两级组合式除雾器的分离性能分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2019-1024

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究两级组合式除雾器的分离性能，对两级旋流式、组合式、两级折流式3种除雾器进行性能分析。通过数值模拟方法分析除雾器内部流场差异，通过搭建实验平台，利用高速摄影技术并结合除雾器流场分布分析液滴在除雾器内部运动行为，进而从压降损失、分离效率、出口液滴粒径等方面开展除雾器分离性能的实验研究。结果表明：液滴在折流板内主要靠撞击叶片累积形成液膜而被捕集，在旋流板内沿叶片边缘滑动，以接近叶片倾角角度向壁面运动形成液膜被捕集；随入口截面速度增加，3种除雾器压降均逐渐增大，差值不断增加，两级旋流式除雾器压降最高；当入口截面速度低于5.7m/s时，两级旋流式、组合式除雾器分离效率均接近100%，同时组合式除雾器出口液滴中位粒径始终低于入口液滴中位粒径，并小于其余两种形式除雾器，对小粒径液滴分离能力显著；当液相流量从6.2m³/h逐步增加至13.7m³/h，3种形式的除雾器分离效率随液相流量增加呈下降趋势，其中两级旋流式除雾器在高气速、高液相流量下适应性最强，同时3种除雾器出口液滴中位粒径总体呈现下降趋势，其中组合式除雾器出口液滴中位粒径仍居于最低水平。

关键词: 气液两相流, 组合式除雾器, 高速摄影, 粒度分布, 分离性能

Abstract:

In order to study the separation performance of a two-stage combined demister, the performance of the two-stage swirling, combined and two-stage baffle demisters was analyzed. Numerical simulation method was used to analyze the difference of the internal flow field in demisters. By setting up an experimental platform, high-speed photography technology was used combined with the flow field distribution of the demisters to analyze the internal movement behavior of the droplets in the demisters, then the experimental research on the separation performance of the demisters was carried out from the aspects of pressure drop loss, separation efficiency and outlet droplets size. The results showed that the droplets are trapped in the baffle mainly by impacting the blades, sliding along the edge of the blades in the swirling plates, and then moving toward the wall at an angle close to the inclination angle of the blades to form a liquid film. As the inlet section gas velocity increases, the pressure drop of the three demisters gradually increases, the difference increases continuously, and the pressure drop of the two-stage swirling demister is the highest. When the inlet section gas velocity is lower than 5.7m/s, the separation efficiency of the two-stage swirling and combined demisters are close to 100%, and the median particle size of the droplets at the outlet of the combined demister is always lower than that in the inlet droplets, the particle size is smaller than the other two types of demister, so the separation ability for small particle size droplets is remarkable. When the liquid phase flow rate is gradually increased from 6.2m³/h to 13.7m³/h, the separation efficiency of the three demisters decreases, and the two-stage swirling demister has the strongest adaptability under high gas velocity and liquid flow. At the same time, the median particle size of the droplets of the three demisters outlets showed a downward trend, and the median particle size of the droplets at the outlet of the combined demister was still at the lowest level.

Key words: gas-liquid flow, combined demister, high-speed photography, particle size distribution, separation performance

中图分类号:

TQ051.8

王泽龙,王建军,刘宏宇. 两级组合式除雾器的分离性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(3): 890-897.

Zelong WANG,Jianjun WANG,Hongyu LIU. Separation performance analysis of a two-stage combined demister[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(3): 890-897.

图/表 12

图1 基本分离元件结构

图2 组合式除雾器结构尺寸（单位：mm）

图3 入口截面速度4.5m·s-1时除雾器内部气相速度云图

图4 实验系统

图5 采样器

图6 高速摄影技术对液滴在折流板中运动画面的捕捉

图7 高速摄影技术对液滴在旋流板中运动画面的捕捉

图8 两级组合式除雾器的压降随入口截面速度变化曲线

图9 两级组合式除雾器的分离效率随入口截面速度变化曲线

图10 两级组合式除雾器的分离效率随液相流量变化曲线

图11 组合式除雾器出口液滴中位粒径随入口截面速度变化曲线

图12 组合式除雾器出口液滴中位粒径随液相流量变化曲线

参考文献 24

1	WU H,PAN D P,JIANG Y Z,et al.Improving the removal of fine particles from desulfurized flue gas by adding humid air[J].Fuel,2016,184:153-161.
2	鲍静静,刘杭,潘京,等.石灰石-石膏法脱硫烟气PM_2.5排放特性[J].热力发电,2014,43(10):1-7.
	BAO J J,LIU H,PAN J,et al.Emission characteristics of PM_2.5 from flue gas desulfurated by limestone-gypsum method[J].Thermal Power Generation,2014,43(10):1-7.
3	付昱,何金起.火力发电厂湿法脱硫“石膏雨”治理方法讨论[J].黑龙江电力,2009,31(5):374-376.
	FU Y,HE J Q.Discussion about solution of gypsum rain when wet desulphurization used for power plant[J].Heilongjiang Electric Power,2009,31(5):374-376.
4	翁卫国,张军,李存杰.湿法脱硫系统“石膏雨”问题的成因及解决对策[J].化工进展,2015,34(1):239-244.
	WENG W G,ZHANG J,LI C J.Origin and solution of the “gypsum rain” problem of limestone-gypsum WFGD system[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2015,34(1):239-244.
5	王沛迪,王雪涛,刘予.火电厂湿法脱硫“石膏雨”成因分析与防治措施[J].上海电力学院学报,2014,30(3):283-286.
	WANG P D,WANG X T,LIU Y.Cause analysis and control measure of gypsum rain of wet flue gas desulfurization in coal-fired power plants[J].Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power,2014,30(3):283-286.
6	邹洋,夏凌风,王运东,等.燃煤电厂烟气脱硫技术最新进展[J].化工进展,2011,30(S1):702-708.
	ZOU Y,XIA L F,WANG Y D,et al.Recent advances in flue gas desulphurization in coal-fired power plant[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2011,30(S1):702-708.
7	郑寅飞.湿法烟气脱硫除雾器的应用研究及展望[J].科技展望,2016,26(1):121-122.
	ZHENG Y F.Research and prospect of application of demisters in WFGD system[J].Science and Technology,2016,26(1):121-122.
8	蒯继玺.脱硫塔高效除雾技术的研究[D].保定:华北电力大学,2014.KUAI J X. Study on technologies of demisting efficiently in desulfurization tower[D].Baoding: North China Electric Power University,2014.
9	郝雅洁,刘嘉宇,袁竹林,等.除雾器内雾滴运动特性与除雾效率[J].化工学报,2014,65(12):4669-4677.
	HAO Y J,LIU J Y,YUAN Z L,et al.Movement characteristics of droplets and demisting efficiency of mist eliminator[J].CIESC Journal,2014,65(12):4669-4677.
10	RAFEE R,RAHIMZADEH H,AHMADI G.Numerical simulations of airflow and droplet transport in a wave-plate mist eliminator[J].Chemical Engineering Research and Design,2010,88(10):1393-1404.
11	周晓蒙.烟气脱水除雾器除雾性能的研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2018.ZHOU X M. Study on demisting characteristic of themist eliminator for fume dehydration[D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University,2018.
12	ZHAO J,JIN B,ZHONG Z.Study of the separation efficiency of a demister vane with response surface methodology[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2007,147(1/2):363-369.
13	KAVOUSI F,BEHJAT Y,SHAHHOSSEINI S.Optimal design of drainage channel geometry parameters in vane demister liquid-gas separators[J].Chemical Engineering Research and Design,2013,91(7):1212-1222.
14	GUAN L,YUAN Z L,YANG L J,et al.Numerical study on the penetration of droplets in a zigzag demister[J].Environmental Engineering Science,2016,33(1):35-43.
15	VENKATESAN G,KULASEKHARAN N,INIYAN S.Numerical analysis of curved vane demisters in estimating water droplet separation efficiency[J].Desalination,2014,339:40-53.
16	LIU Y L,YU D X,JIANG J K,et al.Experimental and numerical evaluation of the performance of a novel compound demister[J].Desalination,2017,409:115-127.
17	ESTAKHRSAR M H,RAFEE R.Effects of wave length and number of bends on the performance of zigzag demisters with drainage channels[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2016,40(2):685-699.
18	滕建鑫,杨春英,贺征.惯性分离装置的性能分析及结构优化[J].化工进展,2019,38(5):2074-2083.
	TENG J X,YANG C Y,HE Z.Performance analysis and structural optimization of inertial separation devices[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2019,38(5):2074-2083.
19	王文燕,袁竹林,黄亚继,等.提高折流板除雾器对细雾滴脱除性能的研究[J].热能动力工程,2018,33(11):87-92.
	WANG W Y,YUAN Z L,HUANG Y J,et al.Research on improving the efficiency of the baffle mist eliminator to remove fine droplets[J].Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power,2018,33(11):87-92.
20	郭欣欣,郑筱凯,王丽梅,等.旋流板式除雾器流动特性的数值模拟分析[J].节能技术,2017,35(6):523-526.
	GUO X X,ZHENG X K,WANG L M,et al.Numerical simulation of flow characteristics of a whirlwind fog-removal device in Wet-FGD[J].Energy Conservation Technology,2017,35(6):523-526.
21	朱凯.利用涡流增强除雾的数值模拟与实验研究[D].南京:东南大学,2017.ZHU K. Numerical simulation and experimental study on one kind of vortex demister[D].Nanjing: Southeast University,2017.
22	王霄,闵健,高正明,等.脱硫吸收塔除雾器性能的实验研究和数值模拟[J].环境工程学报,2008,2(11):1529-1534.
	WANG X,MIN J,GAO Z M,et al.Experimental study and numerical simulation of characteristics of demister of absorbing tower in desulfurization system[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2008,2(11):1529-1534.
23	崔向丽,邓徐帧,胡文胜,等.湿法烟气脱硫液气比的影响因素及参数确定[J].电力科技与环保,2010,26(3):22-23.
	CUI X L,DENG X Z,HU W S,et al.IFactor of liquid-gas ratio and parameter confirm in wet flue gas desulfurization process[J].Electric Power Environmental Protection,2010,26(3):22-23.
24	温斌.旋流板除雾器的流场模拟与提效研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2017.
	WEN B.Study on flow field simulation and efficiency improvement of rotating stream tray separator[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2017.

