Research statue on adsorption properties and mechanism of heavy metal ions using red mud

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-1352

Abstract

Abstract:

Red mud (RM) is an industrial waste residue produced in the extraction process of alumina from bauxite. Red mud could be modified as a low-cost adsorbent to efficiently adsorb heavy metal ions in wastewater. In this paper, the properties and compositions of red mud were discussed. Then, the advantages of red mud in absorbing heavy metal ions were analyzed. The effects of acid modification, roasting modification, and composite modification on the adsorption performance of red mud were summarized. Given that, the mechanisms of red mud for heavy metal ions adsorption were described. The thermodynamic and kinetic models of adsorption for heavy metals were listed. Red mud, as one of industrial wastes, has advantages for the adsorption of heavy metals from wastewater, such as low cost and ready availability, which can realize the “treatment of wastes with wastes”. In our opinion, the technology of heavy metal adsorption with red mud has a promising prospect.

Key words: red mud, heavy metal ions, modification, adsorption, adsorption mechanism, wastewater

摘要：

赤泥（RM）是铝土矿提取氧化铝时排放的工业废渣，对其进行改性后可作为一种低成本吸附剂有效吸附废水中的重金属离子。本文从赤泥的性质和组成进行讨论，分析赤泥吸附重金属离子的优势，总结酸改性、焙烧改性和复合改性对赤泥结构及重金属吸附性能的影响。在此基础上，阐述了赤泥吸附重金属离子的机理，列举了吸附热力学及吸附动力学模型。指出赤泥作为一种大宗工业废弃物，用作吸附剂吸附废水中的重金属离子，具有成本低、来源广泛等优点，同时可达到以废治废的目的，具有良好的应用前景。

关键词: 赤泥, 重金属离子, 改性, 吸附, 吸附机理, 废水

CLC Number:

X758

LIU Qin, ZHOU Xintao, HUANG Jing, LUO Zhongqiu, SHAO Zhoujun, WANG Luxing, WEI Yu, LUO Yunlong. Research statue on adsorption properties and mechanism of heavy metal ions using red mud[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(6): 3455-3465.

刘钦, 周新涛, 黄静, 罗中秋, 邵周军, 王路星, 韦宇, 雒云龙. 赤泥吸附重金属离子性能及其机理研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(6): 3455-3465.

Figures/Tables 12

赤泥类型	SiO₂	CaO	Al₂O₃	Fe₂O₃	Na₂O	K₂O	TiO₂
拜耳法赤泥	3~20	2~8	10~20	30~60	2~10	—	0.1~10
烧结法赤泥	20~23	46~49	5~7	7~10	2~2.5	0.2~0.4	2.5~3
联合法赤泥	20~20.5	43~48	4.4~7.5	6.1~7.5	2.8~3	0.5~5.7	6.1~7.7

元素	矿物	化学结构	作用离子
Fe	赤铁矿	α-Fe₂O₃	Cu²⁺、Zn²⁺、Co²⁺
	针铁矿	α-FeOOH	—
	磁铁矿	Fe₃O₄	As³⁺
	钛铁矿	FeO-TiO₂	—
	水滑石	Mg₆Al₂CO₃（OH）₁₆·4H₂O	Ni²⁺
	磁赤铁矿	γ-Fe₂O₃	—
Al	铝矾土	α-Al₂O₃·3H₂O	—
	勃姆石	γ-AlOOH	—
	三水铝石	Al（OH）₃	Cu²⁺、Zn²⁺
Ti	锐钛矿	TiO₂	—
	钙钛矿	CaTiO₃	Co²⁺
	钛铁矿	FeO-TiO₂	—
Si、Al、Na、Ca	石英	SiO₂	—
	高岭石	Al₂Si₂O₅（OH）₄	—
	埃洛石	Al₂Si₂O₅（OH）₄·H₂O	—
	方解石	CaCO₃	Cu²⁺、Zn²⁺、Cr²⁺
	方钠石	Na₄（Al₃Si₃O₁₂）Cl	Co²⁺、Cr³⁺
	霞石	Na₈（Al₆Si₆O₂₄）CO₃	—

吸附剂	重金属离子	吸附量/mg·g^-1	主要吸附方式	参考文献
赤泥	Cd²⁺	83.03	物理吸附、化学吸附	［18］
	Cu²⁺	21.56		［19］
	Pb²⁺	389.16		［13］
粉煤灰	Cd²⁺	0.089	化学吸附	［20］
	Cu²⁺	7		［21］
	Pb²⁺	18		［21］
黏土	Cd²⁺	39.5	物理吸附、化学吸附	［22］
	Pb²⁺	19.5	物理吸附、化学吸附	［22］

金属离子	初始浓度 /mg?L^-1	吸附剂	吸附剂用量 /g?L^-1	吸附pH	吸附时间 /h	吸附温度 /℃	吸附量 /mg?g^-1	参考文献
Cu²⁺	100	RM	50	5.5	8	30	2.28	［23］
Cu²⁺	180	HCl-RM	4	5.5	1	23	21.56	［19］
Pb²⁺	500	HCl-RM	4	5.5	1	23	123.28	［19］
Pb²⁺	25	RM	0.5	5.5	2	25	46.68	［24］
Cd²⁺	50	RM	10	5	24	25	12.58	［25］
Cd²⁺	10	GRM	1	6.5	24	50	9	［26］
Cd²⁺	10	ARM	5	6	1	30	12.55	［27］
Cd²⁺	100	改性RM	1	4	1	30	83.03	［18］
Cd²⁺	200	RM	2	6	24	25	68	［28］
Zn²⁺	50	RM	10	5	24	25	12.05	［25］
Zn²⁺	200	RM	2	7	24	25	133	［28］
Ni²⁺	50	RM	10	5	24	25	11.06	［25］
Ni²⁺	50	HCl-RM	10	5	24	21	11.1	［29］
Co²⁺	280	RBRM	5	5	48	21	29.47	［30］
Mn²⁺	2	RM	10	6.5	1	25	0.191	［31］

重金属离子	吸附剂	Langmuir等温式			Freundlich等温式			参考文献
重金属离子	吸附剂	q_m/mg?g^-1	K_L/L?mg^-1	$R 2$	$n$	K_F/L?g^-1	$R 2$	参考文献
Mn²⁺	RM	0.3348	00.007	0.5352	0.9545	57.33	0.7576	［31］
Mn²⁺	ARM700	88.36	0.071	0.945	5.56	29.77	0.820	［52］
As³⁺	RM	0.5263	0.037	0.9781	1.0710	20.48	0.9467	［31］
As³⁺	RMA	27.8	38.2		7.11	21.6		［53］
Pb²⁺	RM	6.027	2.043	0.9938	2.3469	0.1160	0.2123	［33］
Zn²⁺	ANRM	14.92	0.138	0.986	1.322	3.174	0.948	［54］
Zn²⁺	RM	12.048	0.517	0.998	4.5	4.4	0.886	［25］
Cd²⁺	IOARM	0.1163	11.3	0.957	1.464	3.681	0.994	［55］
Cd²⁺	RM	12.579	0.411	0.996	6.69	3.79	0.833	［25］
Ni²⁺	BRM0.05	11.11	0.182	0.99				［29］
Ni²⁺	BRM0.1	9.34	0.169	0.996				［29］
Ni²⁺	RM	11.062	0.167	0.997	2.76	2.08	0.878	［25］
Co²⁺	RM	9.0252	0.0184	0.9702	2.9481	0.0624	0.9335	［56］

重金属离子	吸附剂	Langmuir等温式			Freundlich等温式			参考文献
重金属离子	吸附剂	q_m/mg?g^-1	K_L/L?mg^-1	$R 2$	$n$	K_F/L?g^-1	$R 2$	参考文献
Mn²⁺	RM	0.3348	00.007	0.5352	0.9545	57.33	0.7576	［31］
Mn²⁺	ARM700	88.36	0.071	0.945	5.56	29.77	0.820	［52］
As³⁺	RM	0.5263	0.037	0.9781	1.0710	20.48	0.9467	［31］
As³⁺	RMA	27.8	38.2		7.11	21.6		［53］
Pb²⁺	RM	6.027	2.043	0.9938	2.3469	0.1160	0.2123	［33］
Zn²⁺	ANRM	14.92	0.138	0.986	1.322	3.174	0.948	［54］
Zn²⁺	RM	12.048	0.517	0.998	4.5	4.4	0.886	［25］
Cd²⁺	IOARM	0.1163	11.3	0.957	1.464	3.681	0.994	［55］
Cd²⁺	RM	12.579	0.411	0.996	6.69	3.79	0.833	［25］
Ni²⁺	BRM0.05	11.11	0.182	0.99				［29］
Ni²⁺	BRM0.1	9.34	0.169	0.996				［29］
Ni²⁺	RM	11.062	0.167	0.997	2.76	2.08	0.878	［25］
Co²⁺	RM	9.0252	0.0184	0.9702	2.9481	0.0624	0.9335	［56］

重金属离子	吸附剂	准一级动力学方程			准二级动力学方程			参考文献
重金属离子		q_e/mg?g^-1	k₁/min^-1	R²	q_e/mg?g^-1	k₂/g·mg^-1·min^-1	R²	参考文献
Pb²⁺	RM		0.0822	0.882	1.9054	0.6437	0.999	［33］
Cd²⁺	RM500	16.62	0.061	0.56	18.05	0.0044	1	［35］
Cd²⁺	IOARM	0.078	0.039	0.994	0.071	5.99×10^-5	0.991	［55］
Cd²⁺	ARM	0.966	0.0795	0.905	20.6232	0.0052	0.992	［27］
Zn²⁺	ANRM	30	0.0068	0.888	25.859	3.677×10^-3	0.997	［54］
Mn²⁺	RM	17.28	0.0093	0.93	17.96	6×10^-4	0.993	［59］
Mn²⁺	RM700	78.07	0.016	0.977	87.04	2.4×10^-4	0.992	［52］
Ni²⁺	BRM0.1				6.48	0.0029	0.999	［29］
Co²⁺	RBRM				20.47	0.708	0.99	［30］
Sr²⁺	RBRM				18.22	6.044	0.99	［30］

References 59

1	KUMAR S, KUMAR R, BANDOPADHYAY A. Innovative methodologies for the utilisation of wastes from metallurgical and allied industries[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2006, 48(4): 301-314.
2	MUKIZA E, ZHANG L L, LIU X M, et al. Utilization of red mud in road base and subgrade materials: a review[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 141: 187-199.
3	SGLAVO V M, CAMPOSTRINI R, MAURINA S, et al. Bauxite ‘red mud’ in the ceramic industry. Part 1: Thermal behaviour[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2000, 20(3): 235-244.
4	DI CARLO E, BOULLEMANT A, COURTNEY R. A field assessment of bauxite residue rehabilitation strategies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 663: 915-926.
5	ZHU F, LIAO J X, XUE S G, et al. Evaluation of aggregate microstructures following natural regeneration in bauxite residue as characterized by synchrotron-based X-ray micro-computed tomography[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 573: 155-163.
6	LI L Y. A study of iron mineral transformation to reduce red mud tailings[J]. Waste Management, 2001, 21(6): 525-534.
7	AHMED M J K, AHMARUZZAMAN M. A review on potential usage of industrial waste materials for binding heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2016, 10: 39-47.
8	MUSHTAQ F, ZAHID M, BHATTI I A, et al. Possible applications of coal fly ash in wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 240: 27-46.
9	AHMED M J. Adsorption of quinolone, tetracycline, and penicillin antibiotics from aqueous solution using activated carbons: review[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2017, 50: 1-10.
10	张俊杰, 邵敬爱, 黄河洵, 等. 利用污泥制备活性炭及其吸附特性的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(10): 3876-3886.
	ZHANG Junjie, SHAO Jingai, HUANG Hexun, et al. Review on the preparation of activated carbon from sludge and its adsorption characteristics[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(10): 3876-3886.
11	GUPTA V K, SUHAS, ALI I, et al. Removal of rhodamine B, fast green, and methylene blue from wastewater using red mud, an aluminum industry waste[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(7): 1740-1747.
12	KHAIRUL M A, ZANGANE J, MOGHTADER B. The composition, recycling and utilisation of Bayer red mud[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 141: 483-498.
13	SANTONA L, CASTALDI P, MELIS P. Evaluation of the interaction mechanisms between red muds and heavy metals[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 136(2): 324-329.
14	HUA Y, HEAL K V, FRIESL HAN W. The use of red mud as an immobiliser for metal/metalloid contaminated soil: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 325: 17-30.
15	COLLINS R N, CLARK M W, PAYNE T E. Solid phases responsible for Mn-Ⅱ, Cr-Ⅲ, Co-Ⅱ, Ni, Cu-Ⅱand Zn immobilization by a modified bauxite refinery residue (red mud) at pH 7.5[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 236: 419-429.
16	MILENKOVIC A, SMICIKLAS I, BUNDALESKI N, et al. The role of different minerals from red mud assemblage in Co() sorption mechanism[J]. Colloids and Surfaces Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 508: 8-20.
17	WANG S B, ANG H M, TADE M O. Novel applications of red mud as coagulant,adsorbent and catalyst for environmentally benign processes[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(11): 1621-1635.
18	KALKAN E, NADAROGLU H, DIKBAS N, et al. Bacteria-modified red mud for adsorption of cadmium ions from aqueous solutions[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2013, 22(2): 417-429.
19	GRUDIC V V, PERIC D, BLAGOJEVIC N Z, et al. Pb(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅱ) sorption from aqueous solutions using activated red mud-evaluation of kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic models[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2013, 22(2): 377-385.
20	MOHAN S, GANDHIMATHI R. Removal of heavy metal ions from municipal solid waste leachate using coal fly ash as an adsorbent[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 169: 351-359.
21	WANG S, TERDKIABURANA T, TADE M. Single and co-adsorption of heavy metals and humic acid on fly ash[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 58: 353-358.
22	BOONAMNUAYVITAYA V, CHAIYA C, TANTHAPANICHAKOON W, et al. Removal of heavy metals by adsorbent prepared from pyrolyzed coffee residues and clay[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2004, 35: 11-22.
23	AGRAWAL A, SAHU K K, PANDEY B D. A comparative adsorption study of copper on various industrial solid wastes[J]. AIChE Journal, 2004, 50(10): 2430-2438.
24	KAZAK O, TOR A. In situ preparation of magnetic hydrochar by co-hydrothermal treatment of waste vinasse with red mud and its adsorption property for Pb() in aqueous solution[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 393: 122391.
25	AYALA J, FERNANDEZ B. Treatment from abandoned mine landfill leachates. Adsorption technology[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019, 8(3): 2732-2740.
26	GUPTA V K, SHARMA S. Removal of cadmium and zinc from aqueous solutions using red mud[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(16): 3612-3617.
27	SAHU M K, MANDA S, YADAV L S, et al. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of Cd(Ⅱ) ion adsorption from aqueous solution by activated red mud[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016, 57(30): 14251-14265.
28	VACLAVIKOVA M, MISAELIDES P, GALLIOS G, et al. Removal of cadmium, zinc, copper and lead by red mud, an iron oxides containing hydro metallurgical waste[J]. Oxide Based Materials: New Sources, Novel Phases, New Applications, 2005, 155: 517- 525.
29	SMICIKLAS I, SMILJANIC S, PERIC GRUJIC A, et al. Effect of acid treatment on red mud properties with implications on Ni(Ⅱ) sorption and stability[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 242: 27-35.
30	MILENKOVIĆ A S, SMIČIKLASI D, ŠLJIVIĆl IVANOVIĆ M Z, et al. Effect of experimental variables onto Co²⁺ and Sr²⁺ sorption behavior in red mud-water suspensions[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 2016, 51(8): 679-690.
31	PIETRELLI L, IPPOLITO N M, FERRO S, et al. Removal of Mn and As from drinking water by red mud and pyrolusite[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 237: 526-533.
32	SMILJANIC S, SMICIKLAS I, PERIC GRUJIC A, et al. Study of factors affecting Ni²⁺ immobilization efficiency by temperature activated red mud[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 168(2): 610-619.
33	SAHU M K, MANDAL S, DASH S S, et al. Removal of Pb(Ⅱ) from aqueous solution by acid activated red mud[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2013, 1(4): 1315-1324.
34	GURUDIC V V, BRASANAC S, VESNA L, et al. Sorption of cadmium from water using neutralized red mud and activated neutralized red mud[J]. Journal of Engineeringand Applied Sciences, 2013, 8(11): 933–943.
35	YANG T X, WANG Y F, SHENG L X, et al. Enhancing Cd(Ⅱ) sorption by red mud with heat treatment: performance and mechanisms of sorption[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 255: 109866.
36	PULFORD I D, HARGREAVES J S J, DERISOVA J, et al. Carbonised red mud—A new water treatment product made from a waste material[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 100: 59-64.
37	LIANG W T, COUPERTHWAITE S J, KAUR G, et al. Effect of strong acids on red mud structural and fluoride adsorption properties[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 423: 158-165.
38	ANTUNES M L P, COUERTHWAITE S J, CONCEICAO F T DA, et al. Red mud from Brazil: thermal behavior and physical properties[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(2): 775-779.
39	SMILJAVIC S, SMUCIKLAS I, PERIN GRUJIC A, et al. Rinsed and thermally treated red mud sorbents for aqueous Ni²⁺ ions[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 162(1): 75-83.
40	王艳秋, 霍维周. 颗粒赤泥吸附剂对重金属离子的吸附性能研究[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2008, 39(6): 82-85.
	WANG Yanqiu, HUO Weizhou. Adsorption property of granular red mud adsorbent on heavy metal ions[J]. Industrial Water & Wastewater, 2008, 39(6): 82-85.
41	刘江龙, 郭焱, 何小山, 等. 硅烷化赤泥的制备及其对水中铅离子吸附性能分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 37(11): 36-44.
	LIU Jianglong, GUO Yan, HE Xiaoshan, et al. Preparation of silanized red mud and its adsorption properties for lead ions in water[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2019, 37(11): 36-44.
42	刘江龙, 郭焱, 席艺慧. FeCl₃和十六烷基三甲基溴化铵改性赤泥对水中铜离子的吸附性能和机理[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 39(2): 776-789.
	LIU Jianglong, GUO Yan, XI Yihui. Adsorption and mechanism of copper ions in water by red mud modified with FeCl₃ and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2020, 39(2): 776-789.
43	MESGARI ABBASI S, RASHIDI A, GHORBANI A, et al. Synthesis, processing, characterization, and applications of red mud/carbon nanotube composites[J]. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(15): 16738-16743.
44	LUO L, MA C Y, MA Y B, et al. New insights into the sorption mechanism of cadmium on red mud[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(5): 1108-1113.
45	SERRANO S, ODAY P A, VLASSOPULOS D, et al. A surface complexation and ion exchange model of Pb and Cd competitive sorption on natural soils[J]. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta, 2009, 73(3): 543-558.
46	KAUR G, COUPERTHWAITE S J, MILLAR G J. Enhanced removal of Mn(Ⅱ) from solution by thermally activated Bayer precipitates[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2019, 134: 166-175.
47	THOMPSON H A, PAORKS G A, BROWN G E. Formation and release of cobalt() sorption and precipitation products in aging kaolinite-water slurries[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 222(2): 241-253.
48	QI X J, WANG H T, ZHANG L, et al. Removal of Cr(Ⅲ) from aqueous solution by using bauxite residue (red mud): identification of active components and column tests[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 245: 125560.
49	CASTALdI P, SILVETTI M, ENZO S, et al. Study of sorption processes and FT-IR analysis of arsenate sorbed onto red muds (a bauxite ore processing waste)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 175(1/2/3): 172-178.
50	FOO K Y, HAMEED B H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 156(1): 2-10.
51	ARAUJO C S T, ALMEIDA I L S, REZENDE H C, et al. Elucidation of mechanism involved in adsorption of Pb() onto lobeira fruit (Solanum lycocarpum) using Langmuir,Freundlich and Temkin isotherms[J]. Microchemical Journal, 2018, 137: 348-354.
52	CHEN H L, ZHENG J, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Application of annealed red mud to Mn²⁺ ion adsorption from aqueous solution[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(11): 2761-2771.
53	PEPPER R A, COUERTHWAITE S J, MILLAR G J. A novel akaganeite sorbent synthesised from waste red mud: application for treatment of arsenate in aqueous solutions[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(5): 6308-6316.
54	SAHU R C, PATEL R, RAY B C. Adsorption of Zn(Ⅱ) on activated red mud: neutralized by CO₂[J]. Desalination, 2011, 266(1/2/3): 93-97.
55	KHAN T A, CHAUDHRY S A, ALI I. Equilibrium uptake, isotherm and kinetic studies of Cd(Ⅱ) adsorption onto iron oxide activated red mud from aqueous solution[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2015, 202: 165-175.
56	RIFAAI R A, MOKHEMER S A, SABER E A, et al. Neuroprotective effect of quercetin nanoparticles: a possible prophylactic and therapeutic role in alzheimer’s disease[J]. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 2020, 107: 101795.
57	DEIHIMI N, IRANNAJAD M, REZAI B. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of ferricyanide adsorption from aqueous solution by activated red mud[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 227: 277-285.
58	TAN K L, HAMEED B H. Insight into the adsorption kinetics models for the removal of contaminants from aqueous solutions[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2017, 74: 25-48.
59	LI Y C, HUANG H, XU Z, et al. Mechanism study on manganese(Ⅱ) removal from acid mine wastewater using red mud and its application to a lab-scale column[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253: 119955.

[1]	WANG Jiaqing, SONG Guangwei, LI Qiang, GUO Shuaicheng, DAI Qingli. Rubber-concrete interface modification method and performance enhancement path [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 328-343.
[2]	CUI Shoucheng, XU Hongbo, PENG Nan. Simulation analysis of two MOFs materials for O₂/He adsorption separation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[3]	CHEN Chongming, CHEN Qiu, GONG Yunqian, CHE Kai, YU Jinxing, SUN Nannan. Research progresses on zeolite-based CO₂ adsorbents [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 411-419.
[4]	WANG Ying, HAN Yunping, LI Lin, LI Yanbo, LI Huili, YAN Changren, LI Caixia. Research status and future prospects of the emission characteristics of virus aerosols in urban wastewater treatment plants [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 439-446.
[5]	XU Chunshu, YAO Qingda, LIANG Yongxian, ZHOU Hualong. Research progress on functionalization strategies of covalent organic frame materials and its adsorption properties for Hg(Ⅱ) and Cr(Ⅵ) [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[6]	GU Yongzheng, ZHANG Yongsheng. Dynamic behavior and kinetic model of Hg⁰ adsorption by HBr-modified fly ash [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 498-509.
[7]	ZHAO Jingchao, TAN Ming. Effect of surfactants on the reduction of industrial saline wastewater by electrodialysis [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[8]	GUO Qiang, ZHAO Wenkai, XIAO Yonghou. Numerical simulation of enhancing fluid perturbation to improve separation of dimethyl sulfide/nitrogen via pressure swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[9]	WANG Shengyan, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai. Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[10]	ZHU Jie, JIN Jing, DING Zhenghao, YANG Huipan, HOU Fengxiao. Modification of CaSO₄ oxygen carrier by Zhundong coal ash in chemical looping gasification and its mechanism [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4628-4635.
[11]	WANG Jingang, ZHANG Jianbo, TANG Xuejiao, LIU Jinpeng, JU Meiting. Research progress on modification of Cu-SSZ-13 catalyst for denitration of automobile exhaust gas [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4636-4648.
[12]	GE Yafen, SUN Yu, XIAO Peng, LIU Qi, LIU Bo, SUN Chengying, GONG Yanjun. Research progress of zeolite for VOCs removal [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4716-4730.
[13]	WANG Qi, KOU Lihong, WANG Guanyu, WANG Jikun, LIU Min, LI Lanting, WANG Hao. Molecular recognition of dissolved organic matter in bio-treated effluent of coking wastewater [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[14]	SHI Tianxi, SHI Yonghui, WU Xinying, ZHANG Yihao, QIN Zhe, ZHAO Chunxia, LU Da. Effects of Fe²⁺ on the performance of Anammox EGSB reactor [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[15]	YANG Ying, HOU Haojie, HUANG Rui, CUI Yu, WANG Bing, LIU Jian, BAO Weiren, CHANG Liping, WANG Jiancheng, HAN Lina. Coal tar phenol-based carbon nanosphere prepared by Stöber method for adsorption of CO₂ [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 5011-5018.