锰掺杂DSA电极及其对印染废水处理的过程优化

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0860

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以Ti/SnO₂-Sb形稳电极（DSA）为基底，采用浸渍法制备负载有活性层的Ti/SnO₂-Sb/SnO₂-Sb-Mn电极并进行了表征。利用box-behnken实验设计及响应曲面分析法，探讨槽压、搅拌速率、电极间距这三个因素对亚甲基蓝电催化脱色效率的影响，并建立相应的多元二次回归模型，方差分析结果表明，模型的拟合效果好，影响因素的显著性顺序依次为：槽压>电极间距>搅拌速率。验证实验结果显示，当槽压为4.8V、搅拌速率为320r/min、电极间距为1.5cm时，亚甲基蓝的脱色效果达到最佳，此时脱色率达到99.3%，模型的预测值非常接近实验值，验证了该方法的可行性和有效性，可为电催化脱色处理印染废水提供一定的技术指导。

关键词: box-behnken响应曲面法, 锰掺杂DSA电极, 电催化氧化, 脱色, 印染废水

Abstract:

Ti/SnO₂-Sb/SnO₂-Sb-Mn electrode was prepared and characterized. The results showed that the intermediate layer played a great role in the electrochemical performance. The box-behnken model was used to optimize the electrochemical degradation of dye wastewater. The effect of electrolytic voltage, stirring rate and electrode span on degradation rate was quantitatively analyzed. A predictive model was established based on the degradation rate as the response value. The analysis showed that the selected mathematical model was well fitted, the influence factors followed the order: electrolytic voltage>electrode span>stirring rate. The optimum conditions were 4.8V, 320r/min, 1.5cm, and the predicted degradation rate could reach 99.3%. The predicted value of the model was close to the experimental data which illustrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposal method. This study could provide the technical guidance for the treatment of dyeing wastewater by electrocatalysis degradation.

Key words: box-behnken response surface methodology, Mn-doped DSA electrode, electrocatalytic oxidation, degradation, dye wastewater

中图分类号:

O242

朱连燕, 周幸福. 锰掺杂DSA电极及其对印染废水处理的过程优化[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(6): 3459-3467.

ZHU Lianyan, ZHOU Xingfu. Mn-doped DSA electrode and optimized application in wastewater treatment process[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(6): 3459-3467.

