燃气锅炉掺氢燃烧氮氧化物排放机理数值模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0016

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 5637-5647.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0016

燃气锅炉掺氢燃烧氮氧化物排放机理数值模拟

赵巧男¹(), 刘雪敏², 刘峰², 徐洪涛¹(), 刘兆海³, 廖晓炜²

^1.上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院，上海 200093
^2.中国特种设备检测研究院国家市场监管重点实验室（特种设备安全与节能），北京 100029
^3.唐山冀东石油机械责任有限公司，河北唐山 063200

收稿日期:2023-01-05 修回日期:2023-04-18 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-12-15
通讯作者: 徐洪涛
作者简介:赵巧男（1995—），女，博士研究生，研究方向为工业掺氢/氨燃烧特性及污染物控制。E-mail：zhao_qiaonan@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFF0600605)

Numerical on emissions mechanism of nitrogen oxides in gas-fired boilers blended with hydrogen

ZHAO Qiaonan¹(), LIU Xuemin², LIU Feng², XU Hongtao¹(), LIU Zhaohai³, LIAO Xiaowei²

^1.School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
^2.National Key Laboratory of Market Supervision (Safety and Energy Conservation of Special Equipment), China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
^3.Tangshan Jidong Petroleum Machinery Co. , Ltd. , Tangshan 063200, Hebei, China

Received:2023-01-05 Revised:2023-04-18 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-12-15
Contact: XU Hongtao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

工业燃气锅炉掺氢燃烧可减少含碳燃料的使用，但会引起NO _x 排放的增加。本文针对现有工业用HL75-2.5/260-Q型锅炉燃气掺氢燃烧特性展开详尽研究，探究NO和N₂O的生成规律及减少路径，为后续掺氢燃烧低氮燃烧器开发提供依据。首先，基于甲烷详细反应机理Gri-mesh 3.0，对0～90%掺氢比的燃气燃烧特性及污染物生成特性进行模拟研究。其次，利用Chemkin建立该锅炉内部的化学反应器网络模型，研究了最佳掺氢比下的NO和N₂O的生成路径、敏感性及生产速率特性。结果表明：在过量空气系数为1.2的情况下，随掺氢比增加炉膛内火焰高温区域增大，出口温度升高，出口NO由85.59mg/m³逐渐增多到249.85mg/m³；N₂O呈现先减少后增加趋势，在掺氢比为0.2时N₂O排放最少为0.16mg/m³；NO主要来源于基元反应R179 (N + O₂ NO + O)和R180 (N+O₂ NO + O)，N₂O主要来源于基元反应R185 [N₂ + O(+M) N₂O(+M)]。

关键词: 燃气锅炉, 氢, 氮氧化物, 敏感性分析, 生产速率分析, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Combustion of adding hydrogen in industrial gas boilers can reduce the use of carbon-containing fuels, but it will cause an increase in NO _x emission. Therefore, this paper conducted a detailed study on the hydrogen mixed combustion characteristics of an existing industrial gas-fired HL75-2.5/260-Q boiler. The formation law and reduction path of NO and N₂O were explored to provide a fundamental guide for the subsequent development of low-nitrogen burners for hydrogen mixed combustion. Firstly, based on the detailed reaction mechanism of methane Gri-mesh 3.0, the combustion characteristics and pollutant formation characteristics of gas with a hydrogen content ratio of 0—90% were simulated. Secondly, the chemical reactor network model inside the boiler was established by Chemkin, and the generation path, sensitivity, and production rate characteristics of NO and N₂O under the optimal hydrogen mixing ratio were analyzed. The results showed that when the excess air coefficient was 1.2, the high-temperature area of the flame and the outlet temperature increased with the increase of the hydrogen doping ratio. The outlet NO concentration gradually increased from 85.59mg/m³ to 249.85mg/m³. The N₂O emission first decreased and then increased, and the N₂O emission was at least 0.16mg/m³ at the hydrogen mixed ratio of 0.2. NO mainly came from the elementary reactions R179 (N + O₂ NO + O) and R180 (N + O₂ NO + O)), and N₂O mainly came from the elementary reaction R185 [N₂ + O(+M) N₂O(+M)].

Key words: gas-fired boiler, hydrogen, nitrogen oxide, sensitivity analysis, rate of production analysis, numerical study

中图分类号:

TK229

赵巧男, 刘雪敏, 刘峰, 徐洪涛, 刘兆海, 廖晓炜. 燃气锅炉掺氢燃烧氮氧化物排放机理数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(11): 5637-5647.

ZHAO Qiaonan, LIU Xuemin, LIU Feng, XU Hongtao, LIU Zhaohai, LIAO Xiaowei. Numerical on emissions mechanism of nitrogen oxides in gas-fired boilers blended with hydrogen[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(11): 5637-5647.

图/表 16

参考文献 23

1	王珂, 张引弟, 王城景, 等. CH₄掺混H₂的燃烧数值模拟及掺混比合理性分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(2): 240-250.
	WANG Ke, ZHANG Yindi, WANG Chengjing, et al. Numerical simulation of combustion of CH₄ mixed H₂ and rationality analysis of premixed ratio[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2021, 21(2): 240-250.
2	崔耀欣, 刘晓佩, 陈明敏. F级重型燃气轮机燃烧器天然气掺氢全压试验研究[J]. 燃气轮机技术, 2021, 34(2): 38-42.
	CUI Yaoxin, LIU Xiaopei, CHEN Mingmin. Experimental study of natural gas mixed with hydrogen under full pressure of F-class heavy duty gas turbine burner[J]. Gas Turbine Technology, 2021, 34(2): 38-42.
3	HUANG Yue, MA Fanhua. Intelligent regression algorithm study based on performance and NO _x emission experimental data of a hydrogen enriched natural gas engine[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(26): 11308-11320.
4	ZHAO Y, MCDONELL V, SAMUELSEN S. Influence of hydrogen addition to pipeline natural gas on the combustion performance of a cooktop burner[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 12239-12253.
5	GONZÁLEZ-ESPINOSA A, GIL A, ROYO-PASCUAL L, et al. Effects of hydrogen and primary air in a commercial partially-premixed atmospheric gas burner by means of optical and supervised machine learning techniques[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(55): 31130-31150.
6	LI Pengfei, WANG Feifei, MI Jianchun, et al. Mechanisms of NO formation in MILD combustion of CH₄/H₂ fuel blends[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(33):19187-19203.
7	ARAOYE A A, ABDELHAFEZ A, NEMITALLAH M A, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of stability and emissions of hydrogen-assisted oxy-methane flames in a multi-hole model gas-turbine burner[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(38): 20093-20106.
8	DAI Huaming, ZHANG Bingqian, LI Zhuoyu, et al. Combustion characteristics of a porous media burner with partial hydrogen injection[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(2): 1092-1102.
9	IAVARONE S, CAFIERO M, FERRAROTTI M, et al. A multiscale combustion model formulation for NO _x predictions in hydrogen enriched jet flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(41): 23436-23457.
10	SUN Yuhao, ZHANG Yanfei, HUANG Mingming, et al. Effect of hydrogen addition on the combustion and emission characteristics of methane under gas turbine relevant operating condition[J]. Fuel, 2022, 324: 124707.
11	LIU Zhigang, XIONG Yan, ZHU Ziru, et al. Effects of hydrogen addition on combustion characteristics of a methane fueled MILD model combustor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(36): 16309-16320.
12	鲍俊杰, 王迪, 刘峰, 等. 燃尽风对燃气锅炉燃烧特性影响的模拟研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2020, 35(7): 95-101.
	BAO Junjie, WANG Di, LIU Feng, et al. Simulation research of OFA effects on the combustion characteristics of gas-fired boiler[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2020, 35(7):95-101.
13	LAUNDER B E, SPALDING D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2): 269-289.
14	DUAN H, HUANG Y, MEHRA R K, et al. Study on influencing factors of prediction accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) model for NO _x emission of a hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas engine[J]. Fuel, 2018, 234: 954-964.
15	成鹏飞, 李鹏飞, 胡帆, 等. 煤粉无焰富氧燃烧的数值模拟方法进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2021, 27(2): 45-56.
	CHENG Pengfei, LI Pengfei, HU Fan, et al. Progress in numerical methods for flameless oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2021, 27(2): 45-56.
16	NOVOSSELOV I V, MALTE P C, YUAN S, et al. Chemical reactor network application to emissions prediction for industial DLE gas turbine[C].Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2006: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. ASME, 2008: 221-235.
17	CHO Cheon Hyeon, BAEK Gwang Min, SOHN Chae Hoon, et al. A numerical approach to reduction of NO _x emission from swirl premix burner in a gas turbine combustor[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 59(1/2): 454-463.
18	CHEN H Y, WEI Z H, KOLLAR M, et al. A comparative study of N₂O formation during the selective catalytic reduction of NO _x with NH₃ on zeolite supported Cu catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 329: 490-498.
19	ZHU M H, LAI J K, WACHS I E. Formation of N₂O greenhouse gas during SCR of NO with NH₃ by supported vanadium oxide catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 224: 836-840.
20	戴超, 王亚军, 颜应文, 等. 一种基于敏感性分析的RP-3替代燃料简化机理[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47(4): 579-587.
	DAI Chao, WANG Yajun, YAN Yingwen, et al. Reduced mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene based on sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2015, 47(4): 579-587.
21	王丽燕, 王振峰, 陈伟华, 等. 酚醛树脂热解产物高温燃烧详细化学反应机理简化[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 52(1): 131-141.
	WANG Liyan, WANG Zhenfeng, CHEN Weihua, et al. Reduction of chemical kinetic mechanism for high‑temperature pyrolysis products of phenolic resin[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2020, 52(1): 131-141.
22	朱郅寒, 韦中悬, 鲍俊杰, 等. 高原地区燃气锅炉燃尽风技术数值模拟[J]. 热能动力工程, 2021, 36(4): 111-117.
	ZHU Zhihan, WEI Zhongxuan, BAO Junjie, et al. Numerical simulation of the over-fire air technology of gas-fired boiler in plateau area[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2021, 36(4): 111-117.
23	武辉, 穆克进, 王岳, 等. 氢含量对氢气/甲烷混合气扩散燃烧特性的影响研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2010, 25(1): 102-106, 125-126.
	WU Hui, MU Kejin, WANG Yue, et al. Investigation of the influence of the hydrogen content on the diffusion combustion characteristics of hydrogen/methane hybrid gas[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2010, 25(1): 102-106, 125-126.

编号	氢气混合分数f(H₂)	燃气速度/kg·s^-1	空气速度/kg·s^-1
1	0	0.279	5.74
2	0.1	0.273	5.70
3	0.2	0.267	5.67
4	0.3	0.260	5.63
5	0.4	0.251	5.59
6	0.5	0.241	5.56
7	0.6	0.228	5.45
8	0.7	0.212	5.34
9	0.8	0.189	5.20
10	0.9	0.160	5.02

编号	氢气混合分数f(H₂)	燃气速度/kg·s^-1	空气速度/kg·s^-1
1	0	0.279	5.74
2	0.1	0.273	5.70
3	0.2	0.267	5.67
4	0.3	0.260	5.63
5	0.4	0.251	5.59
6	0.5	0.241	5.56
7	0.6	0.228	5.45
8	0.7	0.212	5.34
9	0.8	0.189	5.20
10	0.9	0.160	5.02

序号	基元反应	序号	基元反应
R33	H+O₂+MHO₂+M	R52	H+CH₃(+M)CH₄+(+M)
R34	H+2O₂HO₂+O₂	R84	OH+H₂H+H₂O
R36	H+O₂+N₂HO₂+N₂	R98	OH+CH₄CH₃+H₂O
R38	H+O₂O+OH	R119	HO₂+CH₃OH+CH₃O
R47	H+H₂O₂HO₂+H₂	R158	2CH₃(+M)C₂H₆(+M)

序号	基元反应	序号	基元反应
R33	H+O₂+MHO₂+M	R52	H+CH₃(+M)CH₄+(+M)
R34	H+2O₂HO₂+O₂	R84	OH+H₂H+H₂O
R36	H+O₂+N₂HO₂+N₂	R98	OH+CH₄CH₃+H₂O
R38	H+O₂O+OH	R119	HO₂+CH₃OH+CH₃O
R47	H+H₂O₂HO₂+H₂	R158	2CH₃(+M)C₂H₆(+M)

序号	基元反应	ROP	贡献率/%	方向
R178	N+NON₂+O	6.63×10^-3	0.37	生成
R179	N+O₂NO+O	1.13	63.11	生成
R180	N+OHNO+H	0.51	28.48	生成
R189	NO₂+HNO+OH	4.14×10^-3	0.23	生成
R190	NH+ONO+H	2.52×10^-2	1.41	生成
R208	NNH+ONH+NO	4.25×10^-2	2.37	生成
R214	HNO+HH₂+NO	6.50×10^-2	3.63	生成
R222	NCO+ONO+CO	6.98×10^-3	0.40	生成

燃气锅炉掺氢燃烧氮氧化物排放机理数值模拟

Numerical on emissions mechanism of nitrogen oxides in gas-fired boilers blended with hydrogen

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

序号	基元反应	ROP	贡献率/%	方向
R183	N₂O+HN₂+OH	-1.87×10^-2	86.37	消耗
R184	N₂O+OHN₂+HO₂	4.13×10^-3	11.89	生成
R185	N₂+O(+M)N₂O(+M)	3.06×10^-2	88.11	生成
R199	NH+NON₂O+H	-2.95×10^-3	13.63	消耗

[1]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[2]	杨建平. 降低HPPO装置反应系统原料消耗的PSE[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 21-32.
[3]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[4]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[5]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[6]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[7]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[8]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[9]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[10]	赖诗妮, 江丽霞, 李军, 黄宏宇, 小林敬幸. 含碳掺氨燃料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4603-4615.
[11]	程涛, 崔瑞利, 宋俊男, 张天琪, 张耘赫, 梁世杰, 朴实. 渣油加氢装置杂质沉积规律与压降升高机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4616-4627.
[12]	葛全倩, 徐迈, 梁铣, 王凤武. MOFs材料在光电催化领域应用的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4692-4705.
[13]	史柯柯, 刘木子, 赵强, 李晋平, 刘光. 镁基储氢材料的性能及研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4731-4745.
[14]	刘木子, 史柯柯, 赵强, 李晋平, 刘光. 固体储氢材料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4746-4769.
[15]	毛善俊, 王哲, 王勇. 基团辨识加氢：从概念到应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3917-3922.