中深层地热地埋管管群换热性能模拟和布置优化

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-0501

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在中深层地热地埋管（DBHE）供热技术应用中，主要使用多个地埋管构成管群为建筑供暖。为了研究中深层同轴地埋管管群换热性能，本文基于西安市西咸新区典型地质分布，构建了中深层同轴地埋管管群数值模型，研究了不同间距、不同分布下各地埋管换热器间热交互作用以及长期取热期水温衰减规律。结果表明，多井集群供暖过程中周围岩土所形成的“冷堆积”现象是导致地埋管集群供暖能力逐年下降的主要原因；当地埋管间距从5m增至25m，平均出口水温和取热功率分别提升3.86%和11.5%；在西咸新区典型地质条件分布下，地埋管间间距应保持在15m以上；本文提出的四种管群分布中，地埋管呈直线分布时各地埋管出口水温和取热功率衰减最小，其中心地埋管出口水温仅衰减5.74%。在工程设计中，中深层地埋管管群应尽可能直线排布，避免重叠排布。

关键词: 中深层地热, 同轴地埋管, 管群, 换热, 冷堆积

Abstract:

In the application of the deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE), the pipe array is composed of multiple DBHEs and used for the building heating. In order to study the heat transfer performance of the coaxial DBHE array, a numerical model was established based on the typical geological distribution in Xixian New Area. The influence of the distance between the DBHEs and their distribution patterns was investigated on the thermal interaction and the attenuation of outlet-water temperature during the long-term heating period. The results showed that the ‘cold accumulation’ of rock and soil around the DBHE was the main reason for the decline of the heating capacity of the DBHE array year by year. When the distance between the DBHEs increases from 5m to 25m, the average outlet-water temperature of the DBHE and the heat extraction power increased by 3.86% and 11.5%, respectively. Considering the geological distribution in Xixian New Area, the distance between the DBHEs should be kept above 15m. In the four types of DBHE array distributions (cross, circular, polyline, linear), the straight-line distribution exhibited the smallest attenuation in outlet-water temperature and heat extraction power. The outlet-water temperature of the central DBHE only decreased by 5.74%. In the engineering applications, it is necessary to avoid the overlapping arrangement of DBHEs and ensure that they are arranged in a straight line.

Key words: middle-deep geothermal energy, coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger, pipe array, heat exchange, cold accumulation

中图分类号:

TK529

陈宏飞, 杨富鑫, 谭厚章, 曹静宇, 吴盛源. 中深层地热地埋管管群换热性能模拟和布置优化[J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(3): 1241-1251.

CHEN Hongfei, YANG Fuxin, TAN Houzhang, CAO Jingyu, WU Shengyuan. Heat transfer performance simulation and optimization of deep borehole heat exchanger array[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(3): 1241-1251.

图/表 18

参考文献 26

1	清华大学建筑节能研究中心. 中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告-2021-城镇住宅专题[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2021.
	Building energy conservation research center of Tsinghua University. Annual development research report of building energy efficiency in China 2021(special topics of urban housing)[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2021.
2	王贵玲, 杨轩, 马凌, 等. 地热能供热技术的应用现状及发展趋势[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(11): 15-24.
	WANG Guiling, YANG Xuan, MA Ling, et al. Status quo and prospects of geothermal energy in heat supply[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(11): 15-24.
3	RYBACH L, PFISTER M. Temperature predictions and predictive temperatures in deep tunnels[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1994, 27(2): 77-88.
4	刘俊, 蔡皖龙, 王沣浩, 等. 深层地源热泵系统实验研究及管井结构优化[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(9): 2143-2150.
	LIU Jun, CAI Wanlong, WANG Fenghao, et al. Experimental study on deep ground source heat pump system and optimization of tube-well structure[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(9): 2143-2150.
5	WANG Zhihua, WANG Fenghao, LIU Jun, et al. Field test and numerical investigation on the heat transfer characteristics and optimal design of the heat exchangers of a deep borehole ground source heat pump system[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 153: 603-615.
6	CHEN Shuang, WITTE Francesco, KOLDITZ Olaf, et al. Shifted thermal extraction rates in large borehole heat exchanger array : A numerical experiment[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 167: 114750.
7	TANG Fujiao, NOWAMOOZ Hossein, WANG Dawei, et al. A simplified approach to predicting the heat extraction rate of borehole heat exchangers from parametric analysis[J]. Geothermics, 2022, 101: 102358.
8	ZENG H Y, DIAO N R, FANG Z H. A finite line-source model for boreholes in geothermal heat exchangers[J]. Heat Transfer-Asian Research, 2002, 31(7): 558-567.
9	NALDI Claudia, ZANCHINI Enzo. Effects of the total borehole length and of the heat pump inverter on the performance of a ground-coupled heat pump system[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 306-319.
10	CIMMINO Massimo, BERNIER Michel, ADAMS François. A contribution towards the determination of g-functions using the finite line source[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51(1/2): 401-412.
11	BANDOS Tatyana V, Álvaro CAMPOS-CELADOR, LÓPEZ-GONZÁLEZ Luis M, et al. Finite cylinder-source model for energy pile heat exchangers: Effects of thermal storage and vertical temperature variations[J]. Energy, 2014, 78: 639-648.
12	HOLMBERG Henrik, ACUNA Jose, NASS Erling, et al. Thermal evaluation of coaxial deep borehole heat exchangers[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 97: 65-76.
13	SONG Xianzhi, WANG Gaosheng, SHI Yu, et al. Numerical analysis of heat extraction performance of a deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger geothermal system[J]. Energy, 2018, 164: 1298-1310.
14	FANG Liang, DIAO Nairen, SHAO Zhukun, et al. A computationally efficient numerical model for heat transfer simulation of deep borehole heat exchangers[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2018, 167: 79-88.
15	WANG Changlong, LU Yuehong, CHEN Lewen, et al. A semi-analytical model for heat transfer in coaxial borehole heat exchangers[J]. Geothermics, 2021, 89: 101952.
16	KANG Wenkai, FENG Liubing, YANG Feifan, et al. Simulation of heat transfer performance using middle-deep coaxial borehole heat exchangers by FEFLOW[J]. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(4): 315-327.
17	HU Xincheng, BANKS Jonathan, WU Linping, et al. Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 148: 1110-1123.
18	HUANG Yibin, ZHANG Yanjun, XIE Yangyang, et al. Field test and numerical investigation on deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger based on distributed optical fiber temperature sensor[J]. Energy, 2020, 210: 118643.
19	LI Chao, GUAN Yanling, WANG Xing, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on heat transfer characteristics of vertical deep-buried U-bend pipe to supply heat in buildings with geothermal energy[J]. Energy, 2018, 142: 689-701.
20	LI Ji, XU Wei, LI Jianfeng, et al. Heat extraction model and characteristics of coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 169: 738-751.
21	CAI Wanlong, WANG Fenghao, LIU Jun, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of heat transfer performance and sustainability of deep borehole heat exchangers coupled with ground source heat pump systems[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 149: 975-986.
22	ZHANG Fangfang, YU Mingzhi, SØRENSEN Bjørn R, et al. Heat extraction capacity and its attenuation of deep borehole heat exchanger array[J]. Energy, 2022, 254: 124430.
23	CAI Wanlong, WANG Fenghao, CHEN Shuang, et al. Analysis of heat extraction performance and long-term sustainability for multiple deep borehole heat exchanger array: A project-based study[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 289: 116590.
24	CAI Wanlong, WANG Fenghao, CHEN Chaofan, et al. Long-term performance evaluation for deep borehole heat exchanger array under different soil thermal properties and system layouts[J]. Energy, 2022, 241: 122937.
25	CHEN Feilong, BAI Yujie. Heat transfer character of deep multi-borehole under different geothermal recovery period[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 92-98.
26	张道, 曹琦. 浅论陕西省水文地质构造及其适合的地源热泵形式[J]. 制冷与空调, 2010, 10(2): 14-17, 6.
	ZHANG Dao, CAO Qi. Discussion of hydrogeological structures of Shanxi Province and the applicable forms of GSHP[J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2010, 10(2): 14-17, 6.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

