共冷凝器双循环有机朗肯发电系统㶲分析

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-0019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

有机朗肯循环（ORC）发电是将中低温热源转化为高品位电能的有效途径之一。本文针对热源温度为100~150℃的亚临界饱和有机朗肯循环系统，选用4种有机工质，首先分析热源温度和工质对单级/双循环发电系统?效率和加热器?效率的变化规律，进而对双循环系统窄点温差对系统和加热器?效率的影响进行分析。主要结论包括：在相同热源温度下，R245fa为工质时，双循环系统及加热器的?效率相对于单循环系统的?效率大幅提升，在热源温度为130℃时，系统?效率提高了14.45%。随着窄点温差的增大，系统和加热器?效率减少；不同热源温度下窄点温差增大时，系统和加热器?效率的减小量接近相等，当窄点温差增加2℃，系统?效率平均减少1.9%左右。分析双循环系统采用4种有机工质时系统和加热器?效率，发现?效率都随热源温度增加而增大；当热源温度为100℃和150℃时，工质R245fa相对于R601的系统?效率相差为0.89%和3.54%；对应加热器的?效率相差为0.49%和4.82%。

关键词: 双循环发电系统, ?分析, 窄点温差, 有机朗肯循环, 有机工质

Abstract:

Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power generation is one of the effective ways to convert medium and low temperature heat sources into high-grade electric energy. For the subcritical saturated organic Rankine cycle system with heat source temperature of 100—150℃, four kinds of organic working fluids are selected to study. Firstly, the variation trend of heat source temperature and working fluids on the exergy efficiency and heater exergy efficiency of single stage/two stage power generation system is analyzed, and then the influence of pinch temperature of two stage system on the exergy efficiency of system and heater is analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows: the exergy efficiency of dual cycle system and heater is significantly higher than that of single cycle system at the same heat source temperature, when R245fa is used as working fluid. For example, when the heat source temperature is 130℃, the exergy efficiency of the system is increased by 14.45%. The exergy efficiency of the system and heater decreases with the increase of the pinch temperature; when the pinch temperature increases at different heat source temperatures, the reduction of the exergy efficiency of the system and heater is nearly equal; when the narrow point temperature difference increases by 2℃, the exergy efficiency of the system decreases by about 1.9%. The exergy efficiency of the system and heater is analyzed when four kinds of organic working fluids are used in the dual cycle system, and the exergy efficiency increases with the increase of heat source temperature. When the temperature of heat source is 100℃ and 150℃, the difference of system exergy efficiency between working fluids R245fa and R601 is 0.89% and 3.54%, respectively, and the difference of exergy efficiency of the heater is 0.49% and 4.82%, respectively.

Key words: two stage cycle generation power system, exergy analysis, pinch temperature, organic Rankine cycle, organic working fluids

中图分类号:

TK115

刘广林, 徐进良, 苗政. 共冷凝器双循环有机朗肯发电系统㶲分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6656-6662.

LIU Guanglin, XU Jinliang, MIAO Zheng. Exergy analysis of two stage organic Rankine cycle generation power system with co-condenser[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(12): 6656-6662.

图/表 12

图1 共冷凝双循环发电系统示意图和T-s图

表1 选用工质及物性参数

工质	标准沸点/℃	临界温度/℃	临界压力/MPa	ODP	GWP
R600a	-11.7	134.7	3.64	0	20
R245fa	15.1	154.1	4.43	0	1020
R123	-0.5	152.0	3.8	0.012	53
R601	27.8	187.4	3.39	0	11

