Exploration on standardized test scheme and experimental performance of temperature swing adsorption carbon capture unit

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-1582

Abstract

Abstract:

Temperature swing adsorption (TSA) technology for carbon capture is one of the effective means to control carbon emissions and achieve the targets of “carbon emission peak” and “carbon neutrality”. However, due to the lack of a relatively complete measurement system and an executable standardized test scheme, the test results of unit performance are quite different, and the difficulty in grasping the trend and performance iteration caused by the lack of regularity is not conducive to the industrial development of TSA. In this paper, a standardized test scheme including test conditions, performance evaluation indicators, data measurement and collection was initially proposed, and the performance test of the physical unit of the prototype scale was carried out. The results showed that the scheme was highly executable and can provide reference for the performance evaluation of related units. In addition, the performance test results of the unit showed that the operation state of the unit was easy to control, and the purity and recovery rate could reach more than 90%, but the energy efficiency was between 3.5% and 6.5%, with great potential for improvement. The benchmarking analysis found that the loss of energy consumption of pipes and other components in the unit accounts for 30%—40%. Therefore, it was necessary to further reduce consumption and improve efficiency by optimizing the pipeline layout, improving the heat exchange efficiency in the adsorption chamber, and optimizing the desorption temperature, vacuum pressure and other operating parameters.

Key words: CO₂ capture, CO₂ adsorption, benchmarking analysis, experiment, standardization

摘要：

变温吸附（TSA）碳捕集技术是控制碳排放进而实现“双碳”目标的有效保障手段之一。然而，由于目前缺乏相对完善的计量体系和可执行的标准化测试方案，导致机组性能的测试结果差别较大，缺乏规律性所造成的趋势和性能迭代困难不利于TSA产业化发展。本文初步提出了包含测试工况、性能评价指标、数据的测量与采集三个方面的标准化测试方案，并对样机规模的实物机组进行了性能测试。结果表明，该套方案的可执行度高，可为相关机组的性能评价工作提供借鉴。此外，机组的性能测试结果显示，该机组的运行状态容易控制，纯度和回收率最高均能达到90%以上，但是能源效率在3.5%～6.5%之间，提升潜力大。对标分析发现机组内的管道等部件损失的能耗占比30%～40%，所以需要通过优化管道线路布置、提高吸附腔内换热效率、优化解吸温度和真空压力等运行参数等方式来进一步降耗提效。

关键词: 二氧化碳捕集, 二氧化碳吸附, 对标分析, 实验, 标准化

CLC Number:

TQ116.3

BAI Yadi, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai, ZHAO Li, YANG Yingxia. Exploration on standardized test scheme and experimental performance of temperature swing adsorption carbon capture unit[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3834-3846.

白亚迪, 邓帅, 赵睿恺, 赵力, 杨英霞. 变温吸附碳捕集机组标准化测试方案探讨及性能实验[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3834-3846.

Figures/Tables 19

参考文献	技术类型	研究方法	单位能耗/MJ·kg^-1	e₁	e₂	e₃	e₄	e₅	e₈
Liu等^[14]	TSA	实验	8.41	√	√	√	√	√
Ntiamoah等^[18]	TSA	实验	3.4	√	√
Chen等^[24]	TSA	模拟	5.36	√	√	√	√
Marx等^[25]	TSA	模拟	2.85	√	√	√
	TSA	模拟	12.6	√	√	√	√
Jiang等^[26]	TSA	模拟	6.76	√	√		√
	TVSA	模拟	3.22	√	√		√		√
Ben-Mansour等^[28]	TSA	模拟	2.39	√	√	√	√

15% CO₂

85% N₂

25℃

160℃

25℃

根据吸附剂的材质、结构和性能确定：采用颗粒状活性炭时，为0.20～0.60m/s；采用活性炭纤维毡时，为0.10～0.15m/s；采用蜂窝状吸附剂时，为0.70～1.20m/s

能耗项	计算公式	含义	备注
E₁	$E 1 = m s c p, s T d e s - T a d s$	加热过程中吸附剂升温所消耗的能量	m_s为吸附剂质量；c_p_,s为吸附剂的比热容；T_ads和T_des分别为吸附和解吸温度
E₂	$E 2 = Δ H C O 2 × N C O 2, d e s + Δ H N 2 × N N 2, d e s$	CO₂和N₂从吸附剂中脱附时消耗的能量	$Δ H C O 2$ 和 $Δ H N 2$ 分别为CO₂和N₂的吸附热
E₃	$E 3 = h C O 2, d e s - h C O 2, a d s - T 0 S C O 2, d e s - S C O 2, a d s N C O 2, d e s + h N 2, d e s - h N 2, a d s - T 0 S N 2, d e s - S N 2, a d s N N 2, d e s$	解吸出的CO₂和N₂被加热所消耗的能量	$h C O 2, a d s$ 、 $h C O 2, d e s$ 和 $S C O 2, a d s$ 、 $S C O 2, d e s$ 以及 $h N 2, a d s$ 、 $h N 2, d e s$ 和 $S N 2, a d s$ 、 $S N 2, d e s$ 分别为CO₂和N₂在吸附和解吸温度时的焓和熵
E₄+E₅	$E 4 + E 5 = ∫ 0 t 1 q o i l c p, o i l Δ T 1 d t × η c - E 1 - E 2 - E 3$	吸附腔金属壁面升温及其向环境的散热所消耗的能量	t₁为加热时间；q_oil为导热介质流量；c_p_,oil为导热介质比热；ΔT₁为吸附腔两端的温差
E₆+E₇	$E 6 + E 7 = ∫ 0 t 1 q o i l c p, o i l Δ T 2 d t × η c - E 1 - E 2 - E 3 - E 4 - E 5$	导热介质输送管道升温及其向环境散热所消耗的能量	ΔT₂为热源两端的温差
E₈	$E 8 = ∫ 0 t 2 P d t$	真空泵等运行所消耗的能量	t₂为泵工作时间；P为泵功率

能耗项	计算公式	含义	备注
E₁	$E 1 = m s c p, s T d e s - T a d s$	加热过程中吸附剂升温所消耗的能量	m_s为吸附剂质量；c_p_,s为吸附剂的比热容；T_ads和T_des分别为吸附和解吸温度
E₂	$E 2 = Δ H C O 2 × N C O 2, d e s + Δ H N 2 × N N 2, d e s$	CO₂和N₂从吸附剂中脱附时消耗的能量	$Δ H C O 2$ 和 $Δ H N 2$ 分别为CO₂和N₂的吸附热
E₃	$E 3 = h C O 2, d e s - h C O 2, a d s - T 0 S C O 2, d e s - S C O 2, a d s N C O 2, d e s + h N 2, d e s - h N 2, a d s - T 0 S N 2, d e s - S N 2, a d s N N 2, d e s$	解吸出的CO₂和N₂被加热所消耗的能量	$h C O 2, a d s$ 、 $h C O 2, d e s$ 和 $S C O 2, a d s$ 、 $S C O 2, d e s$ 以及 $h N 2, a d s$ 、 $h N 2, d e s$ 和 $S N 2, a d s$ 、 $S N 2, d e s$ 分别为CO₂和N₂在吸附和解吸温度时的焓和熵
E₄+E₅	$E 4 + E 5 = ∫ 0 t 1 q o i l c p, o i l Δ T 1 d t × η c - E 1 - E 2 - E 3$	吸附腔金属壁面升温及其向环境的散热所消耗的能量	t₁为加热时间；q_oil为导热介质流量；c_p_,oil为导热介质比热；ΔT₁为吸附腔两端的温差
E₆+E₇	$E 6 + E 7 = ∫ 0 t 1 q o i l c p, o i l Δ T 2 d t × η c - E 1 - E 2 - E 3 - E 4 - E 5$	导热介质输送管道升温及其向环境散热所消耗的能量	ΔT₂为热源两端的温差
E₈	$E 8 = ∫ 0 t 2 P d t$	真空泵等运行所消耗的能量	t₂为泵工作时间；P为泵功率

性能指标所需测量参数	纯度	回收率	比能耗	能源效率
解吸阶段出口处实时气体流量	√	√	√	√
吸附阶段进口处的气体流量		√		√
气体中实时CO₂含量	√	√	√	√
进出机组及吸附腔的导热介质温度			√	√
环境温度			√	√
吸附剂温度			√	√
导热介质流量			√	√
泵实时功率			√	√
气体吸附热			Δ	Δ
相应温度下气体的焓			○	○
分离前后CO₂相应的熵变和焓变				○

参数	数值	参数	数值
吸附腔高度/mm	1100	翅片间距/mm	5
吸附腔外径/mm	100	翅片厚度/mm	1
吸附腔壁厚/mm	5	管路外径/mm	12
换热管外径/mm	12	管路壁厚/mm	1
换热管壁厚/mm	1	每腔吸附剂填充量/kg	5
翅片高度/mm	7

测量位置	测试参数	测试设备	准确度
T1～T10	温度/℃	K型热电偶	±0.75%RDG
T11～T18	温度/℃	Pt100	±0.25%RDG
P1、P2	压力/MPa	压力传感器	±1%RDG
HC1、HC2	冷/热量/MJ	热量积算仪	±0.2%RDG
PM	功率/W	功率表	±0.4%RDG +±0.1%F.S.
MF1、MF2	气体流量/L·min^-1	热式质量流量计	±0.5%RDG +±0.3%F.S.
RM1、RM2、RM3	气体流量/L·min^-1	带流量调节功能的流量计	±0.5%RDG +±0.3%F.S.
D1、D2、D3	CO₂体积分数/%	CO₂检测仪	≤±1%F.S.

References 56

1	新华社. 中共中央国务院印发《国家标准化发展纲要》[EB/OL]. (2021-10-10). .
2	国家市场监管总局. 加快推进“双碳”标准化工作国家碳达峰碳中和标准化总体组成立[EB/OL]. (2022-03-04). .
3	国家市场监管总局. 关于印发贯彻实施《国家标准化发展纲要》行动计划的通知[EB/OL]. (2022-07-08). .
4	国家能源局. 关于印发《能源碳达峰碳中和标准化提升行动计划》的通知[EB/OL]. (2022-09-20). .
5	International Energy Agency. CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions[R]. Paris: IEA, 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-clean-energy-transitions.
6	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 烟气二氧化碳捕集纯化工程设计标准: [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2018.
	Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, State Administration for Market Regulation. Standard for design of carbon dioxide capture and purification engineering for flue gas: [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2018.
7	中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 燃煤烟气二氧化碳捕集装备: [S]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016.
	Ministry of Industry and Information of the People’s Republic of China. Carbon dioxide capture equipment of coal-fired flue gas: [S]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016.
8	中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 燃煤烟气碳捕集装置调试规范: [S]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016.
	Ministry of Industry and Information of the People’s Republic of China. Commissioning specification for coal-fired flue gas carbon dioxide capture equipment: [S]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016.
9	中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 燃煤烟气碳捕集装置运行规范: [S]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016.
	Ministry of Industry and Information of the People’s Republic of China. Operation specification for coal-fired flue gas carbon dioxide capture equipment: [S]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016.
10	中国环境科学学会. 二氧化碳捕集利用与封存术语: T/CSES 41—2021 [S].
	Chinese Society For Environmental Sciences. Terms of carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage (CCUS): T/CSES 41—2021 [S].
11	中国华能集团有限公司.我国首个碳捕集领域国际标准正式立项[EB/OL]. (2022-05-18). .
	China Huaneng Group Co., Ltd. China’s first international standard in the field of carbon capture was officially established[EB/OL]. (2022-05-18). .
12	冯雷, 陆成宽. 国家能源集团在碳捕集领域牵头制定的国家标准通过立项[EB/OL]. (2022-08-17). .
	FENG Lei, LU Chengkuan. National standards developed by National Energy Group in the field of carbon capture have been approved[EB/OL]. (2022-08-17). .
13	朱炫灿, 葛天舒, 吴俊晔, 等. 吸附法碳捕集技术的规模化应用和挑战[J]. 科学通报, 2021, 66(22): 2861-2877.
	ZHU Xuancan, GE Tianshu, WU Junye, et al. Large-scale applications and challenges of adsorption-based carbon capture technologies[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(22): 2861-2877.
14	LIU Rushuai, SHI Xiaodong, WANG Chengtong, et al. Advances in post-combustion CO₂ capture by physical adsorption: From materials innovation to separation practice[J]. ChemSusChem, 2021, 14(6): 1428-1471.
15	LIU Bowen, LIAN Yahui, LI Shuangjun, et al. Experimental investigation on separation and energy-efficiency performance of temperature swing adsorption system for CO₂ capture[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 227: 115670.
16	MÉREL J, CLAUSSE M, MEUNIER F. Carbon dioxide capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X zeolite[J]. Environmental Progress, 2006, 25(4): 327-333.
17	MEREL J, CLAUSSE M, MEUNIER F. Experimental investigation on CO₂ post-combustion capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X and 5A zeolites[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(1): 209-215.
18	NTIAMOAH A, LING Jianghua, XIAO P, et al. CO₂ capture by temperature swing adsorption: Use of hot CO₂-rich gas for regeneration[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(3): 703-713.
19	SU Fengsheng, LU Chungsying. CO₂ capture from gas stream by zeolite 13X using a dual-column temperature/vacuum swing adsorption[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(10): 9021-9027.
20	FUJIKI J, CHOWDHURY F A, YAMADA H, et al. Highly efficient post-combustion CO₂ capture by low-temperature steam-aided vacuum swing adsorption using a novel polyamine-based solid sorbent[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 307: 273-282.
21	GOMES V G, YEE K W K. Pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide sequestration from exhaust gases[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2002, 28(2): 161-171.
22	WANG Lu, YANG Ying, SHEN Wenlong, et al. Experimental evaluation of adsorption technology for CO₂ capture from flue gas in an existing coal-fired power plant[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 101: 615-619.
23	LIU Zhen, WANG Lu, KONG Xiangming, et al. Onsite CO₂ capture from flue gas by an adsorption process in a coal-fired power plant[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(21): 7355-7363.
24	CHEN Lijin, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai, et al. Temperature swing adsorption for CO₂ capture: Thermal design and management on adsorption bed with single-tube/three-tube internal heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 199: 117538.
25	MARX D, JOSS L, HEFTI M, et al. Temperature swing adsorption for postcombustion CO₂ capture: Single- and multicolumn experiments and simulations[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(5): 1401-1412.
26	JIANG Nan, SHEN Yuanhui, LIU Bing, et al. CO₂ capture from dry flue gas by means of VPSA, TSA and TVSA[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2020, 35: 153-168.
27	CLAUSSE M, MEREL J, MEUNIER F. Numerical parametric study on CO₂ capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(5): 1206-1213.
28	BEN-MANSOUR R, QASEM N A A. An efficient temperature swing adsorption (TSA) process for separating CO₂ from CO₂/N₂ mixture using Mg-MOF-74[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 156: 10-24.
29	JOSS L, HEFTI M, BJELOBRK Z, et al. On the potential of phase-change adsorbents for CO₂ capture by temperature swing adsorption[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 2271-2278.
30	ZHANG Wenbin, LIU Hao, SUN Chenggong, et al. Capturing CO₂ from ambient air using a polyethyleneimine-silica adsorbent in fluidized beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 116: 306-316.
31	MENDES P A P, RIBEIRO A M, GLEICHMANN K, et al. Separation of CO₂/N₂ on binderless 5A zeolite[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2017, 20: 224-233.
32	SONG Chunfeng, KANSHA Y, FU Qian, et al. Reducing energy consumption of advanced PTSA CO₂ capture process― Experimental and numerical study[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2016, 64: 69-78.
33	CHENG Chuyun, Chia Chen KUO, YANG Mingwei, et al. CO₂ capture from flue gas of a coal-fired power plant using three-bed PSA process[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(12): 3582.
34	PAI K N, BABOOLAL J D, SHARP D A, et al. Evaluation of diamine-appended metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion CO₂ capture by vacuum swing adsorption[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 211: 540-550.
35	LIU Zhen, GRANDE C A, LI Ping, et al. Multi-bed vacuum pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 81(3): 307-317.
36	SHEN Chunzhi, LIU Zhen, LI Ping, et al. Two-stage VPSA process for CO₂ capture from flue gas using activated carbon beads[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(13): 5011-5021.
37	WANG Lu, LIU Zhen, LI Ping, et al. Experimental and modeling investigation on post-combustion carbon dioxide capture using zeolite 13X-APG by hybrid VTSA process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 197: 151-161.
38	JUNG Wonho, PARK Sunghyun, LEE Kwang Soon, et al. Rapid thermal swing adsorption process in multi-beds scale with sensible heat recovery for continuous energy-efficient CO₂ capture[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 392: 123656.
39	ZHAO Ruikai, ZHAO Li, WANG Shengping, et al. Solar-assisted pressure-temperature swing adsorption for CO₂ capture: Effect of adsorbent materials[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2018, 185: 494-504.
40	JIANG L, ROSKILLY A P, WANG R Z. Performance exploration of temperature swing adsorption technology for carbon dioxide capture[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 165: 396-404.
41	MULGUNDMATH V, TEZEL F H. Optimisation of carbon dioxide recovery from flue gas in a TPSA system[J]. Adsorption, 2010, 16(6): 587-598.
42	Mai BUI, ADJIMAN C S, BARDOW A, et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1062-1176.
43	YOUNG J, GARCÍA-DÍEZ E, GARCIA S, et al. The impact of binary water-CO₂ isotherm models on the optimal performance of sorbent-based direct air capture processes[J]. Energy & Environmental Science. 2021, 14(10): 5377-5394.
44	CHEN Lijin, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruaikai, et al. The thermodynamics-based benchmarking analysis on energy-efficiency performance of CO₂ capture technology: Temperature swing adsorption as case study[J]. Energy Technology, 2021, 9(1): 2000756.
45	石文星, 杨子旭, 王宝龙. 对我国空气源热泵室外名义工况分区的思考[J]. 制冷学报, 2019, 40(5): 1-12.
	SHI Wenxing, YANG Zixu, WANG Baolong. Division of outdoor nominal condition of air source heat pumps in China[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2019, 40(5): 1-12.
46	辛月. 燃煤电厂烟气余热梯级利用降低碳捕集成本[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2017.
	XIN Yue. Cascade utilization of flue gas waste heat in coal-fired power plant to reduce the cost of carbon capture[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2017.
47	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 低环境温度空气源热泵(冷水)机组第1部分:工业或商业用及类似用途的热泵(冷水)机组: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
	State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Low ambient temperature air source heat pump(water chilling)packages—Part 1: Heat pump (water chilling)packages for industrial & commercial and similar application: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
48	ZHANG Yingying, JI Xiaoyan, LU Xiaohua. Energy consumption analysis for CO₂ separation from gas mixtures[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 130: 237-243.
49	ZHAO Ruikai, DENG Shuai, LIU Yinan, et al. Carbon pump: Fundamental theory and applications[J]. Energy, 2017, 119: 1131-1143.
50	JIANG L, GONZALEZ-DIAZ A, LING-CHIN J, et al. Post-combustion CO₂ capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant using activated carbon adsorption[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 245: 1-15.
51	SIEGELMAN R L, KIM E J, LONG J R. Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations[J]. Nature Materials, 2021, 20 (8): 1060-1072.
52	中华人民共和国环境保护部. 大气污染治理工程技术导则: [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011.
	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. Technical guidelines for air pollution control projects: [S]. Beijing: China Environment Science Press, 2011.
53	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 能量系统㶲分析技术导则: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
	State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Technical guidelines for exergy analysis in energy systems: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021.
54	COLEMAN H W, STEELE W G JR. Experimentation, validation, and uncertainty analysis for engineers[M]. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009.
55	Sung Ho JO, PARK Young Cheol, MOON Jong Ho, et al. Heat integration of KIERDRY process with a power plant using gPROMS[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6660-6665.
56	WU Kailong, DENG Shuai, LI Shuangjun, et al. Preliminary experimental study on the performance of CO₂ capture prototype based on temperature swing adsorption (TSA)[J]. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 2022, 2: 100035.

