搅拌反应器气液两相流混合过程的涡旋效应数值模拟

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-0490

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究气液两相搅拌釜桨叶对釜内流动结构及气液混合性能的影响，本文以直叶片和推进叶片为研究对象，采用ICEM软件对搅拌釜流场进行六面体结构网格划分，基于SST-DDES湍流模型及欧拉-欧拉多相流模型对搅拌釜内部流场进行三维非定常计算，获得两种桨叶下搅拌釜内部涡结构及其演化过程，并分析搅拌釜内瞬态气相分布和瞬时流场的分布规律。研究结果表明：由于叶片旋转而产生的涡有撕裂、合并、衰减和耗散的演化过程；直叶片相较于推进叶片，其涡耗散速度较快，涡产生到消失的周期较短；由于叶片结构不同，主流的运动方向也随之改变，直叶片沿径向分布，推进叶片沿轴向分布。前者在釜内形成上下两层循环区，不利于气相扩散。后者在釜内形成一个大循环区，加剧釜内流动循环，造成后者的气相扩散能力大于前者。比较两者T_0.95分布，推进叶片要小于直叶片，推进叶片搅拌釜T_0.95近似为直叶片搅拌釜T_0.95的50%。

关键词: 搅拌容器, 推进叶片, 气液两相流, 延迟分离涡模拟, 涡旋结构, 混合时间

Abstract:

The straight blade and the propeller blade are taken as research objects to study the influence of the gas-liquid two-phase stirred tank blade on the flow structure and the gas-liquid mixing performance. The ICEM software was used to divide the flow field of the stirred tank with a hexahedral structure. Based on the SST-DDES turbulence model and the Euler-Euler multiphase flow model, the three-dimensional unsteady calculation of the flow field inside the stirred tank was conducted. The internal eddy structure and evolution process of the two stirred tanks were obtained, and the transient gas phase distribution and instantaneous flow field in the stirred tank were analyzed. The results showed that the eddy generated by the rotation of the blade goes through the evolution process of tearing, merging, attenuation, and dissipation. Compared with the propeller blade, the straight blade has a faster eddy dissipation speed, and its cycle from eddy generation to disappearance is shorter. Due to the differences in blade structure, the direction of motion of the main flow is different. The straight blade is distributed in the radial direction and the propeller blade is distributed along the axial direction. The former has an upper and a lower circulation zone in the tank, which is not conducive to gas phase diffusion. The latter has a large circulation zone in the tank, which accelerates the flow cycle in the tank, causing a higher gas-phase diffusion capacity than the former. A comparison shows that the T_0.95 of the propeller blade tank is smaller, approximately half that of the straight blade tank.

Key words: stirred vessel, propeller blade, gas-liquid flow, DDES, eddy structure, mixing time

中图分类号:

TQ051.7

黎义斌, 梁开一, 歹晓晖, 李正贵. 搅拌反应器气液两相流混合过程的涡旋效应数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(1): 99-110.

Yibin LI, Kaiyi LIANG, Xiaohui DAI, Zhenggui LI. Numerical simulation of eddy effect in the mixing process of gas-liquid two-phase flow in stirred reactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(1): 99-110.

图/表 21

图1 搅拌反应器参数（单位：mm）

表1 推进式桨叶设计参数

断面	断面厚度/mm	断面叶宽/mm	断面与搅拌轴线夹角/(°)
S0	27.00	103.82	33.55
S1	24.75	127.95	42.33
S2	22.50	147.57	49.21
S3	20.25	162.34	54.59
S4	18.00	175.06	58.85
S5	15.75	183.56	62.27
S6	13.50	183.85	65.06
S7	11.25	174.95	67.36
S8	9.00	157.95	69.30
S9	6.75	120.76	70.94
S10	6.50	75.92	72.34

图2 搅拌反应器结构网格

表2 网格无关性及y+值

网格类型	网格数量		y⁺
网格类型	直叶片	推进叶片	直叶片	推进叶片
粗网格	0.39×10⁶	0.40×10⁶	11.96	9.73
中等网格	1.16×10⁶	1.27×10⁶	11.82	8.77
细网格	1.75×10⁶	1.86×10⁶	9.94	8.36

图3 直叶片搅拌釜不同网格下轴向速度分布

图4 推进叶片搅拌釜在不同网格下的轴向速度分布

图5 两种叶片表面y+分布

图6 不同叶片涡演化过程

图7 一个涡演化周期内不同叶片压力及Q准则变化

图8 不同转速下的功率大小

图9 监测点分布

图10 不同轴向位置处轴向速度分布

图11 不同径向位置处的径向速度分布

图12 直叶片搅拌釜轴向截面速度矢量及流线图

图13 推进叶片搅拌釜轴向截面速度矢量及流线图

图14 不同叶片搅拌釜内流动分布

图15 不同时刻下直叶片搅拌釜内气体体积分布

图16 不同时刻下推进叶片搅拌釜内气体体积分布

图17 不同转速下直叶片搅拌釜T0.95分布曲线

图18 不同转速下推进叶片搅拌釜T0.95分布曲线

图19 不同转速下两种搅拌釜T0.95对比

参考文献 27

1	AMEUR H. Energy efficiency of different impellers in stirred tank reactors[J]. Energy, 2015, 93: 1980-1988.
2	BLIATSIOU C, MALIK A, BOHM L, et al. Influence of impeller geometry on hydromechanical stress in stirred liquid/liquid dispersions[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58: 2537-2550.
3	BAO Yuyun, LU Yu, CAI Ziqi, et al. Effects of rotational speed and fill level on particle mixing in a stirred tank with different impellers[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26:1383-1391.
4	MOLNÁR B, EGEDY A, VARGA T. CFD model based comparison of mixing efficiency of different impeller geometries[C]// PIERUCCI S, KLEMES J J. 11th International Conference on Chemical and Process Engineering. Milan, Italy: Aidic Servizi Srl, Via Giuseppe Colombo81, 2013, 32: 1453-1458.
5	ZEDNÍKOVÁ M, LINEK V, MOUCHA T, et al. Energy demands of different impeller types in gas-liquid dispersions[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2004, 39: 123-131.
6	XIE M H, XIA J Y, ZHOU Z, et al. Flow pattern, mixing, gas hold-up and mass transfer coefficient of triple-impeller configurations in stirred tank bioreactors[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53: 5941-5953.
7	杨宇成, 杨时颖, MOSES Arowo. 旋转泡沫填料反应器的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(6): 2046-2052.
	YANG Yucheng, YANG Shiying, MOSES Arowo. Research progress in a rotating foam reactor[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(6): 2046-2052.
8	MENDOZA F, Lopes BAÑALES A, CID E, et al. Hydrodynamics in a stirred tank in the transitional flow regime[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 132: 865-880.
9	DEVI T T, KUMAR B, PETEL A K. Detached eddy simulation of turbulent flow in stirred tank reactor[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 127: 87-94.
10	QI Nana, WANG Hui, ZHANG Kai, et al. Numerical simulation of fluid dynamics in the stirred tank by the SSG Reynolds Stress Model[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4: 506-514.
11	CHENG D, WANG S, YANG C, et al. Numerical simulation of turbulent flow and mixing in gas-liquid-liquid stirred tanks[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56: 13051-13064.
12	YANG Fengling, ZHOU Shenjie, AN Xiaohui. Gas-liquid hydrodynamics in a vessel stirred by dual dislocated-blade Rushton impellers[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23: 1746-1754.
13	NAUSHEEN Basha, AHMED Kovacevic, SHAM Rane. Analysis of oil-injected twin-screw compressor with multiphase flow models[J]. Designs, 2019, 3(4): 54.
14	SPALART P R. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[C]//Proceedings of First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, 1997.
15	SPALART P R, DECK S, SHUR M L, et al. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006, 20: 181-195.
16	LIN Dun, SU Xinrong, YUAN Xin. DDES analysis of the wake vortex related unsteadiness and losses in the environment of a high-pressure turbine stage[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2018, 140: 041001.
17	XIAO Zhixiang, LIU Jian, FU Song. Calculations of massive separation around landing-gear-like geometries[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22: 883-888.
18	YANG Yuchen, WANG Zhenming, ZHAO Ning. A DDES study of the flow past a prolate spheroid using a high-order U-MUSCL scheme[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2020, 34(14/15/16): 6.
19	Gritskevich MIKHAIL S, Garbaruk ANDREY V, JOCHEN Schütze, et al. Development of DDES and IDDES formulations for the k-ω shear stress transport model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2012, 88: 431-449.
20	ZHU Quanhong, XIAO Hang, CHEN Aqiang, et al. CFD study on double-to single-loop flow pattern transition and its influence on macro mixing efficiency in fully baffled tank stirred by a Rushton turbine[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27: 993-1000.
21	ZHANG Ning, LIU Xiaokai, GAO Bo. DDES analysis of the unsteady wake flow and its evolution of a centrifugal pump[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 141: 570-582.
22	HUNT J C R, WRAY A A, MOIN P. Eddies, stream and convergence zones in turbulent flows[R]. San Francisco, USA: Center of Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program, 1988: 193-208.
23	ZHOU Hao, CAI Guobiao, ZHANG Jianhua, et al. Research of wall roughness effects based on Q criterion[J]. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2017, 21: 114.
24	FU Wushung, LAI Yuchih, LI Chunggang. Estimation of turbulent natural convection in horizontal parallel plates by the Q criterion[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 45: 41-46.
25	Peter VRÁBEL, Van Der Lans ROB G J M, KAREL Ch A M Luyben, et al. Mixing in large-scale vessels stirred with multiple radial or radial and axial up-pumping impellers: modelling and measurements[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55: 5881-5896.
26	ZHANG Qinghua, YANG Cha, MAO Zaisha. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow and mixing time in a gas-liquid stirred tank[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51: 10124-10131.
27	GIUSEPPINA Montante, ALESSANDRO Paglianti. Gas hold-up distribution and mixing time in gas-liquid stirred tanks[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 279: 648-658.

[1]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[2]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[3]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[4]	刘厚励, 顾中浩, 阳康, 张莉. 3D打印槽道结构槽宽对池沸腾传热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2282-2288.
[5]	庞力平, 袁虎, 丘文生, 段立强, 李文学. 深度调峰锅炉水动力特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1708-1718.
[6]	张成松, 张静, 龚斌, 李明洋, 袁佳新, 李宏业. 自吸射流柔性搅拌桨振动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1728-1738.
[7]	张猛, 李树谦, 张东, 马坤茹. 微细通道内蒸汽直接接触间歇凝结汽液相界面运动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4644-4652.
[8]	杨锋苓, 梁国林, 张翠勋, 王贵超. 疏水Rushton搅拌桨的减阻性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4682-4690.
[9]	来奎, 王仕博, 徐建新, 肖清泰, 王华, 李春林. 不连续扰流板强化搅拌的模拟仿真及机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 2871-2883.
[10]	梅响, 姚元鹏, 吴慧英. 连通微通道内过冷流动沸腾传热强化机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 2884-2892.
[11]	钱媛媛, 王永杰, 杨雪晶. 臭氧相关水处理工艺及其传质特征研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 411-425.
[12]	廖珮懿, 杨代军, 明平文, 薛明喆, 李冰, 张存满. 微流道气-液两相流研究及其在PEMFC中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(9): 4734-4748.
[13]	吴浩, 索梦善, 陶星晓, 车志钊, 孙凯, 陈锐, 王天友. 开孔金属泡沫内气液两相流动的可视化[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4152-4164.
[14]	胡波, 庞明军. 特征时间对剪切稀化流体气泡上浮特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2440-2451.
[15]	刘银领, 范兵强, 张喆, 郑诗礼, 张洋. 涡轮自吸桨强化气液混合及氧化反应速率[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6620-6628.