Multi-objective capacity and heat analysis of amine-based SO2 capture process from acidity coefficient (pKa) model

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0015

Abstract

Abstract:

The screening of absorbent with high SO₂ absorption capacity and low desorption energy consumption is important to improve the amine-based SO₂ capture process from flue gas. The pK_a values of five diamines were calculated using SMD continuous solvation model and density functional theory at the M05-2X/6-31G* base set level. Two mathematical models of SO₂ absorption capacity and desorption reaction heat of diamines were established based on the predicted pK_a values. The relationship of SO₂ absorption capacity and desorption reaction heat was discussed for the diamine-acid-water ternary absorbent system. The results showed that the mathematical model met the requirement of engineering precision. The SO₂ absorption capacity and deprotonation reaction enthalpy of diamines were increased with the increase of pK_a value. In the screening of organic diamine absorbents, the multi-objective contradictory characteristics of SO₂ absorption capacity and reaction enthalpy were revealed. The numerical relationship between SO₂ cyclic absorption capacity and desorption reaction heat of the five diamines was obtained. The desorption reaction heat of hydroxyethylpiperazine (HEP) was the smallest under the same SO₂ circulating capacity among the five diamines. So, HEP is a promising absorbent in organic diamine-acid-water ternary systems.

Key words: organic amine, SO₂ capture, molecular simulation, absorption capacity, desorption reaction heat

摘要：

筛选高SO₂吸收容量、低解吸能耗的吸收剂是提高胺基烟气SO₂捕集工艺应用潜力的重要途径。本研究采用SMD连续溶剂化模型和密度泛函理论在M05-2X/6-31G*基组水平上预测了5种有机二胺类物质的pK_a，基于预测的pK_a建立起吸收剂对SO₂吸收容量和解吸反应热的数学模型，以探讨有机二胺-酸-水三元体系吸收剂捕集SO₂过程中的效能关系。结果表明，数学模型符合工程精度要求。二胺的SO₂吸收容量和脱质子反应焓都随pK_a增大而增加，筛选有机胺吸收剂展现出对SO₂吸收容量和反应焓的多目标矛盾性特征；量化了5种二胺的SO₂循环吸收容量和解吸反应热的数值关系，在相同SO₂循环容量条件下，5种二胺中羟乙基哌嗪（HEP）的解吸热最小，HEP为有机二胺-酸-水三元体系中的一种潜力二胺类吸收剂。

关键词: 有机胺, SO₂捕集, 分子模拟, 吸收容量, 解吸反应热

CLC Number:

TQ116.02

WANG Dongliang, XIE Jiangpeng, MENG Wenliang, LI Jingwei, ZHOU Huairong. Multi-objective capacity and heat analysis of amine-based SO₂ capture process from acidity coefficient (pK_a) model[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(10): 5669-5676.

王东亮, 谢江鹏, 孟文亮, 李婧玮, 周怀荣. 基于酸度系数（pK_a）模型的胺法SO₂捕集过程多目标效能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5669-5676.

Figures/Tables 11

类别	A	B	C	D	温度区间/K	参考
lnK_s1（SO₂）	-10.9670	1972.5	—	—	—	Rabe等^［16］
lnK_s1（HSO $3 -$ ）	-357.5700	5477.1	65.31	-0.1624	—	Millero等^［17］
lnK（H₂SO₄）	>10	—	—	—	—	Sippola等^［18］
lnK（HSO $4 -$ ）	-49.7086	178.1142	10.9523	-0.0598	—	Sippola等^［18］
lnK（EDAH⁺）	-79.7113	-6508.6363	14.4126	-0.0169	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（PZH⁺）	-62.6234	-7025.0400	11.8682	-0.0136	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEPH⁺）	-69.6302	-6496.8100	13.1533	-0.0154	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（DIHEPH⁺）	-56.7455	-5761.7300	10.7373	-0.0123	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEHPPH⁺）	-75.0596	-6708.4600	14.0755	-0.0172	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（EDAH $2 2 +$ ）	-66.4837	-5110.9300	12.7213	-0.0140	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（PZH $2 2 +$ ）	-92.5319	-3609.9200	17.2128	-0.0208	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEPH $2 2 +$ ）	-84.1281	-2928.1100	15.6410	-0.0190	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（DIHEPH $2 2 +$ ）	-87.4632	-2832.4700	16.4588	-0.0199	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEHPPH $2 2 +$ ）	-66.4512	-3557.3000	12.5968	-0.0142	298.15~398.15	拟合