表2 主要参数取值

m_g	η_pu	η_exp	Δt_d	T₀	t₃	m_i
1kg/s	72%	75%	5℃	292K	30℃	0.55

图2 数值计算流程

表3 模型对比验证数据

数据来源	加热器?效率/%	系统?效率/%
文献［21］	80.5	33.51
本文模拟	80.49	33.51

图3 单级系统?效率与工质蒸发温度关系

图4 双循环系统效率随膨胀机转矩的变化

图5 双循环系统?效率随热源温度变化规律

图6 双循环系统?效率与窄点温差的关系

图7 单级系统加热器?效率随热源温度变化关系

图8 双循环系统加热器?效率随热源温度变化

图9 双循环系统加热器?效率与窄点温差的关系

参考文献 21

1	SUN W Q, YUE X Y, WANG Y H. Exergy efficiency analysis of ORC (organic rankine cycle) and ORC-based combined cycles driven by low-temperature waste heat[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 135: 63-73.
2	HEBERLE F, BRÜGGEMANN D. Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal organic rankine cycle for combined heat and power generation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(11/12): 1326-1332.
3	ZHAO Chunhua, ZHENG Siyu, ZHANG Ji, et al. Exergy and economic analysis of organic Rankine cycle hybrid system utilizing biogas and solar energy in rural area of China[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2017, 14(14): 1221-1229.
4	雷欢, 杨金福, 唐长亮, 等. 结合ORC和VCR的中温余热回收系统性能分析[J]. 热能动力工程, 2017, 32(1): 7-12,117-118.
	LEI Huan, YANG Jinfu, TANG Changliang, et al. Performance of a medium-temperature waste heat refrigeration system with combined ORC and VCR[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2017, 32(1): 7-12,117-118.
5	ALJUNDI I H. Effect of dry hydrocarbons and critical point temperature on the efficiencies of organic Rankine cycle[J]. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(4): 1196-1202.
6	LONG R, BAO Y J, HUANG X M, et al. Exergy analysis and working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat recovery[J]. Energy, 2014, 73: 475-483.
7	张军辉, 刘娟芳, 陈清华. 有机朗肯循环系统最佳蒸发温度和㶲分析[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(3): 820-826.
	ZHANG Junhui, LIU Juanfang, CHEN Qinghua. Optimal evaporating temperature and exergy analysis for organic Rankine cycle[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(3): 820-826.
8	马帅杰, 林文胜. 利用燃气轮机烟气余热的复合有机朗肯循环系统优化分析[J]. 制冷学报, 2019, 40(6): 39-45.
	MA Shuaijie, LIN Wensheng. Optimization and analyses of an organic Rankine cycle combined system utilizing the waste heat of gas turbine exhaust[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2019, 40(6): 39-45.
9	钟绍庚, 王子龙, 孙义文, 等. ORC发电系统变热源温度实验研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2019, 34(8): 10-15, 24.
	ZHONG Shaogeng, WANG Zilong, SUN Yiwen, et al. Experimental study on variable heat source temperature for ORC power generation system[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2019, 34(8): 10-15, 24.
10	LI J, PEI G, LI Y Z, et al. Energetic and exergetic investigation of an organic Rankine cycle at different heat source temperatures[J]. Energy, 2012, 38(1): 85-95.
11	NUR T B, SUNOTO. Exergy analysis of biomass organic Rankine cycle for power generation[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 309: 012057.
12	KAŞKA Ö. Energy and exergy analysis of an organic Rankine for power generation from waste heat recovery in steel industry[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 77: 108-117.
13	SAFARIAN S, ARAMOUN F. Energy and exergy assessments of modified organic rankine cycles (ORCs)[J]. Energy Reports, 2015, 1: 1-7.
14	BADEMLIOGLU A H. Exergy analysis of the organic Rankine cycle based on the pinch point temperature difference[J]. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 2019, 5(3): 157-165.
15	MAGO P J, CHAMRA L M. Exergy analysis of a combined engine-organic Rankine cycle configuration[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2008, 222(8): 761-770.
16	JIN Y L, GAO N P, WANG T T. Influence of heat exchanger pinch point on the control strategy of organic Rankine cycle (ORC)[J]. Energy, 2020, 207: 118196.
17	SUN Q X, WANG Y X, CHENG Z Y, et al. Thermodynamic optimization of a double-pressure organic Rankine cycle driven by geothermal heat source[J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 129: 591-598.
18	LI J, DUAN Y Y, YANG Z, et al. Exergy analysis of novel dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 760-769.
19	李健, 段远源, 杨震, 等. 双压蒸发有机朗肯循环系统㶲分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(7): 1458-1464.
	LI Jian, DUAN Yuanyuan, YANG Zhen, et al. Exergy analysis for the dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(7): 1458-1464.
20	LIU G L, WANG Q Y, XU J L, et al. Exergy analysis of two-stage organic Rankine cycle power generation system[J]. Entropy, 2020, 23(1): 43.
21	KANOGLU M, BOLATTURK A. Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy[J]. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(11): 2366-2374.

[1]	姜华, 张子惠, 宫武旗, 常越勇. MVR分质提盐蒸发结晶系统设计及性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3947-3956.
[2]	李丹, 杨思宇, 钱宇. 耦合溴化锂吸收式制冷与有机朗肯循环的合成气深冷分离工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10): 5236-5246.
[3]	王建勋. 火电机组余热梯级供热技术的综合分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(S2): 149-155.
[4]	李新国, 弭慧惠, 吴晓松, 高冠怡. 调节传热窄点以提升有机朗肯循环性能的分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(5): 2517-2525.
[5]	曹学文, 杨健, 边江, 刘杨, 郭丹, 李琦瑰. 新型双压Linde-Hampson氢液化工艺设计与分析[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(12): 6663-6669.
[6]	刘广林, 曹泷, 刘欢, 苗政, 徐进良. 基于单螺杆膨胀机有机朗肯循环有无回热系统性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(06): 2626-2632.
[7]	王治红, 丁晓明, 吴明鸥, 沈晓燕. 有机朗肯循环在多品位余热发电中的应用[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(05): 2189-2196.
[8]	杨宇鑫, 张红光, 赵蕊, 李健, 赵腾龙, 张梦茹. 工质泵变运行工况对有机朗肯循环系统性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(02): 851-857.
[9]	姚玉婷, 李士雨. 高通量换热器用于低温发电系统的研究[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(10): 3737-3743.
[10]	黄靖伦, 王辉涛, 葛众, 韩金蓉, 赵玲玲. 双压膨胀有机朗肯循环中低温余热发电系统的热力性能[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(09): 3303-3311.
[11]	王明涛, 刘启一, 张百浩. 冷凝条件对基于混合工质的内燃机余热有机朗肯循环热力性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(08): 2927-2934.
[12]	杨德明, 朱碧云, 顾强, 王争光, 印一凡, 高晓新. 基于机械蒸汽再压缩和有机朗肯循环技术的双溶剂协同萃取精馏分离乙酸甲酯-甲醇-水节能工艺[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(05): 2010-2015.
[13]	曹泷, 刘秀龙, 张鸣, 徐进良. 有机朗肯循环发电系统变工况运行的实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(01): 88-95.
[14]	吴国策, 朱兴仪, 赵英汝. 一种新型的太阳能驱动ORC-HP热电联产耦合系统[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(S1): 195-202.
[15]	韩中合, 许鸿胜, 范伟, 赵若丞, 王智. 低温烟气有机郎肯循环ORC系统热力性能与经济性的对比分析[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(11): 4010-4016.