射流清管技术的应用探讨与分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0904

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了对射流清管技术的应用进行探讨与分析，通过对清管器运动过程进行受力分析，建立射流清管器运动模型，探讨射流清管技术的关键参数，并针对射流清管技术的工程应用进行分析，提出风险应对策略。研究表明：射流清管技术的关键参数包括压降系数、旁通率、清管器与管壁的摩擦力。压降系数反映射流孔结构对压降的贡献，主要是结构参数的函数。直通结构、折流板结构和内部阀门结构的压降系数可由各组合部分线性累加计算。旁通率的优选是射流清管技术的核心，旁通率对清管器速度的影响并非理想的线性关系，增加旁通率会在一定程度上增强清管器运动的黏滑效应。当前的研究均未考虑液体润滑对摩擦力的影响且未能耦合摩擦力的沿程变化特点。本文最后对射流清管技术进行了展望，指出摩擦力沿程变化、内部阀门压降系数的研究是优化射流清管模型的重要方向，旁通率、清管器速度以及积液运移三者的耦合关系将是未来的研究热点。

关键词: 射流清管, 模型, 压降系数, 旁通率, 摩擦力

Abstract: For the purpose of discussing and analyzing the application of bypass pigging technology, the key parameters which have significant influence on the pig motion were analyzed by establishing the bypass pigging model through force analysis on the pig. Counter measures of eliminating the bypass pigging risks were put forward by discussing certain engineering applications. The study showed that the key parameters of bypass pigging technology included pressure loss coefficient, bypass fraction and friction between pig cups and pipe walls. The pressure loss coefficient which was the function of pig structural parameters reflected the contribution of the bypass port to the pressure drop. The pressure loss coefficient for a bypass pig with a structure of a conventional bypass port, or a deflector in the front, or an internal valve can be calculated by summing the proportion of different parts in the pig linearly. Optimizing the size of bypass fraction for a specific field condition was the core of bypass pigging technology. The variation of pig velocity in different bypass fractions turned out to be nonlinear and the pig's stick-slip behaviors intensified with the increase of bypass fraction. The effects of liquid lubrication on the reduction of the friction were always neglected by current researches which also failed to couple the variation of friction along the pigging process. Finally, the future development trend was prospected. The study on the variation of friction along the pigging process and pressure loss coefficient of a structure with an internal valve was of great significance for optimizing the bypass pigging model. Coupling the connection among bypass fraction, pig velocity and transport of liquid loading will be the future hot research topic.

Key words: bypass pigging, model, pressure loss coefficient, bypass fraction, friction

中图分类号:

TE832

陈建恒, 罗小明, 何利民, 李晓伟, 李清平, 姚海元. 射流清管技术的应用探讨与分析[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(02): 475-484.

CHEN Jianheng, LUO Xiaoming, HE Limin, LI Xiaowei, LI Qingping, YAO Haiyuan. Discussion and analysis of application of bypass pigging technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(02): 475-484.

参考文献

[1] NGUYEN T T, YOO H R, RHO Y W, et al. Speed control of pig using bypass flow in natural gas pipeline[C]//IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2001. Proceedings ISIE IEEE, 2001:863-868.
[2] NGUYEN T T, KIM S B, YOO H R, et al. Modeling and simulation for pig with bypass flow control in natural gas pipeline[J]. KSME International Journal, 2001, 15(9):1302-1310.
[3] MIRSHAMSI M, RAFEEYAN M. Speed control of pipeline pig using the QFT method[J]. Oil &Gas Science and Technology, 2012, 67(4):693-701.
[4] MONEY N, COCKFIELD D, MAYO S, et al. Dynamic speed control in high velocity pipelines[J]. PPSA Pipelines & Gas Journal, 2012, 239(8):30-38
[5] ZHU X X, ZHANG S M, TAN G B, et al. Experimental study on dynamics of rotatable bypass-valve in speed control pig in gas pipeline[J]. Measurement, 2014, 47(1):686-692.
[6] WU H L, VAN SPRONSEN G. Slug reduction with high by-pass pigs-a mature technology[C]//12th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. BHR Group, 2005:313-325.
[7] GROOTE G A, VAN DE CAMP P B J, VEENSTRA P, et al. By-pass pigging without or with speed control for gas-condensate pipelines[C]//Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015:1-13.
[8] OLANIYAN Y, LARREY D. Bypass pig modeling-a three phase gas condensate pipeline field case[C]//9th North American Conference on Multiphase Technology. BHR Group, 2014:499-512.
[9] VAN SPRONSEN G, ENTABAN A, MOHAMAD AMIN K, et al. Field experience with by-pass pigging to mitigate liquid surge[C]//16th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. BHR Group, 2013:299-308.
[10] O'DONOGHUE A. Pigging as a flow assurance solution:estimating pigging frequency for dewaxing[J]. Pipeline World, 2004, 49(2):13-17.
[11] GALTA T. Bypass pigging of subsea pipelines suffering wax deposition[D]. Trondheim:Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2014.
[12] ADIYODI KENOTH S, AL MATAR A, GUPTA D K. Effectiveness of bypass-pigging solutions in multiphase-flow pipelines with waxy crude oil:evaluation and innovative solution[J]. Oil and Gas Facilities, 2015, 4(06):51-65.
[13] DEN HEIJER A. Frictional behaviour of pigs in motion[D]. Delft:Delft University of Technology, 2016.
[14] KIM D K, CHO S H, PARK S S, et al. Verification of the theoretical model for analyzing dynamic behavior of the pig from actual pigging[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2003, 17(9):1349-1357.
[15] NIECKELE A O, BRAGA A M B, AZEVEDO L F A. Transient pig motion through gas and liquid pipelines[J]. Energy Resources Technology, 2001, 123(12):1513-1519.
[16] TOLMASQUIM S T, NIECKELE A O. Design and control of pig operations through pipelines[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2008, 62(3):102-110.
[17] BOTROS K K, GOLSHAN H. Field validation of a dynamic model for an MFL ILI tool in gas pipelines[C]//8th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010:325-336.
[18] DURALI M, FAZELI A, NABI A. Investigation of dynamics and vibration of PIG in oil and gas pipelines[C]//ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2007:2015-2024.
[19] ESMAEILZADEH F, MOWLA D, ASEMANI M. Mathematical modeling and simulation of pigging operation in gas and liquid pipelines[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2009, 69(1):100-106.
[20] HOSSEINALIPOUR S M, KHALILI A Z, SALIMI A. Numerical simulation of pig motion through gas pipelines[C]//16th Australian Fluid Mechanics Conference. Australia:Gold Coast. 2007:971-975.
[21] SINGH A, HENKES R. CFD modeling of the flow around a by-pass pig[C]//8th North American Conference on Multiphase Technology. BHR Group, 2012:229-243.
[22] AZPIROZ J E, HENDRIX M H W, BREUGEM W P, et al. CFD modelling of bypass pigs with a deflector disk[C]//17th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. BHR Group, 2015:141-155.
[23] LIANG Xiaoyun. Numerical study of flow around bypass pigs[D]. Delft:Delft University of Technology, 2015.
[24] LIANG Z, HE H G, CAI W L. Speed simulation of bypass hole PIG with a brake unit in liquid pipe[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 42:40-47.
[25] HENDRIX M H W, LIANG X, BREUGEM W P, et al. Characterization of the pressure loss coefficient using a building block approach with application to by-pass pigs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 150:13-21.
[26] MASSEY B S. Mechanics of fluids[M]. 9th ed. Oxford:Spon Press, 2012.
[27] RAHE F. Optimizing the active speed control unit for in-line inspection tools in gas[C]//2006 International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006:377-383.
[28] IDELCHIK I E. Handbook of hydraulic resistance[M]. 4th ed. Connecticut:Begell House, 2007.
[29] CHURCHILL S W. Friction-factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes[J]. Chemical Engineering, 1977, 84(24):91-92.
[30] TEYSSANDIER R G, WILSON M P. An analysis of flow through sudden enlargements in pipes[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1974, 64(1):85-95.
[31] NIECKELE A O, BRAGA A M B, AZEVEDO L F A. Transient pig motion through gas and liquid pipelines[J]. Energy Resources Technology, 2001, 123(12):1513-1519.
[32] O'DONOGHUE A F. On the steady state motion of conventional pipeline pigs using incompressible drive media[D]. Cranfield, Bedfordshire:Cranfield University, 1996.
[33] HENDRIX M H W, DEN HEIJER A, BREUGEM W P, et al. Frictional forces during pigging of multiphase pipelines[C]//10th North American Conference on Multiphase Technology.BHR Group, 2016.
[34] ZHU X X, ZHANG S M, LI X L, et al. Numerical simulation of contact force on bi-directional pig in gas pipeline:at the early stage of pigging[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23:127-138.
[35] ZHU X X, WANG D G, YEUNG H, et al. Comparison of linear and nonlinear simulations of bidirectional pig contact forces in gas pipelines[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27:151-157.
[36] ZHANG H, ZHANG S M, LIN L, et al. Mechanical characteristics analysis of pig's sealing disc in offshore pipeline[C]//The Twenty-fifth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. USA:International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2015:14-19.
[37] ZHU X X, WANG W, ZHANG S M, et al. Experimental research on the frictional resistance of fluid-driven pipeline robot with small size in gas pipeline[J]. Tribology Letters, 2017, 65(2):49.
[38] ZHANG H, SANCHEZ C, LIU S H, et al. Wear of a polyurethane rubber used in dry gas pipeline as inspection gauges[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 41:40-48.
[39] ZHANG H, ZHANG S M, LIU S H, et al. Measurement and analysis of friction and dynamic characteristics of PIG's sealing disc passing through girth weld in oil and gas pipeline[J]. Measurement, 2015, 64:112-122.
[40] IJSSELDIJK H P. By-pass pigging experiments and simulation[D]. Delft:Delft University of Technology, 2016.
[41] DONOGHUE O. Pigging as a flow assurance solution avoiding slug catcher overflow[C]//The Pigging Products and Services Association Seminar. UK, 2012.
[42] PARK S, KIM M, NYDAL O J, et al. Mitigation of pig-induced slugs by combination of by-pass pig and inlet separator dual control valves[C]//Offshore Technology Conference Asia. Malaysia:Offshore Technology Conference, 2016:1-15
[43] LEE H S, AGUSTIAWAN D, JATI K I K, et al. Bypass pigging operation experience and flow assurance study[C]//Offshore Technology Conference. USA, 2012:1-10.
[44] ENTABAN A, ISMAIL A, JAMBARI M, et al. By-pass pigging-a ‘simple’ technology with significant business impact[C]//International Petroleum Technology Conference, China. 2013:1-6.
[45] 张占平,李战平,张金箭,等.旁通清管技术在长北项目的应用[J].石油和化工设备, 2013, 16(11):37-41. ZHANG Z P, LI Z P, ZHANG J J, et al. The application of bypass pigging in Changbei project[J]. Petro & Chemical Equipment, 2013, 16(11):37-41.
[46] 王惠,谢艳梅,曾萍.苏里格气田旁通清管技术研究及应用[J].石油化工应用, 2014, 33(11):29-31. WANG H, XIE Y M, ZENG P. The research and application of bypass pigging technology in Sulige gas field[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2014, 33(11):29-31.
[47] 姚海元,罗小明,李清平,等. 一种防卡堵喷气式射流清管器; 201320602776.1[P]. 2013-09-27. YAO H Y, LUO X M, LI Q P, et al. An anti-block jet bypass pig:201320602776.1[P]. 2013-09-27.
[48] WU H L, MOL E B, STARSMORE R P, et al. By-pass pigs for liquid management in a two-phase flow pipeline[C]//BHR Group Conference Series Publication. UK:Professional Engineering Publishing; 1999, 35:361-372.
[49] O'DONOGHUE A. Why pigs get stuck and how to avoid it[J]. Pipes & Pipelines International, 2003, 48(2):5-16.
[50] 蒲红宇,刘仕鳌,蒋洪.天然气管道清管作业风险分析及应对措施[J].油气储运, 2012, 31(6):461-462. PU H Y, LIU S A, JIANG H. Risk analysis and countermeasures of natural gas pigging operation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012, 31(6):461-462.
[51] 张道锋. 天然气管道清管作业风险预控[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2016(7):253-254. ZHANG D F. Risk pre-control of natural gas pigging operation[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2016(7):253-254.
[52] 高超,王皓,郭东升.海底天然气管道清管风险分析及应对[J].天然气与石油, 2016, 34(5):6-10. GAO C, WANG H, GUO D S. Risk analysis and countermeasures of subsea natural gas pigging[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2016, 34(5):6-10.
[53] 丁麟,史博会,吕晓方,等.天然气水合物的生成对浆液流动稳定性影响综述[J].化工进展, 2016, 35(10):3118-3128. DING L, SHI B H, LU X F, et al. Investigation on the effects of natural gas hydrate formation on slurry flow stability[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(10):3118-3128.
[54] 孙志高,樊栓狮,郭开华,等.气体水合物——储运天然气技术与发展[J].化工进展, 2001, 20(1):9-12. SUN Z G, FAN S S, GUO K H, et al. Trend of natural gas storage and transport using hydrates[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2001, 20(1):9-12.
[55] 吕秋楠,陈朝阳,李小森.气体水合物快速生成强化技术与方法研究进展[J].化工进展, 2011, 30(1):74-79. LU Q N, CHEN Z Y, LI X S. Advances in technology and method for promoting gas hydrate rapid formation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2011, 30(1):74-79.
[56] 陈光进,马庆兰,郭天民.气体水合物生成机理和热力学模型的建立[J].化工学报, 2000, 51(5):626-631. CHEN G J, MA Q L, GUO T M. A new mechanism for hydrate formation and development of thermodynamic model[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2000, 51(5):626-631.
[57] CHANG Y S, WNE Z L, XIN Y, et al. Progress in research of gas hydrate[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2011, 19(1):151-162.
[58] 丁麟,史博会,吕晓方,等.天然气水合物形成与生长影响因素综述[J].化工进展, 2016, 35(1):57-64. DING L, SHI B H, LU X F, et al. Review of influence factors of natural gas hydrate formation and growth[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(1):57-64.
[59] 王立满,王玉柱,张海龙.射流清管器清管过程中水合物生成及预防研究[J].清洗世界, 2015, 31(1):14-20. WANG L M, WANG Y Z, ZHANG H L. The numerical simulation on generation and inhibition of natural gas hydrate in by-pass pigging[J]. Cleaning World, 2015, 31(1):14-20.
[60] 樊栓狮,王燕鸿,郎雪梅.天然气水合物动力学抑制技术研究进展[J].天然气工业, 2011, 31(12):99-109. FAN S S, WANG Y H, LANG X M. Progress in the research of kinetic hydrate inhibitors[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(12):99-109.
[61] 胡耀强,何飞,刘婷婷,等.动力学型天然气水合物抑制剂研究进展[J].现代化工, 2015, 35(3):59-61. HU Y Q,HE F,LIU T T,et al.Progress of kinetic inhibitor for natural gas hydrate[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2015, 35(3):59-61.
[62] 田旺和,任帅,王东,等.兰成渝成品油管线清管及内检测方案设计[J].管道技术与设备, 2014(4):41-43. TIAN W H, REN S, WANG D, et al. Design of the pigging and internal inspection product oil of the Lanzhou-ChengduChongqing[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2014(4):41-43.
[63] 杨理践,赵洋,高松巍. 输气管道内检测器压力-速度模型及速度调整策略[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2012, 33(11):2407-2413. YANG L J, ZHAO Y, GAO S W. Pressure-velocity model and speed adjustment strategy for in-pipe detector in gas pipeline[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2012, 33(11):2407-2413.