玉米秸秆循环流化床气化中试试验

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1851

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (08): 2970-2975.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1851

玉米秸秆循环流化床气化中试试验

于杰^1,3, 董玉平², 常加富¹, 董磊¹

1 山东百川同创能源有限公司, 山东济南 250101;
2 山东大学高效洁净机械制造教育部重点实验室, 山东济南 250061;
3 山东省生物质能源工程技术研究中心, 山东济南 250101

收稿日期:2017-09-04 修回日期:2017-11-16 出版日期:2018-08-05 发布日期:2018-08-05
通讯作者: 董玉平,教授,从事生物质能高效清洁转换技术研究。
作者简介:于杰(1971-),男,硕士,工程师,主要从事固体废弃物能源化利用技术与工程转化应用研究。E-mail:cjf6886@126.com。
基金资助:
公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201503135-07）。

Pilot experiment of gasification of corn straw in circulating fluidized bed

YU Jie^1,3, DONG Yuping², CHANG Jiafu¹, DONG Lei¹

1 Shandong Baichuan Tongchuang Energy Company Ltd., Jinan 250101, Shandong, China;
2 Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, Shandong, China;
3 Biomass Energy Engineering Technology Research Center of Shandong Province, Jinan 250101, Shandong, China

Received:2017-09-04 Revised:2017-11-16 Online:2018-08-05 Published:2018-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 玉米秸秆是农业生产过程中产生的剩余物，其热解气化是秸秆类生物质处理应用的重要选择方向。为此，采用循环流化床气化中试装置对玉米秸秆进行了气化试验，研究空气当量比ER、原料含水率对反应温度、气化燃气组分与热值、气化效率及燃气中的焦油含量等气化特性影响规律，并通过改变进料量试验得到了在不同负荷运行条件下的优化工作参数。结果表明：①随着ER的增大，循环流化床气化炉内的反应温度升高，气化燃气中的CO₂含量增加，焦油与CO含量及燃气热值降低，气化效率随ER的增大呈现先增大后减小趋势，较理想的ER为0.26，此时的气化效率达到70.2%、燃气热值为5.1MJ/m³；②原料含水率的增大降低了气化炉内的反应温度，当原料含水率在5%～15%之间逐渐增大时，燃气中的H₂含量、燃气热值及气化效率均有提升，当含水率由15%继续增大到25%过程中，燃气热值与气化效率均出现了快速下降；③根据气化炉额定进料量设计值，改变进料负荷在66%～120%范围内，调节ER在0.26～0.3时均可得到较好的运行工况，对应得到的燃气热值为4.8～5.1MJ/m³、气化效率为69%～72%。

关键词: 玉米秸秆, 气化, 循环流化床, 空气当量比, 含水率

Abstract: The corn straw is the residues produced in the process of agricultural production. Gasification process is an important choice for corn straw's treatment and application. A circulating fluidized bed gasification pilot plant was built to study the effect of air equivalence ratio and water content of raw materials on gasification characteristics, such as reaction temperature, gas composition and calorific value, gasification efficiency, and tar content in produced gas. The optimized operating conditions under different loadings were obtained by changing the feed quantity experiment. The results showed that the gasification temperature and CO₂ in fluidized bed gradually increased with the increase of ER, while the calorific value and tar content both decreased. The gasification efficiency increased first but then decreased. The optimum range of ER was 0.26, and the gasification efficiency and calorific value could reach 70.2% and 5.1MJ/m³ respectively. The increase of raw material moisture content decreased the reaction temperature in the gasification furnace. H₂ content, gas calorific value and gasification efficiency all increased with the increase of moisture content from 5% to 15%. The gas calorific value and gasification efficiency declined rapidly when moisture content increase from 15% to 25%. The better operating conditions were obtained when gasifier operated within a load range 66%-120% of the design feeding rates. The optimum range of ER was 0.26-0.3, and the calorific value and gasification efficiency were 4.8-5.1MJ/m³ and 69%-72% respectively.

Key words: corn straw, gasification, circulating fluidized bed, air equivalence ratio, water content

中图分类号:

于杰, 董玉平, 常加富, 董磊. 玉米秸秆循环流化床气化中试试验[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(08): 2970-2975.

YU Jie, DONG Yuping, CHANG Jiafu, DONG Lei. Pilot experiment of gasification of corn straw in circulating fluidized bed[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(08): 2970-2975.

参考文献

[1] 程序. 生物质能与节能减排及低碳经济[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2009, 17(2):375-378. CHENG Xu.Bioenergy reduction of energy consumption and waste discharge and low-carbon economy[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(2):375-378.
[2] 王雪茜, 陈正华, 孙军. 玉米秸秆能源化利用途径与方法[J].中国资源综合利用, 2014, 32(10):35-39. WANG Xueqian, CHEN Zhenghua, SUN Jun.Research on approach and method of corn straw utilization[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2014, 32(10):35-39.
[3] 李晓.典型生物质颗粒燃料气化燃烧的试验研究[D]. 济南:山东建筑大学, 2012. LI Xiao.Experimental study of combustion with gasification of typical biomass pellets[D]. Jinan:Shandong Jianzhu University, 2012.
[4] GAI C, DONG Y P.Experimental study on non-woody biomass gasification in a downdraft gasifier[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(6):4935-4944.
[5] YIN R Z, LIU R H, WU J K, et al. Influence of particle size on performance of a pilot-scale fixed-bed gasification system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 119:15-21.
[6] GUO F Q, DONG Y P, DONG L, et al. Effect of design and operating parameters on the gasification process of biomass in a downdraft fixed bed:an experimental study[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39:5625-5633.
[7] 张文斌, 张龙全.秸秆气化技术研究现状与对策分析[J]. 中国农机化, 2009(6):90-93. ZHANG Wenbin, ZHANG Longquan.Study on the present state of straw gasification and counter measure analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2009(6):90-93.
[8] 谢军, 吴创之, 陈平, 等.中型流化床中的生物质气化试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2007, 28(1):86-90. XIE Jun, WU Chuangzhi, CHEN Ping, et al. An experimental study on biomass gasification in a medium fluidized bed gasifier[J].Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2007, 28(1):86-90.
[9] 范鹏飞, 李景东, 刘艳涛, 等.感冒清热颗粒中药渣中试规模循环流化床气化试验[J]. 化工进展, 2014, 33(8):1979-1985. FAN Pengfei, LI Jingdong, LIU Yantao, et al.Experimental study of gasification of herb residues of Ganmaoqingre granules in pilot-scale dual-loop circulating fluidized bed[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2014, 33(8):1979-1985.
[10] GUO F Q, DONG Y P, DONG L, et al.Innovative example of herb residues recycling by gasification in a fluidized bed[J]. Waste Management, 2013, 33(4):825-832.
[11] 耿峰, 齐天, 王留民, 等.玉米秸秆颗粒燃料热解气化试验研究[J]. 河南科学, 2014, 32(6):1082-1086. GENG Feng, QI Tian, WANG Liumin, et al.Experimental research on gasification and pyrolysis using corn stalk pellets[J].Henan Science, 2014, 32(6):1082-1086.
[12] 诸林, 蒋鹏, 范峻铭, 等.串行流化床生物质气化动力学模拟[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(2):114-118. ZHU Lin, JIANG Pen, FAN Junmin, et al.Kinetic modeling of biomass gasification in interconnected fluidized beds[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(2):114-118.
[13] 廖洲. 农作物秸秆热解气化研究[D]. 绵阳:西南科技大学, 2014. LIAO Zhou.Research on the pyrolysis and gasification of crop straw[D]. Mianyang:Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2014.
[14] 曾曦, 敖先权, 曹阳, 等. 空气-水蒸气对玉米秸秆与煤流化床共气化的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017, 17(3):551-557. ZENG Xi, AO Xianquan, CAO Yang, et al.Effect of air vapor on co-gasification of corn stalks and coal in fluidized-bed[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2017, 17(3):551-557.
[15] 蒲舸, 刘彦国.玉米秸秆与贫煤固定床内共气化的试验研究[J].煤炭转化, 2014, 37(1):51-54. PU Ge, LIU Yanguo. Experimental study on co-gasification of lean coal and corn straw in a fixed bed gasifier[J]. Coal Conversion, 2014, 37(1):51-54.
[16] 张松寿, 童正明, 周文铸. 工程燃烧学[M]. 北京:中国计量出版社, 2008. ZHANG Songshou, TONG Zhengming, ZHOU Wenzhu. Combustion engineering[M].Beijing:China Measurement Press, 2008.
[17] 常加富, 董玉平, 刘庆磊, 等.文丘里洗涤器净化生物质燃气流场数值模拟及试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(21):186-192. CHANG Jiafu, DONG Yuping, LIU Qinglei, et al.Experimental study and numerical simulation on flow field of venture scrubber purifying biomass gas[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(21):186-192.
[18] 刘广青, 董仁杰, 李秀全.生物质能源转化技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2009. LIU Guangqing, DONG Renjie, LI Xiouquan.Biomass energy conversion technology[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2009.

玉米秸秆循环流化床气化中试试验

Pilot experiment of gasification of corn straw in circulating fluidized bed

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱杰, 金晶, 丁正浩, 杨会盼, 侯封校. 化学链气化中准东煤灰对CaSO₄载氧体改性及其作用机理[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4628-4635.
[2]	张丽宏, 金要茹, 程芳琴. 煤气化渣资源化利用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4447-4457.
[3]	范昀培, 金晶, 刘敦禹, 王静杰, 刘秋祺, 许开龙. CaSO₄载氧体在煤气化化学链燃烧中的脱汞[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1638-1648.
[4]	付佳, 谌伦建, 徐冰, 华绍烽, 李从强, 杨明坤, 邢宝林, 仪桂云. 模拟煤炭气化废水中苯酚的微生物降解[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 526-537.
[5]	房科靖, 熊祖鸿, 鲁敏, 黎涛, 陈勇. 垃圾衍生燃料的制备、热转化特性及应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 132-140.
[6]	张乾, 高增林, 王栋, 彭泽宇, 郝泽光, 黄伟. 煤岩显微组分分离富集物热化学反应特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 160-167.
[7]	付春龙, 王松江, 李国智. 煤气化细渣燃烧技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(S1): 516-523.
[8]	郭凡辉, 武建军, 张海军, 郭旸, 刘虎, 张一昕. 煤气化细渣陶瓷膜真空脱水试验与数值模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(8): 4047-4056.
[9]	张凝凝, 丁华, 高燕, 白向飞, 张昀朋, 孙南翔. 新疆淖毛湖煤中钠在CO₂气化过程的迁移行为[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2348-2355.
[10]	吕飞勇, 初茉, 易浩然, 郝焱, 杨彦博, 石旭, 孙星博. 磁性灰粒在不同粒级气化灰渣中的分布特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2372-2378.
[11]	王思怡, 李月慧, 葛玉洁, 王焕然, 赵璐璐, 李先春. NTP-DBD气化城市污泥及其模型化合物：气氛对产物分布及特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(4): 2150-2160.
[12]	储根云, 范英杰, 张大伟, 高明林, 梅树美, 杨庆春. 煤制乙二醇关键单元技术与低碳集成工艺的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1654-1666.
[13]	刘洋, 黄亚继, 董新新, 丁雪宇, 杨晓域, 王新宇, 张臻荣, 曹歌瀚, 李志远, 田新启. 可燃生活垃圾气化Ca-Fe复合金属氧化物的原位固硫性能[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5677-5684.
[14]	张乾, 向欣宁, 梁丽彤, 刘建伟, 王志青, 房倚天, 黄伟. 热重分析煤焦恒温气化过程中气体切换的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 166-173.
[15]	张强, 陈诗阳. 氧气辅助湿热预处理对玉米秸秆酒精发酵的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(1): 161-165.