256

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	2	0	0	254

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	56	200
比例	22%	78%

摘要

257

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	257

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	22	235
比例	9%	91%

井深/m	岩性	井深/m	岩性
200	灰绿色泥岩	1520	灰绿色泥岩
260	灰绿色泥岩	1625	紫红色细砂岩
365	灰绿色泥岩	1625	紫红色细砂岩
470	灰绿色泥岩	1730	紫红色细砂岩
575	灰绿色泥岩	1835	紫红色细砂岩
680	灰绿色泥岩	1940	紫红色细砂岩
785	紫红色细砂岩	2045	紫红色细砂岩
890	紫红色细砂岩	2150	灰绿色泥岩
995	紫红色细砂岩	2255	灰绿色泥岩
1100	紫红色细砂岩	2360	灰绿色泥岩
1205	紫红色细砂岩	2465	灰绿色泥岩
1310	灰绿色泥岩	2510	紫红色细砂岩
1415	灰绿色泥岩

井深/m	岩性	井深/m	岩性
200	灰绿色泥岩	1520	灰绿色泥岩
260	灰绿色泥岩	1625	紫红色细砂岩
365	灰绿色泥岩	1625	紫红色细砂岩
470	灰绿色泥岩	1730	紫红色细砂岩
575	灰绿色泥岩	1835	紫红色细砂岩
680	灰绿色泥岩	1940	紫红色细砂岩
785	紫红色细砂岩	2045	紫红色细砂岩
890	紫红色细砂岩	2150	灰绿色泥岩
995	紫红色细砂岩	2255	灰绿色泥岩
1100	紫红色细砂岩	2360	灰绿色泥岩
1205	紫红色细砂岩	2465	灰绿色泥岩
1310	灰绿色泥岩	2510	紫红色细砂岩
1415	灰绿色泥岩

材料	密度/kg·m^-3	比热容/J·kg^-1·K^-1	热导率/W·m^-1·K^-1
高密度聚乙烯管	950	2300	0.42
J55钢管	7850	498	40
水泥砂浆	1791	1348	2.8
紫红色砂岩	2600	878	3.662
灰绿色泥岩（Ⅰ）	2027	1099.39	2.767
灰绿色泥岩（Ⅱ）	1551	1410.02	2.662

材料	密度/kg·m^-3	比热容/J·kg^-1·K^-1	热导率/W·m^-1·K^-1
高密度聚乙烯管	950	2300	0.42
J55钢管	7850	498	40
水泥砂浆	1791	1348	2.8
紫红色砂岩	2600	878	3.662
灰绿色泥岩（Ⅰ）	2027	1099.39	2.767
灰绿色泥岩（Ⅱ）	1551	1410.02	2.662

取暖年限	温度/℃
	5m		10m		15m		20m		25m
	#1	#2	#1	#2	#1	#2	#1	#2	#1	#2
1	25.21	24.95	25.59	25.57	25.60	25.60	25.60	25.59	25.59	25.58
2	24.55	24.22	25.11	24.94	25.23	25.17	25.26	25.23	25.33	25.28
3	24.24	23.9	24.83	24.61	25.01	24.87	25.09	25.01	25.17	25.09
4	24.06	23.71	24.66	24.41	24.86	24.7	24.96	24.85	25.06	24.95
5	23.95	23.61	24.54	24.28	24.77	24.58	24.88	24.73	24.98	24.86
6	23.89	23.54	24.47	24.2	24.7	24.49	24.82	24.65	24.94	24.78
7	23.85	23.5	24.42	24.14	24.65	24.43	24.78	24.6	24.9	24.73
8	23.82	23.47	24.39	24.11	24.62	24.39	24.75	24.56	24.87	24.69
9	23.81	23.45	24.37	24.08	24.59	24.36	24.73	24.53	24.85	24.66
10	23.80	23.44	24.35	24.07	24.58	24.35	24.71	24.51	24.84	24.64