[1]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[2]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[3]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[4]	王兰江, 梁瑜, 汤琼, 唐明兴, 李学宽, 刘雷, 董晋湘. 快速热解铂前体合成高分散的Pt/HY催化剂及其萘深度加氢性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4159-4166.
[5]	刘厚励, 顾中浩, 阳康, 张莉. 3D打印槽道结构槽宽对池沸腾传热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2282-2288.
[6]	吴霞, 蒋勋涛, 张余晓, 吕慧园, 黄方, 于筱溪. 基于液滴微流控技术的蛋白质结晶[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2024-2030.
[7]	庞力平, 袁虎, 丘文生, 段立强, 李文学. 深度调峰锅炉水动力特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1708-1718.
[8]	张猛, 李树谦, 张东, 马坤茹. 微细通道内蒸汽直接接触间歇凝结汽液相界面运动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4644-4652.
[9]	李娟娟, 张天永, 李祥高. 电泳显示用高质量铁锰黑纳米分散系的构建[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 3178-3185.
[10]	梅响, 姚元鹏, 吴慧英. 连通微通道内过冷流动沸腾传热强化机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 2884-2892.
[11]	韩芬, 杨娜, 孙永利, 姜斌, 肖晓明, 张吕鸿. 玻璃纤维聚结器脱除油中乳化水[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(12): 6723-6732.
[12]	张悦刊, 葛江波, 刘培坤, 杨兴华. 多进口旋流器流场特征及分离性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 86-94.
[13]	张爽, 赵立新, 刘洋, 宋民航, 刘琳. 脱气除油旋流系统流场分布及分离特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 75-85.
[14]	钱媛媛, 王永杰, 杨雪晶. 臭氧相关水处理工艺及其传质特征研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S1): 411-425.
[15]	廖珮懿, 杨代军, 明平文, 薛明喆, 李冰, 张存满. 微流道气-液两相流研究及其在PEMFC中的应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(9): 4734-4748.