类别	A	B	C	D	温度区间/K	参考
lnK_s1（SO₂）	-10.9670	1972.5	—	—	—	Rabe等^［16］
lnK_s1（HSO $3 -$ ）	-357.5700	5477.1	65.31	-0.1624	—	Millero等^［17］
lnK（H₂SO₄）	>10	—	—	—	—	Sippola等^［18］
lnK（HSO $4 -$ ）	-49.7086	178.1142	10.9523	-0.0598	—	Sippola等^［18］
lnK（EDAH⁺）	-79.7113	-6508.6363	14.4126	-0.0169	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（PZH⁺）	-62.6234	-7025.0400	11.8682	-0.0136	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEPH⁺）	-69.6302	-6496.8100	13.1533	-0.0154	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（DIHEPH⁺）	-56.7455	-5761.7300	10.7373	-0.0123	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEHPPH⁺）	-75.0596	-6708.4600	14.0755	-0.0172	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（EDAH $2 2 +$ ）	-66.4837	-5110.9300	12.7213	-0.0140	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（PZH $2 2 +$ ）	-92.5319	-3609.9200	17.2128	-0.0208	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEPH $2 2 +$ ）	-84.1281	-2928.1100	15.6410	-0.0190	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（DIHEPH $2 2 +$ ）	-87.4632	-2832.4700	16.4588	-0.0199	298.15~398.15	拟合
lnK（HEHPPH $2 2 +$ ）	-66.4512	-3557.3000	12.5968	-0.0142	298.15~398.15	拟合

温度T/K	解离自由能ΔG₁/kJ·mol^-1					解离自由能∆G₂/kJ·mol^-1
温度T/K	EDAH⁺	PZH⁺	HEPH⁺	DIHEPH⁺	HEHPPH⁺	EDAH $2 2 +$	PZH $2 2 +$	HEPH $2 2 +$	DIHEPH $2 2 +$	HEHPPH $2 2 +$
298.15	55.6187	55.9831	52.2001	45.973	47.1383	37.9241	31.6248	25.9967	22.6101	23.8055
308.15	54.628	54.9944	51.1718	45.0618	46.1351	36.8039	30.5023	24.9643	21.4439	22.7563
318.15	53.3262	53.6688	49.7306	43.657	44.6075	35.9446	29.6664	24.2946	20.7295	22.1856
328.15	52.5966	52.9567	49.0525	43.1891	44.066	34.4923	28.1971	22.8366	19.0488	20.612
338.15	51.5683	51.9323	47.9866	42.2486	43.0294	33.3303	27.0363	21.7666	17.8491	19.5294
348.15	50.5358	50.904	46.9165	41.2998	41.9844	32.1641	25.8701	20.6923	16.6369	18.4426
358.15	49.495	49.8674	45.8381	40.3467	40.931	30.9853	24.6913	19.6097	15.4205	17.3474
368.15	48.4542	48.8224	44.7597	39.3895	39.8819	29.8024	23.5126	18.5187	14.2	16.2439
378.15	47.405	47.7816	43.6729	38.4323	38.8243	28.6152	22.3255	17.4319	12.9711	15.1404
388.15	46.3475	46.7282	42.5777	37.4625	37.7584	27.4156	21.1342	16.3367	11.738	14.0285
398.15	45.2899	45.6707	41.4825	36.4928	36.6967	26.2159	19.9429	15.2332	10.5049	12.9124

温度T/K	解离自由能ΔG₁/kJ·mol^-1					解离自由能∆G₂/kJ·mol^-1
温度T/K	EDAH⁺	PZH⁺	HEPH⁺	DIHEPH⁺	HEHPPH⁺	EDAH $2 2 +$	PZH $2 2 +$	HEPH $2 2 +$	DIHEPH $2 2 +$	HEHPPH $2 2 +$
298.15	55.6187	55.9831	52.2001	45.973	47.1383	37.9241	31.6248	25.9967	22.6101	23.8055
308.15	54.628	54.9944	51.1718	45.0618	46.1351	36.8039	30.5023	24.9643	21.4439	22.7563
318.15	53.3262	53.6688	49.7306	43.657	44.6075	35.9446	29.6664	24.2946	20.7295	22.1856
328.15	52.5966	52.9567	49.0525	43.1891	44.066	34.4923	28.1971	22.8366	19.0488	20.612
338.15	51.5683	51.9323	47.9866	42.2486	43.0294	33.3303	27.0363	21.7666	17.8491	19.5294
348.15	50.5358	50.904	46.9165	41.2998	41.9844	32.1641	25.8701	20.6923	16.6369	18.4426
358.15	49.495	49.8674	45.8381	40.3467	40.931	30.9853	24.6913	19.6097	15.4205	17.3474
368.15	48.4542	48.8224	44.7597	39.3895	39.8819	29.8024	23.5126	18.5187	14.2	16.2439
378.15	47.405	47.7816	43.6729	38.4323	38.8243	28.6152	22.3255	17.4319	12.9711	15.1404
388.15	46.3475	46.7282	42.5777	37.4625	37.7584	27.4156	21.1342	16.3367	11.738	14.0285
398.15	45.2899	45.6707	41.4825	36.4928	36.6967	26.2159	19.9429	15.2332	10.5049	12.9124

SO₂分压p(SO₂) /Pa	浓度				相对误差 /%
SO₂分压p(SO₂) /Pa	c(EDA) /mol·L^-1	c(H₃PO₄) /mol·L^-1	c_s(exp) /mol·L^-1	c_s(cal) /mol·L^-1	相对误差 /%
143	0.3	0	0.5610	0.5945	-5.6350
204	0.3	0	0.5630	0.5970	-5.6951
294	0.3	0	0.5820	0.5992	-2.8705
112	0.3	0.13	0.4820	0.4653	3.5891
232	0.3	0.13	0.4660	0.4700	-0.8511
301	0.3	0.13	0.4680	0.4715	-0.7423
108	0.3	0.26	0.3325	0.3380	-1.6272
298	0.3	0.26	0.3450	0.3444	0.1742
373	0.3	0.26	0.3525	0.3462	1.8198
118	0.3	0.39	0.2235	0.2122	5.3252
252	0.3	0.39	0.2288	0.2180	4.9541
337	0.3	0.39	0.2341	0.2211	5.8797

有机胺	a	b	c	d
EDA	-14.2062	21.6396	-10.8574	83.3219
PZ	-8.1086	11.8772	-6.9219	76.1474
HEP	-23.8924	25.9303	-10.7243	67.6164
DIHEP	-91.1772	66.9002	-18.0294	68.1945
HEHPP	-19.6444	24.5696	-11.1515	68.9849

References 34

1	LIU H L, GAO H X, IDEM R, et al. Analysis of CO₂ solubility and absorption heat into 1-dimethylamino-2-propanol solution[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 170: 3-15.
2	BEYAD Y, PUXTY G, WEI S, et al. An SO₂ tolerant process for CO₂ capture[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 31: 205-213.
3	UYANGA I J, IDEM R O. Studies of SO₂- and O₂-induced degradation of aqueous MEA during CO₂ capture from power plant flue gas streams[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(8): 2558-2566.
4	GARG B, VERHEYEN T V, PEARSON P, et al. A technology review for regeneration of sulfur rich amine systems[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 75: 243-253.
5	HANIF M A, IBRAHIM N, ABDUL JALIL A. Sulfur dioxide removal: an overview of regenerative flue gas desulfurization and factors affecting desulfurization capacity and sorbent regeneration[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020, 27(22): 27515-27540.
6	SHAW D. Cansolv CO₂ capture: the value of integration[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 237-246.
7	WALKER R J, WILDMAN D J, GASIOR S J. Evaluation of some regenerate sulfur dioxide absorbents for flue gas desulfurization[J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1983, 33(11): 1061-1067.
8	TANG Z G, ZHOU C C, CHEN C. Studies on flue gas desulfurization by chemical absorption using an ethylenediamine-phosphoric acid solution[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(21): 6714-6722.
9	汤志刚, 周长城, 陈成. 乙二胺/磷酸溶液化学吸收法烟气脱硫的研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2005, 19(3): 285-291.
	TANG Zhigang, ZHOU Changcheng, CHEN Cheng. Chemical absorption of SO₂ by using ethylene diamine/phosphoric acid solution[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2005, 19(3): 285-291.
10	周长城, 汤志刚. 乙二胺/磷酸溶液吸收SO₂的实验研究[J]. 精细化工, 2003, 20(8): 509-512.
	ZHOU Changcheng, TANG Zhigang. Experimental research on flue gas desulfurization by ethylenediamine/phosphoric acid solution[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2003, 20(8): 509-512.
11	WANGLER A, SIEDER G, INGRAM T, et al. Prediction of CO₂ and H₂S solubility and enthalpy of absorption in reacting N-methyldiethanolamine/water systems with ePC-SAFT[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2018, 461: 15-27.
12	KHALILI F, HENNI A, EAST A L L. pK_a values of some piperazines at (298, 303, 313, and 323) K[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2009, 54(10): 2914-2917.
13	REIJENGA J, VAN HOOF A, VAN LOON A, et al. Development of methods for the determination of pK_a values[J]. Analytical Chemistry Insights, 2013, 8: 53-71.
14	PEREIRA R W, RAMABHADRAN R O. pK-yay: a black-box method using density functional theory and implicit solvation models to compute aqueous pK_a values of weak and strong acids[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2020, 124(43): 9061-9074.
15	SANDER R. Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15(8): 4399-4981.
16	RABE A E, HARRIS J F. Vapor liquid equilibrium data for the binary system sulfur dioxide and water[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1963, 8(3): 333-336.
17	MILLERO F J, HERSHEY J P, JOHNSON G, et al. The solubility of SO₂ and the dissociation of H₂SO₃ in NaCl solutions[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 1989, 8(4): 377-389.
18	SIPPOLA H. Critical evaluation of the 2nd dissociation constants for aqueous sulfuric acid[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2012, 532: 65-77.
19	GUPTA M, SILVA E F DA, HARTONO A, et al. Theoretical study of differential enthalpy of absorption of CO₂ with MEA and MDEA as a function of temperature[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2013, 117(32): 9457-9468.
20	WEILAND R H, CHAKRAVARTY T, MATHER A E. Solubility of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide in aqueous alkanolamines[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1993, 32(7): 1419-1430.
21	KIM H, HWANG S J, LEE K S. Novel shortcut estimation method for regeneration energy of amine solvents in an absorption-based carbon capture process[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(3):1478-1485.
22	SUMON K Z, HENNI A, EAST A L L. Predicting pK_a of amines for CO₂ capture: computer versus pencil-and-paper[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(37): 11924-11930.
23	GUPTA M, SILVA E F DA, SVENDSEN H F. Modeling temperature dependency of amine basicity using PCM and SM8T implicit solvation models[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2012, 116(6): 1865-1875.
24	OCHTERSKI J W, PETERSSON G A, MONTGOMERY J A. A complete basis set model chemistry (Ⅴ): extensions to six or more heavy atoms[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1996, 104(7): 2598-2619.
25	MONTGOMERY J A, FRISCH M J, OCHTERSKI J W, et al. A complete basis set model chemistry ( Ⅶ ): use of the minimum population localization method[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2000, 112(15): 6532-6542.
26	MARENICH A V, CRAMER C J, TRUHLAR D G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2009, 113(18): 6378-6396.
27	LU T, CHEN Q X. Shermo: a general code for calculating molecular thermochemistry properties[J]. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2021, 1200: 113249.
28	ZHAO Y, TRUHLAR D G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals[J]. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2008, 120(1/2/3): 215-241.
29	PETERSSON G A, BENNETT A, TENSFELDT T G, et al. A complete basis set model chemistry. Ⅰ. The total energies of closed-shell atoms and hydrides of the first-row elements[J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1988, 89(4): 2193-2218.
30	PETERSSON G A, AL-LAHAM M A. A complete basis set model chemistry (Ⅱ): Open-shell systems and the total energies of the first-row atoms[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1991, 94(9): 6081-6090.
31	HO J, COOTE M L. A universal approach for continuum solvent pK_a calculations: are we there yet?[J]. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2009, 125(1/2): 3-21.
32	张向宇. 实用化学手册[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1986.
	ZHANG Xiangyu. Handbook of practical chemistry[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1986.
33	TAGIURI A, MOHAMEDALI M, HENNI A. Dissociation constant (pK_a) and thermodynamic properties of some tertiary and cyclic amines from (298 to 333) K[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2015, 61(1), 247-254.
34	孙志豪, 郭子东, 陈俊, 等. 哌嗪类有机胺脱除二氧化硫性能及机理探讨[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(S1): 46-51.
	SUN Zhihao, GUO Zidong, CHEN Jun, et al. Performances and mechanism of piperazine-based organic amines removal of SO₂ [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(S1): 46-51.

[1]	CUI Shoucheng, XU Hongbo, PENG Nan. Simulation analysis of two MOFs materials for O₂/He adsorption separation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[2]	OUYANG Sufang, ZHOU Daowei, HUANG Wei, JIA Feng. Research progress on novel anti-migration rubber antioxidants [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3708-3719.
[3]	LI Ruidong, HUANG Hui, TONG Guohu, WANG Yueshe. Hygroscopic properties and corrosion behavior of ammonium salt in a crude oil distillation column [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2809-2818.
[4]	YANG Farong, GU Lili, LIU Yang, LI Weixue, CAI Jieyun, WANG Huiping. Preparation and application of molecularly imprinted polymers of terbutylazine assisted by computer simulation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3157-3166.
[5]	ZHAO Yi, YANG Zhen, ZHANG Xinwei, WANG Gang, YANG Xuan. Molecular simulation of self-healing behavior of asphalt under different crack damage and healing temperature [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3147-3156.
[6]	SONG Chao, YE Xuemin, LI Chunxi. Molecular dynamics study on the influence of self-assembly behaviors of nanoparticles and surfactants on the properties of silicone oil/water interface [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(S1): 366-375.
[7]	FENG Ying, ZHAO Mengjie, CUI Qian, XIE Yuju, ZHANG Jianwei, DONG Xin. Research progress of molecular simulation technology in the development and application of chitosan functional materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(8): 4241-4253.
[8]	LI Yanping, YAN Dazhou, YANG Tao, WEN Guosheng, HAN Zhicheng. Removal of methylchlorosilane in silicon-based electron gas by molecular dynamics simulation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(8): 4375-4385.
[9]	ZHANG Xincheng, HE Lin, SUI Hong, LI Xingang. Demulsification process and enhancement by viscosity reduction for water-in-heavy oil emulsions [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(7): 3534-3544.
[10]	MA Yunbo, WANG Yanfei, LI Peng, LIU Huan, WU Haiyang, SU Heng, MA Xuanxuan, XIA Chuanhai. Effect of organic amines on catalytic hydrodechlorination of chlorophenols over Pd/C catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(11): 6185-6194.
[11]	QIN Li, LI Dongdong, TIAN Jingsheng, HAN Junhua, ZHANG Yin, LI Jianwen, GAO Wenhui. Preparation of leuco malachite green imprinting sensor based on multiple technologies and its application [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(11): 6018-6028.
[12]	LI Bingfan, LIU Gang, CHEN Lei. Dissolution of CH₄ in the crude oil system: behaviors and mechanisms [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(8): 4205-4222.
[13]	WANG Jiajun, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai, ZHAO Li. Analysis of energy and consumption reduction in adsorption recovery of electronic HF [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(7): 3645-3655.
[14]	WANG Xiaotian, LUO Haiyan, XU Junbo, YANG Chao, LIU Huizhou, LI Yingbo. Synthesis of AHT aluminophosphate molecular sieve and its characterization [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(11): 6219-6227.
[15]	Lingyun KONG, Xiujie QUAN, Chaobo LI, Miao YU. Molecular simulation and experimental demonstration of adsorption behavior of emulsifier on surface of chemical composition of aggregate [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(8): 3196-3204.

Multi-objective capacity and heat analysis of amine-based SO₂ capture process from acidity coefficient (pK_a) model

基于酸度系数（pK_a）模型的胺法SO₂捕集过程多目标效能分析

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 34

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments