吉林 吉林 132012;2哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150090
  • 出版日期:2013-05-05 发布日期:2013-05-05

Comparison of hydrogen sulfide removal using bio-trickling filters by inoculating sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and activated sludge

ZHANG Lanhe1,2,SONG Da1,YANG Riguang1,ZHANG Deyi1   

  1. 1School of Chemical Engineering,Northeast Dianli University,Jilin 132012,Jilin,China;2State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,Heilongjiang,China
  • Online:2013-05-05 Published:2013-05-05

摘要: 为了解决恶臭污染问题,采用接种辫硫杆菌ZG11的生物滴滤塔A与接种活性污泥的生物滴滤塔B对硫化氢气体进行了4个多月的脱臭实验研究,主要考察了进气浓度、冲击负荷和氮利用率对硫化氢去除率的影响以及实验前后压力损失的变化。结果表明:当硫化氢进气浓度低于600 mg/m3,即进气负荷Nv低于113.33 g/(m3?h)时,滴滤塔A的去除率接近100%。当进气浓度低于750 mg/m3,即Nv低于133.33 g/(m3?h)时,滴滤塔B的去除率接近100%。当进气流量为8 m3/h时,滴滤塔A与B的压力损失分别为176.4 Pa/m和313.6 Pa/m。与滴滤塔A相比,滴滤塔B启动快,去除速率高,抗冲击负荷能力强,但压力损失大,受氮源的影响较大。

关键词: 硫化氢, 生物滴滤塔, 冲击负荷, 压力损失

Abstract: The deodorization experiment of hydrogen sulfide(H2S)was carried out continuously using bio-trickling filter A inoculating sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and bio-trickling filter B inoculating activated sludge in order to solve the odor pollution. The two bioreactors were operated for more than four months to investigate the effects of inlet concentration,shock loading and consuming quantity of nitrogen on the removal efficiency of H2S. Pressure drops of the bio-trickling filters were also compared before and after the experiment. The results suggested that removal efficiency of the bio-trickling filter A was nearly 100% when inlet concentration of H2S was lower than 600 mg/m3 and the corresponding inlet loading was lower than 113.33 g/(m3?h). Removal efficiency of the bio-trickling filter B was nearly 100% when inlet concentration of H2S was lower than 750 mg/m3 and the corresponding inlet loading was lower than 133.33 g/(m3?h). Pressure drops of the bio-trickling filter A and B were respectively 176.4 Pa/m and 313.6 Pa/m at 8 m3/h of gas flow rate. Compared with bio-trickling filter A,the bio-trickling filter B performed a relatively rapid startup,relatively high removal efficiency and ability to resist shock-loading. However,the bio-trickling filter B had a relatively high pressure drop and its removal efficiency was easily influenced by nitrogen source.

Key words: hydrogen sulfide, bio-trickling filter, shock loading, pressure drop

京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号
版权所有 © 《化工进展》编辑部
地址:北京市东城区青年湖南街13号 邮编:100011
电子信箱:hgjz@cip.com.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn