化工进展

• 化工过程与装备 • 上一篇    下一篇

三叶孔板换热器热力性能及其影响因素分析

朱凌云1,杨锦春2,周帼彦1,谭祥辉1,郭震1,朱辉1,郎红方2,朱冬生1   

  1. 1华东理工大学承压系统与安全教育部重点实验室,上海 200237;2深圳中广核工程设计有限公司,广东 深圳 518031
  • 出版日期:2014-12-05 发布日期:2014-12-05

Investigation of the effects of structural parameters on the thermal performance of heat exchangers with trefoil-baffles

ZHU Lingyun1,YANG Jinchun2,ZHOU Guoyan1,TAN Xianghui1,GUO Zhen1,ZHU Hui1,LANG Hongfang2,ZHU Dongsheng1   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Pressure Systems and Safety(MOE),East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China;2China Nuclear Power Design Co.,Ltd.(Shenzhen),Shenzhen 518031,Guangdong,China
  • Online:2014-12-05 Published:2014-12-05

摘要: 建立了三叶孔板换热器壳程周期性全截面模型,利用商用软件Fluent14.0及RNG k-ε湍流模型对8种不同结构参数的换热器壳程流体流动及传热性能进行数值模拟。分析了支撑板间距、三叶孔孔高、导流筒结构形式等结构参数对三叶孔板换热器传热及阻力性能的影响,并对比不同结构换热器的综合换热性能。结果表明:壳程传热系数与压力梯度都分别随着支撑板间距和开孔高度的增加而减小,且支撑板间距和三叶孔孔高对三叶孔板换热器壳程压降的影响大于其对传热的影响;六边形结构的导流筒换热器换热性能优于圆形导流筒换热器;8种换热器模型中,支撑板间距400mm、三叶孔高3.3mm(模型4-2)的换热器综合性能最好,支撑板间距400mm、三叶孔高1.8mm(模型2-2)的换热器综合性能最差。

关键词: 三叶孔板, 周期性模型, 数值模拟, 支撑板间距, 开孔高度, 三叶孔板, 传热, 计算流体动力学, 影响因素, 数值模拟

Abstract: This research established a simplified periodic model for the flow and heat transfer on shell side of heat exchangers with trefoil-baffles. Based on the RNG k-ε turbulence model,the flow and heat transfer characteristics on shell side were investigated by using commercial CFD software Fluent14.0 for 8 heat exchanger samples with different structural parameters. Effects of the structural parameters,including baffle pitch,trefoil-hole height and draft tube structure,on the performance of heat transfer and friction were analyzed. The results showed that the heat transfer coefficient and pressure gradient decreased when baffle pitch,as well as trefoil-hole height,increased. Baffle pitch and trefoil-hole height had larger influence on pressure drop than that on heat transfer coefficient. The heat exchanger with hexagon draft tube had better heat transfer performance than that with circle draft tube. The comprehensive performances were also evaluated. The Case 4-2(Lb=400mm,H=3.3mm)was best and case 2-2(Lb=400mm,H=1.8mm)was worst among all heat exchangers with different structural parameters.

Key words: trefoil-baffle, periodic model, numerical simulation, baffle pitch, trefoil-hole height, trefoil-baffle, heat transfer, computational fluid dynamics(CFD), influence factor, numerical simulation

京ICP备12046843号-2;京公网安备 11010102001994号
版权所有 © 《化工进展》编辑部
地址:北京市东城区青年湖南街13号 邮编:100011
电子信箱:hgjz@cip.com.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn