基于能量最小多尺度曳力模型的搅拌槽内气液两相流计算流体力学模拟及实验研究

doi:10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0051

化工进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 4000-4009.DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-0051

基于能量最小多尺度曳力模型的搅拌槽内气液两相流计算流体力学模拟及实验研究

李新菊^1,2, 管小平², 杨宁², 刘明言¹

1. 天津大学化工学院, 天津 300350;
2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2017-03-13 修回日期:2017-04-19 出版日期:2017-11-05 发布日期:2017-11-05
通讯作者: 杨宁,博士,研究员,主要从事化工及过程工业中多相反应器的多尺度计算流体力学及过程模拟。
作者简介:李新菊(1990-),女,硕士研究生。E-mail:xjli@ipe.ac.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研究开发计划（2017YFB0602500）及国家自然科学基金项目（91434121，91634203）项目。

Experimental study and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in a stirred tank using the EMMS drag model

LI Xinju^1,2, GUAN Xiaoping², YANG Ning², LIU Mingyan¹

1. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2017-03-13 Revised:2017-04-19 Online:2017-11-05 Published:2017-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用双电导探针和欧拉-欧拉双流体模型对涡轮桨搅拌槽内局部气液分散特性分别进行了实验和三维计算流体力学（CFD）数值模拟研究。重点研究了转速对搅拌槽上下循环区局部气含率分布的影响、，以及全槽液相流场和湍动动能的影响随搅拌转速的变化。实验表明，转速对上循环区气含率分布的影响大于下循环区，且上循环区气含率随转速的增大而增大。CFD模拟比较了TOMIYAMA曳力模型和基于能量最小多尺度理论（EMMS）的DBS-Local曳力模型对局部气含率的预测结果。结果显示DBS-Local曳力模型能够较好地预测出不同搅拌转速下搅拌槽循环区气含率径向分布；TOMIYAMA曳力模型只能定量预测出低搅拌转速下（140r/min，280r/min）循环区的气含率分布，高转速下（420r/min，560r/min）该曳力模型不能模拟出下循环区壁面附近的气体，且低估了上循环区气含率。

关键词: 搅拌槽, 气液两相流, 电导探针, 能量最小多尺度, 计算流体力学

Abstract: The characteristics of local gas-liquid dispersion characteristics in a stirred tank of Rushton impellers were studied by experiments and CFD simulation. The local gas holdup distribution was measured by using a double conductance probe. The gas-liquid flow was modeled by an Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model along with the k-ε turbulence mixture model. Effects of rotational speed on the local gas holdup distribution in the upper and lower circulation zone were studied. The experiments showed that the effect of rotational speed on gas holdup distribution in the upper circulation zone was larger than that in the lower circulation zone,and the gas holdup increased with increasing rotational speed. The prediction of the TOMIYAMA drag model and the DBS-Local drag model based on the EMMS theory was compared. The results showed that the DBS-Local drag model could reasonably predict the local gas holdup distribution under different rotational speeds. The TOMIYAMA drag model can only reasonably predict the local gas holdup distribution under lower rotational speeds(N=140r/min,280r/minpm). It cannot predict the gas bubbles near the tank lower circulation region,and underestimated the gas holdup in the upper recirculation region at higher rotational speeds(420r/min,560r/minpm).

Key words: stirred tank, gas-liquid flow, conductivity probe, energy-minimization multi-scale, computational fluid dynamics

中图分类号:

TQ021.1

李新菊, 管小平, 杨宁, 刘明言. 基于能量最小多尺度曳力模型的搅拌槽内气液两相流计算流体力学模拟及实验研究[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(11): 4000-4009.

LI Xinju, GUAN Xiaoping, YANG Ning, LIU Mingyan. Experimental study and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in a stirred tank using the EMMS drag model[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(11): 4000-4009.

参考文献

[1] LAAKKONEN M,HONKANEN M,SAARENRINNE P,et al. Local bubble size distributions,gas-liquid interfacial areas and gas holdups in a stirred vessel with particle image velocimetry[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2005,109(1):37-47.
[2] BAO Y Y,CHEN L,GAO Z M,et al. Local void fraction and bubble size distributions in cold-gassed and hot-sparged stirred reactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2010,65(2):976-984.
[3] VESSELINOV H H,STEPHAN B,UWE H,et al. A study on the two-phase flow in a stirred tank reactor agitated by a gas-inducing turbine[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design,2008,86(1):75-81.
[4] 高娜,包雨云,高正明. 多层桨搅拌槽内气-液两相局部气含率研究[J]. 高校化学工程学报,2011,25(1):11-17. GAO N,BAO Y Y,GAO Z M. Local void fraction in a sparged reactor with a multi-impeller agitator[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2011,25(1):11-17.
[5] RANADE V V,PERRARD M,XUEREB C,et al. Influence of gas flow rate on the structure of trailing vortices of a rushton turbine:PIV measurements and CFD simulations[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design,2001,79(A8):957-964.
[6] 李良超,王嘉骏,顾雪萍,等.双层桨搅拌槽内局部气液分散特性研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版),2009,43(3):463-467. LI L C,WANG J J,GU X P,et al. Study on local gas-liquid distribution in dual-impeller aerated stirred vessel[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science),2009,43(3):463-467.
[7] KONG L N,LI W,HAN L C,et al. On the measurement of gas holdup distribution near the region of impeller in a gas-liquid stirred Rushton tank by means of γ-CT[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2012,188:191-198.
[8] RAMMOHAN A R. Characterization of single and multiphase flows in stirred tank reactors[D]. St Louis:Washington University,2002.
[9] PETITTI M,VANNI M,MARCHISIO D L,et al. Simulation of coalescence,break-up and mass transfer in a gas-liquid stirred tank with CQMOM[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2013,228:1182-1194.
[10] ZHANG Q H,YANG C,MAO Z S,et al. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow and mixing time in a gas-liquid stirred tank[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,2012,51(30):10124-10131.
[11] HAN L C,LIU Y J,LUO H A. Numerical simulation of gas holdup distribution in a standard Rushton stirred tank using discrete particle method[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2007,15(6):808-813.
[12] ZHANG Y H,BAI Y L,WANG H L. CFD analysis of inter-phase forces in a bubble stirred vessel[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design,2013,91(1):29-35.
[13] KHOPKAR A R,TANGUY P A. CFD simulation of gas-liquid flows in stirred vessel equipped with dual rushton turbines:influence of parallel,merging and diverging flow configurations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2005,63(14):2215-2229.
[14] RANADE V V,AKKER H E A V D. A computational snapshot of gas-liquid flow in baffled stirred reactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,1994,49(24b):5175-5192.
[15] SCARGIALI F,D'ORAZIO A,GRISAFI A,et al. Modelling and simulation of gas-liquid hydrodynamics in mechanically stirred tanks[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design,2007,85(5):637-646.
[16] 陈雷,高正明. 多层桨气-液搅拌反应器内局部特性的数值模拟[J]. 北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2010,37(3):14-19. CHEN L,GAO Z M. Numerical simulation of local characteristics in an aerated stirred tank with multiple impellers[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Natural Science),2010,37(3):14-19.
[17] 李良超,王嘉骏,顾雪萍,等.气液搅拌槽内气泡尺寸与局部气含率的CFD模拟[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2010,44(12):2396-2415. LI L C,WANG J J,GU X P,et al. Ccomputational fluid dynamics simulation of bubble size and local gas holdup in stirred vessel[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science),2010,44(12):2396-2415.
[18] SCHILLER L,NAUMANN A. A drag coefficient correlation[J].Vdi Zeitung,1935,77:318-320.
[19] YANG N,CHEN J H,ZHAO H,et al. Explorations on the multi-scale flow structure and stability condition in bubble columns[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2007,62(24):6978-6991.
[20] YANG N,CHEN J H,GE W,et al. A conceptual model for analyzing the stability condition and regime transition in bubble columns[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2010,65(1):517-526.
[21] YANG N,WU Z Y,CHEN J H,et al. Multi-scale analysis of gas-liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2011,66(14):3212-3222.
[22] YANG N. A multi-scale framework for CFD modelling of multi-phase complex systems based on the EMMS approach[J]. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics,2012,12(2/3):220-229.
[23] 肖颀. 搅拌釜及鼓泡塔内气液两相流的多尺度模拟[D]. 西安:西安交通大学,2015. XIAO Q. Multi-scale modeling of the gas-liquid flow in mixing tanks and bubble columns[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an Jiaotong University,2015.
[24] 肖颀,杨宁.基于EMMS模型的搅拌釜内气液两相流数值模拟[J].化工学报,2016, 677(7):2732-2739. XIAO Q,YANG N. Numerical simulation of gas-liquid flow in stirred tanks based on EMMS model[J]. CIESC Journal,2016,677(7):2732-2739.
[25] 蒋雪冬.基于费托合成的气-液及气-液-固鼓泡塔流体力学特性分析[D]. 西安:西安交通大学,2015. JIANG X D. Hydrodynamics analysis of gas-liquid/gas-liquid-solid bubble columns for fischer-tropsch synthesis[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an Jiaotong University,2015.
[26] JIANG X D,YANG N,YANG B L. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of hydrodynamics in the riser of an external loop airlift reactor[J]. Particuology,2016,27:95-101.
[27] XU T T,JIANG X D,YANG N,et al. CFD simulation of internal-loop airlift reactor using EMMS drag model[J]. Particuology,2015,19:124-132.
[28] TOMIYAMA A,KATAOKA I,ZUN I,et al. Drag coefficients of single bubbles under normal and microgravity conditions[J]. JSME International Journal,1998,41(2):472-479.
[29] KHOPKAR A R,TANGUY P A. CFD simulation of gas-liquid flows in stirred vessel equipped with dual Rushton turbines:influence of parallel,merging and diverging flow configurations[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2008,63(14):3810-3820.
[30] 王卫京. 气液两相搅拌槽的数值模拟与实验研究[D].北京:中国科学院过程工程研究所,2002. WANG W J. Numerical simulation and experimental investigation on gas-liquid flow in a stirred tank[D]. Beijing:Institute of Process Engineering,Chinese Academy of Sciences,2002.

基于能量最小多尺度曳力模型的搅拌槽内气液两相流计算流体力学模拟及实验研究

Experimental study and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in a stirred tank using the EMMS drag model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈匡胤, 李蕊兰, 童杨, 沈建华. 质子交换膜燃料电池气体扩散层结构与设计研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 246-259.
[2]	孙继鹏, 韩靖, 唐杨超, 闫汉博, 张杰瑶, 肖苹, 吴峰. 硫黄湿法成型过程数值模拟与操作参数优化[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 189-196.
[3]	赵晨, 苗天泽, 张朝阳, 洪芳军, 汪大海. 负压状态窄缝通道乙二醇水溶液传热特性[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 148-157.
[4]	王云飞, 秦蕊, 郑利军, 李焱, 李清平. 旋转填充床CFD模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(S1): 1-9.
[5]	罗成, 范晓勇, 朱永红, 田丰, 崔楼伟, 杜崇鹏, 王飞利, 李冬, 郑化安. 中低温煤焦油加氢反应器不同分配器中液体分布的CFD模拟[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(9): 4538-4549.
[6]	卜治丞, 焦波, 林海花, 孙洪源. 脉动热管计算流体力学模型与研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(8): 4167-4181.
[7]	刘厚励, 顾中浩, 阳康, 张莉. 3D打印槽道结构槽宽对池沸腾传热特性的影响[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(5): 2282-2288.
[8]	庞力平, 袁虎, 丘文生, 段立强, 李文学. 深度调峰锅炉水动力特性分析[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(4): 1708-1718.
[9]	邱沫凡, 蒋琳, 刘荣正, 刘兵, 唐亚平, 刘马林. 气固流化床化学反应数值模拟中颗粒尺度模型研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(10): 5047-5058.
[10]	彭德其, 冯源, 王依然, 谭卓伟, 俞天兰, 吴淑英. 立式缩放管内液固颗粒群浓度分布与汇聚特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4662-4672.
[11]	张猛, 李树谦, 张东, 马坤茹. 微细通道内蒸汽直接接触间歇凝结汽液相界面运动特性[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(9): 4644-4652.
[12]	古新, 张前欣, 王超鹏, 方运阁, 李宁, 王永庆. U形导流板换热器传热和阻力性能分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3465-3474.
[13]	徐涵卓, 刘志浩, 孙宝昌, 张亮亮, 邹海魁, 罗勇, 初广文. 流体驱动旋转装备应用与数值模拟方法研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 2806-2817.
[14]	梅响, 姚元鹏, 吴慧英. 连通微通道内过冷流动沸腾传热强化机理分析[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(6): 2884-2892.
[15]	陈龙, 李霞霞, 李伟祥, 戚锐, 邓鑫, 吴斌鑫. 聚丙烯非织造布熔喷过程的计算流体力学模拟研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 537-553.