Ce浸渍方式对CoMo/CeAl2O3催化剂反应性能影响

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-1833

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对具有较高脱硫活性的CoMo/CeAl₂O₃催化剂，考察了Ce的不同浸渍方式对催化剂表面金属性质及催化活性的影响。结果表明，Ce采用不同浸渍方式（CoMo共浸渍）制备催化剂的加氢脱硫活性大小顺序为：先浸渍Ce后浸渍CoMo催化剂（CoMoCe/Al₂O₃）＞先浸渍CoMo后浸渍Ce催化剂（CeCoMo/Al₂O₃）＞Ce与载体混粘后浸渍CoMo催化剂（CoMo/CeAl₂O₃）。对于CoMoCe/Al₂O₃催化剂，先浸渍Ce减弱了二次浸渍CoMo时载体与Mo物种间的相互作用力，有利于Mo物种硫化，提高了硫化度，生成了较多的CoMoS活性相，增加了脱硫率；用实验室自组装固定床微型反应装置对CoMoCe/Al₂O₃催化剂进行了活性评价，以广西石化分公司（广西石化）重馏分油（≥65℃）为原料油时，产物硫含量可以降至8.6μg/g，RON损失1.3个单位。

关键词: 加氢脱硫, 铈, 浸渍方式, 载体, 活性

Abstract:

Series CoMo/CeAl₂O₃ catalysts were prepared by using different impregnation way of cerium and their performance in hydrodesulfurization was investigated. The results showed that the activity of the catalysts is in the following order CoMoCe/Al₂O₃＞CeCoMo/Al₂O₃＞CoMo/CeAl₂O₃. For the CoMoCe/Al₂O₃ catalyst, cerium was loaded on the Al₂O₃ at the first stage and thus can weaken the interaction between molybdenum and supporter, and are helpful for the sulfurization of molybdenum, which can promote the formation of CoMoS active phase and then enhance the catalytic performance of CoMoCe/Al₂O₃ in hydrodesulfurization. Heavy gas oil from Guangxi Petrochemical Company was processed with the CoMoCe/Al₂O₃ catalyst in a self-made fixed-bed micro reactor and the sulfur content of the product was reduced to 8.6μg/g, and the RON loss was 1.3.

Key words: hydrodesulfurization, cerium, impregnation way, supporter, reactivity

中图分类号:

TE624.4

王奇, 柯明, 于沛, 刘洋, 张蕾, 夏成杰, 刘稳. Ce浸渍方式对CoMo/CeAl₂O₃催化剂反应性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(07): 3163-3169.

Qi WANG, Ming KE, Pei YU, Yang LIU, Lei ZHANG, Chengjie XIA, Wen LIU. Effect of impregnation way of Ce on the performance of CoMo/CeAl₂O₃ catalysys in hydrodesulfurization[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(07): 3163-3169.

图/表 12

参考文献 34

1	SONGC. An overview of new approaches to deep desulfurization for ultra-clean gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel[J]. Catalysis Today, 2003, 86(1):211-263.
2	BABICHI V, MOULIJNJ. Science and technology of novel processes for deep desulfurization of oil refinery streams: a review[J]. Fuel, 2003, 82(6):607-631.
3	HUANGR J, ZHANGY, BOZZETTIC, et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China[J]. Nature, 2014, 514(7521):218-222.
4	MCDONALDB C, DE J G, GILMANJ B, et al. Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions[J]. Science, 2018, 359(6377):760-764.
5	于沛, 柯明, 李建鹏,等. La对CoMo/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂选择性加氢脱硫性能的影响[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2016, 47(8):13-19.
	YUPei, KEMing, LIJianpeng, et al. Effect of La on selective hydrodesulfurization performance of CoMo/γ -Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2016, 47(8):13-19.
6	胡乃方, 崔海涛, 邱泽刚，等. 不同P负载量对Co-Mo/γ-Al₂O₃煤焦油加氢脱硫性能影响的研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2016, 44(6):745-753.
	HUNaifang, CUIHaitao, QIUZegang, et al. Effect of different P loads on hydrodesulfurization performance of Co-Mo/γ -Al₂O₃ coal tar catalysts[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44(6):745-753.
7	SCHEFFERB, DEKKERN J J, MANGNUSP J, et al. A temperature-programmed reduction study of sulfided Co-Mo/Al₂O₃, hydrodesulfurization catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1990, 121(1):31-46.
8	YUP, KEM, LIUQ, et al. Enhancement of the selective hydrodesulfurization performance by adding cerium to CoMo/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(99):96662-96668.
9	申志兵, 柯明, 张君涛，等. 活性金属不同浸渍顺序对Mo-Ni/Al₂O₃催化剂硫醚化反应性能的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2017(5):616-623.
	SHENZhibing, KEMing, ZHANGJuntao, et al. Effect of different impregnation sequences of active metals on the thioetherification performance of Mo-Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2017(5):616-623.
10	FANY, LUJ, SHIG, et al. Effect of synergism between potassium and phosphorus on selective hydrodesulfurization performance of CoMo/Al₂O₃ FCC gasoline hydro-upgrading catalyst[J]. Catalysis Today, 2007, 125(3):220-228.
11	张孔远, 刘爱华, 燕京,等. 不同方法制备的CoMo/Al₂O₃加氢脱硫催化剂的表征[J]. 催化学报, 2005, 26(8):639-644.
	ZHANGKongyuan, LIUAihua, YANJing, et al. Characterization of CoMo/Al₂O₃ hydrodesulfurization catalysts prepared by different methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2005, 26(8):639-644.
12	HENKERM, WENDLANDTK P, VALYONJ, et al. Structure of MoO₃ /Al₂O₃ -SiO₂, catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis, 2015, 69(1):205-220.
13	RAJAGOPALS, MARINIH J, MARZARIJ A, et al. Silica-alumina-supported acidic molybdenum catalysts-TPR and XRD characterization[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1994, 147(2): 417-428.
14	LAURITSENJ V, KIBSGAARDJ, OLESENG H, et al. Location and coordination of promoter atoms in Co- and Ni-promoted MoS₂-based hydrotreating catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2007, 249(2): 220-233.
15	YOOSUKB, KIM J H, SONGC, et al. Highly active MoS₂, CoMoS₂ and NiMoS₂ unsupported catalysts prepared by hydrothermal synthesis for hydrodesulfurization of 4,6-dimethyl-dibenzothiophene[J]. Catalysis Today, 2008, 130(1): 14-23.
16	JACOBSENC J H, TORNQVISTE, TOPSØEH. HDS, HDN and HYD activities and temperature-programmed reduction of unsupported transition metal sulfides[J]. Catalysis Letters, 1999, 63(3): 179-183.
17	EMEISC A. Determination of integrated molar extinction coefficients for infrared absorption bands of pyridine adsorbed on solid acid catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1993, 141(2): 347-354.
18	朱玉霞, 林伟, 田辉平, 等. 固体酸催化剂酸性分析方法的研究进展[J]. 石油化工, 2006, 35(7): 607-614.
	ZHUYuxia, LINWei, TIANHuiping, et al. Research progress on acid analysis methods of solid acid catalysts[J]. Petrochemical Technology, 2006, 35(7): 607-614.
19	MASSOTHF E, MURALIDHARG, SHABTAIJ. Catalytic functionalities of supported sulfides: Ⅱ. Effect of support on Mo dispersion[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1984, 85(1): 53-62.
20	RAYBAUDP, HAFNERJ, KRESSEG, et al. Structural and electronic properties of the MoS₂ edge-surface[J]. Surface Science, 1998, 407(1/2/3): 237-250.
21	TOPSØEN, TOPSØEH, MASSOTHF E. Evidence of Brønsted acidity on sulfided promoted and unpromoted Mo/Al₂O₃ catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1989, 119(1): 252-255.
22	PAULJ, CRISTOLS, PAYENE. Computational studies of (mixed) sulfide hydrotreating catalysts[J]. Catalysis Today, 2008, 130(1): 139-148.
23	ANGEL GDEL, GUZMÁNC, BONILLAA, et al. Lanthanum effect on the textural and structural properties of γ-Al₂O₃ obtained from boehmite[J]. Materials Letters, 2005, 59(4): 499-502.
24	秦鸣霞, 俞斌, 杨婧,等. 金属改性对Co-Mo/γ-Al₂O₃加氢脱硫催化剂选择性的影响[J]. 工业催化, 2009, 17(5):45-49.
	QINMingxia, YUBin, YANGJing, et al. Effect of metal modification on selectivity of Co-Mo/γ-Al₂O₃ hydrodesulfurization catalysts[J]. Industrial Catalysis, 2009, 17(5):45-49.
25	温广明, 王文寿, 陈黎行,等. ZnO/θ-Al₂O₃催化剂上全馏分FCC汽油的选择性加氢脱硫[J]. 催化学报, 2007, 28(9):823-828.
	WENGuangming, WANGWenshou, CHENLixing, et al. Selective hydrodesulfurization of full fraction FCC gasoline over ZnO/θ-Al₂O₃ catalyst[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2007, 28(9):823-828.
26	温广明. 全馏分FCC汽油选择性加氢脱硫催化剂的研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2007.
	WENGuangming. Study on selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst for full fraction FCC gasoline[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2007.
27	HUOQ, DOUT, ZHAOZ, et al. Synthesis and application of a novel mesoporous zeolite L in the catalyst for the HDS of FCC gasoline[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2010, 381(1/2): 1-8.
28	EMEISC A. Determination of integrated molar extinction coefficients for infrared absorption bands of pyridine adsorbed on solid acid catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1993, 141(2): 347-354.
29	NINHT K T, MASSINL, LAURENTID, et al. A new approach in the evaluation of the support effect for NiMo hydrodesulfurization catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2011, 407(1/2): 29-39.
30	LIH, LIM, NIEH. Tailoring the surface characteristic of alumina for preparation of highly active NiMo/Al₂O₃ hydrodesulfurization catalyst[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2014, 188(4): 30-36.
31	LIUB, CHAIY, LIY, et al. Effect of sulfidation atmosphere on the performance of the CoMo/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts in hydrodesulfurization of FCC gasoline[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2014, 471: 70-79.
32	GANDUBERTA D, KREBSE, LEGENSC, et al. Optimal promoter edge decoration of CoMoS catalysts: a combined theoretical and experimental study[J]. Catalysis Today, 2008, 130(1): 149-159.
33	BUI V N, LAURENTID, DELICHÈREP, et al. Hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol Part II: Support effect for CoMoS catalysts on HDO activity and selectivity[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2011, 1(3/4): 246-255.
34	孙淑玲, 石亚华, 徐广通, 等. Co-Mo加氢脱硫催化剂的TEM表征[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2006, 37(11):1-6.
	SUNShuling, SHIYahua, XUGuangtong, et al. TEM characterization of Co-Mo hydrodesulfurization catalysts[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2006, 37(11): 1-6.

催化剂	比表面积/m²·g^-1	孔径/nm	孔容/cm³·g^-1
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	259.40	7.83	0.49
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	244.70	7.58	0.48
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	250.81	7.59	0.48

催化剂	比表面积/m²·g^-1	孔径/nm	孔容/cm³·g^-1
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	259.40	7.83	0.49
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	244.70	7.58	0.48
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	250.81	7.59	0.48

催化剂	L酸量/μmol·g^-1		酸量/μmol·g^-1		酸分布/%
催化剂	200℃	350℃	L_w	L_s	L_w	L_s
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	47.26	21.25	26.01	21.25	55.04	44.96
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	66.42	32.88	33.54	32.88	50.50	49.50
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	61.61	28.42	33.19	28.42	53.87	46.13

催化剂	L酸量/μmol·g^-1		酸量/μmol·g^-1		酸分布/%
催化剂	200℃	350℃	L_w	L_s	L_w	L_s
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	47.26	21.25	26.01	21.25	55.04	44.96
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	66.42	32.88	33.54	32.88	50.50	49.50
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	61.61	28.42	33.19	28.42	53.87	46.13

催化剂	电子结合能/eV			Mo的硫化度/%
催化剂	Mo⁴⁺ 3d_5/2	Mo⁵⁺ 3d_5/2	Mo⁶⁺ 3d_5/2	Mo的硫化度/%
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	228.81	229.84	232.61	49.21
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	229.10	229.91	232.53	58.22
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	228.83	229.92	232.82	55.80

Ce浸渍方式对CoMo/CeAl₂O₃催化剂反应性能影响

Effect of impregnation way of Ce on the performance of CoMo/CeAl₂O₃ catalysys in hydrodesulfurization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

催化剂	CoMoS		Co₉S₈		Co(Ⅱ)
催化剂	结合能/eV	相含量 /%	结合能/eV	相含量/%	结合能/eV	相含量 /%
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	778.94	39.10	778.84	2.70	781.45	58.20
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	779.07	49.39	777.81	2.20	781.80	48.41
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	779.12	46.23	777.74	2.01	779.26	51.76

催化剂	平均层数	平均长度/nm
CoMo/CeAl₂O₃	2.79	3.82
CeCoMo/Al₂O₃	2.97	3.80
CoMoCe/Al₂O₃	3.12	3.81

[1]	时永兴, 林刚, 孙晓航, 蒋韦庚, 乔大伟, 颜彬航. 二氧化碳加氢制甲醇过程中铜基催化剂活性位点研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 287-298.
[2]	郑谦, 官修帅, 靳山彪, 张长明, 张小超. 铈锆固溶体Ce_0.25Zr_0.75O₂光热协同催化CO₂与甲醇合成DMC[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 319-327.
[3]	高雨飞, 鲁金凤. 非均相催化臭氧氧化作用机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 430-438.
[4]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[5]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[6]	王谨航, 何勇, 史伶俐, 龙臻, 梁德青. 气体水合物阻聚剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4587-4602.
[7]	高彦静. 单原子催化技术国际研究态势分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4667-4676.
[8]	林晓鹏, 肖友华, 管奕琛, 鲁晓东, 宗文杰, 傅深渊. 离子聚合物-金属复合材料（IPMC）柔性电极的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4770-4782.
[9]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[10]	张丽宏, 金要茹, 程芳琴. 煤气化渣资源化利用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4447-4457.
[11]	毛善俊, 王哲, 王勇. 基团辨识加氢：从概念到应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3917-3922.
[12]	王报英, 王皝莹, 闫军营, 汪耀明, 徐铜文. 聚合物包覆膜在金属分离回收中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3990-4004.
[13]	向阳, 黄寻, 魏子栋. 电催化有机合成反应的活性和选择性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4005-4014.
[14]	陈俊俊, 费昌恩, 段金汤, 顾雪萍, 冯连芳, 张才亮. 高生物活性聚醚醚酮化学改性研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4015-4028.
[15]	张耀杰, 张传祥, 孙悦, 曾会会, 贾建波, 蒋振东. 煤基石墨烯量子点在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4340-4350.