A three-stage utilization system of LNG cold energy with coal-fired waste gas heat source

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.11.050

Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 3720-3726.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2016.11.050

A three-stage utilization system of LNG cold energy with coal-fired waste gas heat source

PAN Zhen¹, QIU Yang¹, QIAO Weibiao¹, ZONG Yue¹, CHEN Shujun²

1. College of Petroleum Engineering, Liaoning Shihua University, Fushun 113001, Liaoning, China;
2. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China

Received:2016-04-05 Revised:2016-05-05 Online:2016-11-05 Published:2016-11-05

以燃煤废气为热源的LNG冷能三级利用系统

潘振¹, 仇阳¹, 乔伟彪¹, 宗月¹, 陈树军²

1. 辽宁石油化工大学石油天然气工程学院, 辽宁抚顺 113001;
2. 中国石油大学(华东)储运与建筑工程学院, 山东青岛 266580

通讯作者: 潘振(1981-),男,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为天然气综合利用技术。E-mail:28335719@qq.com。
作者简介:潘振(1981-),男,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为天然气综合利用技术。E-mail:28335719@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51306210）。

Abstract

Abstract: With the increasing depletion of fossil fuels, recovering industrial low temperature waste heat is becoming an effective way to save energy. Aimed at the problem of energy recovery and reuse, based on the organic Rankine cycle and using low-temperature coal-fired waste gas (about 70℃) and cold energy of liquefied natural gas (LNG, about -162℃), this paper presents a three-stage system by which CO₂ liquefaction and power generation are achieved. The effects of expander inlet pressure and temperature on thermal performance of the LNG three-stage cold energy utilization system were analyzed in detail, and the optimal cycle parameters were obtained. HYSYS software simulation for the system was done with comparative analysis on a three-stage system and a two-stage system. The results show that for a three-stage cold energy utilization system, the thermal efficiency and energy efficiency of the generating unit increased 57.74% and 36.67% compared to those of a two-stage system;the net work output was 61.16% greater than that of a two-stage system. According to the efficiency of 90% power generation and 0.5 Yuan/(kW·h) calculation, the three-stage cold energy utilization system can result in saving of 0.52 million RMB every year. At the same time, the CO₂ liquefaction capacity is 1580kg/h which can reduce emission of CO₂ about 1.365×10⁴t/a. The system can bring considerable economic benefit and achieve better emission reduction.

Key words: liquefied natural gas, coal-fired waste gas, cold energy, organic Rankine cycle, thermodynamics, simulation, power generation, emission reduction

摘要： 随着化石燃料的日益枯竭，回收工业过程中产生的低温余热已成为一种利用能源的重要方式，针对能量回收再利用的问题，将低温燃煤废气（70℃）及LNG（-162℃）冷能进行联合利用，以朗肯循环为基础，设计了一种可以在发电的同时，对CO₂进行液化的LNG冷能三级式利用系统。详细分析了膨胀机入口压力和温度对LNG冷能三级式利用系统热力性能的影响，确定了循环参数，利用HYSYS进行模拟计算，并与之相对应的LNG冷能二级式利用系统进行比较。结果表明：设计的三级式系统发电单元的热效率及（火用）效率较二级式系统分别提升了57.74%及36.67%；三级式系统总净输出功较二级式系统提升了61.16%，按90%发电效率，0.5元/（kW·h）电价计算，三级式系统每年可带来约52万元的经济效益，CO₂液化量为1580kg/h，每年可减排约CO₂1.365×10⁴t，具有可观的经济效益和较好的减排效果。

关键词: 液化天然气, 燃煤废气, 冷能, 有机朗肯循环, 热力学, 模拟, 发电, 减排

CLC Number:

TE09

PAN Zhen, QIU Yang, QIAO Weibiao, ZONG Yue, CHEN Shujun. A three-stage utilization system of LNG cold energy with coal-fired waste gas heat source[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(11): 3720-3726.

潘振, 仇阳, 乔伟彪, 宗月, 陈树军. 以燃煤废气为热源的LNG冷能三级利用系统[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(11): 3720-3726.

