CaO/PAC混合絮凝剂的沼液净化性能

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1760

化工进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (06): 2392-2398.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-1760

CaO/PAC混合絮凝剂的沼液净化性能

涂特^1,2, 冉毅^3,4, 贺清尧^1,2, 梁飞虹^1,2, 王明^1,2, 晏水平^1,2

1 华中农业大学工学院, 湖北武汉 430070;
2 农业部长江中下游农业装备重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070;
3 农业部沼气科学研究所, 四川成都 610041;
4 农业部资源循环利用技术与模式重点实验室, 北京 100125

收稿日期:2017-08-21 修回日期:2017-11-06 出版日期:2018-06-05 发布日期:2018-06-05
通讯作者: 晏水平,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为沼气高值化利用及气体CO₂分离等。
作者简介:涂特(1992-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为沼气高值化利用。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51376078）、公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303099）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金（26622015PY077）及中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目。

Purification performance of biogas slurry by blended CaO/PAC flocculant

TU Te^1,2, RAN Yi^3,4, HE Qingyao^1,2, LIANG Feihong^1,2, WANG Ming^1,2, YAN Shuiping^1,2

1 College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment in Mid-lower Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;
3 Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China;
4 Key Laboratory of Technology and Model for Cyclic Utilization from Agricultural Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100125, China

Received:2017-08-21 Revised:2017-11-06 Online:2018-06-05 Published:2018-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 厌氧发酵后产生的沼液中含有大量的有机污染物需要处理，为降低后期沼液处理工程的操作费用，改善常规絮凝剂存在的不足，本文提出向沼液中添加由氧化钙（CaO）和聚合氯化铝（PAC）组成的混合絮凝剂对沼液进行预处理，降低沼液浊度、化学需氧量（COD）和总磷（TP）质量浓度，以及强化沼液的氨氮脱除潜力，并研究了混合絮凝剂中CaO和PAC的添加顺序、质量浓度配比和总质量浓度的影响。结果表明，CaO/PAC混合絮凝剂中CaO和PAC的添加顺序对沼液净化性能的影响并不显著。降低CaO/PAC中CaO与PAC的质量浓度配比（m_CaO/m_PAC）和增加CaO/PAC总质量浓度均将会降低沼液浊度、COD含量与TP质量浓度，但以沼液pH来表征的沼液氨氮脱除潜能却随着m_CaO/m_PAC值与CaO/PAC总质量浓度的上升而增加。综合考虑混合絮凝剂对沼液的净化性能，CaO/PAC混合絮凝剂总质量浓度可选择12.5～18.75g/L，m_CaO/m_PAC值可选择（2～10）∶1。

关键词: 废水, 沼液, 氨氮脱除, 絮凝剂, 混凝, 环境

Abstract: Biogas slurry generating from the biogas anaerobic fermentation project contains a substantial amount of organic pollutants. It should be treated properly to meet the requirements of the discharge standard or farmland irrigation standard. In order to reduce the operation cost of biogas slurry purification,biogas slurry should be pretreated firstly to reduce all the turbidity value,chemical oxygen demand(COD)and the concentration of total phosphorus(TP),and increase the removal potential of ammonium nitrogen as well. A blended flocculant prepared with calcium oxide(CaO)and polyaluminum chloride(PAC),CaO/PAC,was added into biogas slurry to fulfill this target in the study. It should be noted that the removal potential of ammonium nitrogen was represented by pH of biogas slurry in the study because of the positive correlation between pH and the free ammonia concentration determining the ammonium nitrogen removal performance directly. In terms of turbidity,COD,TP content and pH,the addition order of CaO and PAC in CaO/PAC flocculant,the ratio of CaO mass to PAC mass(m_CaO/m_PAC),and the total concentration of CaO/PAC were investigated. Results showed that the effect of the addition order of CaO and PAC on biogas slurry purification performance is insignificant. With the decrease of m_CaO/m_PAC value and the increase of the total concentration of CaO/PAC flocculant,all the turbidity value,COD and TP contents decrease accordingly. However,the removal potential of ammonium nitrogen in biogas slurry improves with both the m_CaO/m_PAC value and the total concentration of CaO/PAC. If a good biogas slurry pretreatment performance was targeted,it should be better to determine the total concentration of CaO/PAC at 12.5-18.75g/L,and fix m_CaO/m_PAC value at (2-10):1.

Key words: waste water, biogas slurry, ammonium nitrogen removal, flocculant, coagulation, environment

中图分类号:

S216.4

涂特, 冉毅, 贺清尧, 梁飞虹, 王明, 晏水平. CaO/PAC混合絮凝剂的沼液净化性能[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37(06): 2392-2398.

TU Te, RAN Yi, HE Qingyao, LIANG Feihong, WANG Ming, YAN Shuiping. Purification performance of biogas slurry by blended CaO/PAC flocculant[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(06): 2392-2398.

参考文献

[1] 郭新双.高氨氮难降解猪粪沼液的处理工艺探究[D].北京:北京化工大学, 2015. GUO Xinshuang. The exploration of the treatment techniques of hige ammonia nitrogen and recalcitrant slurry produced from swine manure[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2015.
[2] LI X, GUO J B, DONG R J, et al. Properties of plant nutrient:comparison of two nutrient recovery techniques using liquid fraction of digestate from anaerobic digester treating pig manure[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 544(15):774-781.
[3] 贺清尧,冉毅,刘璐,等.生物质灰致沼液氮磷脱除研究[J].农业机械学报, 2017, 48(1):237-244, 251. HE Qingyao, RAN Yi, LIU Lu, et al. Ammonia nitrogen and phosphorous removal from biogas slurry induced by biomass ash addition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(1):237-244, 251.
[4] 冯亮,赵明,周礼杰,等.化学絮凝预处理对A/O-MBR处理养猪沼液的影响[J].工业水处理, 2013, 33(2):16-19, 82. FENG Liang, ZHAO Ming, ZHOU Lijie, et al. Influence of chemical flocculation pretreatment by A/O-MBR on piggery biogas slurry[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2013, 33(2):16-19, 82.
[5] ZHAO Q B, MA J W, ZEB I, et al. Ammonia recovery from anaerobic digester effluent through direct aeration[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 279(1):31-37.
[6] 刘良.厌氧消化液氨氮吹脱和钙剂絮凝工艺研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2015. LIU Liang. Research on ammonia stripping and calcium flocculation process of anaerobic digestate[D]. Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2015.
[7] 郑怀礼,高亚丽,蔡璐微,等.聚合氯化铝混凝剂研究与发展状况[J].无机盐工业, 2015, 47(2):1-5. ZHENG Huaili, GAO Yali, CAI Luwei, et al. Research and development status of poly aluminum chloride coagulant[J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2015, 47(2):1-5.
[8] 杨忠莲,高宝玉,岳钦艳.氯化铝和聚合氯化铝(PAC)在黄河水中的混凝效果与残留铝含量及组分[J].科学通报,2011,56(14):1103-1111. YANG Zhonglian, GAO Baoyu, YUE Qinyan. Coagulation performance, and speciation and concentration of residual aluminum in Yellow River water treatment with AlCl₃ and poly aluminum chloride(PAC)[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin(Chinese Version), 2011, 56(14):1103-1111.
[9] 黄新丽.复合混凝剂PAC-PDMDAAC的混凝效果及机理研究[D].重庆:重庆大学, 2012. HUANG Xinli. Study on the effect and coagulation mechanism of PAC-PDMDAAC[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2012.
[10] FU Y, ZHANG J C, WANG Y Z, et al. Resource preparation of poly-Al-Zn-Fe(PAZF) coagulant from galvanized aluminum slag:characteristics, simultaneous removal efficiency and mechanism of nitrogen and organic matters[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 203:301-308.
[11] 张鑫,白玲玲,黄佳佳,等. CaO絮凝沉淀-树脂吸附两步法处理制药废水[J].化工进展, 2011, 30(3):671-674, 680. ZHANG Xin, BAI Lingling, HUANG Jiajia, et al. Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by CaO flocculation sedimentation and resin adsorption[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2011, 30(3):671-674, 680.
[12] HE Q Y, YU G, TU T, et al. Closing CO₂ loop in biogas production:recycling ammonia as fertilizer[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2017, 51:8841-8850.
[13] BARBOSA R, LAPA N, LOPES H, et al. Removal of phosphorus from wastewaters by biomass ashes[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2013, 68(9):2019-2027.
[14] TANG H X, STUMM W. The coagulation behaviors of Fe(Ⅲ) polymeric specie[J]. Water Research, 1987, 21(1):115-121.
[15] 王龙辉,陈杨武,杜世章,等.无机混凝剂影响因素及其混凝效果对比研究[J].工业用水与废水, 2016, 47(5):47-53, 60. WANG Longhui, CHEN Yangwu, DU Shizhang, et al. Coagulation efficiency of inorganic coagulants and influencing factors thereof[J]. Industrial Water and Wastewater, 2016, 47(5):47-53, 60.
[16] 常青.水处理絮凝学[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2005:50-53. CHANG Qing. Water treatment flocculation[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Press, 2005:50-53.
[17] 赵华章,栾兆坤,蒋展鹏.钙对铝水解聚合反应及聚合铝物化特性的影响[J].无机化学学报, 2004, 20(9):1045-1049. ZHAO Huazhang, LUAN Zhaokun, JIANG Zhanpeng. The influence of Ca on hydrolysis and polymerization of aluminum and physicochemical characteristics of polyaluminum chloride[J].Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2004, 20(9):1045-1049.
[18] 张兰河,李尧松,张立东,等. CTS/PAM/PAC絮凝剂处理造纸废水的应用研究[J].硅酸盐通报, 2015, 34(2):559-562. ZHANG Lanhe, LI Yaosong, ZHANG Lidong, et al. Application study on the treatment of paper-making waste water using chitosan/polyacrylamide/polyaluminium chloride flocculants[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2015, 34(2):559-562.
[19] 周艳伟,易莹,谢乔光,等.沼液中磷的去除与回收技术研究进展[J].安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(30):10701-10704. ZHOU Yanwei, YI Ying, XIE Qiaoguang, et al. Research progress of phosphorus removal and recovery from the digested effluent[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2014, 42(30):10701-10704.
[20] MUSVOTO E V, EKAMA G A, WENTZEL M C, et al. Extension and application of the three-phase weak acid/base kinetic model to the aeration treatment of anaerobic digester liquors[J]. Water S A, 2000, 26(4):417-438.
[21] LIU L, PANG C L, WU S B, et al. Optimization and evaluation of an air-recirculated stripping for ammonia removal from the anaerobic digestate of pig manure[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 94(1):350-357.
[22] LEI X H, SUGIURA N, FENG C P, et al. Pretreatment of anaerobic digestion effluent with ammonia stripping and biogas purification[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 145(3):391-397.
[23] 贺清尧,王文超,蔡凯,等.减压浓缩对沼液CO₂ 吸收性能和植物生理毒性的影响[J].农业机械学报, 2016, 47(2):200-207. HE Qingyao, WANG Wenchao, CAI Kai, et al. Effect of vacuum concentration on CO₂ absorption performance and phytotoxicity of biogas slurry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(2):200-207.
[24] LIU B X, GIANNIS A, ZHANG J F, et al. Air stripping process for ammonia recovery from source-separated urine:modeling and optimization[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2014, 90(12):2208-2217.
[25] 贺清尧,王文超,刘璐,等.沼液氨氮减压蒸馏分离性能与反应动力学[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(17):191-197. HE Qingyao, WANG Wenchao, LIU Lu, et al. Ammonia nitrogen separation performance and kinetics from biogas slurry using vacuum distillation method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(17):191-197.
[26] BONMAT A, FLOTATS X. Air stripping of ammonia from pig slurry:characterisation and feasibility as a pre-or post-treatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion[J]. Waste Management, 2003, 23(3):261-272.
[27] 王文超,贺清尧,余歌,等.外源吸收剂对沼液CO₂ 吸收及农业应用的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(4):1512-1520. WANG Wenchao, HE Qingyao, YU Ge, et al. Effect of exogenous absorbents addition on CO₂ absorption performance of biogas slurry and its agricultural application[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(4):1512-1520.
[28] RUBIO D, LOPEZ-GALINDO C, CASANUEVA J F, et al. Monitoring and assessment of an industrial antifouling treatment. Seasonal effects and influence of water velocity in an open once-through seawater cooling system[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 67(1/2):378-387.
[29] HAN C, WANG Z, YANG W, et al. Effects of pH on phosphorus removal capacities of basic oxygen furnace slag[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 89:1-6.

CaO/PAC混合絮凝剂的沼液净化性能

Purification performance of biogas slurry by blended CaO/PAC flocculant

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王家庆, 宋广伟, 李强, 郭帅成, DAI Qingli. 橡胶混凝土界面改性方法及性能提升路径[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 328-343.
[2]	许春树, 姚庆达, 梁永贤, 周华龙. 共价有机框架材料功能化策略及其对Hg(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 461-478.
[3]	王敏, 毛玉红, 陈超, 白丹. 水处理工艺中铝盐水解物的毒性、形态及控制研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 479-488.
[4]	赵景超, 谭明. 表面活性剂对电渗析减量化工业含盐废水的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 529-535.
[5]	王晨, 白浩良, 康雪. 大功率UV-LED散热与纳米TiO₂光催化酸性红26耦合系统性能[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4905-4916.
[6]	邵志国, 任雯, 许世佩, 聂凡, 许毓, 刘龙杰, 谢水祥, 李兴春, 王庆吉, 谢加才. 终温对油基钻屑热解产物分布和特性影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4929-4938.
[7]	王琦, 寇丽红, 王冠宇, 王吉坤, 刘敏, 李兰廷, 王昊. 焦化废水生物出水中可溶解性有机物的分子识别[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4984-4993.
[8]	史天茜, 石永辉, 武新颖, 张益豪, 秦哲, 赵春霞, 路达. Fe²⁺对厌氧氨氧化EGSB反应器运行性能的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 5003-5010.
[9]	高聪, 陈城虎, 陈修来, 刘立明. 代谢工程改造微生物合成生物基单体的进展与挑战[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4123-4135.
[10]	姜晶, 陈霄宇, 张瑞妍, 盛光遥. 载锰生物炭制备及其在环境修复中应用研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4385-4397.
[11]	郑梦启, 王成业, 汪炎, 王伟, 袁守军, 胡真虎, 何春华, 王杰, 梅红. 菌藻共生技术在工业废水零排放中的应用与展望[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4424-4431.
[12]	陈娜, 张肖静, 张楠, 马冰冰, 张涵, 杨浩洁, 张宏忠. 淬灭酶对亚硝化-混合自养脱氮系统的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3816-3823.
[13]	陈香李, 李倩倩, 张甜, 李彪, 李康康. 自愈合油水分离膜的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(7): 3600-3610.
[14]	李白雪, 信欣, 朱羽蒙, 刘琴, 刘鑫. SASD-A体系构建及进水不同S/N对脱氮工艺的影响机制[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3261-3271.
[15]	杨红梅, 高涛, 鱼涛, 屈撑囤, 高家朋. 高铁酸盐处理难降解有机物磺化酚醛树脂[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(6): 3302-3308.