Combustion characteristics and mercury emission characteristics of high sulfur coal slime

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0888

Abstract

Abstract:

On-line monitoring of mercury emission characteristics from coal slime was carried out by a fixed bed temperature programmed mercury desorption test system, and pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of high sulfur coal slime were studied by thermogravimetric analyzer. Combined with the pyrolysis and combustion characteristic parameters obtained from the experiment, the kinetic analysis was carried out by using the distributed activation energy model. The results show that the pyrolysis and combustion process of coal slime can be divided into three stages. Under non-isothermal conditions, with the increase of heating rate, the pyrolysis process occurs in the high temperature region, and the maximum weight loss rate increases. The corresponding peak temperature shifts, resulting in thermal hysteresis, which is conducive to the precipitation of volatiles; The participation of a small amount of oxygen in the pyrolysis process of coal slime inhibits the precipitation of volatiles, and the comprehensive pyrolysis characteristic parameter D is the largest under the condition of 7% O₂. Pyrolysis performance improved with increasing CO₂ concentration; The combustion performance of coal slime is strengthened with the increase of heating rate, and the activation energy shows a 'U' trend distribution with the change of conversion rate; Inorganic mercury compounds in coal slime are mainly HgCl₂, α-HgS, HgSO₄ and silicoaluminate bound mercury, and the total mercury release ranges from 200°C to 600°C; The release of mercury in coal slime increased with the increase of O₂ concentration. Under CO₂ atmosphere, the total mercury release gradually increased with the increase of CO₂concentration.

Key words: coal slime, fixed-bed, combustion, reaction kinetics, desorption, mercury emissions

摘要：

通过固定床程序升温汞脱附试验系统对所选高硫煤泥中汞排放特性进行在线监测，并利用热重分析仪对煤泥热解和燃烧特性进行研究，结合试验所得热解和燃烧特性参数，采用分布活化能模型，进行动力学分析。结果表明：煤泥的热解和燃烧过程可分为3个阶段，非等温条件下，随着升温速率增加，热解过程在高温区发生，最大失重率提升，对应峰值温度偏移，产生热滞后，利于挥发分析出；在煤泥热解过程中少量氧气的参与，抑制挥发分的析出，在7% O₂条件下综合热解特性参数值D最大。热解性能随CO₂浓度升高而得到改善；煤泥燃烧性能随升温速率的增加而得到加强，其活化能随转化率变化呈现“U”型趋势分布；煤泥中无机汞化合物主要为HgCl₂、α-HgS、HgSO₄以及硅铝酸盐类结合汞，总汞释放主要范围对应200~600℃；煤泥中汞释放量随O₂浓度增大，CO₂气氛条件下，随着CO₂浓度增加，总汞释放量逐渐增大。

关键词: 煤泥, 固定床, 燃烧, 反应动力学, 脱附, 汞排放

CLC Number:

X705

GUO Jinrong, CHENG Peng, JIA Li, GUO Jingnan, WANG Yanlin, ZHANG Yongqiang, QIAO Xiaolei, FAN Baoguo. Combustion characteristics and mercury emission characteristics of high sulfur coal slime[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(S2): 411-420.

郭晋荣, 程鹏, 贾里, 郭婧楠, 王彦霖, 张永强, 乔晓磊, 樊保国. 高硫煤泥燃烧过程中的汞排放特性[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 411-420.

Figures/Tables 15

样品编号	制备种类	制备温度/℃	制备气氛	升温速率 /℃ · min^-1
CS-A	干燥后煤泥	—	—	—
CS-A-Ⅱ	干燥后煤泥	1000	N₂	10
CS-A-Ⅱ-1	干燥后煤泥	1000	3% O₂+97% N₂	10
CS-A-Ⅱ-2	干燥后煤泥	1000	5% O₂+95% N₂	10
CS-A-Ⅱ-3	干燥后煤泥	1000	7% O₂+93% N₂	10
CS-A-Ⅱ-4	干燥后煤泥	1000	10% CO₂+90% N₂	10
CS-A-Ⅱ-5	干燥后煤泥	1000	15% CO₂+85% N₂	10
CS-A-Ⅱ-6	干燥后煤泥	1000	20% CO₂+80% N₂	10
CS-B-Ⅰ	干燥后煤泥	1000	空气	5
CS-B-Ⅱ	干燥后煤泥	1000	空气	10
CS-B-Ⅲ	干燥后煤泥	1000	空气	15
CS-C-400-β	干燥后煤泥	400	空气	—
CS-C-600-β	干燥后煤泥	600	空气	—
CS-C-800-β	干燥后煤泥	800	空气	—
CS-C-1000-β	干燥后煤泥	1000	空气	—

样品	工业分析/%				元素分析/%
样品	M_ad	A_ad	V_ad	FC_ad	C	H	O	N	S
CS-A	0.4	51.2	13.1	35.7	37.7	2.2	2.3	1.1	5.6

样品	t₁/℃	t₂/℃	t₃/℃	t₄/℃	?TG/%	（dw/dt）_max/% · min^-1	V/%	（dw/dt）_mean/% · min^-1	?t_（1/2）/℃	D
CS-A-Ⅱ	132	552	650	741	44.32	-2.28	12.09	-1.32	159	3.1406×10^-6
CS-A-Ⅱ-1	128	543	626	748	42.60	-1.98	11.84	-1.37	142	3.0542×10^-6
CS-A-Ⅱ-2	139	547	673	750	46.35	-2.32	12.42	-1.38	154	3.3960×10^-6
CS-A-Ⅱ-3	144	556	684	762	44.72	-2.52	12.54	-1.45	161	3.5547×10^-6
CS-A-Ⅱ-4	121	538	663	—	45.75	-2.33	12.36	-1.36	157	3.9196×10^-6
CS-A-Ⅱ-5	110	526	671	—	47.16	-2.38	12.74	-1.41	158	4.6766×10^-6
CS-A-Ⅱ-6	98	519	677	—	48.39	-2.47	12.83	-1.49	163	5.6955×10^-6

样品	T_i/℃	T_max/℃	T_b/℃	$d w / d t m a x$ /% · min^-1	$d w / d t m e a n$ /% · min^-1	K_r×10^-5/min^-1 · ℃^-2	S×10⁸/min^-2 · ℃^-3
CS-B-Ⅰ	481	547	629	3.21	2.23	1.39	4.92
CS-B-Ⅱ	497	578	710	4.69	3.27	1.89	8.74
CS-B-Ⅲ	512	609	832	6.68	4.31	2.55	13.20

样品	T_i/℃	T_max/℃	T_b/℃	$d w / d t m a x$ /% · min^-1	$d w / d t m e a n$ /% · min^-1	K_r×10^-5/min^-1 · ℃^-2	S×10⁸/min^-2 · ℃^-3
CS-B-Ⅰ	481	547	629	3.21	2.23	1.39	4.92
CS-B-Ⅱ	497	578	710	4.69	3.27	1.89	8.74
CS-B-Ⅲ	512	609	832	6.68	4.31	2.55	13.20

含汞化合物	析出量最高点温度/℃	析出温度范围/℃
HgCl₂	120±10	70~220
Hg₂Cl₂	130±10	60~220
HgBr₂	110±5	60~220
β-HgS	245±5	170~290
α-HgS	310±10	240~350
HgSO₄	540±20	500~600
Hg₂SO₄	280±10	120~480
HgO	505±10	430~560

References 26

1	刘汉辉. 煤泥与稻壳的掺烧及灰的高值化利用[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
	LIU Hanhui. Mixing-buring of coal slime and rice husk and high valueutilization of ash[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.
2	周强, 段钰锋, 卢平. 燃煤电厂吸附剂喷射脱汞技术的研究进展[J]．化工进展，2018，37(11)：4460-4467．
	ZHOU Qiang, DUAN Yufeng, LU Ping. Research progress on in-duct mercury removal by sorbent injection in power plant[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(11): 4460-4467.
3	黄瑞, 杨阳, 徐文青, 等. 金属硫化物吸附剂脱除烟气汞研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(12): 5243-5251.
	HUANG Rui, YANG Yang, XU Wenqing, et al. Research progress of metal sulfide adsorbents for removing mercury in flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(12): 5243-5251.
4	冯立品, 路迈西, 刘红缨, 等. 汞在选煤过程中的迁移规律研究[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2008(4): 16-18.
	FENG Lipin, LU Maixi, LIU Hongying, et al. Study on the transport of mercury during coal preparation[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2008(4): 16-18.
5	YUDOVICH Y E, KETRIS M P. Mercury in coal: a review part 1. geochemistry[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2005, 62(3): 107-134.
6	任建莉, 周劲松, 骆仲泱, 等. 煤中汞燃烧过程析出规律试验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2002, 22(3): 289-293.
	REN Jianli, ZHOU Jinsong, LUO Zhongyang, et al. Study of mercury emission during coal combustion[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2002, 22(3): 289-293.
7	成汭珅, 魏星, 周凌宇, 等. 煤泥和原煤的燃烧动力学特性实验研究[J]. 热力发电, 2021, 50(2): 55-61.
	CHENG Ruishen, WEI Xing, ZHOU Lingyu, et al. Experimental study on combustion kinetic characteristics of coal slime and raw coal[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2021, 50(2): 55-61.
8	GUO X J, CAI J M, XI Y, et al. Kinetics and thermodynamics of microalgae residue oxidative pyrolysis based on double distributed activation energy model with simulated annealing method[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2021, 154: 104997.
9	KOUICHI M. A new and simple method to estimate f(E) and k₀(E) in the distributed activation energy model from three sets of experimental data[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1995, 9(2): 302-307.
10	李经宽. 煤矸石与典型塑料、橡胶的混合燃烧特性研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2018.
11	吕帅, 吕国钧, 蒋旭光, 等. 印尼褐煤湿煤末(煤泥)热解和燃烧特性及动力学分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(3): 554-561.
	Shuai LYU, Guojun LYU, JIANG Xuguang, et al. Pyrolysis/combustion characteristics and kinetic analysis of Indonesia lignite sludge[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(3): 554-561.
12	杨洪涛, 章祥林, 李勇龙, 等. 淮北矿区煤矸石、煤泥、中煤复配煤热解特性与动力学研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,36(4): 465-468.
	YANG Hongtao, ZHANG Xianglin, LI Yonglong, et al. Study of pyrolysis characteristics and dynamics of gangue coal,coal slurry, coal and compound coal in Huaibei mining area[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2013, 36(4): 465-468.
13	谢昌亚, 王云刚, 赵钦新, 等. 准东煤热解特性及气化活性实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36(S1): 95-102.
	XIE Changya, WANG Yungang, ZHAO Qinxin, et al. Characteristics study on pyrolysis and gasification of Zhundong coal[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36(S1): 95-102.
14	李文秀. O₂/CO₂气氛下煤矸石煤泥燃烧及污染物排放特性研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2018.
	LI Wenxiu. Study on the co-combustion and pollutant emission characteristics of coal gangue and coal slime in O₂/CO₂[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2018.
15	申甲, 龚德鸿, 吴冬梅, 等. 煤泥燃烧动力学特性的非等温热重分析[J]. 热能动力工程, 2018, 33(7): 100-105.
	SHEN Jia, GONG Dehong, WU Dongmei, et al. Non-isothermal thermogravimetric analysis of combustion kinetics of coal sludge[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, 33(7): 100-105.
16	张雷. O₂/CO₂/H₂O复杂气氛下煤泥的燃烧特性研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2019.
	ZHANG Lei. Study on the combustion characteristics of slime in O₂/CO₂/H₂O complex atmosphere[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2019
17	王辉, 杨大伟, 刘松霖, 等. O₂/CO₂条件下煤泥球团的燃烧特性实验研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(1): 45-51.
	WANG Hui, YANG Dawei, LIU Songlin, et al. Experimental investigation on the combustion characteristics of coal slime pellet in O₂/CO₂[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51(1): 45-51.
18	刘明强, 刘建忠, 王睿坤, 等. 煤泥燃烧动力学机理研究的新方法探讨[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(S2): 444-448.
	LIU Mingqiang, LIU Jianzhong, WANG Ruikun, et al. Discussion of a new approach to study kinetic mechanism of coal slurry combustion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(S2): 444-448.
19	冯万国, 楼国锋, 王淦. 不同气氛下焦炭燃烧动力学实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(2): 487-493.
	FENG Wanguo, LOU Guofeng, WANG Gan. Experient investigation on combustion characteristics and kinetics of coke under different atmosphere[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(2): 487-493.
20	张小平. 煤泥掺入添加剂的燃烧特性及灰渣利用研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2004.
	ZHANG Xiaoping. Study on combustion characteristics and ash utilization of coal slurry mixed with additives[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2004.
21	朱红龙, 张传祥, 马名杰, 等. 煤泥型煤燃烧特性的实验研究[J]. 煤炭转化, 2014, 37(4): 55-57.
	ZHU Honglong, ZHANG Chuanxiang, MA Mingjie, et al. Experimental study on combustion characteristics of coal slime briquette[J]. Coal Conversion, 2014, 37(4): 55-57.
22	李娜. 载硫活性炭的汞吸附与再生特性研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2019.
	LI Na. Study on mercury removal and regeneration characteristics of sulfur-loaded activated carbon[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2019.
23	SKODRAS G, DIAMANTOPOULOU I, ZABANIOTOU A, et al. Enhanced mercury adsorption in activated carbons from biomass materials and waste tires[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(8): 749-758.
24	王晨平, 段钰锋, 赵士林, 等. 燃烧温度对煤中汞析出特性及形态分布的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(5): 1899-1905.
	WANG Chenping, DUAN Yufeng, ZHAO Shilin, et al. Effects of coal combustion temperature on mercury emission and speciation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(5): 1899-1905.
25	陈博陶, 韩丽娜, 常丽萍, 等. 汞的吸附及氧化机理的理论研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1): 436-441.
	CHEN Botao, HAN Lina, CHANG Liping, et al. Theoretic research on the adsorption and oxidation mechanism of mercury[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(S1): 436-441.
26	JI Ling, WANG Qianwen, ZHANG Zhiyue, et al. Release characteristics of mercury in chemical looping combustion of bituminous coal[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 94: 197-203.

[1]	XU Jiaheng, LI Yongsheng, LUO Chunhuan, SU Qingquan. Optimization of methanol steam reforming process [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 41-46.
[2]	GU Yongzheng, ZHANG Yongsheng. Dynamic behavior and kinetic model of Hg⁰ adsorption by HBr-modified fly ash [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[3]	LI Ning, LI Jinke, DONG Jinshan. Research and development of porous medium burner in ethylene cracking furnace [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 73-83.
[4]	WANG Shengyan, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai. Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[5]	SHAO Zhiguo, REN Wen, XU Shipei, NIE Fan, XU Yu, LIU Longjie, XIE Shuixiang, LI Xingchun, WANG Qingji, XIE Jiacai. Influence of final temperature on the distribution and characteristics of oil-based drilling cuttings pyrolysis products [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4929-4938.
[6]	SHI Keke, LIU Muzi, ZHAO Qiang, LI Jinping, LIU Guang. Properties and research progress of magnesium based hydrogen storage materials [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4731-4745.
[7]	LAI Shini, JIANG Lixia, LI Jun, HUANG Hongyu, KOBAYASHI Noriyuki. Research progress of ammonia blended fossil fuel [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4603-4615.
[8]	GENG Yuanze, ZHOU Junhu, ZHANG Tianyou, ZHU Xiaoyu, YANG Weijuan. Homogeneous/heterogeneous coupled combustion of heptane in a partially packed bed burner [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4514-4521.
[9]	YANG Ziyu, ZHU Ling, WANG Wenlong, YU Chaofan, SANG Yimin. Research and application progress of smoldering combustion technology for oily sludge [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3760-3769.
[10]	WANG Junjie, PAN Yanqiu, NIU Yabin, YU Lu. Molecular level catalytic reforming model construction and application [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(7): 3404-3412.
[11]	XIU Haoran, WANG Yungang, BAI Yanyuan, ZOU Li, LIU Yang. Combustion characteristics and ash melting behavior of Zhundong coal/municipal sludge blended combustion [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3242-3252.
[12]	ZHENG Xin, JIA Li, WANG Yanlin, ZHANG Jingchao, CHEN Shihu, QIAO Xiaolei, FAN Baoguo. Effect of sewage sludge mixed with coal slime on heavy metal retention characteristics [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 3233-3241.
[13]	WANG Baowen, LIU Tongqing, ZHANG Gang, LI Weiguang, LIN Deshun, WANG Mengjia, MA Jingjing. Reaction characteristics of CuFe₂O₄ modified desulfurization slag oxygen carrier with lignite [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(6): 2884-2894.
[14]	WANG Guangyu, MENG Jinghui, ZHANG Kai. Simulation of intermittent microwave drying of coal slime and dielectric properties [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 1779-1786.
[15]	GE Weitong, LIAO Yalong, LI Mingyuan, JI Guangxiong, XI Jiajun. Preparation and dechlorination kinetics of Pd-Fe/MWCNTs bimetallic catalyst [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(4): 1885-1894.