导风叶片对涡流空气分级机内流场的影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-2271

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用ANSYS-Fluent 17.0软件对有、无导风叶片两种结构的涡流空气分级机内流场进行数值模拟和对比分析，研究了导风叶片对涡流空气分级机内流场的影响。数值模拟结果表明：导风叶片降低了转笼外缘处气流切向速度，从而影响转笼通道内旋涡的分布情况，使有、无导风叶片两种结构的稳定工况不同；导风叶片减小了转笼外缘处气流径向速度的波动和湍流耗散率，此处流场分布相对均匀，有利于提高分级精度；此外，导风叶片在导流过程中，改变了环形区速度场的分布，气流切向速度减小，径向速度增大，径向速度的增大使其分级粒径增大。碳酸钙物料分级实验结果表明：具有导风叶片结构的涡流空气分级机分级粒径较大，分级精度较高；导风叶片处较大的湍流耗散率有助于粉体分散，明显减弱“鱼钩效应”现象。

关键词: 粉体技术, 计算流体力学, 数值模拟, 涡流空气分级机, 导风叶片, 鱼钩效应

Abstract:

The flow fields in the classifiers with or without the guide-vane were simulated and compared using ANSYS-Fluent 17.0 to study the effect of the guide-vane on the flow field in turbo air classifiers. The simulation results show that the airflow tangential velocity at the outer edge of the rotor cage is reduced because of the guide-vane. It influences the vortex distribution in the channel of the rotor cage and makes the steady operating conditions of these two structures different. The guide-vane can reduce the radial velocity fluctuation and turbulence dissipation rate near the outer edge of the rotor cage, where the flow field distribution is relatively uniform, and it is helpful to improve the classification accuracy. Besides, the guide-vane changes the velocity field distribution of the annular region through guiding the airflow. The tangential velocity of airflow decreases and the radial velocity increases. Increase of radial velocity leads to the increase of the cut size. The calcium carbonate classification experimental results show that the cut size is increased and the classification accuracy is improved for the turbo air classifier with the guide-vane. The large turbulent dissipation rate near the guide-vane is conducive to dispersing the powder, weakening the fish-hook effect obviously.

Key words: powder technology, computational fluid dynamics(CFD), numerical simulation, turbo air classifier, guide-vane, fish-hook effect

中图分类号:

TQ051.8

任成,刘家祥,于源. 导风叶片对涡流空气分级机内流场的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(9): 3988-3994.

Cheng REN,Jiaxiang LIU,Yuan YU. Effect of guide-vane on flow field in turbo air classifiers[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(9): 3988-3994.

图/表 11

图1 涡流空气分级机系统示意图

图2 涡流空气分级机数值仿真模型

表1 模型各区域的网格数量

区域	网格数量
区域	Type-A	Type-B
中心区	152812	152812
转笼区	175632	175632
蜗壳区	1005840	1014772
总数	1334284	1343216

图3 转笼通道内径向速度云图（z=50mm）

图4 取样点位置图

图5 气流径向速度分布曲线图

图6 气流切向速度分布曲线图

图7 湍流耗散率分布曲线图（z=50mm）

表2 碳酸钙原料粒度微分分布

颗粒粒径/μm	微分分布/%	颗粒粒径/μm	微分分布/%
＜10	5.54	31～43	24.06
10～15	7.96	43～59	17.67
15～21	13.43	59～74	5.09
21～31	25.16	＞74	1.09

图8 分级实验特劳姆曲线

表3 分级实验性能指标

工况	分级粒径d ₅₀/μm		分级精度K/%
工况	Type-A	Type-B	Type-A	Type-B
12-1200	29.61	25.42	56	52
8-1200	27.05	22.11	58	45

参考文献 17

1	孙占朋, 孙国刚, 杨晓楠, 等 . 竖直涡旋向对卧轮式分级机流场及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(6): 2045-2050.
	SUN Z P , SUN G G , YANG X N , et al . Effect of vertical vortex direction on flow field and performance of horizontal turbo air classifier[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(6): 2045-2050.
2	冯乐乐, 吴玉新, 王景玉, 等 . 转轮式分级器切割粒径的预测模型[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(12): 4579-4585.
	FENG L L , WU Y X , WANG J Y , et al . Prediction model for cut size in turbo air classifiers[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(12): 4579-4585.
3	祝良明, 李双跃 . SLK分级机两种进风口的数值模拟与实验[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 32(3): 533-537.
	ZHU L M , LI S Y . Numerical simulation and experimental research about two kinds of air inlets in SLK classifier[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 32(3): 533-537.
4	殷世文, 刁雄, 黄鹏, 等 . 超细分级机分级性能影响因素的研究[J]. 建材发展导向, 2011, 9(3): 20-24.
	YIN S W , DIAO X , HUANG P , et al . Influence factors on classification performance of superfine classifier[J]. Development Guide to Building Materials, 2011, 9(3): 20-24.
5	李进春, 李双跃, 任朝富, 等 . “L”形涡流分级机导流叶片的数值模拟与试验[J]. 化工进展, 2008, 27(12): 1959-1963.
	LI J C , LI S Y , REN C F , et al . Numerical simulation and experimentation on L-shape guide vane of vortex classifier[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2008, 27(12): 1959-1963.
6	HUANG Q , LIU J X , YU Y . Turbo air classifier guide vane improvement and inner flow field numerical simulation[J]. Powder Technology, 2012, 226(8): 10-15.
7	ESWARAIAH C , NARAYANAN S S , JAYANTI S . A reduced efficiency approach-based process model for a circulating air classifier[J]. Chemical Engineering & Processing Process Intensification, 2008, 47(9): 1887-1900.
8	PRONOBIS M , MROCZEK K , TYMOSZUK M , et al . Optimisation of coal fineness in pulverised-fuel boilers[J]. Energy, 2017, 139: 655-666.
9	GUO L J , LIU J X , LIU S Z , et al . Velocity measurements and flow field characteristic analyses in a turbo air classifier[J]. Powder Technology, 2007, 178(1): 10-16.
10	武树波 . 涡流空气分级机颗粒分离过程数学模拟及双层撒料盘设计[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2017.
	WU S B . Mathematical simulation of particles separation process and design of double layer spreading plate of turbo air classifier[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2017.
11	胡仁喜, 康士廷 . FLUENT 160流场分析从入门到精通[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016.
	HU R X , KANG S T . FLUENT 160 the flow field analysis entry to the master[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016.
12	高利苹, 于源, 刘家祥 . 涡流空气分级机转笼转速对其分级精度的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2012, 63(4): 1056-1062.
	GAO L P , YU Y , LIU J X . Effect of rotor cage rotary speed on classification accuracy in turbo air classifier[J]. CIESC Journal, 2012, 63(4): 1056-1062.
13	王京刚 . 新型转子超细粉体气力分级机的研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 1997.
	WANG J G . The development of a new type of rotor superfine powder air classifier[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 1997.
14	刘家祥 . 涡流空气分级机分级特性及性能改进的研究[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 1997.
	LIU J X . Research on classification characteristics and performance improvement of vortex air classifier[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 1997.
15	王汉封, 柳朝晖, 郭福水, 等 . 用PIV数据估算槽道内湍流动能耗散率[J]. 化工学报, 2004, 55(7): 1066-1071.
	WANG H F , LIU Z H , GUO F S , et al . Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in channel flow by PIV[J]. CIESC Journal, 2004, 55(7): 1066-1071.
16	盖国胜 . 粉体工程[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2009.
	GAI G S . Powder engineering[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2009.
17	NAGESWARARAO K , MEDRONHO R A . Fish hook effect in centrifugal classifiers-a further analysis[J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2014, 132: 43-58.

[1]	王云飞, 秦蕊, 郑利军, 李焱, 李清平. 旋转填充床CFD模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 1-9.
[2]	王太, 苏硕, 李晟瑞, 马小龙, 刘春涛. 交流电场中贴壁气泡的动力学行为[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[3]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[4]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[5]	郭强, 赵文凯, 肖永厚. 增强流体扰动强化变压吸附甲硫醚/氮气分离的数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[6]	邵博识, 谭宏博. 锯齿波纹板对挥发性有机物低温脱除过程强化模拟分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[7]	刘炫麟, 王驿凯, 戴苏洲, 殷勇高. 热泵中氨基甲酸铵分解反应特性及反应器结构优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4522-4530.
[8]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[9]	赵曦, 马浩然, 李平, 黄爱玲. 错位碰撞型微混合器混合性能的模拟分析与优化设计[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4559-4572.
[10]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[11]	叶振东, 刘涵, 吕静, 张亚宁, 刘洪芝. 基于钙镁二元盐的热化学储能反应器的性能优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4307-4314.
[12]	俞俊楠, 俞建峰, 程洋, 齐一搏, 化春键, 蒋毅. 基于深度学习的变宽度浓度梯度芯片性能预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3383-3393.
[13]	单雪影, 张濛, 张家傅, 李玲玉, 宋艳, 李锦春. 阻燃型环氧树脂的燃烧数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3413-3419.
[14]	王硕, 张亚新, 朱博韬. 基于灰色预测模型的水煤浆输送管道冲蚀磨损寿命预测[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3431-3442.
[15]	周龙大, 赵立新, 徐保蕊, 张爽, 刘琳. 电场-旋流耦合强化多相介质分离研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3443-3456.