柴油+水+天然气体系中水合物堵管实验研究

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016-2256

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (08): 2838-2846.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016-2256

柴油+水+天然气体系中水合物堵管实验研究

宋光春¹, 李玉星¹, 王武昌¹, 姜凯¹, 施政灼¹, 赵鹏飞²

1. 中国石油大学(华东)山东省油气储运安全省级重点实验室, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 中国石化集团新星石油有限责任公司, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2016-12-06 修回日期:2016-12-26 出版日期:2017-08-05 发布日期:2017-08-05
通讯作者: 李玉星,教授,主要从事油气储运工程方面的研究和教学工作。
作者简介:宋光春(1992-),男,博士研究生,主要从事深水流动安全保障方向研究。E-mail:UpcNGH_sgc@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51006120）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项（14CX02207A，17CX06017，17CX05006）及中国石油大学（华东）研究生创新工程（YCX2017062）项目。

Experimental investigation on hydrate plugging in diesel oil+water+natural gas systems

SONG Guangchun¹, LI Yuxing¹, WANG Wuchang¹, JIANG Kai¹, SHI Zhenzhuo¹, ZHAO Pengfei²

1. Shandong Key Laboratory of Oil-Gas Storage and Transportation Safety, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
2. SINOPEC Star Petroleum Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China

Received:2016-12-06 Revised:2016-12-26 Online:2017-08-05 Published:2017-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用新建的高压环道装置，以柴油、水、天然气为实验介质，在不同含水率（30%~100%）、液相初始流量（1600~2400kg/h）等条件下进行管道内水合物堵塞实验，研究水合物在管道中的堵塞过程和堵塞机理。根据实验过程中流动参数的变化规律和水合物形态的演化情况，分析了管道内水合物的形成和分布特点并得到了管道内水合物堵塞的两类过程及其对应的主导堵塞机理。对于第一类堵塞，其堵塞过程可分为4个阶段，水合物沉积层在管道内的形成和生长是其主导堵塞机理。对于第二类堵塞，其堵塞过程也可分为4个阶段，液相分层和流体黏度的急剧增加是其主导的堵塞机理。另外，在第一类堵塞实验中观察到了细泥沙状水合物和絮状水合物沉积层，而在第二类堵塞过程中水合物则呈浆状并且没有观察到明显的水合物沉积层。

关键词: 水合物, 堵塞, 过程, 机理, 沉积, 分层

Abstract: In order to investigate hydrate plugging processes and mechanisms,a high pressure flow loop was newly designed and constructed where hydrate plugging experiments were performed in natural gas + diesel oil + water systems for a range of water cuts(30%-100%)and initial liquid flow rates(1600-2400kg/h). Based on the experimental data of hydrate morphology and flow parameters,hydrate formation and distribution characteristics in the flow loop were analyzed and two hydrate plugging types together with the corresponding hydrate plugging mechanisms were proposed. For hydrate plugging type Ⅰ,the plugging process can be divided into four stages. Formation and growing of a hydrate deposition layer is the governing plugging mechanism. For hydrate plugging type Ⅱ,it can also be divided into four stages. Liquid stratification and the sharp increase in viscosity is the governing plugging mechanism. In addition,silt-like hydrates and flocculent-like hydrate deposition layer were observed in hydrate plugging typeⅠwhile slurry-like hydrates with no obvious deposition layer were observed in hydrate plugging typeⅡ.

Key words: hydrate, plugging, process, mechanism, deposition, stratification

中图分类号:

TE88

宋光春, 李玉星, 王武昌, 姜凯, 施政灼, 赵鹏飞. 柴油+水+天然气体系中水合物堵管实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(08): 2838-2846.

SONG Guangchun, LI Yuxing, WANG Wuchang, JIANG Kai, SHI Zhenzhuo, ZHAO Pengfei. Experimental investigation on hydrate plugging in diesel oil+water+natural gas systems[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(08): 2838-2846.

参考文献

[1] SLOAN E D. Clathrate hydrates of natural gases[M]. New York:Marcel Dekker,2007:1-5.
[2] 陈光进,孙长宇,马庆兰. 气体水合物科学与技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2008:223-225. CHEN G J,SUN C Y,MA Q L. Gas hydrates science and technology[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2008:223-225.
[3] HAMMERSCHMIDT E G. Formation of gas hydrates in natural gas transmission lines[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry,1934,26(8):851-855.
[4] SLOAN E D. Natural gas hydrates in flow assurance[M]. New York:Elsevier Science Ltd.,2010:1-36.
[5] YAN K L,GUO K,SUN C Y,et al. Experimental and modeling studies on the viscosity of(diesel oil+water+anti-agglomerant)system at high pressures[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria,2014,377:9-15.
[6] HUO Z,FREER E,LAMAR M,et al. Hydrate plug prevention by anti-agglomeration[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2001,56(1):4979-4991.
[7] PENG B Z,CHEN J,SUN C Y,et al. Flow characteristics and morphology of hydrate slurry formed from(natural gas+diesel oil/condensate oil+water)system containing anti-agglomerant[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2012,84:333-344.
[8] NICHOLAS J W,DIEKER L E,NUEBLING L,et al. Experimental investigation of deposition and wall growth in water saturated hydrocarbon pipelines in the absence of free water[C]//ICGH,Vancouver,2008.
[9] CHEN J,SUN C Y,PENG B Z,et al. Screening and compounding of gas hydrate anti-agglomerants from commercial additives through morphology observation[J]. Energy & Fuels,2013,27:2488-2496.
[10] WANG W C,FAN S S,LIANG D Q,et al. Experimental study on flow characters of CH₃CCl²F hydrate slurry[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration,2008,31:371-378.
[11] WANG W C,FAN S S,LIANG D Q,et al. Experimental study on flow characteristics of tetrahydrofuran hydrate slurry in pipelines[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry,2010,19(3):318-322.
[12] TURNER D. Clathrate hydrate formation in water-in-oil dispersions[D]. Golden:Colorado School of Mines,2005.
[13] NICHOLAS J W,DIEKER L E,SLOAN E D,et al. Assessing the feasibility of hydrate deposition on pipeline walls-adhesion force measurements of clathrate hydrate particles on carbon steel[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2009,331(2):322-328.
[14] JOSHI S V,GRASSO G A,Lafond P G,et al. Experimental flowloop investigations of gas hydrate formation in high water cut systems[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2013,97(7):198-209.
[15] CHEN J,YAN K L,CHEN G J,et al. Insights into the formation mechanism of hydrate plugging in pipelines[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2015,122:284-290.
[16] VIJAYAMOHAN P,MAJID A A A,CHAUDHARI P,et al. Hydrate modeling flow loop experiments for water continuous partially dispersed systems[C]//Texas,Offshore Technology Conference,2014.
[17] ENGLEZOS P,KALOGERAKIS N,DHOLABHAI P D,et al. Kinetics of formation of methane and ethane gas hydrates[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,1987,42(1):2647-2658.
[18] POINDEXTER M K,ZAKI N N,KILPARTRICK P K,et al. Factors contributing to petroleum foaming.-Part 1:crude oil systems[J]. Energy & Fuels,2002,16(3):700-710.
[19] MORRISSY S A,LIM V W,MAY E F,et al. Micromechanical cohesive force measurements between precipitated asphaltene solids and cyclopentane hydrates[J]. Energy & Fuels,2015,29:6277-6285.
[20] MAKOGON Y F. Hydrates of hydrocarbons[M]. Tulsa:Penn Well,1997.
[21] SUN M W,FIROOZABADI A,CHEN G J,et al. Hydrate size measurements in anti-agglomeration at high watercut by new chemical formulation[J]. Energy & Fuels,2015,29(5):2901-2905.
[22] GRASSO G A,LAFOND P G,AMAN Z M,et al. Hydrate formation flowloop experiments[C]//ICGH,Beijing,2008.

柴油+水+天然气体系中水合物堵管实验研究

Experimental investigation on hydrate plugging in diesel oil+water+natural gas systems

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张杰, 白忠波, 冯宝鑫, 彭肖林, 任伟伟, 张菁丽, 刘二勇. PEG及其复合添加剂对电解铜箔后处理的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 374-381.
[2]	王乐乐, 杨万荣, 姚燕, 刘涛, 何川, 刘逍, 苏胜, 孔凡海, 朱仓海, 向军. SCR脱硝催化剂掺废特性及性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 489-497.
[3]	杨建平. 降低HPPO装置反应系统原料消耗的PSE[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 21-32.
[4]	王谨航, 何勇, 史伶俐, 龙臻, 梁德青. 气体水合物阻聚剂研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4587-4602.
[5]	宋伟涛, 宋慧平, 范朕连, 樊飙, 薛芳斌. 粉煤灰在防腐涂料中的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4894-4904.
[6]	李由, 吴越, 钟禹, 林琦璇, 任俊莉. 酸性熔盐水合物预处理麦秆高效制备木糖及其对酶解效率的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4974-4983.
[7]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[8]	尹新宇, 皮丕辉, 文秀芳, 钱宇. 特殊浸润性材料在防治油气管道中水合物成核与聚集的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4076-4092.
[9]	王鑫, 王兵兵, 杨威, 徐志明. 金属表面PDA/PTFE超疏水涂层抑垢与耐腐蚀性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4315-4321.
[10]	吴亚, 赵丹, 方荣苗, 李婧瑶, 常娜娜, 杜春保, 王文珍, 史俊. 用于复杂原油乳液的高效破乳剂开发及应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4398-4413.
[11]	常印龙, 周启民, 王青月, 王文俊, 李伯耿, 刘平伟. 废弃聚烯烃的高值化学回收研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 3965-3978.
[12]	欧阳素芳, 周道伟, 黄伟, 贾凤. 新型耐迁移橡胶防老剂的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3708-3719.
[13]	张凯, 吕秋楠, 李刚, 李小森, 莫家媚. 南海海泥中甲烷水合物的形貌及赋存特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3865-3874.
[14]	顾诗亚, 董亚超, 刘琳琳, 张磊, 庄钰, 都健. 考虑中间节点的碳捕集管路系统设计与优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2799-2808.
[15]	杨扬, 孙志高, 李翠敏, 李娟, 黄海峰. 静态条件下表面活性剂OP-13促进HCFC-141b水合物生成[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2854-2859.