[1]	DAI Huantao, CAO Lingyu, YOU Xinxiu, XU Haoliang, WANG Tao, XIANG Wei, ZHANG Xueyang. Adsorption properties of CO₂ on pomelo peel biochar impregnated by lignin [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 356-363.
[2]	CHEN Chongming, CHEN Qiu, GONG Yunqian, CHE Kai, YU Jinxing, SUN Nannan. Research progresses on zeolite-based CO₂ adsorbents [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 411-419.
[3]	WANG Shengyan, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai. Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[4]	YANG Ying, HOU Haojie, HUANG Rui, CUI Yu, WANG Bing, LIU Jian, BAO Weiren, CHANG Liping, WANG Jiancheng, HAN Lina. Coal tar phenol-based carbon nanosphere prepared by Stöber method for adsorption of CO₂ [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 5011-5018.
[5]	LI Lanyu, HUANG Xinye, WANG Xiaonan, QIU Tong. Reflection and prospects on the intelligent transformation of chemical engineering research [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3325-3330.
[6]	LI Ruolin, HE Shaolin, YUAN Hongying, LIU Boyue, JI Dongli, SONG Yang, LIU Bo, YU Jiqing, XU Yingjun. Effect of in-situ pyrolysis on physical properties of oil shale and groundwater quality [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3309-3318.
[7]	WANG Jiuheng, RONG Nai, LIU Kaiwei, HAN Long, SHUI Taotao, WU Yan, MU Zhengyong, LIAO Xuqing, MENG Wenjia. Enhanced CO₂ capture performance and strength of cellulose-templated CaO-based pellets with steam reactivation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3217-3225.
[8]	LU Shijian, ZHANG Yuanyuan, WU Wenhua, YANG Fei, LIU Ling, KANG Guojun, LI Qingfang, CHEN Hongfu, WANG Ning, WANG Feng, ZHANG Juanjuan. Health risk assessment of nitrosamine pollutant diffusion in a million ton CO₂ capture project [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3209-3216.
[9]	GU Shiya, DONG Yachao, LIU Linlin, ZHANG Lei, ZHUANG Yu, DU Jian. Design and optimization of pipeline system for carbon capture considering intermediate nodes [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2799-2808.
[10]	SANG Wei, TANG Jianfeng, HUA Yihuai, CHEN Jie, SUN Peiyuan, XU Yifei. Effects of physical solvent and amine properties on the performance of biphasic solvent [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 2151-2159.
[11]	SHANG Yu, XIAO Man, CUI Qiufang, TU Te, YAN Shuiping. Recovery characteristics of PVDF/BN-OH flat composite membrane for waste heat of hot stripped gas in CO₂ capture process [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(3): 1618-1628.
[12]	KONG Xiangru, ZHANG Xiaoyang, SUN Pengxiang, CUI Lin, DONG Yong. Research progress of solid porous materials for direct CO₂ capture from air [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(3): 1471-1483.
[13]	CHEN Jiakun, TANG Jian, XIA Heng, QIAO Junfei. Numerical simulation of dioxin emission concentration in grate furnace incineration processes for municipal solid waste [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(2): 1061-1072.
[14]	DU Tao, MA Jinwei, CHEN Qianqian, FANG Hao, CHEN Bingzhang, CHEN Houren. Comparison test and numerical simulation analysis of PV/T module composite cooling mode [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(2): 722-730.
[15]	LI Yaxia, HAN Zemin, WANG Kai, ZHANG Ping, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Jing. Analysis of heat transfer enhancing performance in helical channel by jet at different positions [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(1): 128-137.