页岩容量法和重量法等温吸附实验对比研究

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017.05.018

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 1690-1697.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017.05.018

页岩容量法和重量法等温吸附实验对比研究

周尚文^1,2, 李奇³, 薛华庆^1,2, 郭伟^1,2, 李晓波^1,2, 卢斌^1,2

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院, 河北廊坊 065007;
2. 中国石油天然气集团公司非常规油气重点实验室, 河北廊坊 065007;
3. 中国科学院力学研究所流固耦合系统力学重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2016-09-13 修回日期:2016-10-09 出版日期:2017-05-05 发布日期:2017-05-05
作者简介:周尚文(1987-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事页岩气实验方法和技术研究。E-mail:zhousw10@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2013CB2281）

Comparative study on the volumetric and gravimetric method for isothermal adsorption experiment of shale

ZHOU Shangwen^1,2, LI Qi³, XUE Huaqing^1,2, GUO Wei^1,2, LI Xiaobo^1,2, LU Bin^1,2

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development-Langfang, Langfang 065007, Hebei, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas, CNPC, Langfang 065007, Hebei, China;
3. Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2016-09-13 Revised:2016-10-09 Online:2017-05-05 Published:2017-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩吸附气含量是准确评价页岩含气量和资源潜力的关键参数，目前通常采用等温吸附实验来确定。等温吸附实验方法主要分为容量法和重量法，容量法是目前常用的等温吸附实验方法，重量法的应用还较少。本文通过分析两种方法的实验原理，认为容量法和重量法等温吸附实验测得的吸附量均为过剩吸附量，绝对吸附量并不能通过实验直接测得，并建立了过剩吸附量与绝对吸附量的转换关系。为了对比分析两种实验方法的准确性和稳定性，分别进行了相同样品的容量法和重量法等温吸附实验。测试结果表明，低压时甲烷在页岩中的吸附曲线呈Ⅰ型的吸附曲线特征，但是当压力进一步增大后，等温吸附曲线会出现下降。页岩中超临界甲烷的等温吸附曲线在压力较大时，必然存在下降的趋势，这并非异常现象，而是超临界流体过剩吸附量的本质特征。对比分析认为，在传感器精度和天平精度经过校准的情况下，重量法等温吸附实验对实验参数和环境的敏感程度要低于容量法。特别是对于吸附量较低的泥页岩，容量法测试中引起的误差大于重量法。在现有技术水平条件下，认为重量法更适用于页岩的等温吸附实验研究。

关键词: 页岩气, 容量法, 重量法, 等温吸附, 过剩吸附量

Abstract: Shale gas content is one key parameter to accurately evaluate the gas content and the resource potentiality of shale gas reservoir,and it is usually determined by isothermal adsorption experiments which mainly include volumetric method and gravimetric method. The volumetric method is commonly used in isothermal adsorption experiments,but the application of the gravimetric method is rarely. The adsorption capacities tested by volumetric and gravimetric method are excess adsorption,and the absolute adsorption can't be directly tested by experiments. And then the conversion relationship of the excess absorption and absolute adsorption is established. In order to compare the accuracy and stability of the two methods,the two isothermal adsorption experiments of same sample are performed respectively. The test results show that the adsorption curve is a type I adsorption curve at low pressure,but when the pressure is further increased,the isothermal adsorption curve will decrease. There is an inevitable downward trend of the isothermal adsorption curve at high pressure,which is not an abnormal phenomenon,but is the essential characteristic of excess adsorption capacity of supercritical methane. Comparative analysis show that the isothermal adsorption experiment based on the gravimetric method is less sensitive to experimental environment and parameters than the volumetric method. Especially for shale of lower adsorption capacity,the error caused by the volumetric method is greater than the gravimetric method. Under the existing technical level,the gravimetric method is more suitable for the isothermal adsorption experiment of shale.

Key words: shale gas, volumetric method, gravimetric method, isothermal adsorption, excess adsorption

中图分类号:

TE133

周尚文, 李奇, 薛华庆, 郭伟, 李晓波, 卢斌. 页岩容量法和重量法等温吸附实验对比研究[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(05): 1690-1697.

ZHOU Shangwen, LI Qi, XUE Huaqing, GUO Wei, LI Xiaobo, LU Bin. Comparative study on the volumetric and gravimetric method for isothermal adsorption experiment of shale[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(05): 1690-1697.

参考文献

[1] JARVIE D M,HILL R J,Ruble T E,et al. Unconventional shale gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett shale of north central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale gas assessment[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[2] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al. Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale [J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
[3] ZHOU S W,YAN G,XUE H Q,et al. 2D and 3D nanopore characterization of gas shale in Longmaxi formation based on FIB-SEM[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,73:174-180.
[4] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701. ZOU C N,DONG D Z,WANG Y M,et al. Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects (Ⅰ) [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.
[5] 李玉喜,乔德武,姜文利,等.页岩气含气量和页岩气地质评价综述[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):308-317. LI Y X,QIAO D W,JIANG W L,et al. Gas content of gas-bearing shale and its geological evaluation summary[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):308-317.
[6] 聂海宽,张金川.页岩气聚集条件及含气量计算:以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 地质学报,2012,86(2):349- 361. NIE H K,ZHANG J C. Shale gas accumulation condition and gas content calculation:a case study of Sichuan Basin and its periphery in the Lower Paleozoic[J]. Acta Geological Sinica,2012,86(2):349- 361.
[7] ZHANG T W,ELLIS G S,RUPPEL S C,et al. Effect of organic matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale gas systems [J]. Organic Geochemistry,2012,47:120-131.
[8] 刘洪林,王红岩.中国南方海相页岩吸附特征及其影响因素[J]. 天然气工业,2012,32(9):5-9. LIU H L,WANG H Y. Absorptivity and influential factors of marine shales in South China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(9):5-9.
[9] 郭为,熊伟,高树生,等.页岩气等温吸附/解吸特征[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(7):2836-2840. GUO W,XIONG W,GAO S S,et al. Isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas [J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2013,44(7):2836-2840.
[10] 霍培丽,张登峰,王倩倩,等.页岩吸附性能及作用规律[J]. 化工进展,2016,35(1):74-82. HUO P L,ZHANG D F,WANG Q Q,et al. Perspective of adsorption performance of shale[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2016,35(1):74-82.
[11] LAFORTUNE S,ADELISE F,RHENAL G D R,et al. Assessing CO₂ adsorption capacities onto shales through gravimetric experiments:a first step in the feasibility study of coupling "fracking" with carbon storage [J]. Energy Procedia,2014,63:5933-5937.
[12] 俞凌杰,范明,陈红宇,等.富有机质页岩高温高压重量法等温吸附实验[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(5):557-563. YU L J,FAN M,CHEN H Y,et al. Isothermal adsorption experiment of organic-rich shale under high temperature and pressure using gravimetric method[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(5):557-563.
[13] 马行陟,柳少波,姜林,等.页岩吸附气含量测定的影响因素定量分析[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):488-493. MA X Z,LIU S B,JIANG L,et al. Quantitative analysis on affecting factors of gas adsorption capacity measurement on the shale[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):488-493.
[14] BELMABKHOUT Y,FRERE M,WEIRELD G D. High-pressure adsorption measurements:a comparative study of the volumetric and gravimetric methods [J]. Meas. Sci. Technol.,2004,15:848-858.
[15] DO D D,DO H D. Adsorption of supercritical fluids in non-porous and porous carbons:analysis of adsorbed phase volume and density[J]. Carbon,2003,41(9):1777-1791.
[16] ZHOU L,BAI S P,ZHOU Y P,et al. Adsorption of nitrogen on silica gel over a large range of temperatures[J]. Adsorption,2002,8(1):79-87.
[17] 周理,李明,周亚平.超临界甲烷在高表面活性炭上的吸附测量及其理论分析[J].中国科学(B辑),2000,30(1):49-56. ZHOU L,LI M,ZHOU Y P. Experiment of adsorption of supercritical methane on activated carbon and theoretical analysis[J]. Science in China(Series B),2000,30(1):49-56.
[18] 周理,吕昌忠,王怡林,等.述评超临界温度气体在多孔固体上的物理吸附[J]. 化学进展,1999,11(3):221-226. ZHOU L,LV C Z,WANG Y L,et al. Physisorption of gases on porous solids at above-critical temperatures[J]. Progress in Chemistry,1999,11(3):221-226.
[19] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M. Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs[J]. Fuel,2007,86:2696-2706.
[20] 张庆玲.页岩容量法等温吸附实验中异常现象分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(5):31-33. ZHANG Q L. The analysis of abnormal phenomena in shale isothermal absorption volumetric test[J]. Coal Geology and Exploration,2015,43(5):31-33.
[21] 张庆玲,曹利戈.煤的等温吸附测试中数据处理问题研究[J].煤炭学报,2003,28(2):131-135. ZHANG Q L,CAO L G. Study of data processing in coal sorption isotherm testing[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2003,28(2):131-135.
[22] 聂海宽,张金川,马晓彬,等.页岩等温吸附气含量负吸附现象初探[J].地学前缘,2013,20(6):282-288. NIE H K,ZHANG J C,MA X B,et al. A preliminary study of negative adsorption phenomena of shale adsorption gas content by isothermal adsorption[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(6):282-288.
[23] 林腊梅,张金川,韩双彪,等.泥页岩储层等温吸附测试异常探讨[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):30-33. LIN L M,ZHANG J C,Han S B,et al. Study on abnormal curves of isothermal adsorption of shale[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):30-33.
[24] ROBINSON D B,PENG D,CHUNG S Y. The development of the Peng-Robinson equation and its application to phase equilibrium in a system containing methanol[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria,1985,24(1):25-41.
[25] REDLICH O,KWONG J. On the thermodynamics of solutions. V:an equation of state fugacities of gaseous solutions[J]. Chemical Reviews,1949,44(1):233-244.
[26] SOAVE G. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich- Kwong equation of state[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,1972,27(6):1197-1203.
[27] SETZMANN U,WAGNER W. A new equation of state and tables of thermodynamic properties for methane covering the range from the melting line to 625K at pressures up to 100MPa[J]. Journal of Physical & Chemical Reference Data,1991,20(6):1061-1155.
[28] 熊健,刘向君,梁利喜,等.页岩气超临界吸附的Dubibin-Astakhov改进模型[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(7):849-857. XIONG J,LIU X J,LIANG L X,et al. Improved Dubibin-Astakhov model for shale gas supercritical adsorption[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(7):849-857.
[29] 刘圣鑫,钟建华,马寅生,等.柴东石炭系页岩微观孔隙结构与页岩气等温吸附研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,39(1):33-42. LIU S X,ZHONG J H,MA Y S,et al. Study of microscopic pore structure and adsorption isothermal of carboniferous shale,Eastern Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2015,39(1):33-42.

页岩容量法和重量法等温吸附实验对比研究

Comparative study on the volumetric and gravimetric method for isothermal adsorption experiment of shale

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊颖, 周厚安, 熊钢. 基于臭氧与超声氧化降低页岩气压裂返排液COD[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 1834-1839.
[2]	张巧玲, 秦钊, 刘有智, 师艳婷, 张竞文, 曾广平. 氧化石墨烯-TiO₂复合材料对三种染料的吸附动力学及光催化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2870-2879.
[3]	罗翠娟, 张登峰, 赵春鹏, 伦增珉, 王海涛, 李艳红, 杨劲. 含气页岩中水分赋存与分布的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2726-2737.
[4]	卢培利, 邱哲, 张代钧, 程伟, 陈翱翔, 雷彬, 叶虹. 页岩气开采返排废水有机污染物研究进展与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(03): 1161-1166.
[5]	张锋三, 沈一丁, 王磊, 马国艳, 苏莹, 任婷. 聚丙烯酰胺压裂液减阻剂的合成及性能[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(11): 3640-3644.
[6]	霍培丽, 张登峰, 王倩倩, 李伟, 陶军, 王浩浩, 彭健. 页岩吸附性能及作用规律[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(01): 74-82.
[7]	徐晓宇1，孙悦1，沈健1，翟玉龙2. HY和USY分子筛对模拟油品中碱性氮化物的吸附行为[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(04): 1035-1040.
[8]	胡杰，李振宇，黄格省. 低碳时代我国加快天然气利用的机遇分析与发展建议[J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(10): 2267-2273.
[9]	杨挺，孙小涛. [J]. 化工进展, 2013, 32(03): 717-720.
[10]	邵强，闫光绪，郭绍辉. 稻壳吸附剂的制备及其吸附聚丙烯酰胺的应用研究 [J]. 化工进展, 2007, 26(8): 1201-.