污水出水有机物对臭氧氧化舒必利的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.03.043

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 867-871.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.03.043

污水出水有机物对臭氧氧化舒必利的影响

何欢¹, 隋倩¹, 吕树光¹, 赵文涛², 邱兆富¹

1. 华东理工大学国家环境保护化工过程环境风险评价与控制重点实验室, 上海 200237;
2. 同济大学环境科学与工程学院污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 上海 200092

收稿日期:2014-10-23 修回日期:2014-10-28 出版日期:2015-03-05 发布日期:2015-03-05
通讯作者: 隋倩,讲师,主要从事水环境中微量有机污染物的调查及降解机理的研究。E-mail:suiqian@ecust.edu.cn。
作者简介:何欢(1990-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水中药物及个人护理品的降解研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51208199)、中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2013T60429)及中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目

Effects of effluent organic matter on ozonation of sulpiride

HE Huan¹, SUI Qian¹, LÜ Shuguang¹, ZHAO Wentao², QIU Zhaofu¹

1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Risk Assessment and Control on Chemical Process, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2014-10-23 Revised:2014-10-28 Online:2015-03-05 Published:2015-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 臭氧氧化可以有效去除诸如药物及个人护理品(PPCPs)等新兴有机污染物, 但去除效果受污水出水水质波动的影响。本研究选择了腐殖酸(HA)、牛血清蛋白(BSA)和海藻酸钠(AGS)3种典型有机物作为模型污水出水有机物(EfOM), 从降解速率和矿化程度两方面出发, 考察了EfOM对臭氧氧化去除一种常用抗精神病药物残留舒必利(SP)的影响。结果表明, 臭氧氧化能有效降低水溶液中SP的浓度, 在各反应条件下, 反应8min后去除率均可达85%以上。然而, 在研究条件下, 臭氧氧化对SP的矿化效果不佳, 反应25min后的TOC去除率小于10%。加入HA和BSA后, SP的臭氧氧化反应受到抑制, 随着HA和BSA浓度的增加, 臭氧氧化SP的反应速率逐渐降低, 反应溶液的矿化程度有所提高;而浓度为0~3.0mg/(L TOC)的AGS对臭氧氧化SP的影响较小。

关键词: 舒必利, 氧化, 溶液, 腐殖酸, 牛血清蛋白, 海藻酸钠, 反应动力学

Abstract: Ozonation can effectively remove emerging pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products(PPCPs). However, the effectiveness may be affected by the matrix of wastewater effluent. In this study, the influence of effluent organic matter(EfOM)on the ozonation of sulpiride(SP), a regularly utilized antipsychotic drug, was investigate at two aspects of degradation and mineralization. And three representative model compounds, humic acid(HA), bovine serum albumin(BSA), and sodium alginate(AGS), were used to simulate the main constituents in EfOM. The results showed that ozonation can effectively remove SP concentration from aqueous solution, with the removal efficiency > 85% within 8 min. However, SP couldn't be mineralized completely, and TOC removal efficiency was < 10% after 25min. The ozonation of SP was hindered by the added HA and BSA. With increasing concentrations of HA and BSA, the reaction rate of SP decreased and the mineralization of SP solution was enhanced. However, the influence of AGS on the ozonation of SP was minor at AGS concentrations of 0-3.0mg/(L TOC).

Key words: sulpiride, oxidation, solution, humic acid, bovine serum albumin, sodium alginate, reaction kinetics

中图分类号:

X703

何欢, 隋倩, 吕树光, 赵文涛, 邱兆富. 污水出水有机物对臭氧氧化舒必利的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(3): 867-871.

HE Huan, SUI Qian, LÜ Shuguang, ZHAO Wentao, QIU Zhaofu. Effects of effluent organic matter on ozonation of sulpiride[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(3): 867-871.

参考文献

[1] von Gunten U.Ozonation of drinking water:Part I.Oxidation kinetics and product formation-A review[J].Water Research, 2003, 37(7):1443-1467.

[2] Ried A, Mielcke J, Wieland A.The potential use of ozone in municipal wastewater[J].Ozone Science and Engineering, 2009, 31(6):415-421.

[3] Wu D L, Yang Z Z, Wang W, et al.Ozonation as an advanced oxidant in treatment of bamboo industry wastewater[J].Chemosphere, 2012, 88(9):1108-1113.

[4] Broseus R, Vincent S, Aboulfadl K, et a1.Ozone oxidation of pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors and pesticides during drinking water treatment[J].Water Research, 2009, 43(18):4707-4717.

[5] Ikehata K, Naghashkar N J, El-Din M G.Degradation of aqueous pharmaceuticals by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes:A review[J].Ozone Science and Engineering, 2006, 28(6):353-414.

[6] Yang X, Flowers R C, Weinberg H S, et al.Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products(PPCPs)in an advanced wastewater reclamation plant[J].Water Research, 2011, 45(16):5218-5228.

[7] Sui Q, Huang J, Deng S B, et al.Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals, caffeine and DEET in wastewater treatment plants of Beijing, China[J].Water Research, 2010, 44(2):417-426.

[8] Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, et al.Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes[J].Environmental Science and Technology, 2005, 39(17):6649-6666.

[9] Ikehata K, El-Din M G, Snyder S A.Ozonation and advanced oxidation treatment of emerging organic pollutants in water and wastewater[J].Ozone Science and Engineering, 2008, 30(1):21-26.

[10] Sui Q, Huang J, Lu S G, et al.Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products by sequential ultraviolet and ozonation process in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant[J].Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 8(1):62-68.

[11] Nakada N, Shinohara H, Murata A, et al.Removal of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products(PPCPs)and endocrine-disrupting chemicals(EDCs)during sand filtration and ozonation at a municipal sewage treatment plant[J].Water Research, 2007, 41(19):4372-4382.

[12] Khan M H, Bae H, Jung J Y.Tetracycline degradation by ozonation in the aqueous phase:Proposed degradation intermediates and pathway[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 181(1-3):659-665.

[13] Garoma T, Umamaheshwar S K, Mumper A.Removal of sulfadiazine, sulfamethizole, sulfamethoxazole, and sulfathiazole from aqueous solution by ozonation[J].Chemosphere, 2010, 79(8):814-820.

[14] Jung Y J, Kim W G, Yoon Y, et al.pH Effect on ozonation of ampicillin:Kinetic study and toxicity assessment[J].Ozone Science and Engineering, 2012, 34:156-162.

[15] Lester Y, Avisar D, Mamane H.Ozone degradation of cyclophosphamide-Effect of alkalinity and key effluent organic matter constituents[J].Ozone Science and Engineering, 2013, 35(2):125-133.

[16] Yuan S L, Jiang X M, Xia X H, et al.Detection, occurrence and fate of 22 psychiatric pharmaceuticals in psychiatric hospital and municipal wastewater treatment plants in Beijing, China[J].Chemosphere, 2013, 90(10):2520-2525.

[17] Wang D, Sui Q, Lu S G, et al.Occurrence and removal of six pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant employing anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic and UV processes in Shanghai, China[J].Environmental Science Pollution Research, 2014, 21(6):4276-4285.

[18] Isidori M, Nardelli A, Pascarella L, et al.Toxic and genotoxic impact of fibrates and their photoproducts on non-target organisms[J].Environment International, 2007, 33(5):635-641.

[19] Shonet H K, Vigneswaran S, Snyder S A.Effluent organic matter(EfOM)in wastewater:Constituents, effects, and treatment[J].Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 36(4):327-374.

[20] Manka J, Rebhun M, Mandelbaum A, et al.Characterization of organics in secondary effluents[J].Environmental Science and Technology, 1974, 8(12):1017-1020.

[21] Latifoglu A, Gurol M D.The effect of humic acids on nitrobenzene oxidation by ozonation and O₃/UV processes[J].Water Research, 2003, 37(8):1879-1889.

[22] Xiong F, Croue J P, Legube B.Ozone consumption by aquatic fulvic acids as precursors of radical-type reaction[J].Ozone World Congress, 1991, 1:125-138.

[23] Buffle M O, von Gunten U.Phenols and amine induced HO·generation during the initial phase of natural water ozonation[J].Environmental Science and Technology, 2006, 40(9):3057-3063.

污水出水有机物对臭氧氧化舒必利的影响

Effects of effluent organic matter on ozonation of sulpiride

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[2]	杨寒月, 孔令真, 陈家庆, 孙欢, 宋家恺, 王思诚, 孔标. 微气泡型下向流管式气液接触器脱碳性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 197-204.
[3]	杨建平. 降低HPPO装置反应系统原料消耗的PSE[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 21-32.
[4]	王福安. 300kt/a环氧丙烷工艺反应器降耗减排分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 213-218.
[5]	王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[6]	杨霞珍, 彭伊凡, 刘化章, 霍超. 熔铁催化剂活性相的调控及其费托反应性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 310-318.
[7]	谢璐垚, 陈崧哲, 王来军, 张平. 用于SO₂去极化电解制氢的铂基催化剂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 299-309.
[8]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[9]	张明焱, 刘燕, 张雪婷, 刘亚科, 李从举, 张秀玲. 非贵金属双功能催化剂在锌空气电池研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 276-286.
[10]	郑谦, 官修帅, 靳山彪, 张长明, 张小超. 铈锆固溶体Ce_0.25Zr_0.75O₂光热协同催化CO₂与甲醇合成DMC[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 319-327.
[11]	戴欢涛, 曹苓玉, 游新秀, 徐浩亮, 汪涛, 项玮, 张学杨. 木质素浸渍柚子皮生物炭吸附CO₂特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[12]	高雨飞, 鲁金凤. 非均相催化臭氧氧化作用机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 430-438.
[13]	顾永正, 张永生. HBr改性飞灰对Hg⁰的动态吸附及动力学模型[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[14]	孙玉玉, 蔡鑫磊, 汤吉海, 黄晶晶, 黄益平, 刘杰. 反应精馏合成甲基丙烯酸甲酯工艺优化及节能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 56-63.
[15]	赖诗妮, 江丽霞, 李军, 黄宏宇, 小林敬幸. 含碳掺氨燃料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4603-4615.