图/表 13

参考文献 28

1	BOCZKAJ Grzegorz, FERNANDES André. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes at basic pH conditions: A review [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 320: 608-633.
2	TURAN Nouha Bakaraki, ERKAN Hanife Sari, ILHAN Fatih, et al. Decolorization of textile wastewater by electrooxidation process using different anode materials: Statistical optimization[J]. Water Environment Research, 2022, 94(1): e1683.
3	LI Ruixiang, LI Tian, WAN Yuxuan, et al. Efficient decolorization of azo dye wastewater with polyaniline/graphene modified anode in microbial electrochemical systems[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 421: 126740.
4	AGARWAL Prashant, GUPTA Ritika, AGARWAL Neeraj. Advances in synthesis and applications of microalgal nanoparticles for wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Nanotechnology, 2019, 2019: 1-9.
5	SAHU O, MAZUMDAR B, CHAUDHARI P K. Electrochemical treatment of sugar industry wastewater: Process optimization by response surface methodology[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16(3): 1527-1540.
6	CARDOSO Juliano Carvalho, BESSEGATO Guilherme Garcia, BOLDRIN ZANONI Maria Valnice. Efficiency comparison of ozonation, photolysis, photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis methods in real textile wastewater decolorization[J]. Water Research, 2016, 98: 39-46.
7	PELEYEJU M G, UMUKORO E H, BABALOLA J O, et al. Electrochemical degradation of an anthraquinonic dye on an expanded graphite-diamond composite electrode[J]. Electrocatalysis, 2016, 7(2): 132-139.
8	Sergi GARCIA-SEGURA, BRILLAS Enric. Applied photoelectrocatalysis on the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewaters[J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, 2017, 31: 1-35.
9	郑顺丽, 李澄, 项腾飞, 等. 阳极氧化法制备铝基超疏水涂层及其稳定性和耐蚀性的研究[J]. 材料工程, 2017, 45(10): 71-78.
	ZHENG Shunli, LI Cheng, XIANG Tengfei, et al. Fabrication of Aluminum-based superhydrophobic coating by anodization and research on stability and corrosion resistance[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2017, 45(10): 71-78.
10	王立璇, 马宏瑞, 孟高飞, 等. DSA电极催化氧化法处理制药废水的应用研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2017, 37(7): 35-38.
	WANG Lixuan, MA Hongrui, MENG Gaofei, et al. Study on the application of catalytic-oxidation process with DSA electrode to the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2017, 37(7): 35-38.
11	ZHUO Qiongfang, LI Xing, YAN Feng, et al. Electrochemical oxidation of 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid(6∶2 FTS) on DSA electrode:Operating parameters and mechanism[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26(8): 1733-1739.
12	徐浩, 张倩, 邵丹, 等. 钛基体锑掺杂二氧化锡电极的制备与改性研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(S1): 145-151．
	XU Hao, ZHANG Qian, SHAO Dan, et al. Advance in the preparation and modification of titanium-based Sb-doped SnO₂ electrodes[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2013, 32(S1): 145-151.
13	石凤浜，陈步明，郭忠诚，等. Mn掺杂不锈钢基β-PbO₂电极制备及电催化性能[J]. 复旦学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 51(2): 213-217.
	SHI Fengbang, CHEN Buming, GUO Zhongcheng, et al. Effect of Mn²⁺-doping on preparation and electrocatalytic activity of β-PbO₂ on stainless electrodes[J]. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science), 2012, 51(2): 213-217.
14	XU Li, WANG Ye, XU Qiutong. Comparison of the properties of low-dimensional nano-Ti/SnO₂-Sb-Fe electrodes prepared by different methods[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2019, 166(4): E69-E76.
15	JARDAK Karama, DIRANY Ahmad, DROGUI Patrick, et al. Statistical optimization of electrochemical oxidation of ethylene glycol using response surface methodology[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 105: 12-20.
16	Guitaya Léa, Azaïs Antonin, Zaviska Francois, et al. Electrochemical oxidation as treatment for contaminated wastewaters by carbamazepine: Process optimization through response surface methodology[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2017, 228(10): 384.
17	李鹏芳, 刘邦海, 张科亭, 等. 响应曲面法优化电化学氧化处理染料废水工艺参数的研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(S1): 162-171.
	LI Pengfang, LIU Banghai, ZHANG Keting, et al. Process parameter optimization of electrochemical oxidation of dye wastewater by response surface methodology[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2018, 48(S1): 162-171.
18	HIWARKAR Ajay Devidas, SINGH Seema, SRIVASTAVA Vimal Chandra, et al. Mineralization of pyrrole, a recalcitrant heterocyclic compound, by electrochemical method: Multi-response optimization and degradation mechanism[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 198: 144-152.
19	仉洁, 王旭东, 杨逸飞, 等. 响应面优化温敏水凝胶汲取剂的制备及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5363-5372.
	ZHANG Jie, WANG Xudong, YANG Yifei, et al. Response surface optimization of preparation and performance of thermo-responsive hydrogels as draw agent[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(10): 5363-5372.
20	王栗, 岳琳, 王开红, 等. 响应曲面法优化电化学氧化技术处理染料废水[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(3): 990-996.
	WANG Li, YUE Lin, WANG Kaihong, et al. Optimization of electrochemical oxidation of dye wastewater using response surface methodology[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014,8(3): 990-996.
21	朱连燕, 王玉明, 周幸福. 响应曲面法优化电催化脱色染料废水工艺的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(3): 1335-1342.
	ZHU Lianyan, WANG Yuming, ZHOU Xingfu. Application of response surface methodology in optimizing electrocatalytic degradation of dye wastewater[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(3): 1335-1342.
22	乔仙蓉. 紫外可见光谱分析海娜粉中的指甲花醌[J]. 日用化学工业, 2016, 46(3): 178-182.
	QIAO Xianrong. UV-Vis spectral analysis of lawsone in henna powder[J]. China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2016, 46(3): 178-182.
23	李云雁, 胡传荣. 实验设计与数据处理[M]. 2版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008.
	LI Yunyan, HU Chuanrong. Experiment design and data processing[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008.
24	Montgomery D C. Design and analysis of experiments[M]. 8th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
25	王春雨, 朱玲, 许丹芸, 等.低温等离子体脱色苯的工艺参数优化[J].化工进展, 2020, 39 (1): 402-412.
	WANG Chunyu, ZHU Ling, XU Danyun, et al. Process parameters optimization for degradation of benzene by non-thermal plasma[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39 (1): 402-412.
26	史公初, 廖亚龙, 苏博文, 等. 响应曲面法多目标优化铜冶炼渣氧压选择性浸出工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39 (S1): 270-280.
	SHI Gongchu, LIAO Yalong, SU Bowen, et al. Multi-objective optimization of pressure oxidative selective leaching of copper smelting slag by response surface methodology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39 (S1): 270-280.
27	唐丽蓉, 欧文, 林雯怡, 等. 酸水解制备纳米纤维素工艺条件的响应面优化[J]. 林产化学与工业, 2011, 31(6): 61-65.
	TANG Lirong, Wen OU, LIN Wenyi, et al. Optimization of acid hydrolysis processing of nanocellulose crystal using response surface methodology[J]. Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products, 2011, 31(6): 61-65.
28	刘子菲, 路苹, 高子乔, 等. 水解制备细菌纤维素纳米纤维及纳米纤维稳定的Pickering乳液特性[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(22): 76-82.
	LIU Zifei, LU Ping, GAO Ziqiao, et al. Hydrolysis preparation of bacterial cellulose nanofibers and its characteristics of the Pickering emulsions[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(22): 76-82.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

122

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	2	0	0	120

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	15	107
比例	12%	88%

摘要

126

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	126

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	21	105
比例	17%	83%

水平编码（x）	槽压（X₁）/V	搅拌速率（X₂）/r·min^-1	电极间距（X₃）/cm
-1	3	0	1
1	4	500	1.5
0	5	1000	3

水平编码（x）	槽压（X₁）/V	搅拌速率（X₂）/r·min^-1	电极间距（X₃）/cm
-1	3	0	1
1	4	500	1.5
0	5	1000	3

序号	X₁	X₂	X₃	脱色率（Y）/%
序号	X₁	X₂	X₃	实验值	预测值
1	3	0	2	43.4	42.74
2	5	0	2	96.2	94.88
3	3	1000	2	47.3	48.61
4	5	1000	2	71.3	71.96
5	3	500	1	73.7	75.64
6	5	500	1	98	100.58
7	3	500	3	43	40.41
8	5	500	3	92.9	90.96
9	4	0	1	76.2	74.93
10	4	1000	1	77	73.75
11	4	0	3	56.6	59.85
12	4	1000	3	42.7	43.98
13	4	500	2	81.9	83.32
14	4	500	2	81.7	83.32
15	4	500	2	84	83.32
16	4	500	2	85.6	83.32
17	4	500	2	83.4	83.32

序号	X₁	X₂	X₃	脱色率（Y）/%
序号	X₁	X₂	X₃	实验值	预测值
1	3	0	2	43.4	42.74
2	5	0	2	96.2	94.88
3	3	1000	2	47.3	48.61
4	5	1000	2	71.3	71.96
5	3	500	1	73.7	75.64
6	5	500	1	98	100.58
7	3	500	3	43	40.41
8	5	500	3	92.9	90.96
9	4	0	1	76.2	74.93
10	4	1000	1	77	73.75
11	4	0	3	56.6	59.85
12	4	1000	3	42.7	43.98
13	4	500	2	81.9	83.32
14	4	500	2	81.7	83.32
15	4	500	2	84	83.32
16	4	500	2	85.6	83.32
17	4	500	2	83.4	83.32

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F	P
模型	5693.3	9	632.6	73.9	<0.0001
X₁	2850.1	1	2850.1	333	<0.0001
X₂	145.5	1	145.3	16.9	0.0045
X₃	1005.7	1	1005.8	117.5	<0.0001
X₁X₂	207.3	1	207.4	24.2	0.0017
X₁X₃	163.8	1	163.8	19.1	0.0033
X₂X₃	54	1	54	6.3	0.0403
X₁²	26.3	1	26.3	3.1	0.1233
X₂²	1114.9	1	1114.9	130.3	<0.0001
X₃²	64.8	1	64.78	7.57	0.0284
残差	59.91	7	8.56	—	—
失拟项	49.6	3	16.53	6.42	0.0522
误差	10.31	4	2.58	—	—
总和	5753.2	16	—	—	—