基于分子管理的脱有机硫复配型溶剂的开发与应用

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.06.045

化工进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (06): 1786-1791,1803.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.06.045

基于分子管理的脱有机硫复配型溶剂的开发与应用

张峰¹, 沈本贤¹, 孙辉¹, 刘纪昌¹, 刘元直²

1 华东理工大学化学工程联合国家重点实验室, 上海 200237;
2 中国石化中原油田普光分公司天然气净化厂, 四川达州 636156

收稿日期:2014-10-05 修回日期:2014-11-19 出版日期:2015-06-05 发布日期:2015-06-05
通讯作者: 沈本贤,教授,主要从事油气深度加工及清洁燃料技术的研究。E-mail:sbx@ecust.edu.cn。
作者简介:张峰(1987—),男,博士研究生。
基金资助:
十二五国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05017-005)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项(22A201514010)及中石化"十条龙"科技攻关项目(112125)。

Development and application of formulated solvents based on molecular management theory for removing organic sulfur

ZHANG Feng¹, SHEN Benxian¹, SUN Hui¹, LIU Jichang¹, LIU Yuanzhi²

1 State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2 Natural Gas Purification Plant, Puguang Company, Zhongyuan Oil Field, Sinopec, Dazhou 636156, Sichuan, China

Received:2014-10-05 Revised:2014-11-19 Online:2015-06-05 Published:2015-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于分子管理理念, 对脱有机硫复配型溶剂进行组成设计。采用两维溶解度参数理论, 筛选出与甲硫醇溶解度参数接近的溶剂作为复配溶剂中提高甲硫醇脱除率的组分;并根据胺的碱性、空间位阻效应对其与COS反应速率的影响规律, 选择具有较小空间位阻效应和适当强度碱性的环状胺类作为提高COS脱除率的溶剂组分。根据原料气的有机硫分布特点, 将所筛选的溶剂组分按一定比例配入N-甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)中, 获得了两种复配溶剂(UDS-I, UDS-II)。脱硫实验结果表明, 对于COS占有机硫总量94%的天然气, UDS-I溶剂的COS脱除率较MDEA高出近44个百分点, 其净化天然气质量满足一类气的指标要求;对于甲硫醇占有机硫总量79%的焦化液化气, UDS-II溶剂的甲硫醇脱除率较MDEA高出近50个百分点, 其净化液化气的总硫含量满足民用液化气指标要求。

关键词: 脱硫, 甲硫醇, 羰基硫, 溶剂, 溶解

Abstract: Based on the molecular management theory, the rational formulations of mixed solvents for removing organic sulfurs were designed. Using a two-dimensional solubility parameter theory, the solvents, with similar solubility parameters for methyl mercaptan as compared with alkanolamines, were selected as key components of formulated solvents to remove methyl mercaptan. According to the influence of basicity and steric hindrance of amines on the reaction rates of amines with carbonyl sulfide, the heterocyclic amines with less steric hindrance and moderate basicity were used as key components to enhance removal efficiency for carbonyl sulfide. Depending upon the distributions of organic sulfur in feed gases, the selected solvent components were added to N-methyl diethanolamine (MDEA), then two kinds of formulated solvents (UDS-I and UDS-II) were obtained. The results of desulfurization experiments showed that for the natural gas in which carbonyl sulfide accounted for 94% of total organic sulfur, removal efficiency for carbonyl sulfide with UDS-I was approximately 44 percentage points higher than that of MDEA. The purified natural gas well satisfied the requirement of first-grade commercial gas. For the delayed coking LPG in which methyl mercaptan accounted for 79% of total organic sulfur, removal efficiency for methyl mercaptan of UDS-Ⅱ was about 50 percentage points higher than that of MDEA. The purified LPG could be directly used as civil LPG.

Key words: desulfurization, methyl mercaptan, carbonyl sulfide, solvents, dissolution

中图分类号:

TE645

张峰, 沈本贤, 孙辉, 刘纪昌, 刘元直. 基于分子管理的脱有机硫复配型溶剂的开发与应用[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(06): 1786-1791,1803.

ZHANG Feng, SHEN Benxian, SUN Hui, LIU Jichang, LIU Yuanzhi. Development and application of formulated solvents based on molecular management theory for removing organic sulfur[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(06): 1786-1791,1803.

参考文献

[1] 陈赓良, 常宏岗. 配方型溶剂的应用与气体净化工艺的发展动向[M]. 第2版. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2009:69-71.
[2] Buewell K F, Kubek D J, Sigmund P W. Alkanolamine treating[J]. Hydrocarbon Processing, 1982, 61(3):108-116.
[3] Rivera-Tinoco R, Bouallou C. Reaction kinetics of carbonyl sulfide (COS) with diethanolamine in methanolic solutions[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008, 47(19):7375-7380.
[4] Wu Yongwen. Molecular management for refining operations[D]. Manchester, Britain:University of Manchester, 2010.
[5] Bedell S A, Miller M. Aqueous amines as reactive solvents for mercaptan removal[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46:3729-3733.
[6] Huttenhuis P J G, Mohan A, van Loo S, et al. Absorption of carbonyl sulphide in aqueous piperazine[C]//Institution of Chemical Engineering Symposium Series, Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2006, 152:581-589.
[7] Hancock B C, York P, Rowe R C. The use of solubility parameters in pharmaceutical dosage form design[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1997, 148(1):1-21.
[8] 俞春芳, 黑恩成, 刘国杰. 聚合物的溶剂选择与新的两维溶解度参数[J]. 化工学报, 2001, 52(4):288-294.
[9] 刘国杰, 黑恩成, 史济斌. 一个新的溶解度参数[J]. 化工学报, 1994, 45(12):666-672.
[10] Fedors R F. A method for estimating both the solubility parameters and molar volume of liquids[J]. Polymer Engineering & Science, 1974, 14(2):147-154.
[11] 于成峰, 黑恩成, 刘国杰. 液体内聚能的统计热力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2001, 52(1):407-413.
[12] van Krevelen D W, Te Nijenhuis K. Properties of Polymers:Their Correlation with Chemical Structure[M]. 4th completely revised edition. New York:Elsevier, 2009:189-228.
[13] 王开岳. 天然气净化工艺-脱硫脱碳、脱水、硫磺回收及尾气处理[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2005:147-190.
[14] 上官炬, 常丽萍, 田茂谦, 等. 气体净化与分离技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2012:298.
[15] 章建华. 新型溶剂高效吸收净化高酸性石油天然气技术开发研究[D]. 上海:华东理工大学, 2011.
[16] Al-Ghawas H A, Ruiz-Ibanez G, Sandall O C. Absorption of carbonyl sulfide in aqueous methyldiethanolamine[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci. , 1989, 44(3):631-639.
[17] Amararene F, Bouallou C. Kinetics of carbonyl sulfide (COS) absorption with aqueous solutions of diethanolamine and methyldiethanolamine[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 2004, 43(19): 6136-6141.
[18] Vaidya Prakash D, Kenig Eugeny Y. Kinetics of carbonyl sulfide reaction with alkanolamines:A review[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 148(2-3):207-211.
[19] Littel R J, Versteeg G F, van Swaaij W P M. Kinetics of COS with primary and secondary amines in aqueous solutions[J]. AIChE Journal, 1992, 38(2):244-250.
[20] Hamborg E S, Versteeg G F. Dissociation constants and thermodynamic properties of alkanolamines[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1):1213-1218.
[21] 王璐, 杨敬一, 徐心茹. 胺分子结构与CO₂反应速度常数关系的研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2010, 39(2):95-100.
[22] 周乐. 有机化学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2009:360.
[23] Ernst W R, Chen M S K, Mitchell D L. Hydrolysis of carbonyl sulfide:Comparison to reactions of isocyanates[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1990, 68(2):319-323.
[24] Reilly J T, Schubert C N, Lindner J R, et al. Effect of heterocyclic amine additives on the absorption rates of carbonyl sulfide and carbon dioxide in aqueous methyldiethanolamine solutions[J]. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1990, 93(1):181-19.
[25] Ernst W, Chen M S K. Hydrolysis of carbonyl sulfide in a gas-liquid reactor[J]. AIChE Journal, 1988, 34(1):158-162.

基于分子管理的脱有机硫复配型溶剂的开发与应用

Development and application of formulated solvents based on molecular management theory for removing organic sulfur

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	盛维武, 程永攀, 陈强, 李小婷, 魏嘉, 李琳鸽, 陈险峰. 微气泡和微液滴双强化脱硫反应器操作分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 142-147.
[2]	马伊, 曹世伟, 王家骏, 林立群, 邢延, 曹腾良, 卢峰, 赵振伦, 张志军. 低共熔溶剂回收废旧锂离子电池正极材料的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 219-232.
[3]	廖志新, 罗涛, 王红, 孔佳骏, 申海平, 管翠诗, 王翠红, 佘玉成. 溶剂脱沥青技术应用与进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4573-4586.
[4]	钱思甜, 彭文俊, 张先明. PET熔融缩聚与溶液解聚形成环状低聚物的对比分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4808-4816.
[5]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[6]	王云刚, 焦健, 邓世丰, 赵钦新, 邵怀爽. 冷凝换热与协同脱硫性能实验分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4230-4237.
[7]	于志庆, 黄文斌, 王晓晗, 邓开鑫, 魏强, 周亚松, 姜鹏. B掺杂Al₂O₃@C负载CoMo型加氢脱硫催化剂性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3550-3560.
[8]	王帅旗, 王从新, 王学林, 田志坚. 无溶剂快速合成ZSM-12分子筛[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3561-3571.
[9]	杨许召, 李庆, 袁康康, 张盈盈, 韩敬莉, 吴诗德. 含Gemini离子液体低共熔溶剂热力学性质[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3123-3129.
[10]	王保文, 刘同庆, 张港, 李炜光, 林德顺, 王梦家, 马晶晶. CuFe₂O₄改性脱硫渣氧载体与褐煤的反应特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 2884-2894.
[11]	王嘉, 彭冲, 唐磊, 陆安慧. 渣油加氢催化剂活性相结构调控及对反应性能影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1811-1821.
[12]	范思涵, 于国熙, 来超超, 何欢, 黄斌, 潘学军. 非生物改性对厌氧微生物产物光化学活性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 2180-2189.
[13]	杨园园, 雷婷, 秦青青, 武晓, 李剑, 秦舒浩, 李嘉乐, 张兵兵, 任露露. PEO改性PVDF/SMA膜结构和性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(3): 1515-1526.
[14]	李乃珍, 孙瑞洁, 秦志峰, 苗茂谦, 吴琼笑, 常丽萍, 孙鹏程, 曾剑, 刘毅. 焦炉煤气常量含碳气氛对加氢脱硫催化剂活性、选择性和积炭的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(2): 783-793.
[15]	袁礼, 王学谦, 李翔, 王郎郎, 马懿星, 宁平, 熊亦然. 催化脱除钢铁副产煤气中COS和H₂S的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5147-5161.