浸没式PAC-AMBRs系统中PAC缓解膜污染的研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0527

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

浸没式粉末活性炭-好氧膜生物反应器（powdered activated carbon-aerobic membrane bioreactors，PAC-AMBRs）是一种利用PAC吸附性、微生物降解性和膜分离特性的新型废水处理技术。本文重点分析了近20年来浸没式PAC-AMBRs系统直接投加PAC缓解膜污染机制的研究成果，探讨了PAC通过对污泥絮体和溶解性有机物的综合影响缓解膜污染的机制，分析了PAC投加量和补充率对膜污染的影响。通过分析可知PAC缓解膜污染是一个综合作用的结果。以PAC为载体形成的污泥絮体在膜表面形成结构疏松和抗压性强的滤饼层，不仅能有效降低滤饼层阻力（cake resistance，R_c），还可以作为自成型动态膜截留溶解性有机物和悬浮微生物等来减少此类污染物造成的膜污染。PAC通过吸附和/或表面附着的微生物降解溶解性有机物的协同作用降低其造成的过滤阻力。定期排出和补充一定量的PAC可以提高缓解膜污染的效率。

关键词: 粉末活性炭, 好氧膜生物反应器, 吸附, 微生物降解, 膜污染

Abstract:

The submerged powdered activated carbon-aerobic membrane bioreactors (PAC-AMBRs) are new wastewater treatment technology, which integrates PAC adsorption, microbial degradation, and membrane separation. This review focuses on the previously published research on the mechanism of directly adding PAC to the submerged PAC-AMBRs system to alleviate membrane fouling in the past 20 years. The membrane fouling mitigation mechanism of sludge flocs and dissolved organic matters by PAC is analyzed comprehensively. The effects of PAC dosage and replenishment rate on membrane fouling are discussed. It is concluded that the fouling mitigation by PAC is a comprehensive process. The cake layer formed by sludge flocs with PAC as a carrier had a loose structure and strong pressure resistance. It not only effectively reduces the cake resistance but also is used as a self-forming dynamic membrane, intercepting dissolves organic matter and suspends microorganisms and reducing membrane fouling. Dissolved organic matter is removed through the synergistic effect of PAC adsorption and/or microbial degradation on PAC, reducing membrane fouling and improving permeate flux. Regular discharge and supplement of a certain amount of PAC can improve the efficiency of fouling alleviation.

Key words: powdered activated carbon, aerobic membrane bioreactor, adsorption, microbial degradation, fouling

中图分类号:

X703

刘雅娟. 浸没式PAC-AMBRs系统中PAC缓解膜污染的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 457-468.

LIU Yajuan. Research status of membrane fouling mitigation by PAC in submerged PAC-AMBRs[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(1): 457-468.

图/表 5

参考文献 107

1	PEYRAVI M, JAHANSHAHI M, ALIMORADI M, et al. Old landfill leachate treatment through multistage process: Membrane adsorption bioreactor and nanofitration[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2016, 39(12): 1803-1816.
2	LIPP P, GROß H J, TIEHM A. Improved elimination of organic micropollutants by a process combination of membrane bioreactor (MBR) and powdered activated carbon (PAC)[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2012, 42(1/2/3): 65-72.
3	NG C A, SUN D, ZHANG J, et al. Mechanisms of fouling control in membrane bioreactors by the addition of powdered activated carbon[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2010, 45(7): 873-889.
4	AUN N C, SUN D, FANE A G. Operation of membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2006, 41(7): 1447-1466.
5	MA Defang, GAO Yue, GAO Baoyu, et al. Impacts of powdered activated carbon addition on trihalomethane formation reactivity of dissolved organic matter in membrane bioreactor effluent[J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 117: 338-344.
6	GAO Yue, MA Defang, YUE Qinyan, et al. Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) on MBR performance and effluent trihalomethane formation: At the initial stage of PAC addition[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 216: 838-844.
7	DU Xing, LIU Guangyang, QU Fangshu, et al. Removal of iron, manganese and ammonia from groundwater using a PAC-MBR system: The anti-pollution ability, microbial population and membrane fouling[J]. Desalination, 2017, 403: 97-106.
8	余良正, 杨彬, 雷乐成. 活性炭减缓膜生物反应器膜污染的研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2020, 34(1): 261-268.
	YU Liangzheng, YANG Bin, LEI Lecheng. Study on mitigation of membrane fouling by activated carbon in membrane bioreactors[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2020, 34(1): 261-268.
9	ZHANG Shi, ZUO Xingtao, XIONG Juan, et al. Effect of powdered activated carbon dosage on sludge properties and membrane bioreactor performance in a hybrid MBR-PAC system[J]. Environmental Technology, 2019, 40(9): 1156-1165.
10	TORRETTA V, URBINI G, RABONI M, et al. Effect of powdered activated carbon to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors: A sustainable solution. Case study[J]. Sustainability, 2013, 5(4): 1501-1509.
11	SEO G, TAKIZAWA S, OHGAKI S. Ammonia oxidation at low temperature in a high concentration powdered activated carbon membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Supply, 2002, 2(2): 169-176.
12	KIM H S, TAKIZAWA S, OHGAKI S. Application of microfiltration systems coupled with powdered activated carbon to river water treatment[J]. Desalination, 2007, 202(1/2/3): 271-277.
13	IORHEMEN O T, HAMZA R A, TAY J H. Membrane fouling control in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) using granular materials[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 240: 9-24.
14	WANG Zhiwei, MEI Xiaojie, MA Jinxing, et al. Potential foulants and fouling indicators in MBRs: A critical review[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2013, 48(1): 22-50.
15	王惠, 张四永, 王亚军. PAC强化MBR工艺处理效果的研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(8): 147-153.
	WANG Hui, ZHANG Siyong, WANG Yajun. Research progress on treatment effect of PAC enhanced MBR process[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2020, 38(8): 147-153.
16	李健, 郭烨烨, 王霞, 等. 活性炭提高膜生物反应器运行性能的研究进展[J]. 水处理技术, 2021, 47(1): 7-11, 26.
	LI Jian, GUO Yeye, WANG Xia, et al. The research progress of activated carbon improving the performanceof membrane bioreactor[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2021, 47(1): 7-11, 26.
17	REN Baoyu, LI Chengyue, ZHANG Xihui, et al. Fe(Ⅱ)-dosed ceramic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: Nutrient removal, microbial community and membrane fouling analysis[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 664: 116-126.
18	伍卫, 李畅, 张旭, 等. 亲水改性PVDF膜材料及其膜生物反应器应用[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(11): 4991-4998.
	WU Wei, LI Chang, ZHANG Xu, et al. Novel antifouling PVDF membrane with hydrophilic modification and its application in membrane bioreactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(11): 4991-4998.
19	SAMAEI S M, GATO-TRINIDAD S, ALTAEE A. The application of pressure-driven ceramic membrane technology for the treatment of industrial wastewaters—A review[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 200: 198-220.
20	SKOUTERIS G, SAROJ D, MELIDIS P, et al. The effect of activated carbon addition on membrane bioreactor processes for wastewater treatment and reclamation—Critical review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 185: 399-410.
21	ASIF M B, ZHANG Z. Ceramic membrane technology for water and wastewater treatment: A critical review of performance, full-scale applications, membrane fouling and prospects[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 418: 129481.
22	SANO T, KOGA Y, ITO H, et al. Effects of structural vulnerability of flat-sheet membranes on fouling development in continuous submerged membrane bioreactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 304: 123015.
23	MEIER J. Mechanical influence of PAC particles on membrane processes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 360(1/2): 404-409.
24	JEON S, RAJABZADEH S, OKAMURA R, et al. The effect of membrane material and surface pore size on the fouling properties of submerged membranes[J]. Water, 2016, 8(12): 602.
25	WU Zhichao, CHEN Mei, WANG Qiaoying, et al. Membrane fouling mechanisms: Membrane characteristics and mixed liquor properties[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2018, 35(7): 751-759.
26	LI Jin, WANG Dan, YU Deshuang, et al. Performance and membrane fouling in an integrated membrane coagulation reactor (IMCR) treating textile wastewater[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 240: 82-90.
27	WANG Qiong, WEN Qinxue, CHEN Zhiqiang. Long term effects of Pb²⁺ on the membrane fouling in a hydrolytic-anoxic-oxic-membrane bioreactor treating synthetic electroplating wastewater[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 232: 430-438.
28	DEFRANCE L, JAFFRIN M Y, GUPTA B, et al. Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 73(2): 105-112.
29	LIN Hongjun, ZHANG Meijia, WANG Fangyuan, et al. A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: Characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 460: 110-125.
30	KHAN S J, VISVANATHAN C, JEGATHEESAN V. Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) and cationic polymer on biofouling mitigation in hybrid MBRs[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 113: 165-168.
31	SATYAWALI Y, BALAKRISHNAN M. Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(6): 1577-1588.
32	WILLIAMS M D, PIRBAZARI M. Membrane bioreactor process for removing biodegradable organic matter from water[J]. Water Research, 2007, 41(17): 3880-3893.
33	LI Yaozhong, HE Yanling, LIU Yonghong, et al. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between biological powdered activated carbon sludge and activated sludge in submerged membrane bioreactors[J]. Desalination, 2005, 174(3): 305-314.
34	ASIF M B, REN B, LI C, et al. Evaluating the impacts of a high concentration of powdered activated carbon in a ceramic membrane bioreactor: Mixed liquor properties, hydraulic performance and fouling mechanism[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 616: 118561.
35	YU Zhenzhen, HU Yisong, DZAKPASU Mawuli, et al. Dynamic membrane bioreactor performance enhancement by powdered activated carbon addition: Evaluation of sludge morphological, aggregative and microbial properties[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2019, 75: 73-83.
36	HONG Huachang, PENG Wei, ZHANG Meijia, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor and its implications[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 146: 7-14.
37	SU Xinying, TIAN Yu, LI Hui, et al. New insights into membrane fouling based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge: An especial attention to sludge aggregation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 128: 586-592.
38	REMY M, POTIER V, TEMMINK H, et al. Why low powdered activated carbon addition reduces membrane fouling in MBRs[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(3): 861-867.
39	XIAO Yeyuan, WAHEED H, XIAO Keke, et al. In tandem effects of activated carbon and quorum quenching on fouling control and simultaneous removal of pharmaceutical compounds in membrane bioreactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 341: 610-617.
40	ZHANG Yongji, WANG Xiaotong, YE Hexiu, et al. Effect and mechanism of reduced membrane bioreactor fouling by powdered activated carbon[J]. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2021, 83(5): 1005-1016.
41	王亮, 熊欢, 李君敬. BPAC对超滤膜处理微污染源水过程中膜污染的控制[J]. 中国给水排水, 2014, 30(23): 38-42.
	WANG Liang, XIONG Huan, LI Junjing. Mechanism and efficiency of BPAC for mitigation of membrane fouling from treating micro-polluted source water by UF[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2014, 30(23): 38-42.
42	LIN Hongjun, WANG Fangyuan, DING Linxian, et al. Enhanced performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition for municipal secondary effluent treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(3): 1509-1514.
43	NG C A, SUN D, BASHIR M J K, et al. Optimization of membrane bioreactors by the addition of powdered activated carbon[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 138: 38-47.
44	KHAN M M T, TAKIZAWA S, LEWANDOWSKI Z, et al. Membrane fouling due to dynamic particle size changes in the aerated hybrid PAC-MF system[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 371(1/2): 99-107.
45	VILLAMIL J A, MONSALVO V M, LOPEZ J, et al. Fouling control in membrane bioreactors with sewage-sludge based adsorbents[J]. Water Research, 2016, 105: 65-75.
46	KAYA Y, BACAKSIZ A M, GOLEBATMAZ U, et al. Improving the performance of an aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating pharmaceutical wastewater with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2016, 39(4): 661-676.
47	MENG F, CHAE S R, DREWS A, et al. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(6): 1489-1512.
48	CHO B D, FANE A G. Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical flux operation of a membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 209(2): 391-403.
49	IVERSEN V, VILLWOCK J, DE LA TORRE GARCIA T, et al. Impact of MBR flux enhancer on floc size distribution, dewaterability and shear stability[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2009, 6(1/2/3): 33-40.
50	DE TEMMERMAN L, MAERE T, TEMMINK H, et al. Salt stress in a membrane bioreactor: Dynamics of sludge properties, membrane fouling and remediation through powdered activated carbon dosing[J]. Water Research, 2014, 63: 112-124.
51	REMY M, VAN DER MAREL P, ZWIJNENBURG A, et al. Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(2): 345-350.
52	ZHAO Ying, GU Ping. Effect of powdered activated carbon dosage on retarding membrane fouling in MBR[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2006, 52(1): 154-160.
53	MAQBOOL T, LY Q V, ASIF M B, et al. Fate and role of fluorescence moieties in extracellular polymeric substances during biological wastewater treatment: A review[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 718: 137291.
54	MENG Fangang, DREWS A, MEHREZ R, et al. Occurrence, source, and fate of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(23): 8821-8826.
55	TANG Shujuan, WANG Zhiwei, WU Zhichao, et al. Role of dissolved organic matters (DOM) in membrane fouling of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 178(1/2/3): 377-384.
56	WANG Hui, DING An, GAN Zhendong, et al. Fluorescent natural organic matter responsible for ultrafiltration membrane fouling: Fate, contributions and fouling mechanisms[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 182: 183-193.
57	HONG Huachang, ZHANG Meijia, HE Yiming, et al. Fouling mechanisms of gel layer in a submerged membrane bioreactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 166: 295-302.
58	HUANG Xia, LIU Rui, QIAN Yi. Behaviour of soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2000, 36(5): 401-406.
59	IORHEMEN O T, HAMZA R A, TAY J H. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: Membrane fouling[J]. Membranes, 2016, 6(2): 33.
60	ROSENBERGER S, KRAUME M. Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors[J]. Desalination, 2002, 146(1/2/3): 373-379.
61	LI Chen, YANG Yu, DING Shiyuan, et al. Dynamics of biofouling development on the conditioned membrane and its relationship with membrane performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 514: 264-273.
62	WANG Qiaoying, WANG Zhiwei, ZHU Chaowei, et al. Assessment of SMP fouling by foulant-membrane interaction energy analysis[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 446: 154-163.
63	CHU Hiu Ping, LI Xiaoyan. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): Sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2005, 90(3): 323-331.
64	JIA Shengyong, HAN Hongjun, HOU Baolin, et al. Treatment of coal gasification wastewater by membrane bioreactor hybrid powdered activated carbon (MBR-PAC) system[J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 117: 753-759.
65	ZHANG Quan, SUN Feiyun, DONG Wenyi, et al. Micro-polluted surface water treatment and trace-organics removal pathway in a PAC-MBR system[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2015, 50(9): 1422-1428.
66	HERNANDEZ R M E, VAN KAAM R, SCHETRITE S, et al. Role and variations of supernatant compounds in submerged membrane bioreactor fouling[J]. Desalination, 2005, 179(1/2/3): 95-107.
67	KIM H S, KATAYAMA H, TAKIZAWA S, et al. Development of a microfilter separation system coupled with a high dose of powdered activated carbon for advanced water treatment[J]. Desalination, 2005, 186(1/2/3): 215-226.
68	ZOUBOULIS A I, GKOTSIS P K, ZAMBOULIS D X, et al. Application of powdered activated carbon (PAC) for membrane fouling control in a pilot-scale MBR system[J]. Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2017, 75(10): 2350-2357.
69	SAGBO Omer, SUN Yaxi, HAO Ailing, et al. Effect of PAC addition on MBR process for drinking water treatment[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 58(3): 320-327.
70	KHAN M M T, TAKIZAWA S, LEWANDOWSKI Z, et al. Combined effects of EPS and HRT enhanced biofouling on a submerged and hybrid PAC-MF membrane bioreactor[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(2): 747-757.
71	SATYAWALI Y, BALAKRISHNAN M. Performance enhancement with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating distillery effluent[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 170(1): 457-465.
72	MA Cong, YU Shuili, SHI Wenxin, et al. High concentration powdered activated carbon-membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR) for slightly polluted surface water treatment at low temperature[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 113: 136-142.
73	AMARAL M C S, LANGE L C, BORGES C P. Evaluation of the use of powdered activated carbon in membrane bioreactor for the treatment of bleach pulp mill effluent[J]. Water Environment Research: a Research Publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2014, 86(9): 788-799.
74	ZHANG Shi, XIONG Juan, ZUO Xingtao, et al. Characteristics of the sludge filterability and microbial composition in PAC hybrid MBR: Effect of PAC replenishment ratio[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 145: 10-17.
75	HU Jingyi, SHANG Ran, DENG Huiping, et al. Effect of PAC dosage in a pilot-scale PAC-MBR treating micro-polluted surface water[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 154: 290-296.
76	MUNZ G, GORI R, MORI G, et al. Powdered activated carbon and membrane bioreactors (MBR-PAC) for tannery wastewater treatment: long term effect on biological and filtration process performances[J]. Desalination, 2007, 207(1/2/3): 349-360.
77	JIANG Yu, LIU Yang, SHI Danting, et al. Membrane fouling in a powdered activated carbon-membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR) for micro-polluted water purification: Fouling characteristics and the roles of PAC[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277: 122341.
78	MARTÍ-CALATAYUD M C, HEßLER R, SCHNEIDER S, et al. Transients of micropollutant removal from high-strength wastewaters in PAC-assisted MBR and MBR coupled with high-retention membranes[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 246: 116863.
79	WONG Ling Yong, Choon Aun NG, BASHIR Mohammed J K, et al. Membrane bioreactor performance improvement by adding adsorbent and coagulant: a comparative study[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016, 57(29): 13433-13439.
80	SUZUKI T, WATANABE Y, OZAWA G, et al. Removal of soluble organics and manganese by a hybrid MF hollow fiber membrane system[J]. Desalination, 1998, 117(1/2/3): 119-129.
81	MAILLER R, GASPERI J, COQUET Y, et al. Removal of a wide range of emerging pollutants from wastewater treatment plant discharges by micro-grain activated carbon in fluidized bed as tertiary treatment at large pilot scale[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 542(Pt A): 983-996.
82	MA Defang, GAO Baoyu, XIA Chufan, et al. Effects of sludge retention times on reactivity of effluent dissolved organic matter for trihalomethane formation in hybrid powdered activated carbon membrane bioreactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 166: 381-388.
83	CAMPINAS M, ROSA M J. Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systems[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(5): 1636-1644.
84	ALVARINO T, KOMESLI O, SUAREZ S, et al. The potential of the innovative SeMPAC process for enhancing the removal of recalcitrant organic micropollutants[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 308: 29-36.
85	KIM Hanseung. A study on the development of a submerged microfiltration system coupled with high dose of powdered activated carbon [D]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo, 2000.
86	RAN N, GILRON J, SHARON-GOJMAN R, et al. Powdered activated carbon exacerbates fouling in MBR treating olive mill wastewater[J]. Water, 2019, 11(12): 2498.
87	ALVARINO T, TORREGROSA N, OMIL F, et al. Assessing the feasibility of two hybrid MBR systems using PAC for removing macro and micropollutants[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 203(Pt 2): 831-837.
88	LI Xueqing, HAI F I, NGHIEM L D. Simultaneous activated carbon adsorption within a membrane bioreactor for an enhanced micropollutant removal[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(9): 5319-5324.
89	LESAGE N, SPERANDIO M, CABASSUD C. Study of a hybrid process: Adsorption on activated carbon/membrane bioreactor for the treatment of an industrial wastewater[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2008, 47(3): 303-307.
90	VYRIDES I, CONTERAS P A, STUCKEY D C. Post-treatment of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) saline effluent using powdered activated carbon (PAC)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 177(1/2/3): 836-841.
91	SEO G T, AHAN H I, KIM J T, et al. Domestic wastewater reclamation by submerged membrane bioreactor with high concentration powdered activated carbon for stream restoration[J]. Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2004, 50(2): 173-178.
92	IVERSEN V, MEHREZ R, HORNG R Y, et al. Fouling mitigation through flocculants and adsorbents addition in membrane bioreactors: Comparing lab and pilot studies[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 345(1/2): 21-30.
93	SEO G T, JANG S W, LEE S H, et al. The fouling characterization and control in the high concentration PAC membrane bioreactor HCPAC-MBR[J]. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2005, 51(6/7): 77-84.
94	LEVEILLE S, CARRIERE A, CHAREST S, et al. PAC membrane bioreactor as an alternative to biological activated carbon filters for drinking water treatment[J]. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua, 2013, 62(1): 23-34.
95	SALEEM M, ALIBARDI L, COSSU R, et al. Analysis of fouling development under dynamic membrane filtration operation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 312: 136-143.
96	PIRBAZARI M, RAVINDRAN V, BADRIYHA B N, et al. Hybrid membrane filtration process for leachate treatment[J]. Water Research, 1996, 30(11): 2691-2706.
97	MOHAN S M, NAGALAKSHMI S. A review on aerobic self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor: Formation, performance, fouling and cleaning[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2020, 37: 101541.
98	SREEDA P, SATHYA A B, SIVASUBRAMANIAN V. Novel application of high-density polyethylene mesh as self-forming dynamic membrane integrated into a bioreactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Technology, 2018, 39(1): 51-58.
99	POOSTCHI A A, MEHRNIA M R, REZVANI F. Dynamic membrane behaviours during constant flux filtration in membrane bioreactor coupled with mesh filter[J]. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(13/14/15/16): 1751-1758.
100	SABAGHIAN M, MEHRNIA M R, ESMAIELI M, et al. Formation and performance of self-forming dynamic membrane (SFDM) in membrane bioreactor (MBR) for treating low-strength wastewater[J]. Water Science and Technology: a Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2018, 78(3/4): 904-912.
101	HUANG Chunyan, LIU Hongju, MENG Shujuan, et al. Effect of PAC on the behavior of dynamic membrane bioreactor filtration layer based on the analysis of mixed liquid properties and model fitting[J]. Membranes, 2020, 10(12): 420.
102	MA Cong, YU Shuili, SHI Wenxin, et al. Effect of different temperatures on performance and membrane fouling in high concentration PAC-MBR system treating micro-polluted surface water[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 141: 19-24.
103	NGUYEN L N, HAI F I, NGHIEM L D, et al. Coupling powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption with membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment for enhanced removal of trace organics[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 44: 1410-1411.
104	王小兵, 游浩荣, 叶元柳, 等. PAC/UF工艺处理微污染水源水的膜污染特性[J]. 中国给水排水, 2020, 36(11): 27-32.
	WANG Xiaobing, YOU Haorong, YE Yuanliu, et al. Membrane fouling of PAC/UF process treating micro-polluted source water[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2020, 36(11): 27-32.
105	YANG W, ZHOU H, CICEK N. Removal mechanisms of 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethinylestradiol in membrane bioreactors[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 66(6): 1263-1269.
106	YU Jing, HE Chengda, LIU Xiang, et al. Removal of perfluorinated compounds by membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon (PAC): Adsorption onto sludge and PAC[J]. Desalination, 2014, 334(1): 23-28.
107	FANG Herbert H P, SHI Xinlong, ZHANG Tong. Effect of activated carbon on fouling of activated sludge filtration[J]. Desalination, 2006, 189(1/2/3): 193-199.

膜材料、形式与膜孔径	PAC平均粒径或范围/μm	PAC投加量 /g·L^-1	初始絮状污泥粒径 /μm	PAC辅助形成的污泥絮体粒径/μm	膜污染控制效果	参考文献
PVDF平板膜 MWCO^①=140kDa	76~88	0.75	56.0	84	R_t和R_c分别降低17.5%和24.0%	[42]
聚乙烯中空纤维膜膜孔径0.1μm	150~250	1	—	401	R_t和R_c分别降低16.0%和18.4%	[30]
陶瓷平板膜膜孔径100nm	149	20	48	69±6	过滤周期延长1.5倍平均膜污染速率降低33%	[34]
尼龙滤网膜孔径30μm	8~35	2	98.6	150	过滤周期延长2.5倍	[31]
PVDF平板膜膜孔径0.2μm	125~150	1.2	47.0	56	R_t和R_c分别降低43.9%和53.9% 过滤周期延长1.8倍	[33]
外层尼龙滤网膜孔径75μm	29.4	1	26.1	60.6	稳定水通量提高25%	[35]
PVDF平板膜膜孔径0.1μm	15	0.5	72.2	69.8	临界通量提高19%	[38]
聚丙烯腈中空纤维膜膜孔径0.5μm	14.88±3.93 67.60±2.70	5 5	30.20±0.50	38.15±1.52 90.05±0.52	过滤周期延长5.7倍过滤周期延长9.4倍	[43]
聚乙烯中空纤维膜膜孔径0.1μm	28.64		3.6	6.7 8	过滤周期延长1.7倍过滤周期延长2.5倍	[44]
氯化聚乙烯平板膜膜孔径0.4μm	100~250	1	45	62	连续运行110d后， TMP降低9.3%	[45]
聚醚砜膜膜孔径0.05μm	75	2	70.6	84.7~86.5	运行145d的水通量提高 1.5~2.8倍	[46]
聚丙烯腈中空纤维膜膜孔径0.5μm	24.5	1 3 5	133.9	67.9 55.5 38.2	TMP增高速率降低98.8% TMP增高速率降低99.1% TMP增高速率降低99.3%	[3]

膜材料、形式与膜孔径	PAC平均粒径或范围/μm	PAC投加量 /g·L^-1	初始絮状污泥粒径 /μm	PAC辅助形成的污泥絮体粒径/μm	膜污染控制效果	参考文献
PVDF平板膜 MWCO^①=140kDa	76~88	0.75	56.0	84	R_t和R_c分别降低17.5%和24.0%	[42]
聚乙烯中空纤维膜膜孔径0.1μm	150~250	1	—	401	R_t和R_c分别降低16.0%和18.4%	[30]
陶瓷平板膜膜孔径100nm	149	20	48	69±6	过滤周期延长1.5倍平均膜污染速率降低33%	[34]
尼龙滤网膜孔径30μm	8~35	2	98.6	150	过滤周期延长2.5倍	[31]
PVDF平板膜膜孔径0.2μm	125~150	1.2	47.0	56	R_t和R_c分别降低43.9%和53.9% 过滤周期延长1.8倍	[33]
外层尼龙滤网膜孔径75μm	29.4	1	26.1	60.6	稳定水通量提高25%	[35]
PVDF平板膜膜孔径0.1μm	15	0.5	72.2	69.8	临界通量提高19%	[38]
聚丙烯腈中空纤维膜膜孔径0.5μm	14.88±3.93 67.60±2.70	5 5	30.20±0.50	38.15±1.52 90.05±0.52	过滤周期延长5.7倍过滤周期延长9.4倍	[43]
聚乙烯中空纤维膜膜孔径0.1μm	28.64		3.6	6.7 8	过滤周期延长1.7倍过滤周期延长2.5倍	[44]
氯化聚乙烯平板膜膜孔径0.4μm	100~250	1	45	62	连续运行110d后， TMP降低9.3%	[45]
聚醚砜膜膜孔径0.05μm	75	2	70.6	84.7~86.5	运行145d的水通量提高 1.5~2.8倍	[46]
聚丙烯腈中空纤维膜膜孔径0.5μm	24.5	1 3 5	133.9	67.9 55.5 38.2	TMP增高速率降低98.8% TMP增高速率降低99.1% TMP增高速率降低99.3%	[3]

膜材料、形式与孔径	操作条件	PAC粒径与投加方式	PAC投加量 /g·L^-1	废水及其特征	有机物去除效率	膜污染控制效果	参考文献
PVDF平板膜，MWCO=140kDa	HRT=4d 恒流过滤 J=30LMH	75~80μm 一次性	0.75	市政污水处理厂二沉池出水，TOC=10.7mg/L	TOC：62.7%，TOC去除率提高3.9倍	膜过滤时间延长2倍，R_t降低17.4%	[42]
聚氯乙烯平板膜，膜孔径0.4μm	HRT=12h	— 一次性	4	煤气化废水， COD^①=2.27g/L	COD^①：93%，sEPS减少67.7%	过滤周期延长1.25倍，连续运行50d后，TMP下降34%	[64]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	恒流过滤 J=15LMH	<200目一次性	1	合成废水， COD=398mg/L	COD：95.4%，SMP降低62.2%	R_t和R_c分别降低2.0%和9.1%，膜污染速率降低12.6%~36.4%	[9]
			2		COD：95%，SMP减少69.4%	R_t和R_c分别降低5.1%和16.4%，膜污染速率降低16.1%~38.8%
			4		COD：94.3%，SMP减少50.6%	R_t和R_c分别降低4.7%和18.8%，膜污染速率降低7.1%~19.9%
陶瓷平板膜，膜孔径100nm	DO^②=1.5~2.5mg/L 恒流过滤 J=15LMH	149μm 定期	20	合成市政污水， COD=200~220mg/L	COD：（99.5±0.1）%，SMP和EPS降低77%和61%	过滤周期延长1.5倍，平均膜污染速率降低33%	[34]
氯化聚乙烯平板膜，膜孔径0.4μm	SRT=30h，HRT=19h SAD^③=1.5m³/(m²·h) 恒流过滤 J=8LMH	0.1~0.25mm 定期	1	化妆品废水， COD=9.6~10g/L	COD：（95.4±0.6）%，SMP减少6.9%	临界水通量增加25%，TMP降低	[45]
聚醚砜膜，膜孔径0.05μm	曝气速率=8~10L/min，恒压过滤 TMP=20kPa	75μm 一次性	2	化学法合成依托度酸制药废水，COD=18g/L	COD：85%~98%，sEPS减少28%~88%	运行145d的水通量提高1.5~2.8倍	[46]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	HRT=6h，曝气速率=120L/h，恒流过滤J=16LMH	— 一次性	0.75	校园生活污水 COD=428.4mg/L	COD：91.4%，混合液中COD减少5.9%	膜污染速率降低27.4%~91.3%	[52]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	HRT=6h，曝气速率=120L/h，恒流过滤J=16LMH	— 一次性	1.5	校园生活污水 COD=428.4mg/L	COD：91.8%，混合液中COD减少8.0%	膜污染速率降低3.4%~88.4%	[52]
氯化聚乙烯平板膜，膜孔径0.4μm	恒流过滤 J=17LMH	一次性	1	合成废水 COD=（1987±73）mg/L	COD：96%，SMP减少10%	过滤50mL废水的时间缩短15%	[68]
			3		SMP减少25%	过滤50mL废水的时间缩短40%
			5		SMP减少10%	过滤50mL废水的时间缩短10%
亲水性中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.1μm	曝气速率=5L/min 恒流过滤 J=42LMH	22~45μm（52%）一次性	10	合成废水 COD=9.09mg/L	COD：74.4%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高64%	过滤周期延长1.9倍，膜表面有机物含量减少26.3%	[67]
亲水性中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.1μm	曝气速率=5L/min 恒流过滤 J=42LMH	22~45μm（52%）一次性	40	合成废水 COD=9.09mg/L	COD：82.5%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高64%	过滤周期延长3倍膜表面有机物含量减少83.2%	[67]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.22μm	SRT=30d，HRT=2h 恒流过滤 J=20.02LMH	每天	2	湖水 COD＝7.31mg/L	COD：52.04%，TOC和UV₂₅₄去除率提高2.1和2.3倍	R_c降低47% R_irr降低20.4%	[69]
尼龙滤网，膜孔径30μm	HRT=7d，DO=2~4 mg/L 曝气速率=2.6~ 4.5L/min	31.9μm 一次性	2	酒精蒸馏废水 COD=（29.20~48.26）g/L	COD：41%，COD去除率提高1.5倍	临界通量提高近23% 无膜更换和清洗下的过滤时间延长8d	[71]
聚乙烯亲水膜，膜孔径0.1μm	HRT=2.4h 曝气强度 1000L/(m³·min) 恒流过滤速率=320m/d	— 一次性	40	经沉淀处理后的河水 TOC=（2.35±0.25）mg/L	TOC：71%，多糖和蛋白质去除率提高4.3%和2.2%~4.5%	50d内，TMP从初始值增加到50kPa的过滤周期减少25%	[70]
聚乙烯亲水膜，膜孔径0.1μm	HRT=2.4h 曝气强度 1000L/(m³·min) 恒流过滤速率=320m/d	— 一次性	40	生物过滤后的出水 TOC=（2.10±0.38）mg/L	TOC：66%，蛋白质去除率提高6.2%~6.7%	50d内，TMP从初始值增加到50kPa的过滤周期减少50%	[70]
微滤膜	HRT=2h 曝气强度=0.25m³/h 恒流过滤 J=16.6LMH	— 一次性	5	模拟微污染地表水 DOC=5.4~6.1mg/L	DOC：35%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高66.7%	TMP达到50kPa时的水通量为19LMH	[72]
			25		DOC：50%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高1.3倍	TMP达到50kPa时的水通量为18LMH
			50		DOC：75%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高1.8倍	TMP达到50kPa时的水通量为15.5LMH
			75		DOC：80%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高2倍	TMP达到50 kPa时的水通量为13LMH
聚醚酰亚胺中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.5μm	HRT=9.5h 曝气强度=0.5m³/h	定期	10	漂白浆厂废水 COD=1125mg/L	COD：88%	水通量提高60% 过滤阻力降低50%	[73]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	DO=2~4mg/L 恒流过滤 J=15LMH	定期	2	合成废水 COD=44g/L	COD：（97±2）%	过滤周期延长9.7%~51.2% 过滤阻力降低0.8%~45.3%	[74]

膜材料、形式与孔径	操作条件	PAC粒径与投加方式	PAC投加量 /g·L^-1	废水及其特征	有机物去除效率	膜污染控制效果	参考文献
PVDF平板膜，MWCO=140kDa	HRT=4d 恒流过滤 J=30LMH	75~80μm 一次性	0.75	市政污水处理厂二沉池出水，TOC=10.7mg/L	TOC：62.7%，TOC去除率提高3.9倍	膜过滤时间延长2倍，R_t降低17.4%	[42]
聚氯乙烯平板膜，膜孔径0.4μm	HRT=12h	— 一次性	4	煤气化废水， COD^①=2.27g/L	COD^①：93%，sEPS减少67.7%	过滤周期延长1.25倍，连续运行50d后，TMP下降34%	[64]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	恒流过滤 J=15LMH	<200目一次性	1	合成废水， COD=398mg/L	COD：95.4%，SMP降低62.2%	R_t和R_c分别降低2.0%和9.1%，膜污染速率降低12.6%~36.4%	[9]
			2		COD：95%，SMP减少69.4%	R_t和R_c分别降低5.1%和16.4%，膜污染速率降低16.1%~38.8%
			4		COD：94.3%，SMP减少50.6%	R_t和R_c分别降低4.7%和18.8%，膜污染速率降低7.1%~19.9%
陶瓷平板膜，膜孔径100nm	DO^②=1.5~2.5mg/L 恒流过滤 J=15LMH	149μm 定期	20	合成市政污水， COD=200~220mg/L	COD：（99.5±0.1）%，SMP和EPS降低77%和61%	过滤周期延长1.5倍，平均膜污染速率降低33%	[34]
氯化聚乙烯平板膜，膜孔径0.4μm	SRT=30h，HRT=19h SAD^③=1.5m³/(m²·h) 恒流过滤 J=8LMH	0.1~0.25mm 定期	1	化妆品废水， COD=9.6~10g/L	COD：（95.4±0.6）%，SMP减少6.9%	临界水通量增加25%，TMP降低	[45]
聚醚砜膜，膜孔径0.05μm	曝气速率=8~10L/min，恒压过滤 TMP=20kPa	75μm 一次性	2	化学法合成依托度酸制药废水，COD=18g/L	COD：85%~98%，sEPS减少28%~88%	运行145d的水通量提高1.5~2.8倍	[46]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	HRT=6h，曝气速率=120L/h，恒流过滤J=16LMH	— 一次性	0.75	校园生活污水 COD=428.4mg/L	COD：91.4%，混合液中COD减少5.9%	膜污染速率降低27.4%~91.3%	[52]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	HRT=6h，曝气速率=120L/h，恒流过滤J=16LMH	— 一次性	1.5	校园生活污水 COD=428.4mg/L	COD：91.8%，混合液中COD减少8.0%	膜污染速率降低3.4%~88.4%	[52]
氯化聚乙烯平板膜，膜孔径0.4μm	恒流过滤 J=17LMH	一次性	1	合成废水 COD=（1987±73）mg/L	COD：96%，SMP减少10%	过滤50mL废水的时间缩短15%	[68]
			3		SMP减少25%	过滤50mL废水的时间缩短40%
			5		SMP减少10%	过滤50mL废水的时间缩短10%
亲水性中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.1μm	曝气速率=5L/min 恒流过滤 J=42LMH	22~45μm（52%）一次性	10	合成废水 COD=9.09mg/L	COD：74.4%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高64%	过滤周期延长1.9倍，膜表面有机物含量减少26.3%	[67]
亲水性中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.1μm	曝气速率=5L/min 恒流过滤 J=42LMH	22~45μm（52%）一次性	40	合成废水 COD=9.09mg/L	COD：82.5%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高64%	过滤周期延长3倍膜表面有机物含量减少83.2%	[67]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.22μm	SRT=30d，HRT=2h 恒流过滤 J=20.02LMH	每天	2	湖水 COD＝7.31mg/L	COD：52.04%，TOC和UV₂₅₄去除率提高2.1和2.3倍	R_c降低47% R_irr降低20.4%	[69]
尼龙滤网，膜孔径30μm	HRT=7d，DO=2~4 mg/L 曝气速率=2.6~ 4.5L/min	31.9μm 一次性	2	酒精蒸馏废水 COD=（29.20~48.26）g/L	COD：41%，COD去除率提高1.5倍	临界通量提高近23% 无膜更换和清洗下的过滤时间延长8d	[71]
聚乙烯亲水膜，膜孔径0.1μm	HRT=2.4h 曝气强度 1000L/(m³·min) 恒流过滤速率=320m/d	— 一次性	40	经沉淀处理后的河水 TOC=（2.35±0.25）mg/L	TOC：71%，多糖和蛋白质去除率提高4.3%和2.2%~4.5%	50d内，TMP从初始值增加到50kPa的过滤周期减少25%	[70]
聚乙烯亲水膜，膜孔径0.1μm	HRT=2.4h 曝气强度 1000L/(m³·min) 恒流过滤速率=320m/d	— 一次性	40	生物过滤后的出水 TOC=（2.10±0.38）mg/L	TOC：66%，蛋白质去除率提高6.2%~6.7%	50d内，TMP从初始值增加到50kPa的过滤周期减少50%	[70]
微滤膜	HRT=2h 曝气强度=0.25m³/h 恒流过滤 J=16.6LMH	— 一次性	5	模拟微污染地表水 DOC=5.4~6.1mg/L	DOC：35%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高66.7%	TMP达到50kPa时的水通量为19LMH	[72]
			25		DOC：50%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高1.3倍	TMP达到50kPa时的水通量为18LMH
			50		DOC：75%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高1.8倍	TMP达到50kPa时的水通量为15.5LMH
			75		DOC：80%，UV₂₅₄去除率提高2倍	TMP达到50 kPa时的水通量为13LMH
聚醚酰亚胺中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.5μm	HRT=9.5h 曝气强度=0.5m³/h	定期	10	漂白浆厂废水 COD=1125mg/L	COD：88%	水通量提高60% 过滤阻力降低50%	[73]
PVDF中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.2μm	DO=2~4mg/L 恒流过滤 J=15LMH	定期	2	合成废水 COD=44g/L	COD：（97±2）%	过滤周期延长9.7%~51.2% 过滤阻力降低0.8%~45.3%	[74]

