Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-1040

Abstract

Abstract:

The carbon capture based on electric swing adsorption (ESA) could achieve a swing cycle through on/off mode of power. Meanwhile, it employs Joule heating effect of electrical energy to generate heat and hence to drive the continuous adsorption and regeneration of the adsorbent. With the input of electrical energy in high-grade, an enrichment for a significant concentration difference between carbon source and sink could be achieved, leading to its recent widespread attention. However, the main challenges currently limiting the application of ESA for carbon capture are high energy consumption and low generation efficiency. This paper provided a literature review on research progress on ESA for carbon capture. Firstly, the fundamental principles of carbon capture technology using ESA were presented. Secondly, the research progress and development trends of adsorbents and cyclic construction of ESA for carbon capture over the past decade were reviewed. The performance evaluation of ESA for carbon capture was conducted through the second law of thermodynamics efficiency. Finally, the future development trends of carbon capture technology using ESA were discussed. The key to competitive scalability of such technology lied in improving the conductivity and capture performance of the adsorbent. The preparation technology of adsorbent should be improved. Attention should be given to the heating form of the adsorbent and the resistance distribution in the adsorption chamber. Additionally, coupling with other carbon capture technologies for hierarchical capture should be considered and integration with renewable energy sources should be explored.

Key words: CO₂ capture, adsorbents, desorption, electric swing adsorption, cycle structure, analysis of performance, thermodynamics

摘要：

基于变电吸附的碳捕集技术，通过“通电-断电”实现摆荡模式，利用电能焦耳效应产生热能，驱动吸附剂实现连续地吸附与再生。相对于变温吸附，其输入高品位电能，因此可驱动碳源、碳汇之间的大浓度差富集，近年来备受关注。然而，目前限制变电吸附碳捕集技术应用的主要问题是较高的能耗与较低的产率。据此，本文总结了近年来国内外变电吸附碳捕集技术的研究进展并提出了技术展望。首先讨论了变电吸附碳捕集的基本原理，其次综述了近十年变电吸附碳捕集技术中吸附剂、循环结构的研究进展及发展趋势，应用热力学第二定律效率对变电吸附碳捕集系统展开评价。最后，对变电吸附碳捕集技术发展趋势进行展望，变电吸附技术具备规模化竞争力的关键为：在改善吸附剂导电和捕集性能的基础上，改进吸附剂制备工艺，关注吸附剂的加热形式以及吸附腔体内的电阻分配，尝试与其他碳捕集技术耦合进行分级捕集，与可再生能源进行集成。

关键词: 二氧化碳捕集, 吸附剂, 解吸, 变电吸附, 循环结构, 性能分析, 热力学

CLC Number:

WANG Shengyan, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai. Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.

王胜岩, 邓帅, 赵睿恺. 变电吸附二氧化碳捕集技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.

Figures/Tables 14

年份	材料	类型	比表面积 /m²·g^-1	总孔容积 /cm³·g^-1	平均孔径 /nm	温度 /℃	压力 /bar	入口气体成分	CO₂吸附量 /mol·kg^-1	电阻率 /Ω·m
2009	活性炭纤维 ^[13]	蜂窝整体	907	0.36	16.1	25	1	99.99%CO₂	0.91	—
	70%沸石/30%石墨^[14]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	42	1.5	3.5%CO₂、96.5%N₂	1.2	—
2010	浸渍胺的聚合树脂^[9]	挤压颗粒填充	—	—	—	40	1	99.99%CO₂	3.7	—
2010	66%活性炭纤维/34% 酚醛树脂^[15]	蜂窝整体	998	0.6	1.6	20	1	99.99%CO₂	2.9	—
2011	沥青基球形活性炭 ^[16]	挤压颗粒填充	1205	0.59	—	30	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.12	—
2013	氧化改性的酚醛树脂基炭^[17]	挤压颗粒填充	962	0.41	—	25	1	99.99%CO₂	2.7	—
2013	18%沸石/82%活性炭^[18]	挤压颗粒填充	—	—	—	22	1	7.6%CO₂、92.4%N₂	0.82	0.00144-0.000001T_s
2015	炭^[19]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	30	1	0.3%CO₂	3.45×10^-3	5.02×10^-2
2016	石墨烯薄膜^[20]	片状薄膜	—	—	—	25	1	99.99%CO₂	11.59
2016	石墨烯气凝胶^[20]	片状薄膜	165	—	—	25	1	99.99%CO₂	21.36	—
2016	毫米级介孔碳球 ^[21]	挤压颗粒填充	36	0.13	30.1	75	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	3.71	—
2017	22%酚醛树脂/78%H-ZSM-5-800^[22]	蜂窝整体	397	0.2	—	25	1.1	99.99%CO₂	2.2	5.8
2017	多孔炭（UGIL-900）^[23]	蜂窝整体	4200	2.41	2.3	25	1	99.99%CO₂	2.2	—
2017	活性炭^[24]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	20	1	99.99%CO₂	3.5	0.00063-0.0000004954T_s
2018	70%沸石NaUSY/30%活性炭^[11]	蜂窝整体	460	0.26	—	20	0.15	99.99%CO₂	2.05	1.18×10^-2
2018	活性炭^[25]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0011-0.000000856T_s
2018	18%沸石13X/82%活性炭^[25]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0014-0.00000111T_s
2019	浸渍PEI的碳化硅纤维^[26]	中空管束	—	—	500	30	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	0.886	0.00125
2019	沸石填充的碳纳米管^[26]	中空管束	—		1.6	30	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	11.14	0.0003
2019	82%沸石H-ZSM-5/18%活性炭^[27]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	20	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.2	3.4423-0.0067T_s
2019	70%沸石13X/30%活性炭^[28]	3D打印整体	2028	0.648	—	0	0.15	99.99%CO₂	3.49	0.28
2020	50%沸石13X/50%活性炭^[3]	挤压颗粒填充	—	—	237	30	1	99.99%CO₂	3.2	0.57-0.0885(T_s-293)^0.3
2021	活性炭管^[29]	中空管束	—	—	—	35	1	99.99%CO₂	1.22	0.0108
2021	50%沸石13X/50%活性炭^[6]	3D打印整体	819	0.43	1700	27	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.54	59.0619
2021	50%沸石13X/50%石墨^[6]	3D打印整体	316	0.15	1500	27	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.38	7.5398
2022	47.5%沸石47.5%活性炭5％黏合剂^[30]	3D打印整体	1985	0.88	—	30	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	1.5	—

年份	材料	类型	比表面积 /m²·g^-1	总孔容积 /cm³·g^-1	平均孔径 /nm	温度 /℃	压力 /bar	入口气体成分	CO₂吸附量 /mol·kg^-1	电阻率 /Ω·m
2009	活性炭纤维 ^[13]	蜂窝整体	907	0.36	16.1	25	1	99.99%CO₂	0.91	—
	70%沸石/30%石墨^[14]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	42	1.5	3.5%CO₂、96.5%N₂	1.2	—
2010	浸渍胺的聚合树脂^[9]	挤压颗粒填充	—	—	—	40	1	99.99%CO₂	3.7	—
2010	66%活性炭纤维/34% 酚醛树脂^[15]	蜂窝整体	998	0.6	1.6	20	1	99.99%CO₂	2.9	—
2011	沥青基球形活性炭 ^[16]	挤压颗粒填充	1205	0.59	—	30	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.12	—
2013	氧化改性的酚醛树脂基炭^[17]	挤压颗粒填充	962	0.41	—	25	1	99.99%CO₂	2.7	—
2013	18%沸石/82%活性炭^[18]	挤压颗粒填充	—	—	—	22	1	7.6%CO₂、92.4%N₂	0.82	0.00144-0.000001T_s
2015	炭^[19]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	30	1	0.3%CO₂	3.45×10^-3	5.02×10^-2
2016	石墨烯薄膜^[20]	片状薄膜	—	—	—	25	1	99.99%CO₂	11.59
2016	石墨烯气凝胶^[20]	片状薄膜	165	—	—	25	1	99.99%CO₂	21.36	—
2016	毫米级介孔碳球 ^[21]	挤压颗粒填充	36	0.13	30.1	75	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	3.71	—
2017	22%酚醛树脂/78%H-ZSM-5-800^[22]	蜂窝整体	397	0.2	—	25	1.1	99.99%CO₂	2.2	5.8
2017	多孔炭（UGIL-900）^[23]	蜂窝整体	4200	2.41	2.3	25	1	99.99%CO₂	2.2	—
2017	活性炭^[24]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	20	1	99.99%CO₂	3.5	0.00063-0.0000004954T_s
2018	70%沸石NaUSY/30%活性炭^[11]	蜂窝整体	460	0.26	—	20	0.15	99.99%CO₂	2.05	1.18×10^-2
2018	活性炭^[25]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0011-0.000000856T_s
2018	18%沸石13X/82%活性炭^[25]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0014-0.00000111T_s
2019	浸渍PEI的碳化硅纤维^[26]	中空管束	—	—	500	30	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	0.886	0.00125
2019	沸石填充的碳纳米管^[26]	中空管束	—		1.6	30	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	11.14	0.0003
2019	82%沸石H-ZSM-5/18%活性炭^[27]	蜂窝整体	—	—	—	20	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.2	3.4423-0.0067T_s
2019	70%沸石13X/30%活性炭^[28]	3D打印整体	2028	0.648	—	0	0.15	99.99%CO₂	3.49	0.28
2020	50%沸石13X/50%活性炭^[3]	挤压颗粒填充	—	—	237	30	1	99.99%CO₂	3.2	0.57-0.0885(T_s-293)^0.3
2021	活性炭管^[29]	中空管束	—	—	—	35	1	99.99%CO₂	1.22	0.0108
2021	50%沸石13X/50%活性炭^[6]	3D打印整体	819	0.43	1700	27	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.54	59.0619
2021	50%沸石13X/50%石墨^[6]	3D打印整体	316	0.15	1500	27	0.15	99.99%CO₂	1.38	7.5398
2022	47.5%沸石47.5%活性炭5％黏合剂^[30]	3D打印整体	1985	0.88	—	30	1	15%CO₂、85%N₂	1.5	—

年份	材料	循环结构	CO₂进料体积分数/%	回收率/%	纯度/%	生产率 /kg·s^-1·kg^-1	能耗 / $G J · t C O 2 - 1$	η /%	η_2nd^① /%
2006	活性炭纤维^[13]	五步VESA	50	73.00	—	—	18.04	—	0.32
2008	活性炭^[38]	四步ESA	4.51	89.52	16.36	1.54×10^-3	7.23	—	3.02
2009	70%沸石/30%石墨^[14]	六步ESA	3.5	79.50	78.93	—	2.04	—	11.03
2009	80%沸石13X/20%活性炭^[62]	七步ESA	3.5	70.00	89.70	—	1.90	—	11.52
2010	66%活性炭纤维/34%酚醛树脂^[15]	四步ESA	10.75	95.00	—	—	3.00	—	5.76
2011	沥青基球形活性炭 ^[16]	五步VESA	15	95.00	—	—	3.50	—	4.36
2013	18%沸石/82%活性炭^[18]	六步ESA	8.1	81.40	46.60	—	33.30	32.70	0.53
2015	炭^[19]	四步ESA	0.3	95.00	—	—	33.10	64.00	1.15
2017	分子筛13X ^[44]	八步ESA	3.96	89.90	95.10	—	9.05		2.50
2017	活性炭^[24]	四步ESA	15	76.00	52.00	—	5.64	47.00	2.42
2017	70%沸石13X/30%活性炭^[63]	四步ESA	3.5	90.00	—	—	5.47	—	3.62
2017	70%TRI-PE-MCM-41/30%活性炭^[63]	四步ESA	6.4	90.00	—	—	3.67	—	5.40
2018	80%沸石13X/20%活性炭^[60]	八步ESA	3.96	91.20	94.70	9.60×10^-3	13.05	—	1.74
2018	80%沸石13X/20%活性炭^[60]	八步ESA	7.26	93.60	95.60	1.38×10^-2	9.64	—	2.02
2018	70%NaUSY沸石/30%活性炭^[11]	四步ESA	15	80.00	44.00	3.47×10^-4	2.50	75.00	5.57
2018	活性炭^[11]	四步ESA	15	80.00	53.00	5.86×10^-4	4.43	18.40	3.14
2018	活性炭^[25]	四步ESA	10	—	—	—	4.57	34.67	3.57
2018	18%沸石13X/82%活性炭^[25]	四步ESA	10	—	—	—	3.20	39.51	5.34
2018	70%沸石NaUSY/30%活性炭^[25]	四步ESA	10	—	—	—	2.78	56.22	6.15
2019	浸渍PEI的碳化硅纤维^[26]	三步ESA	15	62.00	81.00	—	14.50	—	0.89
2019	沸石填充的碳纳米管^[26]	三步ESA	15	62.00	81.00	—	9.20	—	1.40
2019	82%沸石H-ZSM-5/18%活性炭^[27]	五步VESA	15	72.00	33.00	4.80×10^-4	2.04	—	6.58
2021	50%沸石13X/50%活性炭^[6]	—	15	—	—	—	—	19.00	—
2021	50%沸石13X/50%石墨^[6]	—	15	—	—	—	—	34.00	—
2022	47.5%沸石47.5%活性炭5％黏合剂^[30]	—	15	—	—	1.98×10^-4	—	—	—
2022	50%硅酸钾/50%活性炭^[64]	四步ESA	30	92.10		—	19.90	—	0.53

年份	材料	循环结构	CO₂进料体积分数/%	回收率/%	纯度/%	生产率 /kg·s^-1·kg^-1	能耗 / $G J · t C O 2 - 1$	η /%	η_2nd^① /%
2006	活性炭纤维^[13]	五步VESA	50	73.00	—	—	18.04	—	0.32
2008	活性炭^[38]	四步ESA	4.51	89.52	16.36	1.54×10^-3	7.23	—	3.02
2009	70%沸石/30%石墨^[14]	六步ESA	3.5	79.50	78.93	—	2.04	—	11.03
2009	80%沸石13X/20%活性炭^[62]	七步ESA	3.5	70.00	89.70	—	1.90	—	11.52
2010	66%活性炭纤维/34%酚醛树脂^[15]	四步ESA	10.75	95.00	—	—	3.00	—	5.76
2011	沥青基球形活性炭 ^[16]	五步VESA	15	95.00	—	—	3.50	—	4.36
2013	18%沸石/82%活性炭^[18]	六步ESA	8.1	81.40	46.60	—	33.30	32.70	0.53
2015	炭^[19]	四步ESA	0.3	95.00	—	—	33.10	64.00	1.15
2017	分子筛13X ^[44]	八步ESA	3.96	89.90	95.10	—	9.05		2.50
2017	活性炭^[24]	四步ESA	15	76.00	52.00	—	5.64	47.00	2.42
2017	70%沸石13X/30%活性炭^[63]	四步ESA	3.5	90.00	—	—	5.47	—	3.62
2017	70%TRI-PE-MCM-41/30%活性炭^[63]	四步ESA	6.4	90.00	—	—	3.67	—	5.40
2018	80%沸石13X/20%活性炭^[60]	八步ESA	3.96	91.20	94.70	9.60×10^-3	13.05	—	1.74
2018	80%沸石13X/20%活性炭^[60]	八步ESA	7.26	93.60	95.60	1.38×10^-2	9.64	—	2.02
2018	70%NaUSY沸石/30%活性炭^[11]	四步ESA	15	80.00	44.00	3.47×10^-4	2.50	75.00	5.57
2018	活性炭^[11]	四步ESA	15	80.00	53.00	5.86×10^-4	4.43	18.40	3.14
2018	活性炭^[25]	四步ESA	10	—	—	—	4.57	34.67	3.57
2018	18%沸石13X/82%活性炭^[25]	四步ESA	10	—	—	—	3.20	39.51	5.34
2018	70%沸石NaUSY/30%活性炭^[25]	四步ESA	10	—	—	—	2.78	56.22	6.15
2019	浸渍PEI的碳化硅纤维^[26]	三步ESA	15	62.00	81.00	—	14.50	—	0.89
2019	沸石填充的碳纳米管^[26]	三步ESA	15	62.00	81.00	—	9.20	—	1.40
2019	82%沸石H-ZSM-5/18%活性炭^[27]	五步VESA	15	72.00	33.00	4.80×10^-4	2.04	—	6.58
2021	50%沸石13X/50%活性炭^[6]	—	15	—	—	—	—	19.00	—
2021	50%沸石13X/50%石墨^[6]	—	15	—	—	—	—	34.00	—
2022	47.5%沸石47.5%活性炭5％黏合剂^[30]	—	15	—	—	1.98×10^-4	—	—	—
2022	50%硅酸钾/50%活性炭^[64]	四步ESA	30	92.10		—	19.90	—	0.53

References 64

1	赵小令, 肖晋宇, 侯金鸣, 等. 中国二氧化碳捕集利用和封存技术经济性与规模预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3): 657-668.
	ZHAO Xiaoling, XIAO Jinyu, HOU Jinming, et al. Economic and scale prediction of CO₂ capture, utilization and storage technologies in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3): 657-668.
2	武永光. CCUS技术进展和应用情况[J]. 当代化工研究, 2022(11): 118-120.
	WU Yongguang. Advances and application of CCUS technology[J]. Modern Chemical Research, 2022(11): 118-120.
3	REGUFE Maria João, FERREIRA Alexandre F P, LOUREIRO José Miguel, et al. Development of hybrid materials with activated carbon and zeolite 13X for CO₂ capture from flue gases by electric swing adsorption[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(26): 12197-12211.
4	陆诗建, 刘苗苗, 刘玲, 等. 烟气胺法CO₂捕集技术进展与未来发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(1): 435-444.
	LU Shijian, LIU Miaomiao, LIU Ling, et al. Progress and future development trend of amine method of CO₂ capture technology from flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(1): 435-444.
5	JIANG L, WANG R Q, GONZALEZ-DIAZ A, et al. Comparative analysis on temperature swing adsorption cycle for carbon capture by using internal heat/mass recovery[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 169: 114973.
6	MENDES Diogo N D L, GASPAR Ana, FERREIRA Isabel, et al. 3D-Printed hybrid zeolitic/carbonaceous electrically conductive adsorbent structures[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2021, 174: 442-453.
7	陈旭, 杜涛, 李刚, 等. 吸附工艺在碳捕集中的应用现状[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39(S1): 155-163.
	CHEN Xu, DU Tao, LI Gang, et al. Application of adsorption technology on carbon capture[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(S1): 155-163.
8	FABUSS B M, DUBOIS W H. Carbon adsorption-electrodesorption process[C]//In: 63rd Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association. St. Louis, MO:1970.
9	GRANDE Carlos A, RIBEIRO Rui P P L, RODRIGUES Alírio E. Challenges of electric swing adsorption for CO₂ capture[J]. ChemSusChem, 2010, 3(8): 892-898.
10	RIBEIRO R P P L, GRANDE C A, RODRIGUES A E. Electric swing adsorption for gas separation and purification: A review[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2014, 49(13): 1985-2002.
11	ZHAO Qinghu, WU Fan, XIE Ke, et al. Synthesis of a novel hybrid adsorbent which combines activated carbon and zeolite NaUSY for CO₂ capture by electric swing adsorption (ESA)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 336: 659-668.
12	YANG Meng, MA Chao, XU Mimi, et al. Recent advances in CO₂ adsorption from air: A review[J]. Current Pollution Reports, 2019, 5(4): 272-293.
13	MOON Seung-Hyun, SHIM Jae-Woon. A novel process for CO₂/CH₄ gas separation on activated carbon fibers—Electric swing adsorption[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 298(2): 523-528.
14	GRANDE Carlos A, RIBEIRO Rui P P L, RODRIGUES Alírio E. CO₂ Capture from NGCC power stations using electric swing adsorption (ESA)[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(5): 2797-2803.
15	AN Hui, FENG Bo. Desorption of CO₂ from activated carbon fibre–phenolic resin composite by electrothermal effect[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(1): 57-63.
16	WANG Zhinan, ZHAN Liang, GE Ming, et al. Pith based spherical activated carbon for CO₂ removal from flue gases[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(22): 5504-5511.
17	PLAZA M G, THURECHT K J, PEVIDA C, et al. Influence of oxidation upon the CO₂ capture performance of a phenolic-resin-derived carbon[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 110: 53-60.
18	RIBEIRO R P P L, GRANDE C A, RODRIGUES A E. Activated carbon honeycomb monolith—Zeolite 13X hybrid system to capture CO₂ from flue gases employing Electric Swing Adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 104: 304-318.
19	LEE Tae Soo, CHO Jung Hyuk, CHI Suk Hwan. Carbon dioxide removal using carbon monolith as electric swing adsorption to improve indoor air quality[J]. Building and Environment, 2015, 92: 209-221.
20	SEVANTHI Ritesh, IRIN Fahmida, PARVIZ Dorsa, et al. Electrical Current stimulated desorption of carbon dioxide adsorbed on graphene based structures[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(49): 43401-43407.
21	WANG Mei, YAO Liwen, WANG Jitong, et al. Adsorption and regeneration study of polyethylenimine-impregnated millimeter-sized mesoporous carbon spheres for post-combustion CO₂ capture[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 168: 282-290.
22	MASALA Alessio, VITILLO Jenny G, MONDINO Giorgia, et al. Conductive ZSM-5-based adsorbent for CO₂ capture: Active phase vs monolith[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(30): 8485-8498.
23	JALILOV Almaz S, LI Yilun, TIAN Jian, et al. Ultra-high surface area activated porous asphalt for CO₂ capture through competitive adsorption at high pressures[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(1): 1600693.
24	ZHAO Qinghu, WU Fan, HE Yingdian, et al. Impact of operating parameters on CO₂ capture using carbon monolith by electrical swing adsorption technology (ESA)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 327: 441-453.
25	ZHAO Ruikai, LIU Longcheng, ZHAO Li, et al. Thermodynamic analysis on carbon dioxide capture by electric swing adsorption (ESA) technology[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2018, 26: 388-396.
26	KELLER L, LOHAUS T, ABDULY L, et al. Electrical swing adsorption on functionalized hollow fibers[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 371: 107-117.
27	ZHAO Qinghu, WU Fan, Yuhan MEN, et al. CO₂ capture using a novel hybrid monolith (H-ZSM5/activated carbon) as adsorbent by combined vacuum and electric swing adsorption (VESA)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 358: 707-717.
28	REGUFE Maria João, FERREIRA Alexandre F P, LOUREIRO José Miguel, et al. Electrical conductive 3D-printed monolith adsorbent for CO₂ capture[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2019, 278: 403-413.
29	ARAOZ María Emilse, MARCIAL Adrián Facundo, TREJO GONZALEZ José Adolfo, et al. Renewable and electroactive biomass-derived tubes for CO₂ capture in agroindustrial processes[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2021, 9(23): 7759-7768.
30	PEREIRA Ana, FERREIRA Alexandre F P, RODRIGUES Alírio, et al. Evaluation of the potential of a 3D-printed hybrid zeolite 13X/activated carbon material for CO₂/N₂ separation using electric swing adsorption[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 450: 138197.
31	HIRST Edward A, ALISON Taylor, ROBERT Mokaya. A simple flash carbonization route for conversion of biomass to porous carbons with high CO₂ storage capacity[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(26): 12393-12403.
32	HUANG Ning, Day Gregory, YANG Xinyu, et al. Engineering porous organic polymers for carbon dioxide capture[J]. Science China Chemistry, 2017, 60(8): 1007-1014.
33	QI Shichao, LIU Yu, PENG A, et al. Fabrication of porous carbons from mesitylene for highly efficient CO₂ capture: A rational choice improving the carbon loop[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 361: 945-952.
34	SOLYANIKOVA A S, Yu Chayka M, BORYAK A V, et al. Composite electrodes of electrochemical capacitors based on carbon materials with different structure[J]. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2014, 50(5): 419-428.
35	WU Junye, ZHU Xuancan, YANG Fan, et al. Shaping techniques of adsorbents and their applications in gas separation: A review[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2022, 10(43): 22853-22895.
36	SAYSSET S, GREVILLOT G, LAMINE A S. In adsorption of volatile organic compounds on carbonaceous adsorbent and desorption by direct joule effect[C]//2nd European Congress of Chemical Engineering. Montpellier, France :1999.
37	MENKA Petkovska, DANIJELA Antov-Bozalo, Markovic ANA, et al. Multiphysics modeling of electric-swing adsorption system with in-vessel condensation[J]. Adsorption, 2007, 13(3): 357-372.
38	GRANDE C, RODRIGUES A. Electric Swing Adsorption for CO₂ removal from flue gases[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, 2(2): 194-202.
39	PETERS Martin, GEITNER Christian, VERHOEVEN Birte Friederike. Experimental investigation of electrothermal desorption of steel mill gases from activated carbon[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2022, 94(10): 1458-1465.
40	RAHIMI Mahshid, SINGH Jayant K, Florian MÜLLER-PLATHE. CO₂ adsorption on charged carbon nanotube arrays: A possible functional material for electric swing adsorption[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(27): 15232-15239.
41	KRETZSCHMAR Ansgar, SELMERT Victor, WEINRICH Henning, et al. Study of CO₂ sorption kinetics on electrospun polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofibers[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2021, 44(7): 1168-1177.
42	Adilla Rashidi NOR, SUZANA Yusup, AZRY Borhan, et al. Experimental and modelling studies of carbon dioxide adsorption by porous biomass derived activated carbon[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014, 16(7): 1353-1361.
43	ERBEN Johannes, HEUBNER Alenica, THIELE Simon, et al. Activation of electrospun carbon fibers: The effect of fiber diameter on CO₂ and steam reaction kinetics[J]. Journal of Polymer Research, 2021, 28(4): 1-14.
44	BONALUMI Davide, LILLIA Stefano, MANZOLINI Giampaolo, et al. Innovative process cycle with zeolite (MS13X) for post combustion adsorption[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 2211-2218.
45	RIBEIRO R P P L, GRANDE C A, RODRIGUES A E. Electrothermal performance of an activated carbon honeycomb monolith[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2012, 90(11): 2013-2022.
46	TRICKETT Christopher A, HELAL Aasif, AL-MAYTHALONY Bassem A, et al. The chemistry of metal-organic frameworks for CO₂ capture, regeneration and conversion[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2017, 2: 17045.
47	LI Hailian, EDDAOUDI Mohamed, O’KEEFFE M, et al. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework[J]. Nature, 1999, 402(6759): 276-279.
48	MILLWARD Andrew R, YAGHI Omar M. Metal-organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2005, 127(51): 17998-17999.
49	QUAN Wenying, HOLMES Hannah E, ZHANG Fengyi, et al. Scalable formation of diamine-appended metal-organic framework hollow fiber sorbents for postcombustion CO₂ capture[J]. JACS Au, 2022, 2: 1350-1358.
50	TAO Yingle, HUANG Guoshun, LI Qiangqiang, et al. Localized electrical induction heating for highly efficient synthesis and regeneration of metal-organic frameworks[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(3): 4097-4104.
51	ALAIN Goeppert, MIKLOS Czaun, SURYA Prakash G K, et al. Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: An overview of CO₂ capture from the atmosphere[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(7): 7833-7853.
52	ZHANG Zhonghua, MA Xiaoliang, WANG Dongxiang, et al. Development of silica-gel-supported polyethylenimine sorbents for CO₂ capture from flue gas[J]. AIChE Journal, 2012, 58(8): 2495-2502.
53	CHAEHOON Kim, Sung Cho HAE, CHANG Shuai, et al. An ethylenediamine-grafted Y zeolite: A highly regenerable carbon dioxide adsorbent via temperature swing adsorption without urea formation[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(5): 1803-1811.
54	MCDONALD Thomas M, MASON Jarad A, KONG Xueqian, et al. Cooperative insertion of CO₂ in diamine-appended metal-organic frameworks[J]. Nature, 2015, 519(7543): 303-308.
55	HICKS Jason C, DRESE Jeffrey H, FAUTH Daniel J, et al. Designing adsorbents for CO₂ capture from flue gas-hyperbranched aminosilicas capable of capturing CO₂ reversibly[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008, 130(10): 2902-2903.
56	YOUSSEF Belmabkhout, ABDELHAMID Sayari. Effect of pore expansion and amine functionalization of mesoporous silica on CO₂ adsorption over a wide range of conditions[J]. Adsorption, 2009, 15(3): 318-328.
57	GOEPPERT Alain, CZAUN Miklos, Robert B MAY, et al. Carbon dioxide capture from the air using a polyamine based regenerable solid adsorbent[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(50): 20164-20167.
58	YU Cheng-Hsiu, HUANG Chih-Hung, TAN Chung-Sung. A review of CO₂ capture by absorption and adsorption[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2012, 12(5): 745-769.
59	Rodrigo SERNA-GUERRERO, SAYARI Abdelhamid. Modeling adsorption of CO₂ on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica. 2: Kinetics and breakthrough curves[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 161(1/2): 182-190.
60	LILLIA S, BONALUMI D, GRANDE C, et al. A comprehensive modeling of the hybrid temperature electric swing adsorption process for CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 74: 155-173.
61	ZHAO Ruikai, DENG Shuai, LIU Yinan, et al. Carbon pump: Fundamental theory and applications[J]. Energy, 2017, 119: 1131-1143.
62	GRANDE Carlos A, RIBEIRO Rui P L, OLIVEIRA Eduardo L G, et al. Electric swing adsorption as emerging CO₂ capture technique[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 1219-1225.
63	VAN DER SPEK Mijndert, ANDREA Ramirez, Faaij ANDRÉ. Challenges and uncertainties of ex ante techno-economic analysis of low TRL CO₂ capture technology: Lessons from a case study of an NGCC with exhaust gas recycle and electric swing adsorption[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 208: 920-934.
64	VEROUGSTRAETE Brieuc, SCHOUKENS Matthias, SUTENS Ben, et al. Electrical swing adsorption on 3D-printed activated carbon monoliths for CO₂ capture from biogas[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 299: 121660.

[1]	DAI Huantao, CAO Lingyu, YOU Xinxiu, XU Haoliang, WANG Tao, XIANG Wei, ZHANG Xueyang. Adsorption properties of CO₂ on pomelo peel biochar impregnated by lignin [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[2]	CHEN Chongming, CHEN Qiu, GONG Yunqian, CHE Kai, YU Jinxing, SUN Nannan. Research progresses on zeolite-based CO₂ adsorbents [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 411-419.
[3]	DONG Jiayu, WANG Simin. Experimental on ultrasound enhancement of para-xylene crystallization characteristics and regulation mechanism [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4504-4513.
[4]	SHI Keke, LIU Muzi, ZHAO Qiang, LI Jinping, LIU Guang. Properties and research progress of magnesium based hydrogen storage materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4731-4745.
[5]	SHAO Zhiguo, REN Wen, XU Shipei, NIE Fan, XU Yu, LIU Longjie, XIE Shuixiang, LI Xingchun, WANG Qingji, XIE Jiacai. Influence of final temperature on the distribution and characteristics of oil-based drilling cuttings pyrolysis products [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4929-4938.
[6]	YANG Ying, HOU Haojie, HUANG Rui, CUI Yu, WANG Bing, LIU Jian, BAO Weiren, CHANG Liping, WANG Jiancheng, HAN Lina. Coal tar phenol-based carbon nanosphere prepared by Stöber method for adsorption of CO₂ [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 5011-5018.
[7]	BAI Yadi, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai, ZHAO Li, YANG Yingxia. Exploration on standardized test scheme and experimental performance of temperature swing adsorption carbon capture unit [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3834-3846.
[8]	LU Yang, ZHOU Jinsong, ZHOU Qixin, WANG Tang, LIU Zhuang, LI Bohao, ZHOU Lingtao. Leaching mechanism of Hg-absorption products on CeO₂/TiO₂ sorbentsin syngas [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3875-3883.
[9]	YANG Xuzhao, LI Qing, YUAN Kangkang, ZHANG Yingying, HAN Jingli, WU Shide. Thermodynamic properties of Gemini ionic liquid based deep eutectic solvents [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3123-3129.
[10]	LU Shijian, ZHANG Yuanyuan, WU Wenhua, YANG Fei, LIU Ling, KANG Guojun, LI Qingfang, CHEN Hongfu, WANG Ning, WANG Feng, ZHANG Juanjuan. Health risk assessment of nitrosamine pollutant diffusion in a million ton CO₂ capture project [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3209-3216.
[11]	WANG Jiuheng, RONG Nai, LIU Kaiwei, HAN Long, SHUI Taotao, WU Yan, MU Zhengyong, LIAO Xuqing, MENG Wenjia. Enhanced CO₂ capture performance and strength of cellulose-templated CaO-based pellets with steam reactivation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3217-3225.
[12]	GU Shiya, DONG Yachao, LIU Linlin, ZHANG Lei, ZHUANG Yu, DU Jian. Design and optimization of pipeline system for carbon capture considering intermediate nodes [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2799-2808.
[13]	MA Runmei, YANG Haichao, LI Zhengda, LI Shuangxi, ZHAO Xiang, ZHANG Guoqing. Influence analysis of coating on deformation and frictional wear of mechanical seal end for high-speed bearing cavity [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 1688-1697.
[14]	SANG Wei, TANG Jianfeng, HUA Yihuai, CHEN Jie, SUN Peiyuan, XU Yifei. Effects of physical solvent and amine properties on the performance of biphasic solvent [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 2151-2159.
[15]	ZHAO Chongyang, ZHAO Lei, SHI Xiangwen, HUANG Jun, LI Zhiyao, SHEN Kai, ZHANG Yaping. Effect of O₂/H₂O/SO₂ on the adsorption of PbCl₂ by modified iron-rich attapulgite at high temperature [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 2190-2200.