阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1901

化工进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 3413-3419.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1901

• 专栏：智能化工装备与安全 • 上一篇下一篇

阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟

单雪影¹(), 张濛¹, 张家傅¹, 李玲玉², 宋艳², 李锦春²

^1.常州大学安全科学与工程学院，江苏常州 213164
^2.常州大学材料科学与工程学院，江苏常州 213164

收稿日期:2022-10-13 修回日期:2022-12-01 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-08-14
通讯作者: 单雪影
作者简介:单雪影（1986—），女，博士，副教授，主要研究方向为聚合物材料的火灾安全。E-mail：xyshan@cczu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(SJCX23_1586)

Numerical simulation of combustion of flame retardant epoxy resin

SHAN Xueying¹(), ZHANG Meng¹, ZHANG Jiafu¹, LI Lingyu², SONG Yan², LI Jinchun²

^1.School of Safety Science and Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China
^2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changzhou University Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China

Received:2022-10-13 Revised:2022-12-01 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-08-14
Contact: SHAN Xueying

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为热固性树脂，环氧树脂（EP）化学结构决定了其易燃，且燃烧时伴随热量和烟气的释放，具有较大的火灾危险性。本文工作首先制备阻燃型EP，结合热重分析和锥形量热仪测试的数据进行材料燃烧数值模拟，对阻燃型EP的火灾危险性进行分析。热重分析的结果表明阻燃剂的加入增加了EP的成炭量；锥形量热仪的分析结果显示阻燃剂的添加使EP的点燃难度加大，热释放速率峰值、总热释放量、烟释放速率峰值和总烟释放量相较于纯EP均有不同程度的降低，表明阻燃型EP具有良好的阻燃性能。材料燃烧数值模拟结果与仪器测试分析的结果相吻合，显示阻燃型EP燃烧速率较为缓慢，热释放量和热传播速率、烟气比率和烟气流动速率明显低于纯EP，因此阻燃型EP材料的火安全性提高。

关键词: 安全, 数值模拟, 复合材料, 阻燃, 火灾危险性

Abstract:

As a thermosetting resin, the chemical structure of epoxy resin (EP) determines its flammability and its combustion is accompanied by the release of heat and smoke, which has a big fire hazard problem. In this work, flame retardant EP was prepared firstly, then the fire hazard of the flame retardant EP was analyzed by the numerical simulation combined with the combustion test data, which were measured by the thermogravimetric analysis and cone calorimeter test. The results of thermogravimetric analysis showed that the addition of flame retardant improved the char formation of EP. The analysis results of cone calorimeter test indicated that the addition of flame retardant made EP ignition more difficult. The peak value of heat release rate, the total heat release, the peak value of smoke production rate and the total smoke production were decreased. Thus, flame retardant EP showed good flame retardancy. Consisting with the instrument test data, numerical simulation results of material combustion showed that the combustion rate of the flame retardant EP was relatively low. The heat release and heat transfer rate, the smoke production rate and smoke flow rate were significantly lower than those of pure EP. Therefore, the fire safety of the flame retardant EP materials was improved.

Key words: safety, numerical simulation, composites, flame retardant, fire hazard

中图分类号:

X937

单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.

SHAN Xueying, ZHANG Meng, ZHANG Jiafu, LI Lingyu, SONG Yan, LI Jinchun. Numerical simulation of combustion of flame retardant epoxy resin[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.

图/表 10

参考文献 11

1	崔锦峰, 王文华, 郭永亮, 等. 磷-硼杂化聚合物/环氧树脂复合材料的制备及阻燃性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(1): 28-38.
	CUI Jinfeng, WANG Wenhua, GUO Yongliang, et al. Preparation and flame retardant properties of phosphorus-boron hybrid polymer/epoxy resin composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(1): 28-38.
2	何腾飞, 王文和, 米红甫, 等. 基于CONE的聚合物材料火灾危险性综合评价方法研究[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2018, 44(10): 5-8.
	HE Tengfei, WANG Wenhe, MI Hongfu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fire risk of three polymeric materials based on CONE[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 44(10): 5-8, 19.
3	刘秋平. ZHS包覆粒子对PVC材料的阻燃抑烟作用研究[D]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学, 2016.
	LIU Qiuping. Research on the flame retardant and smoke suppressing effect of ZHS coated particles on PVC materials[D]. Beijing: Capital University of Economics and Business, 2016.
4	舒中俊, 徐晓楠, 杨守生, 等. 基于锥形量热仪试验的聚合物材料火灾危险评价研究[J]. 高分子通报, 2006(5): 37-44.
	SHU Zhongjun, XU Xiaonan, YANG Shousheng, et al. Integrated assessing fire hazard of polymer based on data of cone calorimeter[J]. Chinese Polymer Bulletin, 2006(5): 37-44, 78.
5	曲芳, 吴鹏, 王志. 环氧树脂复合材料的热解特性及动力学研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2018, 37(11): 1506-1509.
	QU Fang, WU Peng, WANG Zhi. Research of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of epoxy composites[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2018, 37(11): 1506-1509.
6	赵江平, 冯文兴, 武来喜. 建筑火灾烟气中CO迁移规律的FDS模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(6): 16-20.
	ZHAO Jiangping, FENG Wenxing, WU Laixi. Numerical simulation on the spreading rule of CO in building fire by FDS[J]. China Safety Science Journal (CSSJ), 2008, 18(6): 16-20.
7	NGUYEN Q T. Experimental and computational investigations on fire resistance of GFRP composite for building façade[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2014, 62: 218-229.
8	单雪影, 韩骥, 宋艳, 等. 环氧树脂/改性β-环糊精复合材料的热降解和阻燃性能[J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2021, 37(4): 84-91.
	SHAN Xueying, HAN Ji, SONG Yan, et al. Thermal degradation and flame retardancy of epoxy resin/modified β-cyclodextrin[J]. Polymer Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 37(4): 84-91.
9	殷全明, 徐晓楠, 卢林刚, 等. 四苯基双酚A二磷酸酯及复配体系阻燃环氧树脂的热动力学分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2009, 9(1): 148-150.
	YIN Quanming, XU Xiaonan, LU Lingang, et al. Thermo-dynamic study on pyrolysis of bisphenol A diphosphate and the compounding system of flame-retarded epoxy resins[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2009, 9(1): 148-150.
10	赵洁雯. 基于沥青各组分热力学特性的复合阻燃机理研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
	ZHAO Jiewen. Combined retarding of asphalt based on mechanism of components separation[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2017.
11	方廷勇, 冯文兴, 李辉亮, 等. 火灾烟气毒性评价新的“RRC”动态模型及工程应用[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2005, 24(2): 156-158.
	FANG Tingyong, FENG Wenxing, LI Huiliang, et al. Establishment of a new dynamic RRC model in smoke toxicity evaluation and engineering application[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2005, 24(2): 156-158.

样品	mβ-CD质量分数/%	mβ-CD/g	EP/g	DDM/g
EP	0	0	70	14
阻燃EP	25	17.5	70	14

样品	mβ-CD质量分数/%	mβ-CD/g	EP/g	DDM/g
EP	0	0	70	14
阻燃EP	25	17.5	70	14

材料特性	纯EP	阻燃EP	来源
总热释放量（THR）/MJ·m^-2	134.0	66.5	锥形量热仪测试
热释放速率峰值（PHRR）/kJ·m^-2	1797.3	936.6	锥形量热仪测试
烟释放速率（SPR）/m²·s^-1	0.24	0.16	锥形量热仪测试
总烟释放量（TSP）/m²	36.0	24.5	锥形量热仪测试
升温速率/℃·min^-1	20	20	TG分析
700℃炭渣质量分数/%	15.3	27.6	TG分析
反应级数n	1	1	TG分析
指前因子A/s^-1	1.41×10¹⁰	2.52×10¹⁶	TG分析计算
活化能E/kJ·mol^-1	38.0	61.8	TG分析计算

材料特性	纯EP	阻燃EP	来源
总热释放量（THR）/MJ·m^-2	134.0	66.5	锥形量热仪测试
热释放速率峰值（PHRR）/kJ·m^-2	1797.3	936.6	锥形量热仪测试
烟释放速率（SPR）/m²·s^-1	0.24	0.16	锥形量热仪测试
总烟释放量（TSP）/m²	36.0	24.5	锥形量热仪测试
升温速率/℃·min^-1	20	20	TG分析
700℃炭渣质量分数/%	15.3	27.6	TG分析
反应级数n	1	1	TG分析
指前因子A/s^-1	1.41×10¹⁰	2.52×10¹⁶	TG分析计算
活化能E/kJ·mol^-1	38.0	61.8	TG分析计算

[1]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[2]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[3]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[4]	胡喜, 王明珊, 李恩智, 黄思鸣, 陈俊臣, 郭秉淑, 于博, 马志远, 李星. 二硫化钨复合材料制备与储钠性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 344-355.
[5]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[6]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[7]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[8]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[9]	林晓鹏, 肖友华, 管奕琛, 鲁晓东, 宗文杰, 傅深渊. 离子聚合物-金属复合材料（IPMC）柔性电极的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4770-4782.
[10]	郭晋, 张耕, 陈国华, 朱鸣, 谭粤, 李蔚, 夏莉, 胡昆. 车载液氢气瓶设计技术的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4221-4229.
[11]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.
[12]	乔旭, 张竹修. 化工本征安全技术发展路径的思考与探索[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3319-3324.
[13]	吴展华, 盛敏. 绝热加速量热仪在反应安全风险评估应用中的常见问题[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3374-3382.
[14]	俞俊楠, 俞建峰, 程洋, 齐一搏, 化春键, 蒋毅. 基于深度学习的变宽度浓度梯度芯片性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3383-3393.
[15]	汪嘉欣, 潘勇, 熊欣怡, 万晓月, 王建超. 甲苯一步催化硝化制备二硝基甲苯反应过程及危险性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3420-3430.

阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟

Numerical simulation of combustion of flame retardant epoxy resin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 11

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价