References

[1] 张媛媛,许嘉钰,张建,等. 我国燃煤电厂CO₂捕集技术的环境影响[J]. 工业安全与环保,2014,40(6):13-15.
[2] 丁毅,史德明. 钢铁企业余热资源高效利用[J]. 钢铁,2011,46(10):88-93,98.
[3] GUO Tao,WANG Huaixin,ZHANG Shengjun. Comparative analysis of CO₂-based transcritical rankine cycle and HFC245fa-Based subcritical organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal source[J]. Science China: Technological Sciences,2010,53(6):1638-1646.
[4] WANG Jianli,ZHAO Li,WANG Xiaodong. A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle[J]. Applied Energy,2010,87(11):3366-3373.
[5] HUNG T C,WANG S K,KUO C H,et al. A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an orc using low-grad energy sources[J]. Energy,2010,35(3):1403-1411.
[6] SCHUSTER A,KARELLAS S,AUMANN R. Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical organic rankine cycles[J]. Energy,2010,35(2):1033-1039.
[7] 吴俐俊,张晓军. 三种中低温余热蒸汽发电系统的比较研究[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版,2015,43(7):1082-1088.
[8] 杨凯,张红光,宋松松,等. 变工况下车用采油机排气余热有机朗肯循环回收系统[J]. 化工学报,2015,66(3):1097-1102.
[9] 饶文姬,赵良举,刘朝,等. 利用LNG冷能与工业余热的有机朗肯循环研究[J]. 工程热物理学报,2014,35(2):213-217.
[10] 王方,付一珂,范晓伟,等. 液化天然气(LNG)冷能利用研究进展[J]. 化工进展,2016,35(3):748-753.
[11] 王强,厉彦忠,陈曦. 一种基于低品位热源的LNG冷能回收低温动力系统[J]. 热能动力工程,2003,18(3):245-247.
[12] WANG Q,LI Y Z,WANG J. Analysis of power cycle based on cold energy of liquefied natural gas and low-grade heat source[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2004,24(41): 539-548.
[13] SHI X J,CHE D F. A combined power cycle utilizing low-temperature waste heat and LNG cold energy[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2009,50(3):567-575.
[14] MIYAZAKI T,KANG Y T,AKISAWA A,et al. A combined power cycle using refuse incineration and LNG cold energy[J]. Energy,2000,25(7):639-655.
[15] 汤学忠. 热能转换与利用[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社,2013:45.
[16] 倪渊,赵良举,刘朝,等. 非共沸工质ORC低温烟气余热利用分析与优化[J]. 化工学报,2013,64(11):3985-3992.
[17] 孙宪航,陈保东,王雷,等. 以太阳能为高温热源的LNG卫星站冷能发电系统[J]. 天然气工业,2012,32(10):103-106.
[18] 陈煜,巨永林. 利用液化天然气冷能的朗肯循环与联合法发电系统流程的工艺模拟与对比分析[J]. 化工学报,2015,66(s2):387-391.
[19] 张墨耕,赵良举,刘朝,等. 利用LNG冷能与工业余热的有机朗肯循环复合系统优化分析[J]. 化工学报,2014,65(8):3144-3151.
[20] 韩中合,杜燕,王智. 有机朗肯循环低温余热回收系统的工质选择[J]. 化工进展,2014,33(9):2279-2285.
[21] 王弢,林文胜,顾安忠. 利用LNG冷能的有机朗肯循环系统的工质研究和变工况性能分析[J]. 化工学报,2010,61(s2):107-111.

A three-stage utilization system of LNG cold energy with coal-fired waste gas heat source

以燃煤废气为热源的LNG冷能三级利用系统

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Mengyuan, GUO Fan, LI Qunsheng. Simulation and optimization of the third and fourth distillation columns in the recovery section of polyvinyl alcohol production [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 113-123.
[2]	ZHANG Ruijie, LIU Zhilin, WANG Junwen, ZHANG Wei, HAN Deqiu, LI Ting, ZOU Xiong. On-line dynamic simulation and optimization of water-cooled cascade refrigeration system [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 124-132.
[3]	WANG Tai, SU Shuo, LI Shengrui, MA Xiaolong, LIU Chuntao. Dynamic behavior of single bubble attached to the solid wall in the AC electric field [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 133-141.
[4]	SUN Jipeng, HAN Jing, TANG Yangchao, YAN Bowen, ZHANG Jieyao, XIAO Ping, WU Feng. Numerical simulation and optimization of operating parameters of sulfur wet molding process [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[5]	WANG Shengyan, DENG Shuai, ZHAO Ruikai. Research progress on carbon dioxide capture technology based on electric swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 233-245.
[6]	CHEN Kuangyin, LI Ruilan, TONG Yang, SHEN Jianhua. Structure design of gas diffusion layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cell [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[7]	YANG Yudi, LI Wentao, QIAN Yongkang, HUI Junhong. Analysis of influencing factors of natural gas turbulent diffusion flame length in industrial combustion chamber [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 267-275.
[8]	CUI Shoucheng, XU Hongbo, PENG Nan. Simulation analysis of two MOFs materials for O₂/He adsorption separation [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 382-390.
[9]	ZHANG Jie, WANG Fangfang, XIA Zhonglin, ZHAO Guangjin, MA Shuangchen. Current SF₆ emission, emission reduction and future prospects under “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 447-460.
[10]	XU Ruosi, TAN Wei. Flow field simulation and fluid-structure coupling analysis of C-tube pool boiling two-phase flow model [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 47-55.
[11]	ZHANG Fengqi, CUI Chengdong, BAO Xuewei, ZHU Weixuan, DONG Hongguang. Design and evaluation of sweetening process with amine solution absorption and multiple desorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 518-528.
[12]	GUO Qiang, ZHAO Wenkai, XIAO Yonghou. Numerical simulation of enhancing fluid perturbation to improve separation of dimethyl sulfide/nitrogen via pressure swing adsorption [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 64-72.
[13]	SHAO Boshi, TAN Hongbo. Simulation on the enhancement of cryogenic removal of volatile organic compounds by sawtooth plate [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(S1): 84-93.
[14]	XU Youhao, WANG Wei, LU Bona, XU Hui, HE Mingyuan. China’s oil refining innovation: MIP development strategy and enlightenment [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4465-4470.
[15]	CHEN Lin, XU Peiyuan, ZHANG Xiaohui, CHEN Jie, XU Zhenjun, CHEN Jiaxiang, MI Xiaoguang, FENG Yongchang, MEI Deqing. Investigation on the LNG mixed refrigerant flow and heat transfer characteristics in coil-wounded heat exchanger (CWHE) system [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4496-4503.