催化裂化结焦反应的研究进展

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2015.02.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 综述了近年来催化裂化结焦反应的研究进展情况,重点介绍了结焦反应的影响因素、焦炭对催化反应的影响、结焦机理以及焦炭的表征4个方面。研究认为,原料的性质、反应温度、催化剂的类型等因素均会对焦炭的生成产生影响。焦炭可以导致催化剂的失活,而位于孔道内部的焦炭对反应物或产物的扩散不利,进而影响产物的分布。研究表明,各种烃类组分形成焦炭的过程都必须经历芳香烃这一步。对于结焦催化剂可以采取多种表征手段,其中利用XPS以及GC-MS对焦炭进行表征的报道日益增多。尽管国内外对于催化裂化结焦反应的研究开展较早,然而探究焦炭的具体成分仍存在不小的困难,通过先进的表征手段鉴定焦炭中高缩合度芳烃组分以及如何减小催化裂化催化剂的结焦量将成为未来的研究方向。

关键词: 催化裂化, 焦炭, 催化剂, 结焦反应, 失活, 活性

Abstract: In this paper,coking reaction in fluid catalytic cracking is summarized from four aspects,including factors affecting coking,influence on catalytic reactions by coke,coking mechanism and coke characterization. Researches show that properties of feedstock,reaction temperature,catalyst type and other factors affect the formation of coke. Coke formation lead to deactivation of catalyst and affect distribution of products. Coke formation from various hydrocarbons must go through the step of aromatics. Coked catalysts can be characterized by multiple methods. XPS and GC-MS have also been used to characterize coke. However,there are still some difficulties to identify specific components of coke. The identification of polycyclic aromatics in coke and how to reduce coke formation on FCC catalyst will be the direction of future research.

Key words: fluid catalytic cracking, coke, catalyst, coking reaction, deactivation, reactivity

中图分类号:

TE624.4

李腾, 陈小博, 杨朝合, 李春义. 催化裂化结焦反应的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2015, 34(02): 370-375.

LI Teng, CHEN Xiaobo, YANG Chaohe, LI Chunyi. Process of coking reaction in fluid catalytic cracking[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree, 2015, 34(02): 370-375.

参考文献

[1] Fan Y,Bao X,Shi G,et al. Hβ/HZSM-5 composite carrier supported catalysts for olefins reduction of FCC gasoline via hydroisomerization and aromatization[J]. Catal. Lett.,2005,105(1):67-75.
[2] Liu H,Yu J,Fan Y,et al. A scenario-based clean diesel production strategy for China National Petroleum Corporation[J]. Pet. Sci.,2011,8(2):229-238.
[3] 袁起民,龙军,谢朝纲,等. 高氮原料的催化裂化研究进展[J]. 化工进展,2008,27(12):1929-1936.
[4] Hou B,Cao Z,Chen W,et al. Properties and chemical composition of typical coker gas oil[J]. Pet. Sci. Technol.,2007,25:1013-1025.
[5] Wang G,Li Z,Huang H,et al. Synergistic process for coker gas oil and heavy cycle oil conversion for maximum light production[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,2010,49:11260-11268.
[6] Bae E J,Na J G,Chung S H,et al. Identification of about 30000 chemical components in shale oils by electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) coupled with 15 T fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) and a comparison to conventional oil[J]. Energy & Fuels,2010,24:2563-2569.
[7] Chen X,Shen B,Sun J,et al. Characterization and comparison of nitrogen compounds in hydrotreated and untreated shale oil by electrospray ionization (ESI) fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS)[J]. Energy & Fuels,2012,26:1707-1714.
[8] Lee Fu-Ming. Activity of vanadium on different catalyst supports[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,1992,82(2):215-230.
[9] Brevoord E,Powels A C. Proceedings of the international symposiumon deactivation and testing of hydrocarbon conversion catalysts[C]. Chicago:ACS,1995.
[10] Cerqueira H S,Caeiro G,Costa L,et al. Deactivation of FCC catalysts[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A:Chemical,2008,292:1-13.
[11] Mauleon J L,Letzsch W S. Paper presented at the 5th kabalistic ann FCC symp[C]. Vienna,Austria,1984.
[12] Guisnet M,Magnoux P. Organic chemistry of coke formation[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,2001,212:83-96.
[13] Cerqueira H S,Patrick M,Dominique M,et al. Coke formation and coke profiles during the transformation of various reactants at 450℃ over a USHY zeolite[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,2001,208:359-367.
[14] Magnoux P,Machado F,Guisnet M,et al. Mechanism of coke formation during the transformation of propane,toluene and propane-toluene mixture on HZSM-5[C]//Budapest:Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Catalysis,1992.
[15] Cerqueira H S,Ayrault P,Datka J,et al. m-Xylene transformation over a USHY zeolite at 523 and 723K:Influence of coke deposits on activity,acidity,and porosity[J]. J. Catal.,2000,196(1):149-157.
[16] Pierre C Mihindou-Koumba,Henrique S C,Patrick M,et al. Methylcyclohexane transformation over HFAU,HBEA,and HMFI zeolites: II. Deactivation and coke formation[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,2001,40(4):1042-1051.
[17] Guisnet M,Magnoux P. Coking and deactivation of zeolites:Influence of the pore structure[J]. Appl. Catal.,1989,54(1):1-27.
[18] Perere D,Aline A,Perere C,et al. Methanol conversion on acidic ZSM-5,offretite,and mordenite zeolites:A comparative study of the formation and stability of coke deposits[J]. J. Catal.,1981,70:123-136.
[19] Takashi Ino,Sulaiman Al-Khattaf. Effect of unit cell size on the activity and coke selectivity of FCC catalysts[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,1996,142(1):5-17.
[20] Pio Forzatti,Luca Lietti. Catalyst deactivation[J]. J. Catal.,1999,52(2-3):165-181.
[21] Nam In-Sik,Froment G F. Catalyst deactivation by site coverage through multi-site reaction mechanisms[J]. J. Catal.,1987,108(2):271-282.
[22] Bourdillon G,Gueguen C. Characterization of acid catalysts by means of model reactions:I. Acid strength necessary for the catalysis of various hydrocarbon reactions[J]. Appl. Catal.,1990,61(1):123-139.
[23] Caeiro G,Lopesa J M,Magnoux P,et al. A FT-IR study of deactivation phenomena during methylcyclohexane transformation on H-USY zeolites:Nitrogen poisoning,coke formation,and acidity-activity correlations[J]. J. Catal.,2007,249:234-243.
[24] Reyniers M F,Tang Y,Marin G B,et al. Influence of coke formation on the conversion of hydrocarbons:II. i-Butene on HY-zeolites[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,2000,202(1):65-80.
[25] Reyniers M F,Beirnaert H,Marin G B,et al. Influence of coke formation on the conversion of hydrocarbons:I. Alkanes on a USY-zeolite[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,2000,202(1):49-63.
[26] Beeckman J W,Froment G F. Catalyst deactivation by active site coverage and pore blockage[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamen.,1979,18(3):245-256.
[27] Karge H G,NieBen W,Bludau H,et al. In-situ FTIR measurements of diffusion in coking zeolite catalysts[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,1996,146:339-349.
[28] Guisnet M. "Coke" molecules trapped in the micropores of zeolites as active species in hydrocarbon transformations[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A:Chemical,2002,182:367-382.
[29] Magnoux P,Cerqueira H S,Guisnet M,et al. Evolution of coke composition during ageing under nitrogen[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,2002,235:93-99.
[30] Corma A,Mocholia F,Orchillesa V,et al. Methylcyclohexane and methylcyclohexene cracking over zeolite Y catalysts[J]. Appl. Catal.,1990,67(1):307-324.
[31] 杨雪,田辉平,王世环. 催化裂化待生剂积炭结构组成的多重表征[J]. 石油学报:石油加工,2011,27(2):198-206.
[32] 钮根林,杨朝合,山红红,等. 结焦催化剂上焦炭氢碳比的测定方法[J]. 分析化学,2003,31(3):318-321.
[33] Cerqueira H S,Carsten S,Guy J,et al. Multitechnique characterization of coke produced during commercial resid FCC operation[J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,2005,44:2069-2077.
[34] 张雪静,徐广通,郑爱国. FCC催化剂上积炭组成及形态分析[J]. 石油学报:石油加工,2012,28(1):60-64.
[35] Qian K,Tomczak D C,Rakiewicz E F,et al. Coke formation in the fluid catalytic cracking process by combined analytical techniques[J]. Energy & Fuels,1997,11:596-601.
[36] 孙金鹏. 焦化蜡油两段提升管催化裂解与焦化石脑油改质应用基础研究[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2011.
[37] Bayraktar O,Kugler E L. Characterization of coke on equilibrium fluid catalytic cracking catalysts by temperature-programmed oxidation[J]. Appl. Catal. A:General,2002,233:197-213.
[38] 史全,赵锁奇,徐春明,等. 傅立叶变换离子回旋共振质谱仪在石油组成分析中的应用[J]. 质谱学报,2008,29(6):367-378.
[39] 张娜,赵锁奇,史全,等. 高分辨质谱解析委内瑞拉奥里常渣减黏反应杂原子化合物组成变化[J]. 燃料化学学报,2011,39(1):37-41.