膜材料、形式与孔径	操作条件	PAC投加方式	PAC投加量 /g·L^-1	被处理废水类型	废水COD 含量/mg·L^-1	COD去除效率/%	膜污染控制效果	参考文献
PVDF板式膜，膜孔径0.1μm	HRT=3.3h 曝气强度=6m³/h 恒压过滤TMP=0.1MPa	一次性	1	微污染地表水	2.91	38.1	运行第30d的水通量提高10.5%	[75]
			2	微污染地表水	2.86	61.3	运行第30d的水通量提高5.3%
			3	微污染地表水	3.03	26	运行第30d的水通量降低15.3%
聚乙烯中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.4μm	HRT=100h 曝气强度=4m³/h	一次性	1.5	皮革厂废水	4051	81.6	膜污染速率降低，碱洗后TMP降低42.9%，酸清后TMP降低5%	[76]
聚乙烯中空纤维膜，膜孔径0.4μm	HRT=100h 曝气强度=4m³/h	一次性	3	皮革厂废水	4051	79.5	膜污染速率降低，碱洗后TMP降低60%，酸清后TMP降低40%	[76]
聚氯乙烯中空纤维膜，膜孔径10nm	HRT=20min 恒流过滤 J=20LMH	定期	0.003	微污染水	1.92±0.84	24.8	运行35d后的TMP降低13%	[77]
聚醚砜平板膜，膜孔径150kDa	HRT=20h 曝气强度=20m³/h 恒流过滤 J=300L/h	定期	0.5	果汁加工厂废水	4004±698	－	膜污染速率降低65.9%	[78]